nach oben

Erschienen in:

11.01.2023 | Review articles

Comparison of outcomes between single long stent and overlapping stents: a meta-analysis of the literature

verfasst von: Faysal Şaylık, M.D., Tufan Çınar, M.D., Murat Selçuk, M.D., Vedat Çiçek, M.D., Mert Ilker Hayıroğlu, M.D., Ahmet Lütfullah Orhan, M.D.

Erschienen in: Herz | Ausgabe 5/2023

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Objectives

There is no consensus on whether to treat diffuse coronary artery lesions with a single long stent (SLS) or by overlapping two or more stents (OLS). The goal of this review was to compare the outcomes of these two approaches through a meta-analysis of the literature.

Methods

We searched for relevant studies in MEDLINE, Scopus, EMBASE, Google Scholar, and the Cochrane Library. Our meta-analysis included 12 studies (n = 6414) that reported outcomes during the follow-up period.

Results

Individuals who received OLS had a greater risk of cardiac mortality and target lesion revascularization (TLR) than those who received SLS (RR: 1.51, CI: 1.03–2.21, p = 0.03, I² = 0% and RR: 1.64, CI: 1.02–2.65, p = 0.04, I² = 38%, respectively). The fluoroscopy period in the OLS group was longer than in the SLS group (SMD: 0.35, CI: 0.25–0.46, p < 0.01, I² = 0%). more contrast volume was sued for the OLS group; however, there was substantial variability in the pooled analysis (I² = 95%). In terms of all outcomes, there were no differences between stent generation types.

Conclusion

In the first meta-analysis of mainly observational data comparing OLS vs. SLS for long coronary lesions, OLS had higher rates of cardiac mortality and TLR as well as longer fluoroscopy times compared to SLS.

Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich

Caputo RP et al (2012) Impact of drug eluting stent length on outcomes of percutaneous coronary intervention (from the EVENT registry). Am J Cardiol 110:350–355CrossRefPubMed

Negreira-Caamaño M et al (2021) Percutaneous intervention in diffuse coronary disease: overlapping versus single very long stent technique. Results from the OVERLONG registry. Angiology 72:979–985CrossRefPubMed

Jurado-Román A et al (2019) Comparison of clinical outcomes between very long stents and overlapping stents for the treatment of diffuse coronary disease in real clinical practice. Cardiovasc Revasc Med 20:681–686CrossRefPubMed

Ortega-Paz L et al (2017) Impact of stent overlapping on long-term clinical outcomes in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: insights from the five-year follow-up of the EXAMINATION trial. EuroIntervention 13:e557–e563CrossRefPubMed

Räber L et al (2010) Impact of stent overlap on angiographic and long-term clinical outcome in patients undergoing drug-eluting stent implantation. J Am Coll Cardiol 55:1178–1188CrossRefPubMed

Aoki J et al (2005) “Full metal jacket” (stented length ≥64 mm) using drug-eluting stents for de novo coronary artery lesions. Am Heart J 150:994–999CrossRefPubMed

Balakrishnan B et al (2005) Strut position, blood flow, and drug deposition. Circulation 111:2958–2965CrossRefPubMed

Valero E et al (2018) Initial experience with the novel BioMime 60 mm-long sirolimus-eluting tapered stent system in long coronary lesions. EuroIntervention 13:1591–1594CrossRefPubMed

Lee SH et al (2004) Overlapping vs. one long stenting in long coronary lesions. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 62:298–302CrossRefPubMed

10.

Sim HW et al (2020) Treating very long coronary artery lesions in the contemporary drug-eluting-stent era: single long 48 mm stent versus two overlapping stents showed comparable clinical outcomes. Cardiovasc Revasc Med 21:1115–1118CrossRefPubMed

11.

Amirzadegan A, et al (2019) Single long stents versus overlapping multiple stents in the management of very long coronary lesions: comparisons of procedures and clinical outcomes. J Tehran Heart Cent 14:94–102PubMedPubMedCentral

12.

Hoffmann R et al (2002) Randomized comparison of success and adverse event rates and cost effectiveness of one long versus two short stents for treatment of long coronary narrowings. Am J Cardiol 90:460–464CrossRefPubMed

13.

Abellán-Huerta J et al (2019) TCT-296 comparison between the use of very long stents and overlapping stents for the treatment of diffuse coronary artery disease: a real-life registry. J Am Coll Cardiol 74:B294CrossRef

14.

Buszman P et al (2017) TCT-748 long term outcome after revascularization of long coronary artery lesions with very long or overlapping stents. Insights from the propensity score matched registry. J Am Coll Cardiol 70:B317CrossRef

15.

Balachandran A et al (2014) Clinical profile and outcomes of overlapping v/s single long stent in long coronary lesions—the Trivandrum long stent (TRILO) study. Indian Heart J 66:102–103CrossRef

16.

Park JY et al (2011) AS-218 cost-effectiveness of single 38 mm Paclitaxel-eluting stent for diffuse long lesion compared with two or more overlapping Sirolimus-eluting stents in Asian population. Am J Cardiol 107:81A–82ACrossRef

17.

Fei G et al (2010) e0499 long term clinical follow-up of patients with versus without overlapping drug eluting stents for long coronary lesions. Heart 96:A155CrossRef

18.

Won KH et al (2020) Comparison of efficacy of overlapped versus long eluting stent in acute myocardial infarction patients with diffuse long lesion. J Korean Soc Radiol 14:319–336

19.

Sianos G et al (2005) The SYNTAX Score: an angiographic tool grading the complexity of coronary artery disease. EuroIntervention 1:219–227PubMed

20.

Rikhtegar F et al (2014) Hemodynamics in coronary arteries with overlapping stents. J Biomech 47:505–511CrossRefPubMed

21.

Kitabata H et al (2013) Safety and efficacy outcomes of overlapping second-generation Everolimus-eluting stents versus first-generation drug-eluting stents. Am J Cardiol 112:1093–1098CrossRefPubMed

22.

O’Sullivan CJ et al (2014) Impact of stent overlap on long-term clinical outcomes in patients treated with newer-generation drug-eluting stents. EuroIntervention 9:1076–1084CrossRefPubMed

23.

Farooq V et al (2013) Impact of overlapping newer generation drug-eluting stents on clinical and angiographic outcomes: pooled analysis of five trials from the international Global RESOLUTE Program. Heart 99:626CrossRefPubMed

Titel: Comparison of outcomes between single long stent and overlapping stents: a meta-analysis of the literature
verfasst von: Faysal Şaylık, M.D.
Tufan Çınar, M.D.
Murat Selçuk, M.D.
Vedat Çiçek, M.D.
Mert Ilker Hayıroğlu, M.D.
Ahmet Lütfullah Orhan, M.D.
Publikationsdatum: 11.01.2023
Verlag: Springer Medizin
Erschienen in: Herz / Ausgabe 5/2023
Print ISSN: 0340-9937
Elektronische ISSN: 1615-6692
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00059-022-05152-4

Update Kardiologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

Newsletter bestellen

Springer Medizin

Comparison of outcomes between single long stent and overlapping stents: a meta-analysis of the literature