Skip to main content
Erschienen in: International Ophthalmology 8/2023

28.03.2023 | Review

Diagnostic accuracy of confocal scan in detecting acanthamoeba keratitis and fungal keratitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis

verfasst von: Seyed Mohamadmehdi Moshtaghion, Mohammad Abolhosseini, Mehdi Yaseri, Seyed Bagher Hosseini, Mozhgan Rezaei Kanavi

Erschienen in: International Ophthalmology | Ausgabe 8/2023

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Purpose

Acanthamoeba keratitis (AK) and fungal keratitis (FK) are two microbial keratitis that cause serious damage and, without early accurate diagnosis and treatment, may lead to blindness. In vivo corneal confocal scan, as an emerging ocular diagnostic method in comparison with microbiological smears and cultures as the gold standard, may assist in accelerating appropriate diagnosis.

Objective

To determine the diagnostic accuracy of confocal scan for the diagnosis of AK and FK.

Methods

Data were collected via a comprehensive literature search of PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, Embase and Scopus using keywords related to diagnostic accuracy of confocal scan in AK and FK up to October 2022. Pooled data underwent meta-analysis in terms of sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), and overall diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) of confocal scan for the diagnosis of AK and FK.

Results

The final 14 relevant studies were identified, including 1950 eyes. Meta-analysis in AK group revealed 94% sensitivity, 87% specificity, 89% PPV, 92% NPV, and DOR of 143.32, and in FK group disclosed 88% sensitivity, 85% specificity, 85% PPV, 88% NPV, and DOR of 75.98.

Conclusion

The accuracy of confocal scan for the diagnosis of AK was significantly more than that for detecting FK; despite the limitations such as limited numbers of available retrospective studies for the detection of FK, confocal scan had an acceptable performance in detecting FK eyes. The overall performance of NCS was similar with that of HRT-RCM for the detection of both types of keratitis.
Anhänge
Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Abbott RL, Zegans M, Elander TR (2004) Acanthamoeba keratitis. In: Tasman W (ed) Foundations of Duane’s clinical ophthalmology. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Philadelphia Abbott RL, Zegans M, Elander TR (2004) Acanthamoeba keratitis. In: Tasman W (ed) Foundations of Duane’s clinical ophthalmology. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Philadelphia
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Sharma S, Kunimoto DY, Gopinathan U et al (2002) Evaluation of corneal scraping smear examination methods in the diagnosis of bacterial and fungal keratitis: a survey of eight years of laboratory experience. Cornea 21(7):643–647CrossRefPubMed Sharma S, Kunimoto DY, Gopinathan U et al (2002) Evaluation of corneal scraping smear examination methods in the diagnosis of bacterial and fungal keratitis: a survey of eight years of laboratory experience. Cornea 21(7):643–647CrossRefPubMed
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Ficker L, Kirkness C, McCartney A et al (1991) Microbial keratitis—;the false negative. Eye 5(5):549–559CrossRefPubMed Ficker L, Kirkness C, McCartney A et al (1991) Microbial keratitis—;the false negative. Eye 5(5):549–559CrossRefPubMed
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Ferrer C, Alió JL (2011) Evaluation of molecular diagnosis in fungal keratitis. Ten years of experience. J Ophthalmic Inflamm Infect 1(1):15–22CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Ferrer C, Alió JL (2011) Evaluation of molecular diagnosis in fungal keratitis. Ten years of experience. J Ophthalmic Inflamm Infect 1(1):15–22CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Radford CF, Minassian DC, Dart JKG (2002) Acanthamoeba keratitis in England and Wales: incidence, outcome, and risk factors. Br J Ophthalmol 86(5):536–542CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Radford CF, Minassian DC, Dart JKG (2002) Acanthamoeba keratitis in England and Wales: incidence, outcome, and risk factors. Br J Ophthalmol 86(5):536–542CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Page MA, Mathers WD (2013) Acanthamoeba keratitis: a 12-Year experience covering a wide spectrum of presentations, diagnoses, and outcomes. J Ophthalmol 2013:670242CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Page MA, Mathers WD (2013) Acanthamoeba keratitis: a 12-Year experience covering a wide spectrum of presentations, diagnoses, and outcomes. J Ophthalmol 2013:670242CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Thebpatiphat N, Hammersmith KM, Rocha FN et al (2007) Acanthamoeba keratitis: a parasite on the rise. Cornea 26(6):701–706CrossRefPubMed Thebpatiphat N, Hammersmith KM, Rocha FN et al (2007) Acanthamoeba keratitis: a parasite on the rise. Cornea 26(6):701–706CrossRefPubMed
9.
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Thomas PA, Leck AK, Myatt M (2005) Characteristic clinical features as an aid to the diagnosis of suppurative keratitis caused by filamentous fungi. Br J Ophthalmol 89(12):1554–1558CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Thomas PA, Leck AK, Myatt M (2005) Characteristic clinical features as an aid to the diagnosis of suppurative keratitis caused by filamentous fungi. Br J Ophthalmol 89(12):1554–1558CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
11.
Zurück zum Zitat O’Day DM, Head WS (2000) Advances in the management of keratomycosis and Acanthamoeba keratitis. Cornea 19(5):681–687CrossRefPubMed O’Day DM, Head WS (2000) Advances in the management of keratomycosis and Acanthamoeba keratitis. Cornea 19(5):681–687CrossRefPubMed
12.
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Niederer RL, McGhee CNJ (2010) Clinical in vivo confocal microscopy of the human cornea in health and disease. Prog Retin Eye Res 29(1):30–58CrossRefPubMed Niederer RL, McGhee CNJ (2010) Clinical in vivo confocal microscopy of the human cornea in health and disease. Prog Retin Eye Res 29(1):30–58CrossRefPubMed
15.
Zurück zum Zitat McInnes MDF, Moher D, Thombs BD et al (2018) Preferred reporting items for a systematic review and meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy studies: the PRISMA-DTA statement. JAMA 319:388–396CrossRefPubMed McInnes MDF, Moher D, Thombs BD et al (2018) Preferred reporting items for a systematic review and meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy studies: the PRISMA-DTA statement. JAMA 319:388–396CrossRefPubMed
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Whiting P, Rutjes AWS, Reitsma JB et al (2004) Sources of variation and bias in studies of diagnostic accuracy: a systematic review. Ann Intern Med 140(3):189–202CrossRefPubMed Whiting P, Rutjes AWS, Reitsma JB et al (2004) Sources of variation and bias in studies of diagnostic accuracy: a systematic review. Ann Intern Med 140(3):189–202CrossRefPubMed
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Rutter CM, Gatsonis CA (2001) A hierarchical regression approach to meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy evaluations. Stat Med 20(19):2865–2884 Rutter CM, Gatsonis CA (2001) A hierarchical regression approach to meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy evaluations. Stat Med 20(19):2865–2884
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Chidambaram JD, Prajna NV, Larke NL et al (2016) Prospective study of the diagnostic accuracy of the in vivo laser scanning confocal microscope for severe microbial keratitis. Ophthalmology 123(11):2285–2293CrossRefPubMed Chidambaram JD, Prajna NV, Larke NL et al (2016) Prospective study of the diagnostic accuracy of the in vivo laser scanning confocal microscope for severe microbial keratitis. Ophthalmology 123(11):2285–2293CrossRefPubMed
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Goh JWY, Harrison R, Hau S et al (2018) Comparison of in vivo confocal microscopy, PCR and culture of corneal scrapes in the diagnosis of acanthamoeba keratitis. Cornea 37(4):480–485CrossRefPubMed Goh JWY, Harrison R, Hau S et al (2018) Comparison of in vivo confocal microscopy, PCR and culture of corneal scrapes in the diagnosis of acanthamoeba keratitis. Cornea 37(4):480–485CrossRefPubMed
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Kanavi MR, Javadi M, Yazdani S et al (2007) Sensitivity and specificity of confocal scan in the diagnosis of infectious keratitis. Cornea 26(7):782–786CrossRefPubMed Kanavi MR, Javadi M, Yazdani S et al (2007) Sensitivity and specificity of confocal scan in the diagnosis of infectious keratitis. Cornea 26(7):782–786CrossRefPubMed
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Kheirkhah A, Syed ZA, Satitpitakul V et al (2017) Sensitivity and specificity of laser-scanning in vivo confocal microscopy for filamentous fungal keratitis: role of observer experience. Am J Ophthalmol 179:81–89CrossRefPubMed Kheirkhah A, Syed ZA, Satitpitakul V et al (2017) Sensitivity and specificity of laser-scanning in vivo confocal microscopy for filamentous fungal keratitis: role of observer experience. Am J Ophthalmol 179:81–89CrossRefPubMed
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Kheirkhah A, Satitpitakul V, Syed ZA et al (2018) Factors influencing the diagnostic accuracy of laser-scanning in vivo confocal microscopy for Acanthamoeba keratitis. Cornea 37(7):818–823CrossRefPubMed Kheirkhah A, Satitpitakul V, Syed ZA et al (2018) Factors influencing the diagnostic accuracy of laser-scanning in vivo confocal microscopy for Acanthamoeba keratitis. Cornea 37(7):818–823CrossRefPubMed
23.
Zurück zum Zitat McKelvie J, Alshiakhi M, Ziaei M et al (2018) The rising tide of Acanthamoeba keratitis in Auckland, New Zealand: a 7-year review of presentation, diagnosis and outcomes (2009–2016). Clin Exp Ophthalmol 46(6):600–607CrossRefPubMed McKelvie J, Alshiakhi M, Ziaei M et al (2018) The rising tide of Acanthamoeba keratitis in Auckland, New Zealand: a 7-year review of presentation, diagnosis and outcomes (2009–2016). Clin Exp Ophthalmol 46(6):600–607CrossRefPubMed
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Tu EY, Joslin CE, Sugar J et al (2008) The relative value of confocal microscopy and superficial corneal scrapings in the diagnosis of acanthamoeba keratitis. Cornea 27(7):764–772CrossRefPubMed Tu EY, Joslin CE, Sugar J et al (2008) The relative value of confocal microscopy and superficial corneal scrapings in the diagnosis of acanthamoeba keratitis. Cornea 27(7):764–772CrossRefPubMed
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Vaddavalli PK, Garg P, Sharma S et al (2011) Role of confocal microscopy in the diagnosis of fungal and acanthamoeba keratitis. Ophthalmology 118(1):29–35CrossRefPubMed Vaddavalli PK, Garg P, Sharma S et al (2011) Role of confocal microscopy in the diagnosis of fungal and acanthamoeba keratitis. Ophthalmology 118(1):29–35CrossRefPubMed
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Füst Á, Tóth J, Simon G, Imre L, Nagy ZZ (2017) Specificity of in vivo confocal cornea microscopy in Acanthamoeba keratitis. Eur J Ophthalmol 27(1):10–15CrossRefPubMed Füst Á, Tóth J, Simon G, Imre L, Nagy ZZ (2017) Specificity of in vivo confocal cornea microscopy in Acanthamoeba keratitis. Eur J Ophthalmol 27(1):10–15CrossRefPubMed
27.
Zurück zum Zitat De Craene S, Knoeri J, Georgeon C, Kestelyn P, Borderie VM (2018) Assessment of confocal microscopy for the diagnosis of polymerase chain reaction-positive Acanthamoeba Keratitis: a case-control study. Ophthalmology 125(2):161–168CrossRefPubMed De Craene S, Knoeri J, Georgeon C, Kestelyn P, Borderie VM (2018) Assessment of confocal microscopy for the diagnosis of polymerase chain reaction-positive Acanthamoeba Keratitis: a case-control study. Ophthalmology 125(2):161–168CrossRefPubMed
28.
Zurück zum Zitat Hau SC, Dart JK, Vesaluoma M et al (2010) Diagnostic accuracy of microbial keratitis with in vivo scanning laser confocal microscopy. Br J Ophthalmol 94(8):982–987CrossRefPubMed Hau SC, Dart JK, Vesaluoma M et al (2010) Diagnostic accuracy of microbial keratitis with in vivo scanning laser confocal microscopy. Br J Ophthalmol 94(8):982–987CrossRefPubMed
29.
Zurück zum Zitat Nasef MH, El Emam SY, ElShorbagy MS, Allam WA. Acanthamoeba Keratitis in Egypt: Characteristics and Treatment Outcomes. Clin Ophthalmol. 2021;15:1339–1347. Published 2021 Mar 29 Nasef MH, El Emam SY, ElShorbagy MS, Allam WA. Acanthamoeba Keratitis in Egypt: Characteristics and Treatment Outcomes. Clin Ophthalmol. 2021;15:1339–1347. Published 2021 Mar 29
30.
Zurück zum Zitat Parmar DN, Awwad ST, Petroll WM, Bowman RW, McCulley JP, Cavanagh HD (2006) Tandem scanning confocal corneal microscopy in the diagnosis of suspected acanthamoeba keratitis. Ophthalmology 113(4):538–547CrossRefPubMed Parmar DN, Awwad ST, Petroll WM, Bowman RW, McCulley JP, Cavanagh HD (2006) Tandem scanning confocal corneal microscopy in the diagnosis of suspected acanthamoeba keratitis. Ophthalmology 113(4):538–547CrossRefPubMed
31.
Zurück zum Zitat Mathers WD, Nelson SE, Lane JL, Wilson ME, Allen RC, Folberg R (2000) Confirmation of confocal microscopy diagnosis of Acanthamoeba keratitis using polymerase chain reaction analysis. Arch Ophthalmol 118(2):178–183CrossRefPubMed Mathers WD, Nelson SE, Lane JL, Wilson ME, Allen RC, Folberg R (2000) Confirmation of confocal microscopy diagnosis of Acanthamoeba keratitis using polymerase chain reaction analysis. Arch Ophthalmol 118(2):178–183CrossRefPubMed
32.
Zurück zum Zitat Vengayil S, Panda A, Satpathy G et al (2009) Polymerase chain reaction-guided diagnosis of mycotic keratitis: a prospective evaluation of its efficacy and limitations. Investig Ophthalmol Vis Sci 50(1):152–156CrossRef Vengayil S, Panda A, Satpathy G et al (2009) Polymerase chain reaction-guided diagnosis of mycotic keratitis: a prospective evaluation of its efficacy and limitations. Investig Ophthalmol Vis Sci 50(1):152–156CrossRef
33.
Zurück zum Zitat Yera H, Ok V, Lee K et al (2021) PCR and culture for diagnosis of Acanthamoeba keratitis. Br J Ophthalmol 105(9):1302–1306CrossRefPubMed Yera H, Ok V, Lee K et al (2021) PCR and culture for diagnosis of Acanthamoeba keratitis. Br J Ophthalmol 105(9):1302–1306CrossRefPubMed
34.
Zurück zum Zitat Zhang Y, Wang ZQ, Deng SJ et al (2019) Diagnostic value of fungal fluorescence staining on corneal scrapings for fungal keratitis. Zhonghua Yan Ke Za Zhi 55(8):601–608PubMed Zhang Y, Wang ZQ, Deng SJ et al (2019) Diagnostic value of fungal fluorescence staining on corneal scrapings for fungal keratitis. Zhonghua Yan Ke Za Zhi 55(8):601–608PubMed
36.
Zurück zum Zitat Abolhosseini M, Moshtaghion SM, Kanavi R, Hosseini SB (2021) A triad of microscopes for rapid and proper diagnosis of infectious keratitis. Clin Exp Optom 16:1–3 Abolhosseini M, Moshtaghion SM, Kanavi R, Hosseini SB (2021) A triad of microscopes for rapid and proper diagnosis of infectious keratitis. Clin Exp Optom 16:1–3
Metadaten
Titel
Diagnostic accuracy of confocal scan in detecting acanthamoeba keratitis and fungal keratitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis
verfasst von
Seyed Mohamadmehdi Moshtaghion
Mohammad Abolhosseini
Mehdi Yaseri
Seyed Bagher Hosseini
Mozhgan Rezaei Kanavi
Publikationsdatum
28.03.2023
Verlag
Springer Netherlands
Erschienen in
International Ophthalmology / Ausgabe 8/2023
Print ISSN: 0165-5701
Elektronische ISSN: 1573-2630
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10792-023-02689-z

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 8/2023

International Ophthalmology 8/2023 Zur Ausgabe

Neu im Fachgebiet Augenheilkunde

Metastase in der periokulären Region

Metastasen Leitthema

Orbitale und periokuläre metastatische Tumoren galten früher als sehr selten. Aber mit der ständigen Aktualisierung von Medikamenten und Nachweismethoden für die Krebsbehandlung werden neue Chemotherapien und Strahlenbehandlungen eingesetzt. Die …

Staging und Systemtherapie bei okulären und periokulären Metastasen

Metastasen Leitthema

Metastasen bösartiger Erkrankungen sind die häufigsten Tumoren, die im Auge diagnostiziert werden. Sie treten bei ungefähr 5–10 % der Patienten mit soliden Tumoren im Verlauf der Erkrankung auf. Besonders häufig sind diese beim Mammakarzinom und …

CME: Wundheilung nach Trabekulektomie

Trabekulektomie CME-Artikel

Wird ein Glaukom chirurgisch behandelt, ist die anschließende Wundheilung von entscheidender Bedeutung. In diesem CME-Kurs lernen Sie, welche Pathomechanismen der Vernarbung zugrunde liegen, wie perioperativ therapiert und Operationsversagen frühzeitig erkannt werden kann.

„standard operating procedures“ (SOP) – Vorschlag zum therapeutischen Management bei periokulären sowie intraokulären Metastasen

Metastasen Leitthema

Peri- sowie intraokuläre Metastasen sind insgesamt gesehen selten und meist Zeichen einer fortgeschrittenen primären Tumorerkrankung. Die Therapie ist daher zumeist palliativ und selten kurativ. Zudem ist die Therapiefindung sehr individuell. Die …

Update Augenheilkunde

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.