Erschienen in:
01.09.2010 | Originalarbeit
Comparison of sequential left internal thoracic artery grafting and separate left internal thoracic artery and venous grafting
A 5-year follow-up
verfasst von:
Dr. D. Wendt, D. Schmidt, D. Wasserfuhr, B. Osswald, M. Thielmann, P. Tossios, H. Kühl, H. Jakob, P. Massoudy
Erschienen in:
Herz
|
Ausgabe 6/2010
Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten
Abstract
Objectives
The superiority of left internal thoracic artery (LITA) grafting to the left anterior descending artery (LAD) is well established. Patency rates of 80%–90% have been reported at 10-year follow-up. However, the superiority of sequential LITA grafting has not been proven. Our aim was to compare patency rates after sequential LITA grafting to a diagonal branch and the LAD with patency rates of LITA grafting to the LAD and separate vein grafting to a diagonal branch.
Methods
A total of 58 coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) patients, operated on between 01/2000 and 12/2002, underwent multi-slice computed tomography (MSCT) between 2006 and 2008. Of these patients, 29 had undergone sequential LITA grafting to a diagonal branch and to the LAD (“Sequential” Group), while in 29 the LAD and a diagonal branch were separately grafted with LITA and vein (“Separate” Group). Patencies of all anastomoses were investigated.
Results
Mean follow-up was 1958±208 days. The patency rate of the LAD anastomosis was 100% in the Sequential Group and 93% in the Separate Group (p=0.04). The patency rate of the diagonal branch anastomosis was 100% in the Sequential Group and 89% in the Separate Group (p=0.04). Mean intraoperative flow on LITA graft was not different between groups (69±8ml/min in the Sequential Group and 68±9ml/min in the Separate Group, p=n.s.).
Conclusion
Patency rates of both the LAD and the diagonal branch anastomoses were higher after sequential arterial grafting compared with separate arterial and venous grafting at 5-year follow-up. This indicates that, with regard to the antero-lateral wall of the left ventricle, there is an advantage to sequential arterial grafting compared with separate arterial and venous grafting.