Introduction
Method
Search strategy
Eligibility criteria
Inclusion: any child (under 18 years of age at symptom onset) which has any illness that fulfils all the following criteria: |
• Multiple losses of already attained cognitive developmental skills |
• Duration of illness greater than 3 months |
• Skill loss most likely due to CNS dysfunction |
• Evidence of generalised (not merely focal) brain dysfunction |
• Has a condition which will in the future, in all probability, lead to progressive deterioration as above |
Exclusion: |
• Conditions associated with static intellectual losses (e.g., infectious, traumatic, or anoxic insults) (a) |
• Conditions mainly associated with episodic cognitive impairment (e.g., in the context of acute metabolic crises) |
Selection criteria
Data extraction
Quality analysis
Methodological Rigour
Results
Authors | Year | Country | Research design | Study aim/purpose | Recruitment methods | No. of participants (% male, female) | Parent age range/mean age | Child age range/mean age | Patient diagnosis | Data collection methods |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Hoffmann et al. [58] | 2021 | Germany | Cross-sectional | To offer parents specific effective day-today coping measures: | In cooperation with the German MPS Society, a convenience sample of all registered families of children with MPS I, -II & -III & neurological involvement (n = 268) were invited to participate by mail in the summer of 2017 | N = 37 (4 males & 33 females) | children were male in 52.9% (n = 18) | M = 8.7 (SD = 4.23) years of age | MPS I, -II or -III | Semi-structured questionnaires. Impact on interfamilial relationships used two-sided VAS-scales (range − 2.50 to + 2.50). Advice for ‘recently diagnosed’ families was collected through free text investigation |
Yazdani et al. [47] | 2022 | Canada | Cross-sectional | To explore the extent to which parents think modifications of healthcare services have affected their families | Parents were identified through the Leukodystrophies & Neurometabolic Disorders Clinic at the Montreal Children’s Hospital of the McGill University Health Centre. Sampling was purposeful, & not r&om. Eligible parents were contacted until data saturation was reached | N = 13 (4 males & 9 females) | 36–54 years | 3–23 years | Genetically Determined Leukoencephalopathies | Semi-structured interviews & sociodemographic form |
Eichler et al. [50] | 2016 | USA | Cross-sectional | To identify relevant clinical/quality-of-life outcomes for patients/parents | Participants were identified via patient support groups: in the United States, France, Germany & Colombia | N = 23 (14 males & 9 females) | Metachromatic leukodystrophies | Semi-structured qualitative interviews & 1 focus group | ||
Needham et al. [55] | 2014 | USA | Cross-sectional | To describe a population of patients with MPS II in the domain of adaptive functioning, & to examine the impact of MPS II on family functioning & relationships | Patients were recruited through national MPS societies in English-speaking countries, the hunterpatients.com website, the MPSforum.com website, & through contacting geneticists in the United States | N = 73 | not reported | 12.52 years (SD = 8.88). all patients were male | MPS II (Hunter syndrome) | Questionnaire including stadardised measures (Vinel&-II & PedsQL Family Impact Module) & purpose designed measures (demographics % supplementary Qs for qualitative analysis) |
Krantz et al. [51] | 2021 | Sweden | Cross-sectional | To investigate parents' experience of having a child with CLN3 & how these experiences can be related to family resilience | Parents of children diagnosed with CLN3 disease attending or who had attended Queen Silvia's Hospital in Gothenburg, Sweden were contacted by the research team in February/March 2021 | N = 8 (3 males aged 40–51 years & 5 females aged 41–51) | 11–24 years, (N = 5 & one patient deceased) | CLN3 disease | Semi-structured interviews | |
Porter et al. [52] | 2021 | USA | Cross-sectional | To explore parent-reported impact of Sanfilippo syndrome symptoms on the patient & family, which symptoms were most important to be addressed by future treatments, & what degree of treatment benefit would be considered meaningful | Cure Sanfilippo Foundation recruited participants using email & social media, through the ConnectMPS Registry communication, & by snowball recruitment through existing formal informal parent support networks | N = 25 (6 males & 19 females) | 29 to 65 years, with a median age of 38 years | 4–36 years with a median age of 8yrs | MPSIII subtype A (17), subtype B (6), or subtype C (2) | Focus groups (× 3) & a questionnaire |
Grant et al. [56] | 2013 | UK | Cross-sectional | To examine the psychological impact of parenting a child with MPS III using valid & reliable measures, with a control group of parents of children with ID, to examine syndrome specific effects of parenting a child with MPS III | Families with a child with MPS III were recruited from the UK MPS Society & the outpatient clinic of Metabolic Medicine at Manchester, as part of a large-scale investigation into the sleep & circadian rhythms of children with MPS III | N = 23 (7 males & 16 females) (& 23 parents of children with ID; 3 M & 20 F) | M = 35.8 (23–49 years) | M = 8.63 (2–15 years) | MPS III | The learning disability casemix scale, ECBI, RSA, MSPSS, Brief COPE, PIP, GHQ-12 |
Somanadhan et al. [49] | 2016 | Irel& | Longitudinal | To underst& parents’ experience of living & caring for a child with MPS (1). To examine the knowledge & underst&ing of MPS from the perspective of parents (2). To explore the impact of regular hospitalisation of children living with MPS on family life (3) | Families were recruited from the outpatient clinic of the National Centre for Inherited Metabolic Disorders (NCIMD), Irel& where access to this specialist cohort group was more readily available | N = 8 | not collected | 6 months-22 years | MPS I Hurler syndrome, MPS II (Hunter syndrome), MPS III (Sanfilippo syndrome) | Interviews |
Kuratsubo et al. [60] | 2008 | Japan | Cross-sectional | To assess mental health in parents of patients with the childhood cerebral form of X-linked adrenoleukodystrophy (CCALD) & to investigate factors relating to psychological problems in order to improve clinical management & quality of life | Mental health examinations & a questionnaire were sent to 40 ALD families who were members of the Japanese Association of ALD families | N = 37 parents (43% males) | M = 47 years (32–60) | M = 16.8 years (8–24), Years from disease onset 8.7 years (2–16) | X-linked adrenoleukodystrophy (CCALD) | Questionnaire & psychological examinations (BDI-II, GHQ60, STAI) |
Varvogli et al. [61] | 1999 | USA | Cross-sectional | To investigate the psychological profile of mothers whose children carry a mitochondrial disorder | Participants were mothers of children followed by the Mitochondrial Clinic at Children’s Hospital | N = 42 | M = 35 (range 23–49 years) | mean age 6 years (N = 50) (range 8 months-22 years) | MELAS, Kearns-Sayre syndrome, PDH deficient, NARP syndrome, Cytochrome oxidase deficiency, Complex I deficiency, Complex III deficiency, Leigh disease, Barth syndrome, Multiple complex deficiency | Phone interview & multiple-choice questionnaire (MMPI-2) to assess personality & psychopathology |
Conjin et al. | 2018 | Netherl&s | Cross-sectional | To assess depression, & parental distress, as well as posttraumatic stress symptoms, in mothers & fathers of MPS III patients compared to Dutch reference groups | Parents of all living MPS III patients under care at the Academic Medical Center (AMC), Amsterdam, were invited by letter to participate in this cross-sectional study Parents who gave permission to participate received an e-mail with a personal link to online questionnaires | N = 57 (19 males & 26 females) | M = 20, age range 5–38 years | MPS III | scales (HADS, DT-P, SRS-PTSD) | |
Dermer et al. [57] | 2020 | Canada | Cross-sectional | To characterize stress experienced by parents of children affected by genetically determined leukoencephalopathies, along with demographic & clinical factors correlating with higher parental stress & demonstrate the feasibility of the Parenting Stress Index–4th Edition | Parents were eligible to complete the questionnaire if their child was between 1 month & 12 years of age. All patients were followed at the Montreal Children’s Hospital of the McGill University Health Center in Montreal, Quebec, Canada. Patients were included if they had a molecular diagnosis of genetically determined leukoencephalopathy or evidence of genetically determined leukoencephalopathy based on the brain MRI pattern | N = 55 (21 males & 34 females) | Between 1 & 12 months old (11%), 1–4 years (33%), 5–7 years (17%), 8–12 years (39%) | Genetically Determined Leukoencephalopathies | PSI-4 (3 domains of parenting stress), Electronic & paper charts were reviewed for each patient & clinical features were recorded & Clinical notes were also used to evaluate the degree of the child’s disability, using validated measures | |
Ammann-Schnell et al. [62] | 2021 | Germany | Cross-sectional | To investigate the impact of these diseases on the affected families, e.g. mothers, fathers & non-affected siblings | Families recruited within the nationwide Leukonet natural history study, patient support groups in Germany [ELAGermany, MLD support group “Weisse Wolke” & PCH- Familie e.V.]) | N = 43 families, (35 males & 41 females) | 11.6 | MLD = 30 | Semi-structured questionnaire, consisting of a general part & the Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory (PedsQL™) Version 2.0 Family Impact Module (FIM) | |
Bose et al. [48] | 2019 | USA | Cross-sectional | To characterize the ZSD caregiver emotional experience in order to develop a comprehensive picture of the specific influences & interactions within a caregiver's daily life | All participants for this study were members of the Global Foundation for Peroxisomal Disorders (GFPD; https://www.thegfpd.org/)., study recruitment fliers were posted on the GFPD website & Facebook page to solicit enrolment. Individuals self-selected to participate | N = 37 (12 males, 25 females) | 25–64 years | 30 children with ZSD & 7 children with D-bifunctional protein deficiency (DBPD), a clinically-similar peroxisome disorder, participated in the study | ||
Killian et al. [63] | 2022 | USA | Longitudinal | To characterize relationships between child & caretaker characteristics & caretaker quality of life | N = 727 & N = 220 (30%) had 5 years of follow-up | M = 38 years | M = 9 | Rett syndrome | Semi-structured focus group(s)(× 3) & demographic questionnaire | |
Rozensztrauch et al. [54] | 2021 | Pol& | Cross-sectional | To underst& the clinical presentation of RTT in relation to QoL & family functioning | Eligible parents were contacted & mailed traditional pencil-&-paper questionnaires together with a stamped, self-addressed envelope in which they were to return the completed survey to the research team. The invitation to participate in the study included a letter & an information packet explaining the study & the questionnaires to complete | N = 23 | M = 7 (2–12 years) | Rett syndrome | An author-designed questionnaire (ADQ), the Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory 4.0 generic core scales; PedsQL 4.0), & the PedsQL Family Impact Module (PedsQL-FIM) | |
Lamb et al. [64] | 2016 | USA | Cross-sectional | To investigate factors related to family functioning & adaptation in caregivers of individuals with Rett syndrome (RS) | Participants were recruited from 4 clinics across the eastern & south-eastern United States, the 25th Annual Education & Awareness Conference for Rett Syndrome, & various RS organizations & websites. All interested individuals were invited to complete the paper surveys that were mailed to their homes or to visit the online version available on a SurveyMonkey1 platform | N = 396 (90% females) | M = 43, range 22–74 years | M = 13, range 1-50yrs 98% females | Rett syndrome | Quantitative survey (available paper & electronic form) with validated measures of parental self-efficacy, coping methods, family functioning, & adaptation |
Palacios-Ceña et al. [27] | 2019 | Spain | Multi-perspective cohort study | To explore the experiences of a group of caregivers of children with Rett syndrome with regards to living & caring for their children | The researchers explained the purpose & design of the study to the individuals who met the inclusion criteria during an initial face-to-face contact session. A one-week period was then allowed for patients to decide whether or not they wished to participate & they were given a copy of the informed consent for them to review. In a second face-to-face session, they were asked to provide written informed consent & permission to tape the interviews | N = 31; (14 males, 17 females) | M = 45 | M = 12 years, range 3–38 years | Rett syndrome | In-depth interviews, focus groups, researchers’ field notes & caregivers’ personal documents |
Mori et al. [65] | 2019 | Australia | Longitudinal | to examine the trajectory of parental well-being among Australian families caring for a child with Rett syndrome over a period of 9 years | Data were sourced from the Australian Rett Syndrome Database (ARSD), housed at the Telethon Kids Institute in Perth, Western Australia.. Data on a comprehensive range of family & child characteristics have been collected via family questionnaires in 1996, 2000, 2002, 2004, 2006, 2009 & 2011, developed in accordance with the specific aims of each wave of data collection in collaboration with a family reference group | N = 198; (92% females) | M = BL: 41 (27-64yrs range) to M = 48 years at end timepoint (30-72trs range) | Rett syndrome | Purpose designed questionnaires including McMaster Family Assessment Device (FAD) to assess family functioning & parental wellbeing using the short Form 12 Health Survey (SF-12) |
Authors | (1) Healthcare experiences with their child? | (2) Psychosocial impacts of childhood dementia | (3) Parents’ information & support needs |
---|---|---|---|
Hoffmann et al. [58] | MPS I patients reported lower frequency of challenging behaviour & better perceived manageability than MPS II & -III Aggression, hyperactivity, agitation, orality, & sleep disturbance highly frequent & stressful symptoms Medication & non-medication approaches rated similarly effective | Parents grow into a state of acceptance, largely uninfluenced by child behavior or state of illness Social exchange & private space are important to strengthen personal & interfamilial functioning | Support managing challenging & uncooperative behaviors Family networking & sharing of management strategies |
Yazdani et al. [47] | Perceived impact of the pandemic on healthcare services: Delays & losses: cancelled appointments, prolonged waiting time for services, loss of home care support, loss of school-related services, parental decision to delay services for the safety of their family Management of child’s needs independently associated with perceived amplification of child’s symptoms | Advantages: reduced emotional & physical burden of going to the hospital; reduced travel time; more quality time with loved ones; saved costs associated with gas & parking; reduced work absenteeism; reduced child & parent exhaustion; improved communication between parents & healthcare professionals Concern: parents experience a higher level of stress owing to the shortage of services & the child’s vulnerability Stress fear that physicians might miss important clinical features regarding child’s regression | Desire for telemedicine in their child’s long-term care Telemedicine only employed when physical examination is not necessary, when the child is stable & well known to the physician Preference of video consultations over phone appointments |
Eichler et al. [50] | Diagnostic process: misdiagnoses, difficulty with length of time taken to obtain a final MLD after symptom onset Most troublesome symptoms: immobility & respiratory difficulties Frequent healthcare visits: 8/22 patients experienced 11 hospitalizations since diagnosis, & 14/22 parents reported these lasted 4 days | Visits to healthcare professionals had an emotional impact on parents: overwhelmed with decisions, grief & guilt watching their child in pain, struggling to communicate "slowly deteriorate & die" Time & attention required to care for child limited time for social activities, confined to home, contributed to relationship breakdowns Depression, feelings of fear, guilt, remorse, & hopelessness Impacted decision to have further children & impacted siblings as they struggled to understand the disease | Comprehensive information about psychiatric/behavioral signs & symptoms Increase awareness & knowledge of MLD to reduce misdiagnoses & diagnostic delays Treatment priorities: Preference for a treatment that stops the disease progression or slows progression of disease to improve quality of life Therapy to improve speech or communication & reduce decline in mobility, pain, cognitive ability, communication, respiratory problems or food intake |
Needham et al. [55] | Communication, daily living skills, socialization, & motor skills were significantly lower for patients with severe MPS II Receptive, expressive & written communication; personal & community daily living skills; play & leisure time; coping skills; & fine motor skills were significantly lower for patients with severe MPS II Within the severe MPS II group, there was a strong significant & negative correlation between all Vineland domains & age. Thus, for those with severe MPS II, the older the patients are, the lower their adaptive behavior functioning | A more severe presentation of MPS II was correlated with more impact (i.e. lower HRQOL, lower family functioning, lower social, physical functioning, daily living & family relationships) for the parents & families Levels of support & ways to maintain psychological health varied widely for parents Parents reported maintaining employment, staying active, going to church, attending therapy, positive thinking, support from friends & family, social networking, & going out with friends supported their psychological health Fear of the child’s death &/or life expectancy, worry for their child’s pain, future level of functioning, how the patient will cope with having MPS II, & social isolation Greatest worry is what would happen to their children if the parent died before the patient | Support systems to improve social life & methods to maintain psychological health |
Krantz et al. [51] | Long processing times & lack of knowledge about the disease Society not developed for progressive disease where worsening of symptoms can happen suddenly Limited support & access to contacts in the health &/or social insurance system Adult healthcare system was not seen as fit for purpose | Recurring losses & grief throughout the course of the disease which began with diagnosis & continued with progressive loss of child's function Difficulties finding time to recharge, less time available outside of the family & a loss of relationships with people who used to be close Negative impact on romantic relationships Side-lined siblings The end stage of the disease with the child completely dependent & with possible psychotic symptoms brings a sense of an additional loss, not only related to their death but also a loss of identity Guilt, frustration, hopelessness Shared resilience adapting to new circumstances using acceptance & adopting new shared beliefs about what is important & meaningful in life | Relief from care assistants, relatives & a short-term stay at a care centre where families of children with disabilities could meet Time to recharge without guilt & spending time without affected child was important to maintain family functioning Organizational processes: need for flexibility & workplace adjustments Parental support groups to share knowledge & experiences was a way to create understand & learn from other parents A result-oriented vision including collaborative problems solving within the families & seeing the disease as a common enemy could help with dealing with the grief of the diagnosis |
Porter et al. [52] | Two overarching impact domains cognitive/behavioral/psychological & physical health | Cognitive/behavioral/psychological impact: Child: frustration, anxiety/unhappiness in child Child & family: communication, frustration, hyperactivity Family: relationship & social deficits, impulse control/aggressive behaviors, unsafe behaviours, sleep disturbance/night-time waking Physical health impact: Child: Sleep problems, seizures, feeding & maintaining nutrition Child & family: Pain/headaches (experienced & anticipated), mobility, illness/vulnerability to illness Family: digestive issues & toileting | Pressing treatment needs related to communication & behavior Parents highly valued incremental benefits targeting symptoms, to maintain current skills set & treatments that would slow or stop symptom progression or rate of decline Broad as possible access to clinical trials (without age limitations) & later to approved therapies Emphasis on improving quality of life for the child, parents, & family as their primary goal for new treatments Clinical trials that assess outcomes other than, or in addition to, currently used global cognitive measures of evidence for global improvement in cognition |
Grant et al. [56] | Older children with MPS III were more intellectual impaired As children with MPS III got older the frequency of their challenging behaviour decreased, but there was no significant relationship with how difficult parents found these behaviours to manage Children with MPS III had a significantly higher level of intellectual disability than the children with ID | Social resources as their highest protective factor & planned future as their lowest protective factor Parents experienced similar levels of perceived social support & reported feeling significantly more supported by their significant other than by family or friends Acceptance was most frequently used coping strategy & self-blame was least used coping strategy Both groups of parents scored above the clinical cut off for anxiety & depression Mean scores of both groups of parents were higher in all categories than those of mothers of children in oncology services indicating high levels of stress in both groups | Behaviour support packages, with appropriate adaptations to learn behaviour management techniques, coping strategies, how to build, resilience factors, & social support networks Flexible strategies to respond to their child’s current needs & unpredictable behavior patterns rather than focusing on future planning Professional psychological support for families during transition periods to discuss their mixed emotional challenges Referral to appropriate psychological services, together with support from relevant parental support groups, who play an important role in providing social & emotional support to parents who are geographically diverse & do not have access to face-to-face support groups |
Somanadhan et al. [49] | Frustration waiting long time for diagnosis & spending significant amount of time navigating bureaucracy for basic needs Future is unknown from prognosis to outcome Unsatisfactory collaboration & communication between healthcare professionals Hospital Vs. Home: preferred to be in their home rather than a hospital, aided routine & structure in their regular life | Devastated by the enormity of the debilitating nature of their child’s rare genetic life-limiting condition & the impact on their child’s life expectancy Process of trying to accept their child’s diagnosis was an emotional struggle, they reacted with upset, devastation, anger & shock Life characterised by uncertainty & ambiguity: life as a roller coaster & living with MPS as a constant battle Marital relationships markedly strained & fear of siblings becoming side-lined Fear that comes with increasing evidence of visible clinical features & realisation that the gap would widen as they got older Frustration & anger comparing to other conditions with treatments available – particularly those parents of children approaching end of life Parents wanted to be proactive & commonly used reframing strategies Coping achieved through awareness that there were other children with more severe diagnoses | Collaboration & communication between healthcare professionals, especially during initial diagnostic disclosure Improved specialist knowledge of rare condition among healthcare professionals to avoid delays in referral, diagnosis & disease management/treatment Emotionally supportive communication of diagnosis & coping strategies for ongoing challenges of caring for child with progressive condition that has no cure Streamlined, consistent & equitable access to healthcare resources & supports for their child’s condition. E.g., more responsive physiotherapy, occupational therapy, psychology, & social support services Frequent & planned reassessment of children & parents psychosocial & mental healthcare needs |
Kuratsubo et al. [60] | Correlation between low social status & psychological problems among parents Many of the parents were seeking psychological counseling | High scores on the BDI-II, suggesting mothers & fathers were in a depressive state. Depression in mothers was serious as compared with previous reports According to the GHQ60 11/21 mothers were considered to be in a state of neurosis 4/16 fathers & 8/21 mothers showed high levels of anxiety Younger mothers with young patients with fewer years since diagnosis tended to be more depressed | Tailored support services, including psychological counseling, home nursing care, supports in workplace & community Early intervention for mental health problems should be provided for younger mothers with few years since the child’s diagnosis |
Varvogli et al. [61] | Children had significant developmental & neurological difficulties Progressive worsening of neurological functioning Over half patients had 4 + special needs. The most common were dependence on a wheelchair, developmental delays, feedings through a gastrointestinal tube & vision problems | 56% of the mothers had scores in the pathological range on three or more scales Higher MMPI-2 scores were significantly related to the age of mothers, with younger mothers evidencing greater psychopathology Results from the open-ended interview suggest that the child’s age & the circumstances of the diagnosis did not have an impact on the mother’s personality profile | Psychosocial services tailored to reduce the level of anxiety & stress in mothers |
Conjin et al. | Posttraumatic Stress: 22%, (7 mothers & 3 fathers) met the criteria for the diagnosis of PTSD. The prevalence in this study is significantly higher among parents of MPS III patients compared to Dutch general population Anxiety & Depression: Mothers of MPS III patients reported significantly higher mean levels of anxiety & depression, & more frequently clinically relevant anxiety & depression than mothers in the reference group Fathers reported more frequently clinically relevant depression compared to fathers in the reference group | Structural monitoring of the psychosocial functioning of MPS III parents Access to professional psychological & peer support from those in the community | |
Dermer et al. [57] | The average total stress percentile significantly higher than the median normative sample Twenty percent of parents had high levels of stress (> 85th percentile), & 11% had clinically significant levels of stress (> 90th percentile) No significant difference was found between mother & father’s mean total stress score Mothers’ total stress percentile was significantly higher if their child had behavior difficulties | Tailored parent psychological counseling & support early after the initial diagnosis Supportive treatments of children with behavioral difficulties | |
Ammann-Schnell et al. [62] | Time to diagnosis & number of clinicians families visited in attempt to get diagnosis from first onset of symptoms was very distressing Disease-specific knowledge in parents was high: 71% received disease specific information from clinicians, 51% from other affected families, 46% internet, 14% specific literature Empathic handling of diagnosis, honesty about the severity & comprehensible explanation of the condition was helpful Disturbing factors were insensitive behaviour towards parents, ignorance of the disease from doctors’ part & passing on of unconfirmed diagnosis | MLD families reported significantly poorer HRQOL than the families with healthy children (Total Impact Score, Parent HRQOL & Family Functioning Summary Scores) Significantly poorer Family Functioning observed in the late-infantile MLD families compared to the juvenile MLD families No significant correlations between the severity of the symptoms on the family’s quality of life Mothers spent an average of 88 h caring for child, more often than fathers missed out on or sacrificed a professional career to be able to care for the child at home The diagnostic phase/time to diagnosis & the terminal disease stage represents an especially high burden on families The heavy demands on care, & minimal feedback from the child at that stage are possible reasons for this | Increasing general awareness, about rare diseases including (MLD) among healthcare professionals Encouraging healthcare professionals to listen to parents who report that they are worried about developmental & behavioral features of their children, they have not known before A reliable system of easily accessible diagnostic counseling for healthcare professionals & families, which should involve academic centers to promote rapid diagnosis of rare diseases |
Bose et al. [48] | Parents of younger children relieved upon receiving diagnosis vs resignation & numbness in older bereaved parents | Range of emotions identified by frequency (overwhelmed, stressed, anxious, exhausted most frequent) & extensiveness (“gut-wrenching”, “devastating”, anger at healthcare professionals & healthcare system – not invested in learning more about rare diseases/lack of coordination) Stressors; interactions with healthcare professionals / managing multiple needs – feeling of failure, impact on social relationships, highlighting importance of social networks, perceived lack of support contributed to resentment & isolation Confusion deep sadness & uncertainty for the overall progressive nature of disease/ present & anticipated negative impact on child’s QOL Regret & guilt for time lost spent on unaffected siblings Coping (cognitive & behavioural strategies employed to address these emotional experiences) redefining expectations, acceptance of difference in parent experiences to help cope with challenges & limitations of the disease, advocating for child’s needs, becoming involved in promoting disease awareness Collaborative, transparent & consistent healthcare community fosters trust & respect which positively impacted parents | Simple, targeted approaches focusing on improved communication between healthcare professionals & parents Resources for emotional support & counseling to support redefining parent expectations & to promote acceptance Social support system & healthcare community (e.g. advocacy organisations to enhance knowledge & ability to address child’s needs effectively) crucial element in managing overall emotional experience |
Killian et al. [63] | Increasing child & parent age associated with decreased parent PCS & increased MCS Parents of children who were older at diagnosis showed poorer parent PCS & improved MCS Greater time period beyond age of regression was associated with poorer parent PCS & improved MCS More severe disease associated with poorer PCS but improved MCS Feeding problems & seizure severity adversely impacted both PCS & MCS | Multivariate predictors: a longer interval beyond regression was associated with poorer PCS Parents who felt limited in the amount of time for their own needs also had poorer PCS, as did parents who sensed tension or conflict at home For parent MCS, increased child’s age was associated with an improved score Feeding problems were associated with poorer MCS. Finally, CHQ items associated with personal worry, lack of time & poor family dynamics described a relationship between increasing severity & poorer MCS For Rett syndrome, clinical severity, as measured by the CSS, associated with poorer PCS but with improved MCS | Access to appropriate psychosocial resources to reduce parent emotional distress, worry & to improve family dynamics Time allocated to cater for parents own needs, especially among parents of children with severe clinical features (child feeding problems & seizure severity) to improve parent quality of life Supports for child feeding problems & seizure severity |
Rozensztrauch et al. [54] | 75% of children aged 1–2 years experienced a significant regression in acquired skills, with developmental deterioration, severe dementia, with loss of speech, autistic features, & stereotypies Malnutrition (78% of children), epilepsy (43%), impaired mobility (40%), scoliosis (13%), respiratory problems (87%), hyperventilation 22% Average age when symptoms were first noticed was 1 year Child’s average age at diagnosis was 3.5 | Malnutrition & feeding difficulties significantly affect family functioning in family relationships dimension Parents were not satisfied with the effects of rehabilitation Children living in urban areas had better access to healthcare professionals than those living in towns & villages | Access to specialists & rehab centres offering early diagnostic services, especially for families living in rural areas Psychological support for parents, especially in early diagnosis stage Assistance with feeding difficulties to improve family relationships Identification of child’s need & targeted assistance with individual problems Healthcare professionals’ help with making appropriate decisions for patient care |
Lamb et al. [64] | Parents who shared more of the caregiving responsibilities with other family members had more effective family functioning Less effective functioning was associated with having more than one child with RS & having children who were older when symptoms of RS emerged (more years asymptomatic) 3 key variables were significantly correlated with family functioning: parental self-efficacy, problem-focused coping & emotion focused coping 4 key variables were significantly correlated with adaptation: parental self-efficacy, problem-focused & emotion focused coping, & family functioning Mediation: family functioning is a significant partial mediator of the relationships between adaptation & three key variables: parental self-efficacy, problem-focused coping & emotion focused coping | Interventions to strengthen parent competence in their role to enhance parent adaptation, to increase parental self-efficacy, employing appropriate coping strategies, & facilitating greater family functioning Parent education about importance of family dynamics, to facilitate effective communication about roles & responsibilities, & to encourage other members of the family to provide support for the primary caregiver Referral pathways to support groups & other resources to promote adaptation | |
Palacios-Ceña et al. [27] | Genetic diagnosis experienced as a pilgrimage: looking for answers, seeking diagnosis: as confirmation of their suspicions & fears as early as possible to avoid delaying treatment Information seeking from specialist healthcare professionals & internet Non-pharmacological therapies (speech therapy, physio) necessary basic pillars for parents to fight illness on another front as they attempt to decrease the physical & cognitive disability of the child | Symptoms: manifold, arising at irregular intervals, leading to a state of alert in the caregivers, which affected their initial feelings of joy after giving birth Challenges managing day-to-day life: integrating treatments & care into daily life & family routine Appointments short with limited number of sessions, difficult & expensive to access continuous therapies in public system Learning to care; with ever-changing problems without a fixed pattern (nutritional problems, bowel problems, sleeping disorders, respiratory disorders, epileptic seizures & stereotypical movements) Sleep, stress & anxiety impact the whole family & parent who experience distress that they are unable to care for their child High impact on family economic resources, direct & indirect indispensable costs associated with hospital care, work readjustments resulting in decreased economic income. In addition, cost of sanitary supplies is considered abusive; no regulations | Economic support & resources for direct & indirect indispensable caregiving costs Equitable access to genetic testing & diagnoses across geographical / residential locations Social support networks to loan or buy second-hand materials |
Mori et al. [65] | Living in a remote area, the child being a teenager at baseline, frequent sleep disturbances or behavioural problems, & the type of MECP2 gene mutation were each associated with later poorer parental physical well-being Being a single parent or on a low income was also associated with later poorer physical well-being Child being enterally fed was associated with later poorer emotional well-being Both the physical & emotional well-being of the parent improved when the child was living in out-of-home care | Healthcare professionals being alert to the possibility & need for management of a child’s sleep or emotional disturbance Additional support for parents as child moves through adolescence into early adulthood, including additional physical supports (hoists, modified vehicle) Respite for coping with care demands & facilitating parents’ social life Additional supports for single parents & families showing poor functioning |