nach oben

Current Pain and Headache Reports

Erschienen in:

29.07.2023 | Secondary Headache (M Robbins, Section Editor)

Telemedicine in Headache Medicine: A Narrative Review

verfasst von: Jennifer Robblee

Erschienen in: Current Pain and Headache Reports | Ausgabe 9/2023

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Purpose of Review

The purpose of the study is to review and discuss the use of telemedicine in headache medicine.

Recent Findings

Before the COVID-19 pandemic, the use of telemedicine for headache was most common in Europe. In recent years, however, telemedicine has been used broadly within headache medicine, including for pediatric patients and behavioral interventions. Several randomized clinical trials have shown that telemedicine is non-inferior to face-to-face visits. Multiple studies have reported substantial benefits associated with telemedicine, including high satisfaction rates, improved access to headache specialists, reduced travel, quicker visits, greater cost-effectiveness, reduced wait times, reduced no-show rates, and the increased comfort of remaining in one’s home environment. The main limitation reported is the lack of a physical examination, including fundus assessment.

Summary

Telemedicine has become a vital tool in headache patient care, with the data supporting its use for patient follow-up in particular.

Aronson SH. The Lancet on the telephone 1876–1975. Med Hist. 1977;21(1):69–87. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0025727300037182.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Nesbitt TS. The evolution of telehealth: where have we been and where are we going? In: Medicine. BoHCSIo, editor. The role of telehealth in an evolving health care environment: workshop summary. Washington (DC): National Academies Press (US); 2012.

American Telemedicine Association. ATA’s standardized telehealth terminology and policy language for states on medical practice. 2020.

Craig J, Chua R, Russell C, Patterson V, Wootton R. The cost-effectiveness of teleneurology consultations for patients admitted to hospitals without neurologists on site. 1: A retrospective comparison of the case-mix and management at two rural hospitals. J Telemed Telecare. 2000;6(Suppl 1):S46–9. https://doi.org/10.1258/1357633001934122.CrossRefPubMed

Duncan C, Macleod AD. Video consultations in ordinary and extraordinary times. Pract Neurol. 2020;20(5):396–403. https://doi.org/10.1136/practneurol-2020-002579.CrossRefPubMed

Pereira-Monteiro J, Wysocka-Bakowska MM, Katsarava Z, Antonaci F, European Headache Federation. Guidelines for telematic second opinion consultation on headaches in Europe: on behalf of the European Headache Federation (EHF). J Headache Pain. 2010;11(4):345–8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10194-010-0211-6.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Muller KI, Alstadhaug KB, Bekkelund SI. Headache patients’ satisfaction with telemedicine: a 12-month follow-up randomized non-inferiority trial. Eur J Neurol. 2017;24(6):807–15. https://doi.org/10.1111/ene.13294.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Muller KI, Alstadhaug KB, Bekkelund SI. Telemedicine in the management of non-acute headaches: a prospective, open-labelled non-inferiority, randomised clinical trial. Cephalalgia. 2017;37(9):855–63. https://doi.org/10.1177/0333102416654885.CrossRefPubMed

Muller KI, Alstadhaug KB, Bekkelund SI. A randomized trial of telemedicine efficacy and safety for nonacute headaches. Neurology. 2017;89(2):153–62. https://doi.org/10.1212/WNL.0000000000004085.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

10.

Bekkelund SI, Muller KI. Video consultations in medication overuse headache. A randomized controlled trial. Brain Behav. 2019;9(7):e01344. https://doi.org/10.1002/brb3.1344.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

11.

Muller KI, Alstadhaug KB, Bekkelund SI. Acceptability, feasibility, and cost of telemedicine for nonacute headaches: a randomized study comparing video and traditional consultations. J Med Internet Res. 2016;18(5):e140. https://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.5221.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

12.

Harper K, McLeod M, Brown SK, Wilson G, Turchan M, Gittings EM, et al. Teleneurology service provided via tablet technology: 3-year outcomes and physician satisfaction. Rural Remote Health. 2019;19(1):4743. https://doi.org/10.22605/RRH4743.CrossRefPubMed

13.

Friedman DI, Rajan B, Seidmann A. A randomized trial of telemedicine for migraine management. Cephalalgia. 2019;39(12):1577–85. https://doi.org/10.1177/0333102419868250.CrossRefPubMed

14.

Qubty W, Patniyot I, Gelfand A. Telemedicine in a pediatric headache clinic: A prospective survey. Neurology. 2018;90(19):e1702–5. https://doi.org/10.1212/WNL.0000000000005482.CrossRefPubMed

15.

Vierhile A, Tuttle J, Adams H, tenHoopen C, Baylor E. Feasibility of providing pediatric neurology telemedicine care to youth with headache. J Pediatr Health Care. 2018;32(5):500–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pedhc.2018.02.004.CrossRefPubMed

16.

Lo MD, Gospe SM Jr. Telemedicine and child neurology. J Child Neurol. 2019;34(1):22–6. https://doi.org/10.1177/0883073818807516.CrossRefPubMed

17.

Asukile M, Chishimba L, Chomba M, Mataa M, Mutete F, Mwendaweli N, et al. Implementation of a teleneurology clinic in Zambia during the COVID-19 pandemic. Ann Neurol. 2022;91(4):445–54. https://doi.org/10.1002/ana.26323.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

18.

Cottrell C, Drew J, Gibson J, Holroyd K, O’Donnell F. Feasibility assessment of telephone-administered behavioral treatment for adolescent migraine. Headache. 2007;47(9):1293–302. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1526-4610.2007.00804.x.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

19.

Cicolini G, Palma E, Tafuri E, Sansoni J, Giamberardino MA. Effectiveness of the telephonic-case-management for treatment of headache. A pilot study. Prof Inferm. 2011;64(3):173–8.PubMed

20.

North F, Uthke LD, Tulledge-Scheitel SM. Internal e-consultations in an integrated multispecialty practice: a retrospective review of use, content, and outcomes. J Telemed Telecare. 2015;21(3):151–9. https://doi.org/10.1177/1357633X15572204.CrossRefPubMed

21.

Robblee J, Starling AJ. E-consultation in headache medicine: a quality improvement pilot study. Headache. 2020;60(10):2192–201. https://doi.org/10.1111/head.13981.CrossRefPubMed

22.

Abu Libdeh A, Flanigan J, Heinan K. Experience with pediatric neurology e-consults from a specialist perspective at an academic center. J Child Neurol. 2022;37(5):373–9. https://doi.org/10.1177/08830738221077760.CrossRefPubMed

23.

Brilla R, Woo KM, Seeger SK. Do headache patients require more care in between visits than other neurology outpatients? Headache. 2018;58(7):960–3. https://doi.org/10.1111/head.13339.CrossRefPubMed

24.

Mueller B, Sweetnam C, Klenofsky B, Pace A, Grant J, Natbony L, et al. A retrospective cohort study of clinical factors, visit patterns, and demographic factors associated with use of remote communications in patients with headache. Headache. 2021;61(10):1521–8. https://doi.org/10.1111/head.14226.CrossRefPubMed

25.

Garcia-Azorin D, Seeher KM, Newton CR, Okubadejo NU, Pilotto A, Saylor D, et al. Disruptions of neurological services, its causes and mitigation strategies during COVID-19: a global review. J Neurol. 2021;268(11):3947–60. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00415-021-10588-5.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

26.

Kristoffersen ES, Sandset EC, Winsvold BS, Faiz KW, Storstein AM. Experiences of telemedicine in neurological out-patient clinics during the COVID-19 pandemic. Ann Clin Transl Neurol. 2021;8(2):440–7. https://doi.org/10.1002/acn3.51293.CrossRefPubMed

27.

Minen MT, Szperka CL, Kaplan K, Ehrlich A, Riggins N, Rizzoli P, et al. Telehealth as a new care delivery model: the headache provider experience. Headache. 2021;61(7):1123–31. https://doi.org/10.1111/head.14150.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

28.

Belvis R, Santos-Lasaosa S, Irimia P, Lopez Blanco R, Torres-Ferrus M, Morollon N, et al. Telemedicine in the management of patients with headache: current situation and recommendations of the Spanish Society of Neurology’s Headache Study Group. Neurologia (Engl Ed). 2021. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nrl.2021.01.018.CrossRefPubMed

29.

Grinberg AS, Fenton BT, Wang K, Lindsey H, Goldman RE, Baird S, et al. Telehealth perceptions and utilization for the delivery of headache care before and during the COVID-19 pandemic: a mixed-methods study. Headache. 2022;62(5):613–23. https://doi.org/10.1111/head.14310.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

30.

Katsuki M. The first case series from Japan of primary headache patients treated by completely online telemedicine. Cureus. 2022;14(11):e31068. https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.31068.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

31.

Chiang CC, Halker Singh R, Lalvani N, Shubin Stein K, Henscheid Lorenz D, Lay C, et al. Patient experience of telemedicine for headache care during the COVID-19 pandemic: an American Migraine Foundation survey study. Headache. 2021;61(5):734–9. https://doi.org/10.1111/head.14110.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

32.

Hatcher-Martin JM, Adams JL, Anderson ER, Bove R, Burrus TM, Chehrenama M, et al. Telemedicine in neurology: telemedicine work group of the American Academy of Neurology update. Neurology. 2020;94(1):30–8. https://doi.org/10.1212/WNL.0000000000008708.CrossRefPubMed

33.

McKenna MC, Al-Hinai M, Bradley D, Doran E, Hunt I, Hutchinson S, et al. Patients’ experiences of remote neurology consultations during the COVID-19 pandemic. Eur Neurol. 2020;83(6):622–5. https://doi.org/10.1159/000511900.CrossRefPubMed

34.

Bekkelund SI, Muller KI. One-year remission rate of chronic headache comparing video and face-to-face consultations by neurologist: randomized controlled trial. J Med Internet Res. 2021;23(12):e30151. https://doi.org/10.2196/30151.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

35.

Smith M, Nakamoto M, Crocker J, Tiffany Morden F, Liu K, Ma E, et al. Early impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on outpatient migraine care in Hawaii: results of a quality improvement survey. Headache. 2021;61(1):149–56. https://doi.org/10.1111/head.14030.CrossRefPubMed

36.

Caponnetto V, Ornello R, De Matteis E, Papavero SC, Fracasso A, Di Vito G, et al. The COVID-19 pandemic as an opportunity to improve health care through a nurse-coordinated multidisciplinary model in a headache specialist center: the implementation of a telemedicine protocol. Telemed J E Health. 2022;28(7):1016–22. https://doi.org/10.1089/tmj.2021.0414.CrossRefPubMed

37.

Scavasine VC, Ribas MZ, Augustin G, Zetola VHF, Ducci RD, Lange MC. Store-and-forward teleneurology results in a large Brazilian city. Arq Neuropsiquiatr. 2022;80(8):802–5. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0042-1755204.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

38.

Aquino E, Rodrigues DLG, Batista CEA, Basso J, Gadenz SD, Kim KY, et al. Teleconsultations in neurology in a universal health system amid COVID-19: a descriptive study. Rev Assoc Med Bras (1992). 2022;68(10):1376–82. https://doi.org/10.1590/1806-9282.20220697.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

39.

Domingues RB, Mantese CE, Aquino EDS, Fantini F, Prado GFD, Nitrini R. Telemedicine in neurology: current evidence. Arq Neuropsiquiatr. 2020;78(12):818–26. https://doi.org/10.1590/0004-282X20200131.CrossRefPubMed

40.

Rosenthal S, Yonker M. Telemedicine in pediatric headache: a review and practical implementation. Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep. 2021;21(6):27. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11910-021-01112-3.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

41.

McGeary D, McGeary C. Telerehabilitation for headache management. Phys Med Rehabil Clin N Am. 2021;32(2):373–91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pmr.2021.01.005.CrossRefPubMed

42.

Grazzi L, Telesca A, Rizzoli P. Management of chronic migraine with medication overuse by web-based behavioral program during the COVID-19 emergency: results at 12 months. Neurol Sci. 2022;43(3):1583–5. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10072-021-05836-5.CrossRefPubMed

43.

Dias L, Martins B, Pinto MJ, Rocha AL, Pinto M, Costa A. Headache teleconsultation in the era of COVID-19: patients’ evaluation and future directions. Eur J Neurol. 2021;28(11):3798–804. https://doi.org/10.1111/ene.14915.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

44.

Thawani SP, Minen MT, Stainman RS, Friedman S, Bhatt JM, Foo FA, et al. Neurologists’ evaluations of experience and effectiveness of teleneurology encounters. Telemed J E Health. 2023;29(3):442–53. https://doi.org/10.1089/tmj.2021.0551.CrossRef

45.

Spina E, Tedeschi G, Russo A, Trojsi F, Iodice R, Tozza S, et al. Telemedicine application to headache: a critical review. Neurol Sci. 2022;43(6):3795–801. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10072-022-05910-6.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

46.

Noutsios CD, Boisvert-Plante V, Perez J, Hudon J, Ingelmo P. Telemedicine applications for the evaluation of patients with non-acute headache: a narrative review. J Pain Res. 2021;14:1533–42. https://doi.org/10.2147/JPR.S309542.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

47.

Bentivegna E, Tassorelli C, De Icco R, Sances G, Martelletti P. Tele-healthcare in migraine medicine: from diagnosis to monitoring treatment outcomes. Expert Rev Neurother. 2022;22(3):237–43. https://doi.org/10.1080/14737175.2022.2045954.CrossRefPubMed

48.

Clausen TC, Greve NK, Muller KI, Kristoffersen ES, Schytz HW. Telemedicine in headache care: a systematic review. Cephalalgia. 2022;42(13):1397–408. https://doi.org/10.1177/03331024221111554.CrossRefPubMed

49.

Rabinovitch BS, Diaz PL, Langleben AC, Katz TM, Gordon T, Le K, et al. Wait times and patient throughput after the implementation of a novel model of virtual care in an outpatient neurology clinic: a retrospective analysis. J Telemed Telecare. 2022. https://doi.org/10.1177/1357633X221139558.CrossRefPubMed

50.

Tropea TF, Fuentes A, Roberts Z, Spindler M, Yuan K, Perrone C, et al. Provider experience with teleneurology in an academic neurology department. Telemed J E Health. 2022;28(3):374–83. https://doi.org/10.1089/tmj.2021.0096.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

51.

Prelack M, Fridinger S, Gonzalez AK, Kaufman MC, Xian J, Galer PD, et al. Visits of concern in child neurology telemedicine. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2022;64(11):1351–8. https://doi.org/10.1111/dmcn.15256.CrossRefPubMed

52.

Sasaki R, Yunoki T, Nakano Y, Fukui Y, Takemoto M, Morihara R, et al. Actual telemedicine needs of Japanese patients with neurological disorders in the COVID-19 pandemic. Intern Med. 2023;62(3):365–71. https://doi.org/10.2169/internalmedicine.9702-22.CrossRefPubMed

53.

Franciosi EB, Tan AJ, Kassamali B, Leonard N, Zhou G, Krueger S, et al. The impact of telehealth implementation on underserved populations and no-show rates by medical specialty during the COVID-19 pandemic. Telemed J E Health. 2021;27(8):874–80. https://doi.org/10.1089/tmj.2020.0525.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

54.

Rubin R. Telemedicine rollbacks-why providing care across state lines is no longer as simple as it was early in the pandemic. JAMA. 2022;328(23):2291–3. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2022.20875.CrossRefPubMed

55.

Begasse de Dhaem O, Bernstein C. Headache virtual visit toolbox: the transition from bedside manners to webside manners. Headache. 2020;60(8):1743–6. https://doi.org/10.1111/head.13885.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

56.

Rogers DG, Santamaria K, Seng EK, Grinberg AS. Behavioral health, telemedicine, and opportunities for improving access. Curr Pain Headache Rep. 2022;26(12):919–26. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11916-022-01096-w.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Titel: Telemedicine in Headache Medicine: A Narrative Review
verfasst von: Jennifer Robblee
Publikationsdatum: 29.07.2023
Verlag: Springer US
Erschienen in: Current Pain and Headache Reports / Ausgabe 9/2023
Print ISSN: 1531-3433
Elektronische ISSN: 1534-3081
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11916-023-01141-2

Neu im Fachgebiet AINS

Blutdrucksenkung schon im Rettungswagen bei akutem Schlaganfall?

31.05.2024 Apoplex Nachrichten

Der optimale Ansatz für die Blutdruckkontrolle bei Patientinnen und Patienten mit akutem Schlaganfall ist noch nicht gefunden. Ob sich eine frühzeitige Therapie der Hypertonie noch während des Transports in die Klinik lohnt, hat jetzt eine Studie aus China untersucht.

Nicht Creutzfeldt Jakob, sondern Abführtee-Vergiftung

29.05.2024 Hyponatriämie Nachrichten

Eine ältere Frau trinkt regelmäßig Sennesblättertee gegen ihre Verstopfung. Der scheint plötzlich gut zu wirken. Auf Durchfall und Erbrechen folgt allerdings eine Hyponatriämie. Nach deren Korrektur kommt es plötzlich zu progredienten Kognitions- und Verhaltensstörungen.

Häusliche Gewalt in der orthopädischen Notaufnahme oft nicht erkannt

28.05.2024 Häusliche Gewalt Nachrichten

In der Notaufnahme wird die Chance, Opfer von häuslicher Gewalt zu identifizieren, von Orthopäden und Orthopädinnen offenbar zu wenig genutzt. Darauf deuten die Ergebnisse einer Fragebogenstudie an der Sahlgrenska-Universität in Schweden hin.

Update AINS

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

hier abonnieren

Live-Webinar "Urologie und Sexualmedizin in der Praxis"

Springer Medizin

Telemedicine in Headache Medicine: A Narrative Review

Abstract

Purpose of Review

Recent Findings

Summary

Neu im Fachgebiet AINS

Blutdrucksenkung schon im Rettungswagen bei akutem Schlaganfall?

Ähnliche Überlebensraten nach Reanimation während des Transports bzw. vor Ort

Nicht Creutzfeldt Jakob, sondern Abführtee-Vergiftung

Häusliche Gewalt in der orthopädischen Notaufnahme oft nicht erkannt

Update AINS

Live-Webinar "Urologie und Sexualmedizin in der Praxis"

Springer Medizin

Abstract

Purpose of Review

Recent Findings

Summary

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu diesem Inhalt zu erhalten

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 9/2023

A Multimodal Conservative Approach to Treating Migraine: A Physical Therapist’s Perspective

Episodic Migraine and Psychiatric Comorbidity: A Narrative Review of the Literature

Perioperative Use of Ketamine

Complex Regional Pain Syndrome (CRPS) and the Value of Early Detection

Multi-agent Systems and Cancer Pain Management

The Exploration of Cannabis and Cannabinoid Therapies for Migraine

Neu im Fachgebiet AINS

Blutdrucksenkung schon im Rettungswagen bei akutem Schlaganfall?

Ähnliche Überlebensraten nach Reanimation während des Transports bzw. vor Ort

Nicht Creutzfeldt Jakob, sondern Abführtee-Vergiftung

Häusliche Gewalt in der orthopädischen Notaufnahme oft nicht erkannt

Update AINS