nach oben

Erschienen in:

16.08.2021 | Schwerpunkt

Technisches Rüstzeug für chronisch verschlossene Gefäße

verfasst von: F. Voll, MD, C. Kuna, MD, S. Kufner, MD, S. Cassese, MD, PhD

Erschienen in: Herz | Ausgabe 5/2021

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Zusammenfassung

Die perkutane Revaskularisation von chronisch verschlossenen Koronarien stellt seit jeher eine große Herausforderung für die interventionelle Kardiologie dar. In den letzten Jahrzenten wurde eine Vielzahl an Anstrengungen unternommen, um die Revaskularisationsstrategien für chronisch verschlossene Koronarien zu standardisieren. Diese Bestrebungen sind v. a. in dem steigenden Interesse der verschiedenen kardiologischen Fachgesellschaften an dieser Patientengruppe, in der zunehmenden Erfahrung der Interventionalisten und in der fortwährenden Entwicklung des technischen Instrumentariums und von endovaskulären Unterstützungstechnologien begründet. Diese Übersichtsarbeit beleuchtet die aktuell zur Verfügung stehenden Hilfsmittel sowie Technologien, Techniken und Strategien zur perkutanen Rekanalisation von chronisch verschlossenen Koronarien.

Ybarra LF et al (2021) Definitions and clinical trial design principles for coronary artery chronic total occlusion therapies: CTO-ARC consensus recommendations. Circulation 143(5):479–500PubMedCrossRef

Fefer P et al (2012) Current perspectives on coronary chronic total occlusions: the Canadian multicenter chronic total occlusions registry. J Am Coll Cardiol 59(11):991–997PubMedCrossRef

Azzalini L et al (2016) Epidemiology, management strategies, and outcomes of patients with chronic total coronary occlusion. Am J Cardiol 118(8):1128–1135PubMedCrossRef

Sachdeva R et al (2014) The myocardium supplied by a chronic total occlusion is a persistently ischemic zone. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 83(1):9–16CrossRefPubMed

Werner GS et al (2009) Chronic total coronary occlusions in patients with stable angina pectoris: impact on therapy and outcome in present day clinical practice. Clin Res Cardiol 98(7):435–441PubMedCrossRef

Jang WJ et al (2015) Long-term survival benefit of revascularization compared with medical therapy in patients with coronary chronic total occlusion and well-developed collateral circulation. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 8(2):271–279PubMedCrossRef

Khan MF et al (2013) Effects of percutaneous revascularization of chronic total occlusions on clinical outcomes: a meta-analysis comparing successful versus failed percutaneous intervention for chronic total occlusion. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 82(1):95–107PubMedCrossRef

Christakopoulos GE et al (2015) Meta-analysis of clinical outcomes of patients who underwent percutaneous coronary interventions for chronic total occlusions. Am J Cardiol 115(10):1367–1375PubMedCrossRef

Patel VG et al (2013) Angiographic success and procedural complications in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary chronic total occlusion interventions: a weighted meta-analysis of 18,061 patients from 65 studies. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 6(2):128–136PubMedCrossRef

10.

Mares A, Mukherjee D (2021) Management of chronic total occlusion of coronary artery. Int J Angiol 30(1):48–52PubMedCrossRef

11.

Lee PH et al (2016) Successful recanalization of native coronary chronic total occlusion is not associated with improved long-term survival. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 9(6):530–538PubMedCrossRef

12.

Werner GS et al (2018) A randomized multicentre trial to compare revascularization with optimal medical therapy for the treatment of chronic total coronary occlusions. Eur Heart J 39(26):2484–2493CrossRefPubMed

13.

Obedinskiy AA et al (2018) The IMPACTOR-CTO trial. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 11(13):1309–1311PubMedCrossRef

14.

Lee SW et al (2019) Randomized trial evaluating percutaneous coronary intervention for the treatment of chronic total occlusion. Circulation 139(14):1674–1683CrossRefPubMed

15.

Mashayekhi K et al (2018) A randomized trial to assess regional left ventricular function after stent implantation in chronic total occlusion: the REVASC trial. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 11(19):1982–1991PubMedCrossRef

16.

Galassi AR et al (2011) In-hospital outcomes of percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with chronic total occlusion: insights from the ERCTO (European registry of chronic total occlusion) registry. EuroIntervention 7(4):472–479PubMedCrossRef

17.

Maeremans J et al (2016) The hybrid algorithm for treating chronic total occlusions in europe: the RECHARGE registry. J Am Coll Cardiol 68(18):1958–1970PubMedCrossRef

18.

Galassi AR et al (2019) Percutaneous recanalisation of chronic total occlusions: 2019 consensus document from the EuroCTO club. EuroIntervention 15(2):198–208PubMedCrossRef

19.

Bakker EJ et al (2017) Fully transradial versus transfemoral approach for percutaneous intervention of coronary chronic total occlusions applying the hybrid algorithm: insights from RECHARGE registry. Circ Cardiovasc Interv 10(9):e5255PubMedCrossRef

20.

Meijers TA et al (2021) Randomized comparison between radial and femoral large-bore access for complex percutaneous coronary intervention. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 14(12):1293–1303. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcin.2021.03.041CrossRefPubMed

21.

Soud M et al (2020) The efficacy and safety of transradial and transfemoral approach in treatment of coronary chronic total occlusion: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Expert Rev Cardiovasc Ther 18(11):809–817PubMedCrossRef

22.

Brilakis E (2012) S et al A percutaneous treatment algorithm for crossing coronary chronic total occlusions. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 5(4):367–379PubMedCrossRef

23.

Karatasakis A et al (2017) Guidewire and microcatheter utilization patterns during antegrade wire escalation in chronic total occlusion percutaneous coronary intervention: Insights from a contemporary multicenter registry. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 89(4):E90–e98PubMedCrossRef

24.

Maeremans J et al (2016) Antegrade wire escalation for chronic total occlusions in coronary arteries: simple algorithms as a key to success. J Cardiovasc Med (Hagerstown) 17(9):680–686CrossRef

25.

Walsh SJ et al (2020) Intravascular healing is not affected by approaches in contemporary CTO PCI: the CONSISTENT CTO study. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 13(12):1448–1457PubMedCrossRef

26.

Song L et al (2017) Intravascular ultrasound analysis of Intraplaque versus subintimal tracking in percutaneous intervention for coronary chronic total occlusions and association with procedural outcomes. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 10(10):1011–1021PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef

27.

Sumitsuji S et al (2011) Fundamental wire technique and current standard strategy of percutaneous intervention for chronic total occlusion with histopathological insights. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 4(9):941–951PubMedCrossRef

28.

Wu EB et al (2019) Chronic total occlusion wiring: a state-of-the-art guide from the asia pacific chronic total occlusion club. Heart Lung Circ 28(10):1490–1500PubMedCrossRef

29.

Wilson WM et al (2016) Hybrid approach improves success of chronic total occlusion angioplasty. Heart 102(18):1486–1493PubMedCrossRef

30.

Maeremans J et al (2017) Antegrade dissection and reentry as part of the hybrid chronic total occlusion revascularization strategy. Circ Cardiovasc Interv 10(6):e4791PubMedCrossRef

31.

McEntegart MB et al (2016) The collateral circulation of coronary chronic total occlusions. EuroIntervention 11(14):e1596–603PubMedCrossRef

32.

Whitlow PL et al (2012) Use of a novel crossing and re-entry system in coronary chronic total occlusions that have failed standard crossing techniques: results of the FAST-CTos (facilitated antegrade steering technique in chronic total occlusions) trial. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 5(4):393–401PubMedCrossRef

33.

Sakakura K et al (2014) Comparison of pathology of chronic total occlusion with and without coronary artery bypass graft. Eur Heart J 35(25):1683–1693PubMedCrossRef

34.

Tajti P et al (2018) The hybrid approach to chronic total occlusion percutaneous coronary intervention: update from the PROGRESS CTO registry. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 11(14):1325–1335PubMedCrossRef

35.

Khand A et al (2015) Retrograde wiring of collateral channels of the heart in chronic total occlusions: a systematic review and meta-analysis of safety, feasibility, and incremental value in achieving revascularization. Angiology 66(10):925–932PubMedCrossRef

36.

Joyal D et al (2012) The retrograde technique for recanalization of chronic total occlusions: a step-by-step approach. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 5(1):1–11PubMedCrossRef

37.

Kovacic JC et al (2013) GuideLiner mother-and-child guide catheter extension: a simple adjunctive tool in PCI for balloon uncrossable chronic total occlusions. J Interv Cardiol 26(4):343–350PubMedCrossRef

38.

Mashayekhi K et al (2017) Wire externalisation techniques for retrograde percutaneous coronary interventions of chronic total occlusions. EuroIntervention 13(12):e1489–e1490PubMedCrossRef

39.

Azzalini L et al (2018) Intracoronary snaring of the retrograde guidewire: how to overcome extreme takeoff angles in chronic total occlusion percutaneous coronary intervention. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 91(3):464–469PubMedCrossRef

40.

Hsu JT et al (2009) Traditional antegrade approach versus combined antegrade and retrograde approach in the percutaneous treatment of coronary chronic total occlusions. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 74(4):555–563PubMedCrossRef

41.

Vemmou E et al (2019) Recent advances in microcatheter technology for the treatment of chronic total occlusions. Expert Rev Med Devices 16(4):267–273PubMedCrossRef

42.

Mohandes M et al (2016) Efficacy and safety of tornus catheter in percutaneous coronary intervention of hard or balloon-uncrossable chronic total occlusion. ARYA Atheroscler 12(4):206–211PubMedPubMedCentral

43.

Danek BA et al (2017) Incidence, treatment, and outcomes of coronary perforation during chronic total occlusion percutaneous coronary intervention. Am J Cardiol 120(8):1285–1292PubMedCrossRef

44.

Ellis SG et al (1994) Increased coronary perforation in the new device era. Incidence, classification, management, and outcome. Circulation 90(6):2725–2730PubMedCrossRef

45.

Shimony A et al (2011) Coronary artery perforation during percutaneous coronary intervention: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Can J Cardiol 27(6):843–850PubMedCrossRef

46.

Wu K et al (2019) Predictors, treatment, and long-term outcomes of coronary perforation during retrograde percutaneous coronary intervention via epicardial collaterals for recanalization of chronic coronary total occlusion. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 93(S1):800–809PubMedCrossRef

47.

Kinnaird T et al (2016) Incidence, determinants, and outcomes of coronary perforation during percutaneous coronary intervention in the United Kingdom between 2006 and 2013: an analysis of 527 121 cases from the British cardiovascular intervention society database. Circ Cardiovasc Interv 9(8):e3449. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.115.003449CrossRefPubMed

48.

Xenogiannis I, Brilakis ES (2019) Advances in the treatment of coronary perforations. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 93(5):921–922PubMedCrossRef

49.

Witzke CF et al (2004) The changing pattern of coronary perforation during percutaneous coronary intervention in the new device era. J Invasive Cardiol 16(6):257–301PubMed

50.

Teis A et al (2010) Coronary artery perforation by intracoronary guide wires: risk factors and clinical outcomes. Rev Esp Cardiol 63(6):730–734PubMed

51.

Werner GS, Ahmed WH (2017) Fenestration of a papyrus PK covered stent to recover the occluded left main bifurcation after sealing a left main perforation during a CTO procedure. Cardiovasc Revasc Med 18(6s1):41–44PubMedCrossRef

52.

Moriyama N, Tanaka Y, Saito S (2017) Bailout polytetrafluoroethylene-covered stent implantation for left main bifurcation perforation using the kissing stent technique. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 89(6):1022–1027PubMedCrossRef

53.

Kufner S et al (2019) Outcome after new generation single-layer polytetrafluoroethylene-covered stent implantation for the treatment of coronary artery perforation. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 93(5):912–920PubMedCrossRef

54.

Giannini F et al (2018) A practical approach to the management of complications during percutaneous coronary intervention. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 11(18):1797–1810PubMedCrossRef

55.

Garbo R, Oreglia JA, Gasparini GL (2017) The balloon-microcatheter technique for treatment of coronary artery perforations. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 89(2):E75–e83PubMedCrossRef

56.

Milasinovic D et al (2018) Step-by-step manual for planning and performing bifurcation PCI: a resource-tailored approach. EuroIntervention 13(15):e1804–e1811PubMedCrossRef

57.

Yu CW et al (2017) Coronary computed tomography angiography predicts guidewire crossing and success of percutaneous intervention for chronic total occlusion: Korean multicenter CTO CT registry score as a tool for assessing difficulty in chronic total occlusion percutaneous coronary intervention. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging 10(4):e5800PubMedCrossRef

58.

Tian NL et al (2015) Angiographic and clinical comparisons of intravascular ultrasound- versus angiography-guided drug-eluting stent implantation for patients with chronic total occlusion lesions: two-year results from a randomised AIR-CTO study. EuroIntervention 10(12):1409–1417PubMedCrossRef

59.

Kim BK et al (2015) Clinical impact of intravascular ultrasound-guided chronic total occlusion intervention with zotarolimus-eluting versus biolimus-eluting stent implantation: randomized study. Circ Cardiovasc Interv 8(7):e2592PubMedCrossRef

60.

Galassi AR et al (2016) Utility of intravascular ultrasound in percutaneous revascularization of chronic total occlusions: an overview. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 9(19):1979–1991PubMedCrossRef

61.

Xhepa E et al (2019) Subintimal versus intraplaque recanalization of coronary chronic total occlusions: mid-term angiographic and OCT findings from the ISAR-OCT-CTO registry. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 12(19):1889–1898PubMedCrossRef

62.

Xhepa E et al (2021) Clinical and angiographic outcomes of crossing techniques for coronary chronic total occlusions—the ISAR-CTO registry. EuroIntervention. https://doi.org/10.4244/EIJ-D-20-01248CrossRefPubMed

Titel: Technisches Rüstzeug für chronisch verschlossene Gefäße
verfasst von: F. Voll, MD
C. Kuna, MD
S. Kufner, MD
S. Cassese, MD, PhD
Publikationsdatum: 16.08.2021
Verlag: Springer Medizin
Erschienen in: Herz / Ausgabe 5/2021
Print ISSN: 0340-9937
Elektronische ISSN: 1615-6692
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00059-021-05053-y

Neu im Fachgebiet Kardiologie

Nach Herzinfarkt mit Typ-1-Diabetes schlechtere Karten als mit Typ 2?

29.05.2024 Herzinfarkt Nachrichten

Bei Menschen mit Typ-2-Diabetes sind die Chancen, einen Myokardinfarkt zu überleben, in den letzten 15 Jahren deutlich gestiegen – nicht jedoch bei Betroffenen mit Typ 1.

Erhöhtes Risiko fürs Herz unter Checkpointhemmer-Therapie

28.05.2024 Nebenwirkungen der Krebstherapie Nachrichten

Kardiotoxische Nebenwirkungen einer Therapie mit Immuncheckpointhemmern mögen selten sein – wenn sie aber auftreten, wird es für Patienten oft lebensgefährlich. Voruntersuchung und Monitoring sind daher obligat.

GLP-1-Agonisten können Fortschreiten diabetischer Retinopathie begünstigen

24.05.2024 Diabetische Retinopathie Nachrichten

Möglicherweise hängt es von der Art der Diabetesmedikamente ab, wie hoch das Risiko der Betroffenen ist, dass sich sehkraftgefährdende Komplikationen verschlimmern.

TAVI versus Klappenchirurgie: Neue Vergleichsstudie sorgt für Erstaunen

21.05.2024 TAVI Nachrichten

Bei schwerer Aortenstenose und obstruktiver KHK empfehlen die Leitlinien derzeit eine chirurgische Kombi-Behandlung aus Klappenersatz plus Bypass-OP. Diese Empfehlung wird allerdings jetzt durch eine aktuelle Studie infrage gestellt – mit überraschender Deutlichkeit.

Update Kardiologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

Newsletter bestellen

Live-Webinar "Urologie und Sexualmedizin in der Praxis"

Springer Medizin

Zusammenfassung

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu diesem Inhalt zu erhalten

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 5/2021

Pushing the limits for interventional treatment of aortic valve stenosis

Kardiale Amyloidose und Aortenklappenstenose

Patent foramen ovale—When to close and how?

Predictors of adequate intraprocedural premature ventricular complex (PVC) frequency during idiopathic PVC ablation