Skip to main content
Hauptrubriken
CME Facharzt-Training Webinare Zeitschriften Bücher e.Medpedia Podcast
Service
Jobbörse Info & Hilfe
Fachgebiete
Anästhesiologie Allgemeinmedizin Arbeitsmedizin Augenheilkunde Chirurgie Dermatologie Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe HNO Innere Medizin Kardiologie Neurologie Onkologie und Hämatologie Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie Pädiatrie Pathologie Psychiatrie Radiologie Rechtsmedizin Urologie Zahnmedizin
Themen
Typ-2-Diabetes und Adipositas Klimawandel und Gesundheit Neues aus dem Markt COVID-19 Praxis und Beruf Seltene Erkrankungen GOÄ & EBM Panorama
Sammlungen
Kasuistiken Algorithmen & Infografiken Blickdiagnosen Arthropedia FlapFinder (für Dermatochirurgen) Videos Kongressberichterstattung Medizin für Apothekerinnen und Apotheker Für Ärztinnen und Ärzte in Weiterbildung Für Medizinstudierende

Live-Webinar "Urologie und Sexualmedizin in der Praxis"

Häufige urologisch-sexualmedizinische Themen in der Praxis sind das Thema des MMW-Webinars am 5. Juni von 17.30 bis 19 Uhr. Konkret geht es um die Frage, wann bei Harnwegsinfektionen auf Antibiotika verzichtet werden kann, und um ein Update zur Therapie von Libido- und Potenzstörungen des Mannes. Der dritte Vortrag behandelt sexuell übertragbare Krankheiten. Stellen Sie Ihre Fragen an die Experten und sammeln Sie 2 CME-Punkte. Jetzt gleich anmelden!
Erweiterte Suche
Anmelden
nach oben
Current Cardiology Reports
Erschienen in: Current Cardiology Reports 12/2023

08.11.2023 | Pericardial Disease (AL Klein and CL Jellis, Section Editors)

Surgical Approaches for Pericardial Diseases: What Is New?

verfasst von: David Moros, Anthony Zaki, Michael Zhen-Yu Tong

Erschienen in: Current Cardiology Reports | Ausgabe 12/2023

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Purpose of Review

The purpose of this review is to discuss the evolving techniques and approaches for pericardiectomy, with a focus on the use of cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) and the extent of radical pericardial resection. The review aims to highlight the benefits and considerations associated with these modifications in radical pericardiectomy.

Recent Findings

Recent studies have demonstrated that the use of CPB during pericardiectomy does not increase procedural risk or negatively impact survival. In fact, it has been shown to contribute to a more radical resection and improve postoperative outcomes, which is associated with less recurrence and better survival.

Summary

The review emphasizes the importance of radical pericardiectomy and the use of CPB in achieving successful outcomes. Radical resection of the pericardium, facilitated by CPB, helps minimize the risk of recurrent constrictions and the need for reinterventions. The findings highlight the correlation between postoperative outcomes and survival, further supporting the use of CPB.
Literatur
1.
Adler Y, Charron P, Imazio M, Badano L, Barón-Esquivias G, Bogaert J, et al. 2015 ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of pericardial diseases: the Task Force for the Diagnosis and Management of Pericardial Diseases of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) endorsed by: the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS). Eur Heart J. 2015;36(42):2921–64.PubMed
2.
• Chiabrando JG, Bonaventura A, Vecchié A, Wohlford GF, Mauro AG, Jordan JH, et al. Management of acute and recurrent pericarditis: JACC state-of-the-art review. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2020;75(1):76–92. This article provides an up-to-date overview of the current management of acute and recurrent pericarditis, outlining the various available medical treatment options, as well as considerations for when to choose surgical management.PubMed
3.
•• Unai S, Johnston DR. Radical pericardiectomy for pericardial diseases. Curr Cardiol Rep. 2019;21(2):6. This article provides a clear and specific description of the surgical approach that is currently being performed most frequently.PubMed
4.
Johnston DR. Surgical management of pericardial diseases. Prog Cardiovasc Dis. 2017;59(4):407–16.PubMed
5.
Rodriguez ER, Tan CD. Structure and anatomy of the human pericardium. Prog Cardiovasc Dis. 2017;59(4):327–40.PubMed
6.
Hoit BD. Anatomy and physiology of the pericardium. Cardiol Clin. 2017;35(4):481–90.PubMed
7.
Syed FF, Schaff HV, Oh JK. Constrictive pericarditis—a curable diastolic heart failure. Nat Rev Cardiol. 2014;11(9):530–44.PubMed
8.
• Oh NA, Hennecken C, Van den Eynde J, Doulamis IP, Avgerinos DV, Kampaktsis PN. Pericardiectomy and Pericardial window for the treatment of pericardial disease in the contemporary era. Curr Cardiol Rep. 2022;24(11):1619–31. This article summarizes contemporary practices in pericardial diseases. It emphasizes the diagnostic approach and current management of constrictive pericarditis, while also highlighting various studies that confirm the benefits of CPB in pericardiectomy.PubMed
9.
Cremer PC, Kumar A, Kontzias A, Tan CD, Rodriguez ER, Imazio M, et al. Complicated pericarditis: understanding risk factors and pathophysiology to inform imaging and treatment. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2016;68(21):2311–28.PubMed
10.
Fitzpatrick DP, Wyso EM, Bosher LH, Richardson DW. Restoration of normal intracardiac pressures after extensive pericardiectomy for constrictive pericarditis. Circulation. 1962;25(3):484–92.PubMed
11.
Hemmati P, Greason KL, Schaff HV. Contemporary techniques of pericardiectomy for pericardial disease. Cardiol Clin. 2017;35(4):559–66.PubMed
12.
•• Tzani A, Doulamis IP, Tzoumas A, Avgerinos DV, Koudoumas D, Siasos G, et al. Meta-analysis of population characteristics and outcomes of patients undergoing pericardiectomy for constrictive pericarditis. Am J Cardiol. 2021;1(146):120–7. This systematic review and meta-analysis aim to describe the characteristics and outcomes of patients with constrictive pericarditis who underwent pericardiectomy, providing a comprehensive analysis of this population in the current era.
13.
George TJ, Arnaoutakis GJ, Beaty CA, Kilic A, Baumgartner WA, Conte JV. Contemporary etiologies, risk factors, and outcomes after pericardiectomy. Ann Thorac Surg. 2012;94(2):445–51.PubMedPubMedCentral
14.
Komoda T, Frumkin A, Knosalla C, Hetzer R. Child-Pugh score predicts survival after radical pericardiectomy for constrictive pericarditis. Ann Thorac Surg. 2013;96(5):1679–85.PubMed
15.
Avgerinos D, Rabitnokov Y, Worku B, Neragi-Miandoab S, Girardi LN. Fifteen-year experience and outcomes of pericardiectomy for constrictive pericarditis. J Card Surg. 2014;29(4):434–8.PubMed
16.
Bertog SC, Thambidorai SK, Parakh K, Schoenhagen P, Ozduran V, Houghtaling PL, et al. Constrictive pericarditis: etiology and cause-specific survival after pericardiectomy. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2004;43(8):1445–52.PubMed
17.
Gatti G, Fiore A, Ternacle J, Porcari A, Fiorica I, Poletti A, et al. Pericardiectomy for constrictive pericarditis: a risk factor analysis for early and late failure. Heart Vessels. 2020;35(1):92–103.PubMed
18.
Kang SH, Song JM, Kim M, Choo SJ, Chung CH, Kang DH, et al. Prognostic predictors in pericardiectomy for chronic constrictive pericarditis. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2014;147(2):598–605.PubMed
19.
Gillaspie EA, Stulak JM, Daly RC, Greason KL, Joyce LD, Oh J, et al. A 20-year experience with isolated pericardiectomy: analysis of indications and outcomes. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2016;152(2):448–58.PubMed
20.
Nishimura S, Izumi C, Amano M, Imamura S, Onishi N, Tamaki Y, et al. Long-term clinical outcomes and prognostic factors after pericardiectomy for constrictive pericarditis in a Japanese population. Circ J. 2017;81(2):206–12.PubMed
21.
•• Murashita T, Schaff HV, Daly RC, Oh JK, Dearani JA, Stulak JM, et al. Experience with pericardiectomy for constrictive pericarditis over eight decades. Ann Thorac Surg. 2017;104(3):742–50. The study highlights a notable shift in the etiology of the disease over the research period. It also demonstrates that long-term survival following pericardiectomy is influenced by various patient characteristics, including the etiology of the constriction and the severity of symptoms. This article, featuring the most extensive cohort of retrospective patients to date, underscores these significant findings.PubMed
22.
Szabó G, Schmack B, Bulut C, Soós P, Weymann A, Stadtfeld S, et al. Constrictive pericarditis: risks, aetiologies and outcomes after total pericardiectomy: 24 years of experience†. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2013;44(6):1023–8.PubMed
23.
Pahwa S, Crestanello J, Miranda W, Bernabei A, Polycarpou A, Schaff H, et al. Outcomes of pericardiectomy for constrictive pericarditis following mediastinal irradiation. J Card Surg. 2021;36(12):4636–42.PubMed
24.
Wang H, Wei J, Zheng Q, Meng L, Xin Y, Yin X, et al. Radiation-induced heart disease: a review of classification, mechanism and prevention. Int J Biol Sci. 2019;15(10):2128–38.PubMedPubMedCentral
25.
Koutroumpakis E, Deswal A, Yusuf SW, Abe JI, Nead KT, Potter AS, et al. Radiation-induced cardiovascular disease: mechanisms, prevention, and treatment. Curr Oncol Rep. 2022;24(5):543–53.PubMed
26.
• Tabucanon RS, Wang TKM, Chetrit M, Furqan MM, Chan N, Pande A, et al. Worsened tricuspid regurgitation following pericardiectomy for constrictive pericarditis. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2021;14(10):e012948. This article emphasizes the importance of assessing and managing tricuspid regurgitation in patients undergoing pericardiectomy, given its potential worsening after the procedure and its implications for patient survival.PubMed
27.
Calderon-Rojas R, Greason KL, King KS, Oh JK, Stulak JM, Daly RC, et al. Tricuspid valve regurgitation in patients undergoing pericardiectomy for constrictive pericarditis. Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2020;32(4):721–8.PubMed
28.
Góngora E, Dearani JA, Orszulak TA, Schaff HV, Li Z, Sundt TM. Tricuspid regurgitation in patients undergoing pericardiectomy for constrictive pericarditis. Ann Thorac Surg. 2008;85(1):163–71.PubMed
29.
Tariq MU, Aman W, Karwa A, Benatti R, Klein A. Right ventricular dilatation post pericardiectomy causes tricuspid regurgitation. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2015;65(10_Supplement):A1315–A1315.
30.
• Alajaji W, Xu B, Sripariwuth A, Menon V, Kumar A, Schleicher M, et al. Noninvasive multimodality imaging for the diagnosis of constrictive pericarditis. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2018;11(11):e007878. This article provides a summary of the available multimodal imaging techniques used in the diagnosis of constrictive pericarditis, as well as their differentiation from other conditions such as restrictive cardiomyopathy using these images.PubMed
31.
Klein AL, Abbara S, Agler DA, Appleton CP, Asher CR, Hoit B, et al. American Society of Echocardiography clinical recommendations for multimodality cardiovascular imaging of patients with pericardial disease: endorsed by the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance and Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2013;26(9):965–1012.e15.PubMed
32.
Talreja DR, Nishimura RA, Oh JK, Holmes DR. Constrictive pericarditis in the modern era: novel criteria for diagnosis in the cardiac catheterization laboratory. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2008;51(3):315–9.PubMed
33.
Feng D, Glockner J, Kim K, Martinez M, Syed IS, Araoz P, et al. Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging pericardial late gadolinium enhancement and elevated inflammatory markers can predict the reversibility of constrictive pericarditis after antiinflammatory medical therapy. Circulation. 2011;124(17):1830–7.PubMed
34.
Brucato A, Lim-Watson MZ, Klein A, Imazio M, Cella D, Cremer P, et al. Interleukin-1 trap rilonacept improved health-related quality of life and sleep in patients with recurrent pericarditis: results from the phase 3 clinical trial RHAPSODY. J Am Heart Assoc. 2022;11(20):e023252.PubMedPubMedCentral
35.
Zhu P, Mai M, Wu R, Lu C, Fan R, Zheng S. Pericardiectomy for constrictive pericarditis: single-center experience in China. J Cardiothorac Surg. 2015;10(1):34.PubMedPubMedCentral
36.
Chowdhury UK, Seth S, Reddy SM. Pericardiectomy for chronic constrictive pericarditis via left anterolateral thoracotomy. Oper Tech Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2008;13(1):14–25.
37.
Chowdhury UK, Subramaniam GK, Kumar AS, Airan B, Singh R, Talwar S, et al. Pericardiectomy for Constrictive pericarditis: a clinical, echocardiographic, and hemodynamic evaluation of two surgical techniques. Ann Thorac Surg. 2006;81(2):522–9.PubMed
38.
Mitchell JD, Cehic DA, Morgia M, Bergom C, Toohey J, Guerrero PA, et al. Cardiovascular manifestations from therapeutic radiation: a multidisciplinary expert consensus statement from the International Cardio-Oncology Society. JACC CardioOncol. 2021;3(3):360–80.PubMedPubMedCentral
39.
Castro-Varela A, Schaff HV. Dr Stuart Harrington: historical challenges and success in pericardiectomy. JTCVS Open. 2022;2(10):303–7.
40.
Johansson L. Diseases of the pericardium. In: Derra E, editor. Encyclopedia of Thoracic Surgery / Handbuch Der Thoraxchirurgie: Band / Volume 2: Spezieller Teil 1 / Special Part 1 [Internet]. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer; 1959 [cited 2023 Aug 29]. p. 614–46. Available from: https://​doi.​org/​10.​1007/​978-3-642-94757-5_​13.
41.
Churchill ED. Decortication of the heart (Delorme) for adhesive pericarditis. Arch Surg. 1929;19(6):1457–69.
42.
McCaughan BC, Schaff HV, Piehler JM, Danielson GK, Orszulak TA, Puga FJ, et al. Early and late results of pericardiectomy for constrictive pericarditis. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1985;89(3):340–50.PubMed
43.
Cho YH, Schaff HV, Dearani JA, Daly RC, Park SJ, Li Z, et al. Completion pericardiectomy for recurrent constrictive pericarditis: importance of timing of recurrence on late clinical outcome of operation. Ann Thorac Surg. 2012;93(4):1236–40.PubMed
44.
Rupprecht L, Schmid C. More reasons for pericardiectomy without cardiopulmonary bypass. Ann Thorac Surg. 2018;105(4):1280.PubMed
45.
Shiraishi M, Yamaguchi A, Muramatsu K, Kimura N, Yuri K, Matsumoto H, et al. Validation of Waffle procedure for constrictive pericarditis with epicardial thickening. Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2015;63(1):30–7.PubMed
46.
Aksüt M, Altaş Ö, Kırali K. Intraoperative accidents and postoperative complications in the surgery of the pericardium. In: Nistor CE, Tsui S, Kırali K, Ciuche A, Aresu G, Kocher GJ, editors. Thoracic surgery: cervical, thoracic and abdominal approaches [Internet]. Cham: Springer International Publishing; 2020 [cited 2023 Aug 30]. p. 663–9. Available from: https://​doi.​org/​10.​1007/​978-3-030-40679-0_​58.
47.
Unzué L, García E, Díaz-Antón B, Fernández-Portales J, Teijeiro R, Rodríguez-del-Río M. Percutaneous closure of a giant coronary artery fistula after surgical pericardiectomy. Review of the literature. Cardiovasc Revasc Med. 2017;18(5):384–9.PubMed
48.
Busch C, Penov K, Amorim PA, Garbade J, Davierwala P, Schuler GC, et al. Risk factors for mortality after pericardiectomy for chronic constrictive pericarditis in a large single-centre cohort. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2015;48(6):e110–6.PubMed
49.
• Fang L, Zheng H, Yu W, Chen G, Zhong F. Effects of intraoperative fluid management on postoperative outcomes after pericardiectomy. Front Surg. 2021;8:673466. This retrospective study underscores the significance of intravenous fluid management during surgery, emphasizing that employing restrictive fluid therapy is linked to enhanced postoperative recovery and advocates it as the suitable fluid management approach for patients undergoing pericardiectomy.PubMedPubMedCentral
50.
Vistarini N, Chen C, Mazine A, Bouchard D, Hebert Y, Carrier M, et al. Pericardiectomy for constrictive pericarditis: 20 years of experience at the Montreal Heart Institute. Ann Thorac Surg. 2015;100(1):107–13.PubMed
51.
Maciolek K, Asfaw ZE, Krienbring DJ, Arnsdorf SE, Balkhy HH. Robotic endoscopic off-pump total pericardiectomy in constrictive pericarditis. Innovations. 2016;11(2):134–7.PubMed
Metadaten
Titel
Surgical Approaches for Pericardial Diseases: What Is New?
verfasst von
David Moros
Anthony Zaki
Michael Zhen-Yu Tong
Publikationsdatum
08.11.2023
Verlag
Springer US
Erschienen in
Current Cardiology Reports / Ausgabe 12/2023
Print ISSN: 1523-3782
Elektronische ISSN: 1534-3170
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11886-023-01986-4

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 12/2023

Current Cardiology Reports 12/2023 Zur Ausgabe

Global Cardiovascular Health (L Sperling and D Gaita, Section Editors)

Cardioneuroablation for the Treatment of Vasovagal Syncope: Current Status and Impact on Quality of Life

Diabetes and Cardiovascular Disease (D Bruemmer, Section Editor)

Cardiovascular and Renal Benefit of Novel Non-steroidal Mineralocorticoid Antagonists in Patients with Diabetes

Management of Acute Coronary Syndromes (H Jneid, Section Editor)

Cardiac Rehabilitation After Hospitalization for Acute Coronary Syndrome

Cardiovascular Critical Care (A Higgins and R Lee, Section Editors)

Stroke and Mechanical Circulatory Support in Adults

Cardiac Biomarkers (AA Quyyumi, Section Editor)

Biomarkers of Hepatic Dysfunction and Cardiovascular Risk

Nuclear Cardiology (V Dilsizian, Section Editor)

The Brain–Heart Axis: Neuroinflammatory Interactions in Cardiovascular Disease

Neu im Fachgebiet Kardiologie

Nach Herzinfarkt mit Typ-1-Diabetes schlechtere Karten als mit Typ 2?

29.05.2024 Herzinfarkt Nachrichten

Bei Menschen mit Typ-2-Diabetes sind die Chancen, einen Myokardinfarkt zu überleben, in den letzten 15 Jahren deutlich gestiegen – nicht jedoch bei Betroffenen mit Typ 1.

Erhöhtes Risiko fürs Herz unter Checkpointhemmer-Therapie

28.05.2024 Nebenwirkungen der Krebstherapie Nachrichten

Kardiotoxische Nebenwirkungen einer Therapie mit Immuncheckpointhemmern mögen selten sein – wenn sie aber auftreten, wird es für Patienten oft lebensgefährlich. Voruntersuchung und Monitoring sind daher obligat.

GLP-1-Agonisten können Fortschreiten diabetischer Retinopathie begünstigen

24.05.2024 Diabetische Retinopathie Nachrichten

Möglicherweise hängt es von der Art der Diabetesmedikamente ab, wie hoch das Risiko der Betroffenen ist, dass sich sehkraftgefährdende Komplikationen verschlimmern.

TAVI versus Klappenchirurgie: Neue Vergleichsstudie sorgt für Erstaunen

21.05.2024 TAVI Nachrichten

Bei schwerer Aortenstenose und obstruktiver KHK empfehlen die Leitlinien derzeit eine chirurgische Kombi-Behandlung aus Klappenersatz plus Bypass-OP. Diese Empfehlung wird allerdings jetzt durch eine aktuelle Studie infrage gestellt – mit überraschender Deutlichkeit.

Update Kardiologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

Newsletter bestellen