P1: Interventions to promote effective interprofessional collaboration that improves care outcomes for older people: a realist synthesis of evidence
Carmel Davies1, Deirdre O’Donnell1, Apolonia Radomska1, Éidín Ní Shé3, Marie O’Shea1, Catherine Devaney2, Sarah Donnelly1, Gráinne O’Donoghue1, Aoife De Brún1, Helen Whitty2, PJ Harnett2, Deirdre Lang2, Reema Harrison4, Eilish McAuliffe1, Emer Ahern2
1University College Dublin, Dublin 4, Ireland; 2National Clinical Programme for Older Persons, Dublin, Ireland; 3Royal College of Surgeons of Ireland, Dublin, Ireland; 4Macquarie University, Sydney, Australia
Correspondence: Carmel Davies (carmel.davies@ucd.ie)
P2: The impact of after action review on safety culture and staff-wellbeing: findings from a mixed-methods effectiveness-implementation study in a hospital setting in Ireland
Siobhan Eithne McCarthy1, Mairead Finn1, Gintare Valentelyte2, Fiona Boland3, Catherine Hogan4, Loretta Jenkins4, Theresa Keane1, Lisa Mellon5, Lorraine Schwanberg4, Aisling Walsh6, David Williams7, Natasha Rafter8
1Graduate School of Healthcare Management, RCSI University of Medicine & Health Sciences, Dublin, Ireland; 2Healthcare Outcomes Research Centre, School of Population Health, RCSI University of Medicine & Health Sciences, Dublin, Ireland; 3Data Science Centre, School of Population Health, RCSI University of Medicine & Health Sciences; 4National Quality and Patient Safety Directorate, Health Service Executive, Ireland; 5Dept of Health Psychology, School of Population Health, RCSI University of Medicine & Health Sciences, Dublin, Ireland; 6Dept of Public Health & Epidemiology, School of Population Health, RCSI University of Medicine & Health Sciences, Dublin, Ireland; 7School of Medicine, RCSI University of Medicine & Health Sciences, Dublin, Ireland; 8School of Population Health, RCSI University of Medicine & Health Sciences, Dublin, Ireland
Correspondence: Siobhan Eithne McCarthy (smccarthy@rcsi.ie)
O3: Process evaluation of the SMARThealth pregnancy hybrid type 2 cluster randomised controlled trial: a protocol
Nicole Votruba1,2, Ankita Sharma1, Sreya Majumdar3, Sudhir Thout3, Deversetty Praveen3,4, Varun Arora5, Pallab K. Maulik3,4, Jane Hirst1,2
1Nuffield Department of Women’s & Reproductive Health, University of Oxford, United Kingdom; 2The George Institute for Global Health UK, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom; 3The George Institute for Global Health, India; 4The George Institute for Global Health, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia; 5Post Graduate Institute of Medical Science, Rohtak, India
Correspondence: Nicole Votruba (nicole.votruba@wrh.ox.ac.uk)
P5: The feasibility of implementing rapid-learning methodology to inform radiotherapy treatment: healthcare professionals’ views
Arbaz Kapadi1, David P French1, Gareth Price2,3, Corinne Faivre-Finn2,3, Rebecca Holley2,3, Kate Wicks2,3
1Manchester Centre of Health Psychology, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK; 2The University of Manchester, Division of Cancer Sciences, Radiotherapy Related Research, Manchester, UK; 3The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Wilmslow Road, Withington, Manchester, UK
Correspondence: Arbaz Kapadi (arbaz.kapadi@manchester.ac.uk)
Theme | Theme Summary |
---|---|
1] The alignment of rapid-learning methodologies with the reality of practice
| A rapid-learning approach using RWD can provide timely evidence and help to formalise changes (through an iterative learning process) that are routinely introduced but with little evaluation. The use of RWD further complements the vision to ‘learn from every patient’ offering greater potential for treatment personalisation. |
2] Variability of clinical and RWD
| Concerns around the quality of clinical and RWD extend to data collection (e.g. poor follow-up data), issues over data recording and sharing formats, incompleteness of data reporting (e.g. toxicity and PROM data), and data analysis (time, resource, skill). |
3]The maturity of data and digital infrastructures for rapid-learning
| The need to develop integrative data and digital infrastructures to enable timely access to data and data standardisation. |
4] Support and evidence needed to convince adoption of rapid-learning approaches.
| Support for implementation of rapid-learning includes time and resources for data collection, access to analytical support, and clear surveillance strategy (to increase confidence in the reliability of data). Further method clarification to better understand additional practice demands and provide guidance over critical data points (to minimise risk) when introducing treatment changes. |
O6: A protocol for developing a checklist tool that places intersectional inequalities at the centre of patient and public involvement activities
Patrick Kierkegaard1,2
1CRUK Convergence Science Centre, Imperial College London, London, SW7 2AZ, UK; 2NIHR London In Vitro Diagnostics Cooperative, Imperial College London, W2 1NY, UK
Correspondence: Patrick Kierkegaard (p.kierkegaard@imperial.ac.uk)
P7: Transdisciplinary implementation science for complex futures
Hossai Gul1,3, Stephanie Best2,4, Janet Long3,4, Ellenore Martin4, Lucinda Murray5, Vanessa Fitzgerald6, Frances Rapport3, Mike Field4,5, Jeffrey Braithwaite3,4
1TD School, University of Technology Sydney, Sydney, NSW, 2007, Australia; 2Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, 3010, Australia; 3Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW, 2109, Australia; 4Australian Genomics, Melbourne, VIC, 3051, Australia; 5Hunter New England Local Health District, New Lambton, NSW, 2305, Australia; 6NSW Ministry of Health, St Leonards, NSW, 2065, Australia
Correspondence: Hossai Gul (hossai.gul@uts.edu.au)
P8: Systems science approach to conducting and integrating implementation assessments across multiple settings within complex healthcare systems
Hossai Gul1,3, Stephanie Best2,4, Janet Long3,4, Ellenore Martin4, Lucinda Murray5, Vanessa Fitzgerald6, Frances Rapport3, Mike Field4,5, Jeffrey Braithwaite3,4
1TD School, University of Technology Sydney, Sydney, NSW, 2007, Australia; 2Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, 3010, Australia; 3Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW, 2109, Australia; 4Australian Genomics, Melbourne, VIC, 3051, Australia; 5Hunter New England Local Health District, New Lambton, NSW, 2305, Australia; 6NSW Ministry of Health, St Leonards, NSW, 2065, Australia
Correspondence: Hossai Gul (hossai.gul@uts.edu.au)
P9: The post-implementation scenario: investigating the sustainability of matrix support through professional practices
Ana Laura Salomé Lourencetti1, Carlos Alberto dos Santos Treichel2, Maria Giovana Borges Saidel1, Rosana Teresa Onocko Campos3
¹School of Nursing, State University of Campinas, Campinas-SP, Brazil; ²Department of Maternal Child and Psychiatric Nursing, School of Nursing, University of São Paulo, Brazil; ³Department of Collective Health, School of Medical Sciences, State University of Campinas, Campinas-SP, Brazil
Correspondence: Ana Laura Salomé Lourencetti (laurana.salome@gmail.com)
P10: Qualitative exploration of the views and experiences of making every contact count and within service providers and users within the third and social economy sector: a reflexive thematic analysis of semi-structured interviews
Beth Nichol1, Rob Wilson2, Angela Rodrigues3, Catherine Haighton1
1Department of Social Work, Education, and Community Wellbeing, Northumbria University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK; 2Newcastle Business School, Northumbria University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK; 3Department of Psychology, Northumbria University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
Correspondence: Beth Nichol (bethany.nichol@northumbria.ac.uk)
P11: Implementing change relationships in multi-site youth justice settings- a methodological design
Jacqueline Dwane1, Caitlin Lewis1, Eoin O’Meara Daly1 Sean Redmond1 Alice Coffey2
1Research Evidence into Programmes, Policy and Practice (REPPP), School of Law, Faculty of Arts, Humanities and Social Science, University of Limerick, Ireland; 2Department of Nursing and Midwifery, Faculty of Education and Health Sciences, University of Limerick, Ireland
Correspondence: Jacqueline Dwane (Jacqueline.dwane@ul.ie)
P12: Insights on barriers, facilitators, and lessons learned in the implementation of complex suicide prevention interventions: a systematic review
Sadhvi Krishnamoorthy1, Sharna Mathieu1, Gregory Armstrong2, Victoria Ross1, Jillian Francis3,4,5, Lennart Reifels6, Kairi Kõlves1
1Australian Institute for Suicide Research and Prevention, World Health Organization Collaborating Centre for Research and Training in Suicide Prevention, School of Applied Psychology, Griffith University, Queensland, Australia; 2Nossal Institute for Global Health, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, University of Melbourne, Victoria, Australia; 3School of Health Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Victoria, Australia; 4Department of Health Services Research, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Victoria, Australia; 5Clinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada; 6Centre for Mental Health, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
Correspondence: Sadhvi Krishnamoorthy (sadhvi.krishnamoorthy@griffithuni.edu.au)
P13: Understanding implementation and impact of post-Covid remote monitoring pathways in integrated care systems
Judith Fynn1, Adam Wagner3,6, Lisa Miners3,6, Katherine Cummergen1, Sophie Knight1, Alan Bellinger4, Kevin Minier5, Sarah Rae5, Jennifer Lynch2,6
1Health Innovation East, Unit C, Magog Court, Shelford Bottom, Cambridge, CB22 3AD, UK; 2University of Hertfordshire, Hatfield, Hertfordshire AL10 9AB, UK; 3University of East Anglia, Norwich Research Park, Norwich NR4 7TJ, UK; 4Healthwatch Hertfordshire, Kings Court, London Rd, Stevenage SG1 2NG, UK; 5East of England Citizen’s Senate, Unit C, Magog Court, Shelford Bottom, Cambridge, CB22 3AD, UK; 6NIHR Applied Research Collaboration East of England, Douglas House,18 Trumpington Road, CB2 8AH
Correspondence: Judith Fynn (judith.fynn@eahsn.org)
P14: The connected Yorkshire community health checks programme for cardiovascular disease prevention
Ciaran O’Neill, Zuneera Khurshid, Vishal Sharma, Michael McCooe
Improvement Academy, Bradford Institute for Health Research, Temple Bank House, Duckworth Lane Bradford, BD9 6RJ, UK
Correspondence: Ciaran O’Neill (ciaran.o'neill@bthft.nhs.uk)
P15: Tailoring implementation strategies which target patients in healthcare contexts: protocol for a scoping review sub-study
Laura-Jane McCarthy1, Fiona Riordan1, Jane Murphy1, Nickola Pallin1, Claire Kerins2, Bianca Albers3, Lauren Clack3, Eimear Morrissey4, Geoffrey M. Curran5, Cara C. Lewis6, Byron J. Powell7, Justin Presseau8, Luke Wolfenden9, Sheena M. McHugh1
1School of Public Health, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland; 2Health Promotion, University of Galway, Galway, Ireland; 3Institute for Implementation Science in Health Care, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland; 4School of Psychology, University of Galway, Galway, Ireland; 5Department of Psychiatry, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR, USA; 6Kaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute, 1730 Minor Avenue, Suite 1600, Seattle, WA, 98101, USA; 7Brown School, Washington University in St. Louis, One Brookings Drive, Campus Box 1196, St. Louis, MO, 63130, USA; 8Clinical Epidemiology, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Canada; 9School of Medicine and Public Health, College of Health, Medicine, and Wellbeing, the University of Newcastle, Callaghan, NSW, Australia
Correspondence: Laura-Jane McCarthy (laura-janemccarthy@ucc.ie)
O16: A policy lab to accelerate translation of novel research into policy to improve timely detection and appropriate action in care of women with pre-eclampsia in Sierra Leone
Katy Kuhrt1, Osman Koroma2, Alexandra Ridout1, Francis Smart3, Harriet Boulding4, Andrew Shennan1 on behalf of the NIHR CRIBS Global Maternal Health Group
1Department of Women and Children’s Health, King’s College London, London, UK; 2Welbodi Partnership, Freetown, Sierra Leone; 3Department of Policy, Planning and Information, Ministry of Health and Sanitation, Sierra Leone; 4The Policy Institute, King’s College London, London, UK
Correspondence: Katy Kuhrt (katykuhrt24@gmail.com)
P17: A cross-sectional exploration of the generative mechanisms and potential staff outcomes associated with interprofessional collaboration within the newly established community specialist teams integrating care for older people in Ireland
Apolonia Radomska1, Dr Deirdre O’Donnell1, Helen Whitty2, Catherine Devaney2, Dr Emer Ahern2, Dr PJ Harnett2
1School of Nursing, Midwifery and Health Systems, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland; 2National Clinical Programme for Older People (NCPOP), Dublin, Ireland
Correspondence: Apolonia Radomska (apoloniaradomska1@ucd.ie)
P18: Addressing physical healthcare in mental health settings: implementation and evaluation of two novel interventions
Raymond McGrath1, Julie Williams2, Gracie Tredget1, Amy Ronaldson3, Jorge Arias de la Torre3, Isabel McMullen1, Prashanth Reddy4, George Gillett1, Theo Boardman-Pretty1, Nick Sevdalis2, Fiona Gaughran5, Ioannis Bakolis3, Zarnie Khadjesari6, Euan Sadler7
1South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust, London, SE5 8AZ, UK; 2Centre for Implementation Science, King’s College London, London, SE5 8AF, UK; 3Department of Biostatistics and Health Informatics, King’s College London, London, SE5 8AF, UK; 4King’s College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Denmark Hill, London, SE5 9RS, UK; 5Psychosis Studies, King's College London, London, SE5 8AF, UK; 6Behavioural and Implementation Science (BIS) research group, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK; 7Department of Nursing, Midwifery and Health, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
Correspondence: Raymond McGrath (raymond.mcgrath@slam.nhs.uk)
O19: Acceptability of the CONNECTS-Food resource: supporting primary schools in implementing a systems-based whole school approach to food
Wendy Burton1, Jayne V. Woodside 2, Harry Rutter3, Amir M. Sharif4, Charlotte E.L. Evans5, Suzanne Spence6, Sara Ahern7, Niamh O’ Kane2, Maria Bryant1,8, Tim Baker9
1Department of Health Sciences, University of York, Heslington, York, YO10 5DD, UK; 2Centre for Public Health, Queens University Belfast, University Rd, Belfast, BT7 1NN,UK; 3Department of Social & Policy Sciences, University of Bath, Claverton Down, Bath, BA2 7AY, UK; 4Faculty of Management, Law and Social Sciences, University of Bradford, Richmond Road, Bradford, BD7 1DP, UK; 5School of Food Science and Nutrition, University of Leeds, Woodhouse, Leeds, LS2 9JT, UK; 6Population Health Sciences Institute, University of Newcastle, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE1 7RU, UK; 7Better Start Innovation Hub, Bradford Institute of Health Research, Bradford Royal Infirmary, Duckworth Lane, Bradford, BD9 6RJ, UK; 8Hull York Medical School, Heslington, York, YO10 5DD, UK; 9Independent Consultant, London, UK
Correspondence: Wendy Burton (wendy.burton@york.ac.uk)
O20: A theory of change of a quality improvement training programme at a large London hospital
Katie L. Richards1, Manuela Russo1, Barbora Krausova1, Kathryn Watson1, Lorraine Catt2, Alister Notridge2, Rachel Olive1, Kia-Chong Chua1, Lucy Goulding1, Andrea Cortes2, Nick Sevdalis1,3
1King’s Improvement Science, Centre for Implementation Science, Health Service and Population Research Department, King’s College London, London, UK; 2Quality Improvement Team, King’s College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK; 3Centre for Behavioural and Implementation Science Interventions, National University of Singapore, Singapore
Correspondence: Katie L. Richards (katie.1.richards@kcl.ac.uk)
O21: Improving comprehensive care: insights from a mixed method survey following the introduction of Australian comprehensive care standard
Beibei Xiong1, Paul Prudon1, Daniel X. Bailey1, Christine Stirling2, Melinda Martin-Khan1,3,4
1Centre for Health Services Research, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, 4102, Australia; 2School of Nursing, University of Tasmania, Hobart, Tasmania, 7000, Australia; 3Department of Health and Life Sciences, University of Exeter, Exeter, England, EX1 2HZ, United Kingdom; 4School of Nursing, University of Northern British Columbia, Prince George, British Columbia, V2N 4Z9, Canada
Correspondence: Beibei Xiong (Beibei.Xiong@uq.edu.au)
P22: Scale-up of a novel vital signs alert device to improve maternity care in Sierra Leone: a mixed methods evaluation of device repair and maintenance
Charlotte Greene1, Alice Pearson1, Alex Rideout1, Katy Kuhurt1, Daniel Gassim Kay Jah2, Francis Momoh3, Professor Andrew Shennan1
1Department of Women and Children’s Health, King’s College London, London, UK; 2Welbodi Partnership, Freetown, Sierra Leone; 3Princess Christian Maternity Hospital, Ministry of Health and Sanitation, Freetown, Sierra Leone
Correspondence: Charlotte Greene (pearson.alice1@gmail.com)
P24: Challenges for oral health promotion in the school health program in Brazil: a literature review informed by the CFIR framework
Victoria Almeida Oliveira Furtunato1, Carlos Alberto dos Santos Treichel2
1Department of Collective Health, School of Medical Sciences, State University of Campinas, Campinas-SP, Brazil; ²Department of Maternal-Child and Psychiatric Nursing, School of Nursing, University of São Paulo, São Paulo-SP, Brazil
Correspondence: Carlos Alberto dos Santos Treichel (treichel@usp.com)
O25: Exploring processes for implementing palliative care in intensive using normalisation process theory
Stephanie A Meddick-Dyson1, Jason W Boland1, Andrew Bradshaw2, Mark Pearson1, Fliss E M Murtagh1
1Wolfson Palliative Care Research Centre, Hull York Medical School, University of Hull, UK; 2Cicely Saunders Institute, Kings College London, London, England, United Kingdom
Correspondence: Stephanie A Meddick-Dyson (stephanie.meddick-dyson@nhs.net)
P26: Palliative care implementation in the intensive care unit: using the implementation research logic model as a framework for systematic review and synthesis
Stephanie A Meddick‐Dyson1, Jason W Boland1, Mark Pearson1, Sarah Greenley2, Rutendo Gambe1, John R Budding1, Fliss E M Murtagh1
1Wolfson Palliative Care Research Centre, Hull York Medical School, University of Hull, Hull HU6 7RX, UK; 2Cancer Awareness, Screening and Diagnostic Pathways Research Group (CASP), Hull York Medical School, University of Hull, Hull, UK
Correspondence: Stephanie A Meddick‐Dyson (stephanie.meddick-dyson@nhs.net)
P27: De-implementing low value practices in mental health care
Qandeel Shah, Rebecca Lawton, Sarah Alderson, Ed Breckin
School of Psychology, University of Leeds, University Rd, Leeds, LS2 9JT, UK
Correspondence: Qandeel Shah (ll14qs@leeds.ac.uk)
O29: Physical healthcare in community mental health services for adults with Serious Mental Illness (SMI): implementing recommendations using the knowledge-to-action framework
Gracie Tredget1, Julie Williams2, Ray McGrath1, Nick Sevdalis2, Fiona Gaughran3, Ioannis Bakolis4, Euan Sadler5
1South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust, London, SE5 8AZ, UK; 2Centre for Implementation Science, King’s College London, London, SE5 8AF, UK; 3Psychosis Studies, King’s College London, London, SE5 8AF, UK; 4Department of Biostatistics and Health Informatics, King’s College London, London, SE5 8AF, UK; 5Department of Nursing, Midwifery and Health, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
Correspondence: Gracie Tredget (gracie.tredget@slam.nhs.uk)
P30: Development of a video-based evidence synthesis knowledge translation resource: drawing on a user-centred design approach
Cristian Deliv1, Declan Devane2,3, El Putnam4, Patricia Healy2,3, Amanda Hall5, Sarah Rosenbaum6, Elaine Toomey2,3
1School of Medicine, University of Galway, Galway, Ireland; 2Cochrane Ireland and Evidence Synthesis Ireland, University of Galway, Galway, Ireland; 3School of Nursing and Midwifery, University of Galway, Galway, Ireland; 4School of English and Creative Arts, University of Galway, Galway, Ireland; 5Primary Healthcare Research Unit, Faculty of Medicine, Memorial University, Newfoundland, Canada; 6Centre for Informed Health Choices, Norwegian Institute of Public Health, Oslo, Norway
Correspondence: Elaine Toomey (Elaine.toomey@universityofgalway.ie)
O31: Trusting relationships and implementation outcomes: findings from a trust-building intervention to support scale-up of an evidence-based program in child welfare
Allison Metz1, Todd Jensen1, Amanda Farley1, Annette Boaz2, Lacy Dicharry3
1School of Social Work, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, USA; 2London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK; 3Lacy Dicharry Consulting, Baton Rouge, Louisiana, USA
Correspondence: Allison Metz (allison.metz@unc.edu)
P32: Views and experiences of mental health services implementation stakeholders in Ukraine after the onset of the current full-scale war
Alyona Mazhnaya1, Beth McGinty2, Sergiy Bogdanov3
1School of Public Health, National University of Kyiv-Mohyla academy, Kyiv, 04655, Ukraine; 2Population of Health Sciences, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, 10065, USA; 3Centre for Mental Health and Psychosocial Support, National University of Kyiv-Mohyla academy, Kyiv, 04655, Ukraine
Correspondence: Alyona Mazhnaya (a.mazhnaia@ukma.edu.ua)
O33: A co-produced web-based implementation toolkit to facilitate adaptive implementation in health and social care
Cindy Brooks1,2, Susi Lund2, David Kryl1,3, Michelle Myall1,2
1NIHR ARC Wessex, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK; 2School of Health Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK; 3Wessex Academic Health Science Network, Southampton Science Park, Hampshire, UK
Correspondence: Cindy Brooks (C.F.Brooks@soton.ac.uk)
P34: Navigating uncertainty in the implementation of a compassionate care initiative in a NHS mental health setting during Covid-19: findings from a case study with implications for sustainability
Cindy Brooks1,2, Jackie Bridges1,2, Jane Frankland1,2, Michelle Myall1,2
1NIHR ARC Wessex, University of Southampton; 2School of Health Sciences, University of Southampton
Correspondence: Cindy Brooks (C.F.Brooks@soton.ac.uk)
P35: Content validity indexes assigned to the Brazilian version of the ImpRes-tool: a tool to improve the quality of implementation projects and research
Carlos Alberto dos Santos Treichel1, Leidy Janeth Erazo Chavez2, Louise Hull3, Rosana Teresa Onocko Campos2
¹Department of Maternal-Child and Psychiatric Nursing, School of Nursing, University of São Paulo, São Paulo-SP, Brazil; 2Department of Collective Health, School of Medical Sciences, State University of Campinas, Campinas-SP, Brazil; 3Centre for Implementation Science, Health Service and Population Research Department, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King’s College London, London, UK
Correspondence: Carlos Alberto dos Santos Treichel (treichelcarlos@gmail.com)
O36: How do teams tailor improvements in diabetes care: preliminary findings from a process evaluation study
Elaine O’Halloran, Melissa Girling, Michael Sykes, Tracy Finch (on behalf of the EQUIPD team)
Department of Nursing, Midwifery & Health, Northumbria University, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE7 7XA, UK
Correspondence: Elaine O’Halloran (elaine.ohalloran@northumbria.ac.uk)
O37: Hearing for all: design and delivery of a sustainable auditory implant programme
Andile L Sibiya1,2, Ayanda Gina3, Bianca Birdsey4, Zandile Shezi3
1Discipline of Otorhinolaryngology, School of Clinical Medicine, College of Health Sciences, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Durban, South Africa; 2Department of Health, KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa; 3Discipline of Audiology, School of Health Sciences, College of Health Sciences, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Durban, South Africa; 4THRIVE Parent Support & Advocacy Group, South Africa
Correspondence: Andile L Sibiya (sibiyaL1@ukzn.ac.za)
O38: Implementation of the ‘Continuity of Care’ concept through team-based care: lessons learned
Chirk Jenn Ng1,2, Swetha S Kumar1, Prawira Oka1,2, Loke Chui Yee1, Ng Lok Pui1
1SingHealth Polyclinics, Singapore 150167; 2Duke-NUS Medical school, Singapore 169857
Correspondence: Chirk Jenn Ng (ng.chirk.jenn@singhealth.com.sg)
O39: Process evaluation of the implementation of the ‘Health Pals’ concept in delivering preventive care: a qualitative study
Swetha S Kumar1, Prawira Oka1,2, Ng Lok Pui1, Loke Chui Yee1, Ng Chirk Jenn1,2
1SingHealth Polyclinics, Singapore 150167; 2Duke-NUS Medical school, Singapore 169857
Correspondence: Swetha S Kumar (saravana.kumar.swetha@singhealth.com.sg)
O40: Facilitating the implementation of unscheduled care coordination hubs using tests of change and a rapid, relevant and responsive approach to evaluation
Kristian Hudson1, Zuneera Khurshid2
1The Yorkshire Humber Applied Research Collaboration, Bradford Institute for Health Research, Temple Bank House, Bradford Royal Infirmary, BD9 6RJ, UK; 2The Improvement Academy, Bradford Institute for Health Research, Temple Bank House, Bradford Royal Infirmary, BD9 6RJ, UK
Correspondence: Kristian Hudson (kristian.hudson@yhia.nhs.uk)
O41: Using the Exploration, Preparation, Implementation, Sustainment (EPIS) framework to adapt a sexual and reproductive health intervention for Latina teens and female caregivers
Katherine G. Merrill1, Jacqueline Silva1, Jacqueline Fuentes1, Angela Sedeño2, Susana Salgado3, Sara Vargas2, Jennifer Cano3, Veronica Nabor3, Jamison Merrill4, Jeff DeCelles5, Kate Guastaferro6, Geri Donenberg1
1Center for Dissemination and Implementation Science, University of Illinois, Chicago, USA; 2The Kedzie Center, Chicago, USA; 3Centro Romero, Chicago, USA; 4School of Public Health, University of Illinois Chicago, Chicago, USA; 5Grassroot Soccer, Norwich, USA; 6New York University, New York. USA
Correspondence: Katherine G. Merrill (kgm@uic.edu)
P43: Stakeholder’s experiences of tailoring implementation of the DAFNE structured education programme for type 1 diabetes
Jane Murphy1, Fiona Riordan1, Claire Kerins2, Laura-Jane McCarthy1, Luke Wolfenden3, Sheena M. McHugh1
1School of Public Health, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland; 2Health Promotion, University of Galway, Galway, Ireland; 3School of Medicine and Public Health, College of Health, Medicine, and Wellbeing, the University of Newcastle, Callaghan, NSW, Australia
Correspondence: Fiona Riordan (fiona.riordan@ucc.ie)
P44: Supporting vulnerable families online – exploring the experiences of service users and practitioners and the development of a best practice framework to support the implementation of digital social care services
Gráinne Hickey, Niamh McCarthy, Lauren Maguire, Siobhan Greene
Barnardos Ireland, Christchurch Square, Dublin 8, D08 DT63, Ireland
Correspondence: Gráinne Hickey (grainne.hickey@barnardos.ie)
P45: Applying an implementation science lens to Ireland’s national care experience programme
Lisa Ann Kennedy1, Conor Foley2, Tracy O’Carroll1, Rachel Flynn2
1Health information and Quality Authority, George’s Court, George’s Lane, Dublin 7, D07 E98Y, Ireland; 2Health information and Quality Authority, Unit 1301, City Gate, Mahon, Cork, T12 Y2XT, Ireland
Correspondence: Lisa Ann Kennedy (lakennedy@hiqa.ie)
P46: Using Geographic Information System (GIS) to understand service user’s patterns of accessing primary healthcare facilities in Goa, India
Luanna Fernandes1, Bijayalaxmi Biswal1, Shanu Usgaokar1, Yashi Gandhi1, Urvita Bhatia1, Abhijit Nadkarni1,2, Chris Grundy3
1Addictions and related-Research Group, Sangath, Goa, India; 2Department of Population Health, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK; 3Department of Social and Environmental Health Research, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK
Correspondence: Luanna Fernandes (luanna.fernandes@sangath.in)
O47: Tailored strategies to address determinants of practice: a systematic review protocol
Sheena M. McHugh1, Fiona Riordan1, Jane Murphy1, Laura-Jane McCarthy1, Claire Kerins2, Eimear Morrissey3, Danielle Adams4, Siobhan O’Connor5, Éilis J. O’Reilly1, Rosemary Meza6, Cara C. Lewis7, Byron J. Powell4,8,9, Michel Wensing10, Signe Flottorp11, Luke Wolfenden12
1School of Public Health, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland; 2Health Promotion Research Centre, University of Galway, Galway, Ireland; 3School of Psychology & School of Medicine, University of Galway, Galway, Ireland; 4Center for Mental Health Services Research, Brown School of Social Work and Public Health, Washington University in St. Louis, St Louis, USA; 5Division of Nursing, Midwifery and Social Work, School of Health Sciences, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK; 6Kaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute, Seattle, Washington, USA; 7NHLBI's Center for Translation Research and Implementation Science (CTRIS), Maryland, USA; 8Division of Infectious Diseases, John T. Milliken Department of Medicine, Washington University School of Medicine, Washington University in St. Louis, St Louis, USA; 9Center for Dissemination and Implementation, Institute for Public Health, Washington University in St. Louis, St Louis, USA; 10Dept. of General Practice and Health Services Research, University Hospital Heidelberg, Germany; 11Norwegian Institute of Public Health, Oslo, Norway; 12School of Medicine and Public Health, College of Health, Medicine, and Wellbeing, the University of Newcastle, Newcastle, UK
Correspondence: Fiona Riordan (fiona.riordan@ucc.ie)
O48: Implementation-minded policy making: an evidence synthesis
Jane Lewis1, Anne-Marie Baan1, Emma Wills1, Amy Lloyd2, Dan Bristow2
1Centre for Evidence and Implementation, London, England, UK; 2Wales Centre for Public Policy, Cardiff, Wales, UK
Correspondence: Jane Lewis (Jane.lewis@ceiglobal.org)
P49: Implementing a new ‘Test, Evidence, Transition’ programme to accelerate the effective and equitable adoption of cancer pathway innovations
Luke Weaver1, Alexandra Feast1, Brian Knowles1, Natalie Masento1, Naser Turabi2, Kate Hamilton-West1
1Social and Behavioural Research, Cancer Research UK, London, E20 1JQ, United Kingdom; 2Evidence & Implementation, Cancer Research UK, London, E20 1JQ, United Kingdom
Correspondence: Luke Weaver (luke.weaver@cancer.org.uk)
P50: What is needed to implement self-management support (SMS) in cancer care delivery? A qualitative study of SMS implementation in Ireland
Nickola Pallin1, Sheena McHugh1, Roisin Connolly2, Josephine Hegarty3, John Browne1
1School of Public Health, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland; 2Cancer Research @UCC, College of Medicine and Health, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland; 3School of Nursing and Midwifery, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland
Correspondence: Nickola Pallin (npallin@ucc.ie)
P51: Exploring outcomes from a novel shared professional training and wrap around support package on sustaining complex intervention fidelity: lessons from LISTEN
Fiona J. Leggat¹, Nick Sevdalis², Fiona Jones¹,³
¹Population Health Research Institute, St George’s, University of London, London, England, UK; ² Centre for Behavioural and Implementation Science Interventions, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore; ³ Centre for Applied Health and Social Care Research, Faculty of Health, Social Care and Education, Kingston University, London, England, UK
Correspondence: Fiona J. Leggat (fleggat@sgul.ac.uk)
O52: Evaluation of implementation of the GLA:D® Ireland programme for hip and knee osteoarthritis across public and private healthcare settings in the first year
Clodagh M. Toomey1,2,3, Avantika Bhardwaj1,2, Norelee Kennedy1,2, Anne MacFarlane3,4
1School of Allied Health, University of Limerick, Limerick, Ireland V94 T9PX; 2Health Research Institute, University of Limerick, Limerick, Ireland V94 T9PX; 3Public and Patient Involvement Research Unit, University of Limerick, Limerick, Ireland V94 T9PX; 4School of Medicine, University of Limerick, Limerick, Ireland V94 T9PX
Correspondence: Clodagh M. Toomey (Clodagh.toomey@ul.ie)
Implementation Outcome | Method and Result |
---|---|
Adoption | 23/71 (32%) of trained physiotherapists implemented at least one programme across 15 distinct sites (n=10 primary care, n=2 public hospital, n=3 private practice) across all four provinces in Ireland (n=6 Munster, n=4 Connacht, n=3 Leinster, n=2 Ulster). |
Acceptability | Acceptability of intervention measure (AIM) – completed by physiotherapists following training, with maximum score of five. Mean 4.7 (Standard Deviation (SD) 0.5), range 4-5 |
Appropriateness | Intervention appropriateness measure (IAM) – completed by physiotherapists following training, with maximum score of five. Mean 4.5 (SD 0.5), range 3-5 |
Feasibility | Feasibility of intervention measure (FIM) – completed by physiotherapists following training, with maximum score of five. Mean 4.1 (SD 0.6), range 3-5 |
Penetration | No. patients screened n=130 (47% primary care, 35% public hospital, 18% private practice) No. patients refused consent to share data n=2 No. patients completed baseline questionnaires n=94 (72%) No. patients completed follow-up questionnaires n=51 (39%) Referral sources – GP referral (n=50) Advanced practice physiotherapist referral (n=23), Orthopaedic consultant referral (n=22) Other healthcare professional (n=20) Clinic waitlist (n=12), Patient self-referral (n=3) |
O53: A process evaluation of a quality improvement collaborative (QIC) to improve the uptake of insulin pumps for people with type 1 diabetes (EQUIPD Study)
Melissa Girling, Elaine O’ Halloran, Michael Sykes, Tracy Finch (on behalf of the EQUIPD team)
Department of Nursing, Midwifery & Health, Northumbria University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
Correspondence: Melissa Girling (melissa.girling@northumbria.ac.uk)
O54: Using logic models to advance the implementation of complex genomics sequencing within a complex care pathway
Joseph Elias1, Rona Weerasuriya2,3, Melissa Martyn3,4,5, Sophie O’Haire6, Kortnye Smith6, Clara Gaff3,4,5, Natalie Taylor1
1School of Population Health, UNSW, Sydney, NSW, Australia; 2The Burnet Institute, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia; 3Murdoch Children’s Research Institute, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia; 4Melbourne Genomics Health Alliance, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia; 5Department of Paediatrics, University of Melbourne, Victoria, Australia; 6Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
Correspondence: Joseph Elias (Joseph.Elias1@unsw.edu.au)
P55: Barriers and enablers to participating in self-management support among those living with and beyond cancer: a qualitative study informed by the TDF and COM-B
Nickola Pallin1, Sheena McHugh1, Roisin Connolly2, John Browne1
1School of Public Health, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland; 2Cancer Research @UCC, College of Medicine and Health, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland
Correspondence: Nickola Pallin (npallin@ucc.ie)
O56: Implementation of a national programme for people presenting to emergency departments with self-harm and suicide-related ideation: a qualitative study of implementation determinants
Selena O’Connell1,2, Grace Cully,1,2, Sheena McHugh1, Margaret Maxwell3, Anne Jeffers4, Katerina Kavalidou2,4, Sally Lovejoy4, Eve Griffin1,2
1School of Public Health, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland; 2National Suicide Research Foundation, Cork, Ireland; 3NMAHP Research Unit, University of Stirling, Stirling, UK; 4Health Service Executive, Dublin, Ireland
Correspondence: Selena O’Connell (Selena.oconnell@ucc.ie)
O57: The evaluation and adaptation of the KwaZulu-Natal Auditory Implant Programme(KZN-AIP), South Africa
Zandile Shezi1, Andile L. Sibiya2, Ayanda Gina3
1Discipline of Audiology, School of Health Sciences, College of Health Sciences, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Durban, South Africa; 2Discipline of Otorhinolaryngology, School of Clinical Medicine, College of Health Sciences, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Durban, South Africa; 3Discipline of Audiology, School of Health Sciences, College of Health Sciences, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Durban, South Africa
Correspondence: Zandile Shezi (blosez@ukzn.ac.za)
P58: Perceived sustainability of a community paramedicine model to reduce acute care utilization: a case study in two settings
Jennifer L. Ridgeway1, Olivia A. Smith1, Michelle A. Lampman1, Terri Menser1, Rozalina G. McCoy1,2,3
1Division of Health Care Delivery Research, Robert D. and Patricia E. Kern Center for the Science of Health Care Delivery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA; 2Division of Community Internal Medicine, Geriatrics, and Palliative Care, Department of Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, 55905, USA; 3Community Paramedic Service, Mayo Clinic Ambulance, Rochester, Minnesota, 55905, USA
Correspondence: Jennifer L. Ridgeway (ridgeway.jennifer@mayo.edu)
Domain | Community paramedics (n=7) | Clinicians and members of the care team (n=50) | Administrators (n=6) | All respondents |
---|---|---|---|---|
Mean (SD) | Mean (SD) | Mean (SD) | Mean (SD) | |
Organizational Readiness
|
4.45 (1.15)
|
5.22 (0.96)
|
4.97 (1.04)
|
5.11 (0.99)
|
Organizational systems are in place to support the various needs of the CACP program
| 3.25 (1.26) | 5.05 (1.25) | 5.17 (1.94) | 4.91 (1.41) |
The CACP program fits in well with the culture of the team
| 6.00 (0.82) | 6.36 (0.84) | 6.50 (0.55) | 6.35 (0.81) |
The CACP program has feasible and sufficient resources (e.g., time, space, funding) to achieve its goals
| 4.00 (1.63) | 4.74 (1.51) | 3.67 (1.21) | 4.51 (1.50) |
The CACP program has adequate staff to achieve its goals
| 4.50 (1.00) | 4.59 (1.32) | 3.67 (1.22) | 4.45 (1.29) |
The CACP program is well integrated into the operations of the organization
| 4.50 (2.65) | 5.11 (1.49) | 5.83 (0.98) | 5.15 (1.49) |
Workflow Integration
|
5.30 (0.71)
|
5.70 (0.93)
|
5.52 (1.03)
|
5.66 (0.93)
|
The CACP program is built into the clinical workflow
| 4.50 (1.00) | 4.89 (1.49) | 5.00 (1.41) | 4.87 (1.42) |
The CACP program is easy for clinicians to use
| 4.00 (0.82) | 5.68 (1.33) | 6.00 (1.23) | 5.57 (1.36) |
The CACP program integrates well with established clinical practices
| 5.25 (1.71) | 5.92 (1.04) | 5.67 (1.37) | 5.83 (1.13) |
The CACP program aligns well with other clinical systems (e.g., electronic health record)
| 5.25 (1.71) | 6.11 (0.99) | 5.67 (1.86) | 5.98 (1.19) |
The CACP program is designed to be used consistently
| 4.75 (1.71) | 5.68 (1.27) | 5.50 (0.84) | 5.57 (1.26) |
Outcomes & Effectiveness
|
4.35 (1.10)
|
6.18 (0.88)
|
5.56 (1.25)
|
5.91 (1.09)
|
The practice has evidence of beneficial outcomes
| 5.00 (0.00) | 6.21 (1.08) | 5.67 (1.75) | 6.02 (1.19) |
The practice is associated with improvement in patient outcomes that are clinically meaningful
| 4.75 (0.50) | 6.27 (0.90) | 6.50 (0.84) | 6.17 (0.96) |
The practice is clearly linked to positive health or clinical outcomes
| 4.00 (1.16) | 6.11 (0.94) | 6.33 (1.21) | 5.96 (1.14) |
The practice is cost-effective
| 4.00 (1.83) | 6.00 (1.12) | 5.00 (1.55) | 5.67 (1.38) |
The practice has clear advantages over alternatives
| 4.00 (2.31) | 6.43 (0.73) | 4.60 (1.14) | 6.02 (1.27) |
Overall Mean by Group
|
4.30
|
5.64
|
5.42
|
5.49
|
O59: Developing an intervention and implementation strategy to improve delivery of evidence based care for knee pain attributed to degenerative meniscal tears in the primary care setting
Helen O’Leary1, Elaine Toomey2, Karen McCreesh1
1School of Allied Health, University of Limerick, Limerick, Ireland; 2School of Psychology, National University of Ireland, Galway, Ireland
Correspondence: Helen O’Leary (helen.oleary@ul.ie)
P61: Implementing a web-based application for men’s health screening in a primary care setting during the Covid-19 pandemic: a mixed-methods pilot study
Chor Yau Ooi1,2, Chirk Jenn Ng3, Anne E. Sales4, Chin Hai Teo1
1Department of Primary Care Medicine, University of Malaya, 50603, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia; 2Department of Family Medicine, Universiti Malaysia Sarawak, 94300, Kota Samarahan, Malaysia; 3Duke-NUS Medical School, 8 College Rd, Singapore 169857; 4Sinclair School of Nursing and Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO 65211, USA
Correspondence: Chor Yau Ooi (cyooi@unimas.my)
P62: Developing a theory of change for implementing the novel UK Children’s Palliative care Outcome Scale (C-POS:UK) into routine paediatric palliative care
Hannah M Scott1, Debbie Braybrook1, Daney Harðardóttir1, Inez Gaczkowska1, Clare Ellis-Smith1, Lorna K Fraser1, Fliss EM Murtagh2, Richard Harding1, on behalf of C-POS
1Florence Nightingale Faculty of Nursing Midwifery and Palliative Care, Cicely Saunders Institute, King’s College London, London, SE59PJ, United Kingdom; 2Hull York Medical School, Wolfson Palliative Care Research Centre, Hull, HU6 7RX, United Kingdom
Correspondence: Hannah M Scott (hannah.m.scott@kcl.ac.uk)
O63: An approach for developing a tailored implementation intervention to implement a web-based application for men’s health screening in a primary care setting during the Covid-19 pandemic
Chor Yau Ooi1,2, Chirk Jenn Ng3, Anne E. Sales4, Chin Hai Teo1
1Department of Primary Care Medicine, University of Malaya, 50603, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia; 2Department of Family Medicine, University Malaysia Sarawak, 94300, Kota Samarahan, Malaysia; 3Duke-NUS Medical School, 8 College Rd, Singapore 169857; 4Sinclair School of Nursing and Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO 65211, USA
Correspondence: Chor Yau Ooi (cyooi@unimas.my)
O64: Scaling -up a virtual culturally tailored diabetes self-management programme for African and Caribbean communities (HEAL-D Online) across NHS regions in England: a qualitative study using the EPIS framework
Sophie Lowry1, Joseph T S Low1, Louise Goff2, Sally Irwin1, Oliver Brady1, Natasha Curran1, Nick Sevdalis3, Andrew Walker1
1Health Innovation Network, London, UK; 2Department of Health Sciences, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK; 3Centre for Behavioural and Implementation Science Interventions, National University of Singapore, Singapore
Correspondence: Sophie Lowry (Sophie.lowry2@nhs.net)
P65: HEAL-D online – is it feasible to implement a virtual culturally tailored diabetes self-management programme for African and Caribbean communities in south London
Joseph T S Low1, Sophie Lowry1, Louise Goff2, Sally Irwin1, Oliver Brady1, Natasha Curran1, Nick Sevdalis3, Andrew Walker1
1Health Innovation Network, London, UK; 2Department of Health Sciences, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK; 3Centre for Behavioural and Implementation Science Interventions, National University of Singapore, Singapore
Correspondence: Joseph T S Low (joseph.low1@nhs.net)
P66: A qualitative analysis of experiences, enablers and barriers to implementing nationally endorsed health and social care standards in Ireland
Yvonne Kelly1, Niamh O’Rourke2, Rachel Flynn1, Josephine Hegarty3, Laura M Keyes1
1Health Information and Standards Directorate, Health Information and Quality Authority, Unit 1301, Citygate, Mahon, Cork, T12 Y2XT, Ireland; 2Health Information and Standards Directorate, Health Information and Quality Authority, George's Court, George's Lane, Dublin 7, D07 E98Y, Ireland; 3Catherine McAuley School of Nursing and Midwifery, Brookfield Health Sciences Complex, University College Cork, College Road Cork, T12 AK54, Ireland
Correspondence: Yvonne Kelly (ykelly@hiqa.ie)
O67: Pathfinding, peace-making, power, and passion: exploring the lived experience of facilitation during implementation of Canada’s mental health recovery guidelines
Myra Piat1, Marie-Pier Rivest2, Ian Graham3, Helene Albert2, Lucy Melville4, Megan Wainwright5, Eleni Sofouli6, Kanwar Singh6, Stephanie Vasko7
1Department of Psychiatry, McGill University, Montreal, Canada; 2Douglas Mental Health University Institute, Montreal, Canada; 3Social Work Department, Université de Moncton, Moncton, Canada; 4School of Epidemiology & Public Health, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada; 5Bangor University, Wales, UK; 6Durham University, Durham, UK; 7York University, Toronto, Canada
Correspondence: Lucy Melville (l.melville-richards@bangor.ac.uk)
O68: Minding the gap: the importance of active facilitation in moving boundary objects from in-theory to in-use as a tool for knowledge mobilisation
Shaima M. Hassan1,2, Lucy Melville-Richards3, Adele Ring1,2, Jane Cloke1,2, Sandra Smith2, Pooja Saini4, Mark Goodall1,2, Ana Porroche-Escudero5, Jennie Popay5, Mark Gabbay1,2
1Institute of Population Health Sciences, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK; 2NIHR Applied Research Collaboration ARC NWC, Liverpool, UK; cSchool of Health Science, Bangor University, UK; 4Department of Psychology, Faculty of Health, Liverpool John Moores University, UK; 5Lancaster university, Lancaster, UK
Correspondence: Jane Cloke (jcloke@liverpool.ac.uk)
O69: The Mental Health Care in Primary healthcare project (SMAPS) implementation assessment research: Stakeholders analysis protocol
llana Eshriqui1,2, Luciana Cordeiro1,2, Ana Alice Freire de Sousa1,2, Daiana Bonfim1,2, Letícia Yamawaka de Almeida1,2
1Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein, São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil; 2Albert Einstein Center for Studies Research and Practice in PHC (CEPPAR), São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
Correspondence: llana Eshriqui (ilana.eoliveira@einstein.br)
P70: Using the consolidated framework of implementation research and implementation outcomes to develop interview scripts: methodological insights from the Mental Health in Primary Health Care project (SMAPS) implementation assessment research
llana Eshriqui1,2, Luciana Cordeiro1,2, Ana Alice Freire de Sousa1,2, Daiana Bonfim1,2, Letícia Yamawaka de Almeida1,2
1Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein, São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil; 2Albert Einstein Center for Studies Research and Practice in PHC (CEPPAR), São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
Correspondence: llana Eshriqui (ilana.eoliveira@einstein.br)
P71: Design and implementation of an online older person/student nurse intergenerational café using CFIR
Dympna Tuohy1, Irene Cassidy1, Eileen Carey1, Margaret Graham1, Jan McCarthy1, Kellie Morrissey2, Jill Murphy1, Jacinta Shanahan3, Teresa Tuohy1
1Department of Nursing and Midwifery, University of Limerick, Limerick, Ireland; 2School of Design, University of Limerick, Limerick, Ireland; 3Office of the President, University of Limerick, Limerick, Ireland
Correspondence: Dympna Tuohy (dympna.tuohy@ul.ie)
O73: Exploring MECC implementation within the North East and North Cumbria region (NENC) in England
Angela Rodrigues1, Bethany Nichol2, Rob Wilson3, Caroline Charlton1, Beckie Gibson1, Tracy Finch4, Catherine Haighton2, Gregory Maniatopoulos5, Emma L. Giles6, Deborah Harrison7, Denise Orange8, Craig Robson9, Jill Harland9
1Department of Psychology, Northumbria University, Northumberland Building, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE1 8ST, UK; 2Department of Social Work, Education and Community Wellbeing, Northumbria University, Coach Lane Campus West, Newcastle Upon Tyne, NE7 7XA; 3Newcastle Business School, Northumbria University, Newcastle-upon-Tyne, NE1 8ST, UK; 4Department of Nursing, Midwifery and Health, Northumbria University; 5University of Leicester School of Business, University of Leicester, Leicester, United Kingdom; 6Teesside University, School of Health and Life Sciences, Middlesborough, TS1 3BX, UK; 7Newcastle University Business School, Newcastle University, Newcastle Upon Tyne, NE1 4AX, UK; 8Office for Health Improvement & Disparities, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE15 8NY, UK; 9Northumbria Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust, North Tyneside General Hospital, NE29 8NH, UK
Correspondence: Angela Rodrigues (angela.rodrigues@northumbria.ac.uk)
P74: The application of logic models and theories of change to inform healthcare policy: a scoping review
Maria VM Karadimova-Watts1, Andy Bradshaw2, Katherine Sleeman2
1GKT School of Medical Education, King’s College London, London, SE1 1UL, UK; 2Cicely Saunders Institute of Palliative Care, Policy & Rehabilitation, King’s College London, London, SE5 9RS, UK
Correspondence: Maria VM Karadimova-Watts (maria.karadimova-watts@kcl.ac.uk)
O75: Scaling out: spreading the delivery of an advance care planning digital intervention from nursing homes to community care
Kevin Brazil1, Roisin O’Neill1, Olivia Jamison1, Alice Coffey2, Julie Doherty1, Owen Doody2, Anne Finucane3, Julie Green4, Karen Harrison Dening5, Gary Mitchell1, Nancy Preston6
1School of Nursing and Midwifery, Queen’s University Belfast, County Antrim, BT9 7BL, Northern Ireland, UK; 2Department of Nursing Studies and Midwifery, University of Limerick, County Limerick, Ireland; 3School of Health and Social Science, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, EH8 9AG, Scotland, UK; 4School of Nursing and Midwifery, Keele University, Staffordshire, ST5 5BG, England, UK; 5School of Nursing and Midwifery De Montford University, Leicester, LE1 9BH, England, UK; 6Department of Health Research, Lancaster University, Lancaster, LA1 4YG, England, UK
Correspondence: Kevin Brazil (k.brazil@qub.ac.uk)
P76: Access to healthcare in Covid-19: evidence from a specialist acute service
Rona Inniss1,2, Natalie Smith1, Susie M.D. Henley1
1Neurofibromatosis Centre, Guy's Hospital, London, SE1 9RT, UK; 2Florence Nightingale Faculty of Nursing, Midwifery & Palliative Care, King's College London, London, WC2R 2LS, UK
Correspondence: Rona Inniss (r.inniss@gstt.nhs.uk)
O77: Investigating a role for implementation science in Irish national environmental policy
Cáit Ní Chorcora, John O’Neill
Institute of Public Administration, 57-61 Lansdowne Road, Dublin 4, D04 TC62, Ireland
Correspondence: Cáit Ní Chorcora (cnichorcora@ipa.ie)
-
A wide spectrum of approaches to implementation science identified - from the very controlled and confined environment of a fixed community response (i.e. drug intervention scenarios) to approaches where wider policy decisions need to be considered at national/regional or local levels.
-
Within this wide spectrum outlined above, it becomes more challenging to define exact applicability of implementation science frameworks when encountering more general evidence for policy considerations.
P78: Costing digital health implementation efforts in hospitals: a qualitative framework analysis of semi-structured interviews
Thomasina Donovan1, Hannah E Carter1, Steven M McPhail1,2, Bridget Abell1
1Australian Centre for Health Services Innovation and Centre for Healthcare Transformation, School of Public Health and Social Work, Faculty of Health, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, QLD, Australia; 2Digital Health and Informatics, Metro South Health, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
Correspondence: Thomasina Donovan (thomasina.donovan@hdr.qut.edu.au)
O79: Sustaining and scaling-up best practices to improve nutrition care in Canadian hospitals using a mentor-champion program
Katherine L. Ford1, Celia Laur2,3, Roseann Nasser4, Rupinder Dhaliwal5, Johane P. Allard6, Leah Gramlich7, Heather H. Keller1,8
1Department of Kinesiology and Health Sciences, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Ontario, N2L 3G1, Canada; 2Women’s College Hospital Institute for Health System Solutions and Virtual Care (WIHV), Toronto, Ontario, M5S 1B2, Canada; 3Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, M5T 3M6, Canada; 4Clinical Nutrition Services, Saskatchewan Health Authority, Regina, Saskatchewan, S4P 1C4, Canada; 5Canadian Nutrition Society, Kemptville, Ontario, K0G 1J1, Canada; 6Department of Nutritional Sciences, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, M5S 1A4, Canada; 7Department of Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, T6G 2R3, Canada; 8Schlegel-UW Research Institute for Aging, Waterloo, Ontario, N2J 0E2, Canada
Correspondence: Heather H. Keller (hkeller@uwaterloo.ca)
P80: Culturally-appropriate end-of-life care: do and don’t review findings to inform healthcare and other service providers
Donna M. Wilson1,2, Begoña Errasti-Ibarrondo3, Brooklyn Grainger1, Jean Triscott1
1University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada; 2University of Navarra, Limerick, Ireland; 3 University of Navarra, Pamplona, Spain
Correspondence: Donna M. Wilson (donna.wilson@ualberta.ca)
O83: Causal loop diagramming to model, tailor, and test sustainment strategies in multi-level, cross-context implementation efforts
Erika L. Crable1,2,3, Thomas Engell4, Ryan Kenneally1,2, Teresa Lind2,5, Gregory A. Aarons1,2,3
1Department of Psychiatry, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, 92093, USA; 2Child and Adolescent Services Research Center, San Diego, CA, 92123, USA; 3UC San Diego ACTRI Dissemination and Implementation Science Center, La Jolla, CA, 92093, USA; 4Centre for Child and Adolescent Mental Health, Eastern and Southern Norway, Gullhaugveien 1-3, 0484, Oslo, NOR; 5Department of Child and Family Development, San Diego State University, San Diego, CA, 92182, USA
Correspondence: Erika L. Crable (ecrable@health.ucsd.edu)
P84: NICO: narrative intervention for long COVID pilot feasibility and acceptability study
Rachel Johnson-Koenke1,2, Emma Baker1, Jacqueline Jones1
1University of Colorado, College of Nursing, Aurora, CO, USA; 2Department of Veteran Affairs, Eastern Colorado Healthcare System, Aurora, CO, USA
Correspondence: Rachel Johnson-Koenke (rachel.a.johnson@cuanschutz.edu)
Instrument | Baseline | 3 months |
---|---|---|
Generalized Anxiety Disorder 7 item scale (GAD-7) assessment | 9.6 (mild to moderate anxiety) | 4.1 (minimal anxiety) |
Personal Health Questionnaire (PHQ9) | 9.3 (high end of mild depressive symptoms) | 5.5 (low end of mild depressive symptoms) |
Program Satisfaction Interview | All participants reported satisfaction with the program and that it was helpful (n=11) |
O85: Findings from the health champions study
Julie Williams1,10, Ray McGrath2,10, Karen Ang2,10, Ioannis Bakolis3, Andy Healey1,4, Jorge Arias de la Torre1,5,6,7, Isabel Mdudu2, Fiona Gaughran2,8, Euan Sadler9, Mariana Pinto de Costa2, Errol Green2, Natalia Stepan10, Gracie Tredget2,10, Zarnie Khadjesari11, Sean Cross2,10, Nick Sevdalis1
1Centre for Implementation Science, King’s Collge London, SE5 8AF, UK; 2South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust, London, SE5 8AZ, UK; 3Department of Biostatistics and Health Informatics, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King’s College London, London, SE5 8AF, UK; 4Kings Health Economics, Health Service and Population Research Department, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, SE5 8AF, UK; 5Care for Long Term Conditions Research Division. Florence Nightingale Faculty of Nursing, Midwifery & Palliative Care, King’s College London, London, UK; 6CIBER Epidemiology and Public Health (CIBERESP). Barcelona, Spain 7 Institute of Biomedicine (IBIOMED), Universidad de León. León, Spain; 8Psychosis Studies, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK; 9Department of Nursing, Midwifery and Health, School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Environmental and Life Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK; 10King’s Health Partners Mind and Body Programme, Ground Floor, Counting House, Guy’s Hospital St Thomas St, London, UK; 11Behavioural and Implementation Science (BIS) research group, School of Health Sciences, University of East Anglia, Norwich Research Park, Norwich, UK
Correspondence: Julie Williams (julie.williams@kcl.ac.uk)
P87: Evaluating the implementation of a national programme for transforming mental health in schools across south west London: the Children and Young People (CYP) emotional wellbeing in schools programme
Helen Sheldon, Phoebe Blackney, Lydia Davies, Andrew Walker
Health Innovation Network, Floor 10 Becket House, 1 Lambeth Palace Rd, London SE1 7EU
Correspondence: Helen Sheldon (helen.sheldon3@nhs.net)
P88: Evaluating the early implementation of digitally enabled virtual wards: a case study approach
Camille Aznar
Health Innovation Network, London, UK
Correspondence: Camille Aznar (camille.aznar@nhs.net)
-
Offering continuous monitoring to all patients
-
Referring a small but targeted cohort of patients
-
Developing established clinical and referral pathways
-
In-reach virtual ward staff based in acute settings
-
Strengthening relationships with acute trust and VW staff
-
Building multi-disciplinary teams
-
Clear clinical governance arrangements in place