Skip to main content
Hauptrubriken
CME Facharzt-Training Webinare Zeitschriften Bücher e.Medpedia Podcast
Service
Jobbörse Info & Hilfe
Fachgebiete
Anästhesiologie Allgemeinmedizin Arbeitsmedizin Augenheilkunde Chirurgie Dermatologie Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe HNO Innere Medizin Kardiologie Neurologie Onkologie und Hämatologie Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie Pädiatrie Pathologie Psychiatrie Radiologie Rechtsmedizin Urologie Zahnmedizin
Themen
Typ-2-Diabetes und Adipositas Klimawandel und Gesundheit Neues aus dem Markt COVID-19 Praxis und Beruf Seltene Erkrankungen GOÄ & EBM Panorama
Sammlungen
Kasuistiken Algorithmen & Infografiken Blickdiagnosen Arthropedia FlapFinder (für Dermatochirurgen) Videos Kongressberichterstattung Medizin für Apothekerinnen und Apotheker Für Ärztinnen und Ärzte in Weiterbildung Für Medizinstudierende

Live-Webinar "Urologie und Sexualmedizin in der Praxis"

Häufige urologisch-sexualmedizinische Themen in der Praxis sind das Thema des MMW-Webinars am 5. Juni von 17.30 bis 19 Uhr. Konkret geht es um die Frage, wann bei Harnwegsinfektionen auf Antibiotika verzichtet werden kann, und um ein Update zur Therapie von Libido- und Potenzstörungen des Mannes. Der dritte Vortrag behandelt sexuell übertragbare Krankheiten. Stellen Sie Ihre Fragen an die Experten und sammeln Sie 2 CME-Punkte. Jetzt gleich anmelden!
Erweiterte Suche
Anmelden
nach oben
Current Cardiology Reports
Erschienen in: Current Cardiology Reports 10/2023

18.10.2023 | Structural Heart Disease (S Vakamudi, Section Editor)

Noninvasive Multimodality Imaging for the Assessment of Anomalous Coronary Artery

verfasst von: Christoph Gräni, Marius R. Bigler, Raymond Y. Kwong

Erschienen in: Current Cardiology Reports | Ausgabe 10/2023

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Purpose of Review

Anomalous aortic origin of a coronary artery (AAOCA) is a rare congenital coronary anomaly with the potential to cause myocardial ischemia and adverse cardiac events. The presence of AAOCA anatomy itself does not necessarily implicate a need for revascularization. Therefore, the purpose of this review is to assess how noninvasive comprehensive anatomic- and physiologic evaluation may guide patient management.

Recent Findings

The assessment of AAOCA includes an accurate description of the anomalous origin/vessel course including anatomical high-risk features such as a slit-like ostium, proximal narrowing, elliptic vessel shape, acute take-off angle, intramural course, and possible concomitant coronary atherosclerosis and hemodynamics. Various cardiac imaging modalities offer unique advantages and capabilities in visualizing these anatomical and functional aspects of AAOCA.

Summary

This review explored the role of noninvasive multimodality imaging in the characterization of AAOCA by highlighting the strengths, limitations, and potential applications of the current different cardiac imaging methods, with a focus on the pathophysiology of myocardial ischemia and stress testing protocols.
Literatur
1.
Bogers AJ, Gittenberger-de Groot AC, Poelmann RE, Péault BM, Huysmans HA. Development of the origin of the coronary arteries, a matter of ingrowth or outgrowth? Anat Embryol. 1989;180:437–41.CrossRef
2.
Pérez-Pomares JM, de la Pompa JL, Franco D, Henderson D, Ho SY, Houyel L, et al. Congenital coronary artery anomalies: a bridge from embryology to anatomy and pathophysiology–a position statement of the development, anatomy, and pathology ESC Working Group. Cardiovasc Res. 2016;109:204–16.PubMedCrossRef
3.
Angelini P. Coronary artery anomalies–current clinical issues: definitions, classification, incidence, clinical relevance, and treatment guidelines. Tex Heart Inst J. 2002;29:271–8.PubMedPubMedCentral
4.
• Bigler MR, Ashraf A, Seiler C, Praz F, Ueki Y, Windecker S, et al. Hemodynamic relevance of anomalous coronary arteries originating from the opposite sinus of Valsalva-in search of the evidence. Front Cardiovasc Med. 2021;7. A detailed discussion is provided on the complex interaction between fixed and dynamic elements in AAOCA, which may lead to hemodynamic significance.
5.
Yamanaka O, Hobbs RE. Coronary artery anomalies in 126,595 patients undergoing coronary arteriography. Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn. 1990;21:28–40.PubMedCrossRef
6.
Cheezum MK, Liberthson RR, Shah NR, Villines TC, O’Gara PT, Landzberg MJ, et al. Anomalous aortic origin of a coronary artery from the inappropriate sinus of Valsalva. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2017;69:1592–608.PubMedCrossRef
7.
Gräni C, Benz DC, Schmied C, Vontobel J, Possner M, Clerc OF, et al. Prevalence and characteristics of coronary artery anomalies detected by coronary computed tomography angiography in 5634 consecutive patients in a single centre in Switzerland. Swiss Med Wkly. 2016;146.
8.
Eckart RE, Scoville SL, Campbell CL, Shry EA, Stajduhar KC, Potter RN, et al. Sudden death in young adults: a 25-year review of autopsies in military recruits. Ann Intern Med. 2004;141:829–34.PubMedCrossRef
9.
Angelini P. Coronary artery anomalies: an entity in search of an identity. Circulation. 2007;115:1296–305.PubMedCrossRef
10.
Basso C, Maron BJ, Corrado D, Thiene G. Clinical profile of congenital coronary artery anomalies with origin from the wrong aortic sinus leading to sudden death in young competitive athletes. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2000;35:1493–501.PubMedCrossRef
11.
Stout KK, Daniels CJ, Aboulhosn JA, Bozkurt B, Broberg CS, Colman JM, et al. 2018 AHA/ACC guideline for the management of adults with congenital heart disease: executive summary: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines. Circulation. 2019;139:e637–97.PubMed
12.
Baumgartner H, De Backer J, Babu-Narayan SV, Budts W, Chessa M, Diller G-P, et al. 2020 ESC Guidelines for the management of adult congenital heart disease: the Task Force for the management of adult congenital heart disease of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). Eur Heart J. 2020.
13.
Knuuti J, Wijns W, Saraste A, Capodanno D, Barbato E, Funck-Brentano C, et al. ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of chronic coronary syndromes: the Task Force for the diagnosis and management of chronic coronary syndromes of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). Eur Heart J. 2019;41:407–77.
14.
Angelini P, Vidovich MI, Lawless CE, Elayda MA, Lopez JA, Wolf D, et al. Preventing sudden cardiac death in athletes: in search of evidence-based, cost-effective screening. Tex Heart Inst J. 2013;40:148–55.PubMedPubMedCentral
15.
Angelini P, Uribe C. Anatomic spectrum of left coronary artery anomalies and associated mechanisms of coronary insufficiency. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2018;92:313–21.PubMedCrossRef
16.
Grani C, Buechel RR, Kaufmann PA, Kwong RY. Multimodality imaging in individuals with anomalous coronary arteries. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2017;10:471–81.PubMedCrossRef
17.
Angelini P and Uribe C. Critical update and discussion of the prevalence, nature, mechanisms of action, and treatment options in potentially serious coronary anomalies. Trends Cardiovasc Med. 2022.
18.
Brothers JA, Whitehead KK, Keller MS, Fogel MA, Paridon SM, Weinberg PM, et al. Cardiac MRI and CT: differentiation of normal ostium and intraseptal course from slitlike ostium and interarterial course in anomalous left coronary artery in children. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2015;204:W104–9.PubMedCrossRef
19.
Jegatheeswaran A, Devlin PJ, McCrindle BW, Williams WG, Jacobs ML, Blackstone EH, et al. Features associated with myocardial ischemia in anomalous aortic origin of a coronary artery: a Congenital Heart Surgeons’ Society study. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2019;158:822-834.e3.PubMedCrossRef
20.
Davies JE, Burkhart HM, Dearani JA, Suri RM, Phillips SD, Warnes CA, et al. Surgical management of anomalous aortic origin of a coronary artery. Ann Thoracic Surg. 2009;88:844–7; discussion 847–8.
21.
Davis JA, Cecchin F, Jones TK, Portman MA. Major coronary artery anomalies in a pediatric population: incidence and clinical importance. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2001;37:593–7.PubMedCrossRef
22.
Gräni C, Benz DC, Schmied C, Vontobel J, Mikulicic F, Possner M, et al. Hybrid CCTA/SPECT myocardial perfusion imaging findings in patients with anomalous origin of coronary arteries from the opposite sinus and suspected concomitant coronary artery disease. Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology. 2017;24:226–34.PubMedCrossRef
23.
Ripley DP, Saha A, Teis A, Uddin A, Bijsterveld P, Kidambi A, et al. The distribution and prognosis of anomalous coronary arteries identified by cardiovascular magnetic resonance: 15 year experience from two tertiary centres. Journal of cardiovascular magnetic resonance : official journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance. 2014;16:34.PubMedCrossRef
24.
Cheezum MK, Ghoshhajra B, Bittencourt MS, Hulten EA, Bhatt A, Mousavi N, et al. Anomalous origin of the coronary artery arising from the opposite sinus: prevalence and outcomes in patients undergoing coronary CTA. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2017;18:224–35.PubMedCrossRef
25.
Taylor AJ, Rogan KM, Virmani R. Sudden cardiac death associated with isolated congenital coronary artery anomalies. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1992;20:640–7.PubMedCrossRef
26.
Cheitlin MD, De Castro CM, McAllister HA. Sudden death as a complication of anomalous left coronary origin from the anterior sinus of Valsalva. A not-so-minor congenital anomaly Circulation. 1974;50:780–7.PubMed
27.
Taylor AJ, Byers JP, Cheitlin MD, Virmani R. Anomalous right or left coronary artery from the contralateral coronary sinus: “high-risk” abnormalities in the initial coronary artery course and heterogeneous clinical outcomes. Am Heart J. 1997;133:428–35.PubMedCrossRef
28.
Diao KY, Zhao Q, Gao Y, Shi K, Ma M, Xu HY, et al. Prognostic value of dual-source computed tomography (DSCT) angiography characteristics in anomalous coronary artery from the opposite sinus (ACAOS) patients: a large-scale retrospective study. BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2020;20:25.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
29.
Angelini P, Uribe C, Monge J, Tobis JM, Elayda MA, Willerson JT. Origin of the right coronary artery from the opposite sinus of Valsalva in adults: characterization by intravascular ultrasonography at baseline and after stent angioplasty. Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions. 2015;86:199–208.CrossRef
30.
Zhang LJ, Wu SY, Huang W, Zhou CS, Lu GM. Anomalous origin of the right coronary artery originating from the left coronary sinus of Valsalva with an interarterial course: diagnosis and dynamic evaluation using dual-source computed tomography. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 2009;33:348–53.PubMedCrossRef
31.
Pijls NH, Van Gelder B, Van der Voort P, Peels K, Bracke FA, Bonnier HJ et al. Fractional flow reserve. A useful index to evaluate the influence of an epicardial coronary stenosis on myocardial blood flow. Circulation. 1995;92:3183–93.
32.
Nasis A, Machado C, Cameron JD, Troupis JM, Meredith IT, Seneviratne SK. Anatomic characteristics and outcome of adults with coronary arteries arising from an anomalous location detected with coronary computed tomography angiography. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2015;31:181–91.PubMedCrossRef
33.
Virmani R, Chun PK, Goldstein RE, Robinowitz M, McAllister HA. Acute takeoffs of the coronary arteries along the aortic wall and congenital coronary ostial valve-like ridges: association with sudden death. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1984;3:766–71.PubMedCrossRef
34.
Angelini P, Flamm SD. Newer concepts for imaging anomalous aortic origin of the coronary arteries in adults. Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions. 2007;69:942–54.CrossRef
35.
Angelini P, Uribe C. Symptomatic right coronary anomaly with dynamic systolic intramural obliteration and isolated right ventricular ischemia. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2019;93:445–7.PubMedCrossRef
36.
Angelini P, Velasco JA, Ott D, Khoshnevis GR. Anomalous coronary artery arising from the opposite sinus: descriptive features and pathophysiologic mechanisms, as documented by intravascular ultrasonography. J Invasive Cardiol. 2003;15:507–14.PubMed
37.
Lee SE, Yu CW, Park K, Park KW, Suh JW, Cho YS, et al. Physiological and clinical relevance of anomalous right coronary artery originating from left sinus of Valsalva in adults. Heart (British Cardiac Society). 2016;102:114–9.PubMed
38.
Boler AN, Hilliard AA, Gordon BM. Functional assessment of anomalous right coronary artery using fractional flow reserve: an innovative modality to guide patient management. Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions. 2017;89:316–20.CrossRef
39.
Tsujita K, Maehara A, Mintz GS, Franklin-Bond T, Mehran R, Stone GW,et al. In vivo intravascular ultrasonic assessment of anomalous right coronary artery arising from left coronary sinus. Am J Cardiol. 2009;103:747–51.PubMedCrossRef
40.
de Oliveira DM, Gomes V, Caramori P. Intravascular ultrasound and pharmacological stress test to evaluate the anomalous origin of the right coronary artery. J Invasive Cardiol. 2012;24:E131–4.PubMed
41.
Mitchell JH, Haskell W, Snell P, Van Camp SP. Task Force 8: classification of sports. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2005;45:1364–7.PubMedCrossRef
42.
Gräni C, Chappex N, Fracasso T, Vital C, Kellerhals C, Schmied C, et al. Sports-related sudden cardiac death in Switzerland classified by static and dynamic components of exercise. Eur J Prev Cardiol. 2016;23:1228–36.PubMedCrossRef
43.
Brothers J, Carter C, McBride M, Spray T, Paridon S. Anomalous left coronary artery origin from the opposite sinus of Valsalva: evidence of intermittent ischemia. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2010;140:e27–9.PubMedCrossRef
44.
Sachdeva S, Frommelt MA, Mitchell ME, Tweddell JS, Frommelt PC. Surgical unroofing of intramural anomalous aortic origin of a coronary artery in pediatric patients: single-center perspective. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2018;155:1760–8.PubMedCrossRef
45.
Pelliccia A. Congenital coronary artery anomalies in young patients: new perspectives for timely identification. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2001;37:598–600.PubMedCrossRef
46.
Cheitlin MD, MacGregor J. Congenital anomalies of coronary arteries: role in the pathogenesis of sudden cardiac death. Herz. 2009;34:268–79.PubMedCrossRef
47.
Lim MJ, Forsberg MJ, Lee R, Kern MJ. Hemodynamic abnormalities across an anomalous left main coronary artery assessment: evidence for a dynamic ostial obstruction. Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions. 2004;63:294–8.CrossRef
48.
Finocchiaro G, Behr ER, Tanzarella G, Papadakis M, Malhotra A, Dhutia H, et al. Anomalous coronary artery origin and sudden cardiac death: clinical and pathological insights from a national pathology registry. JACC Clin Electrophysiol. 2019;5:516–22.PubMedCrossRef
49.
Romp RL, Herlong JR, Landolfo CK, Sanders SP, Miller CE, Ungerleider RM, et al. Outcome of unroofing procedure for repair of anomalous aortic origin of left or right coronary artery. Ann Thoracic Surg. 2003;76:589–95; discussion 595–6.
50.
Uebleis C, Groebner M, von Ziegler F, Becker A, Rischpler C, Tegtmeyer R, et al. Combined anatomical and functional imaging using coronary CT angiography and myocardial perfusion SPECT in symptomatic adults with abnormal origin of a coronary artery. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2012;28:1763–74.PubMedCrossRef
51.
De Luca L, Bovenzi F, Rubini D, Niccoli-Asabella A, Rubini G, De Luca I. Stress-rest myocardial perfusion SPECT for functional assessment of coronary arteries with anomalous origin or course. Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine. 2004;45:532–6.PubMed
52.
Doan TT, Sachdeva S, Bonilla-Ramirez C, Reaves-O’Neal DL, Masand P, Mery CM, et al. Ischemia in anomalous aortic origin of a right coronary artery: large pediatric cohort medium-term outcomes. Circ Cardiovasc Interventions. 2023;16:e012631.
53.
Pijls NH, Fearon WF, Tonino PA, Siebert U, Ikeno F, Bornschein B, et al. Fractional flow reserve versus angiography for guiding percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with multivessel coronary artery disease: 2-year follow-up of the FAME (Fractional Flow Reserve Versus Angiography for Multivessel Evaluation) study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2010;56:177–84.
54.
Bigler MR, Stoller M, Praz F, Siontis GCM, Grossenbacher R, Tschannen C, et al. Functional assessment of myocardial ischaemia by intracoronary ECG. Open Heart. 2021;8: e001447.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
55.
Agrawal H, Wilkinson JC, Noel CV, Qureshi AM, Masand PM, Mery CM, et al. Impaired myocardial perfusion on stress CMR correlates with invasive FFR in children with coronary anomalies. J Invasive Cardiol. 2021;33:E45-e51.PubMed
56.
Tessitore A, Caiffa T, Bobbo M, D’Agata Mottolese B, Barbi E, Chicco D. Anomalous aortic origin of coronary artery: for a challenging diagnosis, a transthoracic echocardiogram is recommended. Acta Paediatr. 2022;111:265–8.PubMedCrossRef
57.
Fernandes F, Alam M, Smith S, Khaja F. The role of transesophageal echocardiography in identifying anomalous coronary arteries. Circulation. 1993;88:2532–40.PubMedCrossRef
58.
Zeppilli P, dello Russo A, Santini C, Palmieri V, Natale L, Giordano A, et al. In vivo detection of coronary artery anomalies in asymptomatic athletes by echocardiographic screening. Chest. 1998;114:89–93.PubMedCrossRef
59.
Lepper W, Belcik T, Wei K, Lindner JR, Sklenar J, Kaul S. Myocardial Contrast Echocardiography. Circulation. 2004;109:3132–5.PubMedCrossRef
60.
Vogel R, Indermühle A, Reinhardt J, Meier P, Siegrist PT, Namdar M, et al. The quantification of absolute myocardial perfusion in humans by contrast echocardiography: algorithm and validation. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2005;45:754–62.PubMedCrossRef
61.
Lorber R, Srivastava S, Wilder TJ, McIntyre S, DeCampli WM, Williams WG, et al. Anomalous aortic origin of coronary arteries in the young: echocardiographic evaluation with surgical correlation. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2015;8:1239–49.PubMedCrossRef
62.
Zeltser I, Cannon B, Silvana L, Fenrich A, George J, Schleifer J, et al. Lessons learned from preparticipation cardiovascular screening in a state funded program. Am J Cardiol. 2012;110:902–8.PubMedCrossRef
63.
Ichikawa M, Sato Y, Komatsu S, Hirayama A, Kodama K, Saito S. Multislice computed tomographic findings of the anomalous origins of the right coronary artery: evaluation of possible causes of myocardial ischemia. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2007;23:353–60.PubMedCrossRef
64.
Graidis C, Dimitriadis D, Karasavvidis V, Dimitriadis G, Argyropoulou E, Economou F, et al. Prevalence and characteristics of coronary artery anomalies in an adult population undergoing multidetector-row computed tomography for the evaluation of coronary artery disease. BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2015;15:112.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
65.
Gentile F, Castiglione V, De Caterina R. Coronary Artery Anomalies. Circulation. 2021;144:983–96.PubMedCrossRef
66.
Palmieri V, Gervasi S, Bianco M, Cogliani R, Poscolieri B, Cuccaro F, et al. Anomalous origin of coronary arteries from the “wrong” sinus in athletes: diagnosis and management strategies. Int J Cardiol. 2018;252:13–20.PubMedCrossRef
67.
Salman R, More SR, Ferreira Botelho MP, Ketwaroo PM, Masand PM, Molossi S, et al. Detection of anomalous aortic origin of a coronary artery (AAOCA) by echocardiogram: when does computed tomographic angiography add value? Clin Imaging. 2023;95:74–9.PubMedCrossRef
68.
Leipsic J, Yang TH, Thompson A, Koo BK, Mancini GB, Taylor C, et al. CT angiography (CTA) and diagnostic performance of noninvasive fractional flow reserve: results from the Determination of Fractional Flow Reserve by Anatomic CTA (DeFACTO) study. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2014;202:989–94.PubMedCrossRef
69.
Ihdayhid AR, Norgaard BL, Gaur S, Leipsic J, Nerlekar N, Osawa K, et al. Prognostic value and risk continuum of noninvasive fractional flow reserve derived from coronary CT angiography. Radiology. 2019;292:343–51.PubMedCrossRef
70.
Tang CX, Lu MJ, Schoepf JU, Tesche C, Bauer M, Nance J, et al. Coronary Computed Tomography Angiography-Derived Fractional Flow Reserve in Patients with Anomalous Origin of the Right Coronary Artery from the Left Coronary Sinus. Korean J Radiol. 2020;21:192–202.PubMedCrossRef
71.
Bigler MR, Stark AW, Giannopoulos AA, Huber AT, Siepe M, Kadner A, et al. Coronary CT FFR vs invasive adenosine and dobutamine FFR in a right anomalous coronary artery. JACC Case Rep. 2022;4:929–33.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
72.
Kawaji T, Shiomi H, Shizuta S, Kimura T. Diagnosis of functional ischemia in a right coronary artery with anomalous aortic origin. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr. 2016;10:188–90.PubMedCrossRef
73.
Tahir H, Ahmad S, Awan MU, Omar B, Glass J, Cole J. Anomalous origin of left anterior descending artery and left circumflex artery from right coronary sinus with malignant left anterior descending artery course: role of coronary CT angiography derived fractional flow reserve in decision making. Cureus. 2018;10: e3220.PubMedPubMedCentral
74.
Miki T, Miyoshi T, Watanabe A, Osawa K, Amioka N, Ito H. Anomalous aortic origin of the right coronary artery with functional ischemia determined with fractional flow reserve derived from computed tomography. Clinical case reports. 2018;6:1371–2.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
75.
Adjedj J, Hyafil F, Fretay XHd, Dupouy P, Juliard JM, Ou P, et al. Physiological evaluation of anomalous aortic origin of a coronary artery using computed tomography–derived fractional flow reserve. J Am Heart Assoc. 2021;10:e018593.
76.
Jiang MX, Khan MO, Ghobrial J, Rogers IS, Pettersson GB, Blackstone EH, et al. Patient-specific fluid–structure simulations of anomalous aortic origin of right coronary arteries. JTCVS Techniques. 2022;13:144–62.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
77.
Ferrag W, Scalbert F, Adjedj J, Dupouy P, Ou P, Juliard J-M, et al. Role of FFR-CT for the evaluation of patients with anomalous aortic origin of coronary artery. JACC: Cardiovasc Imaging. 2021;14:1074–1076.
78.
Benz DC, Gräni C, Hirt Moch B, Mikulicic F, Vontobel J, Fuchs TA, Stehli J, et al. Minimized radiation and contrast agent exposure for coronary computed tomography angiography: first clinical experience on a latest generation 256-slice scanner. Acad Radiol. 2016;23:1008–14.PubMedCrossRef
79.
Seitun S, De Lorenzi C, Cademartiri F, Buscaglia A, Travaglio N, Balbi M, et al. CT myocardial perfusion imaging: a new frontier in cardiac imaging. Biomed Res Int. 2018;2018:7295460.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
80.
Danad I, Szymonifka J, Schulman-Marcus J, Min JK. Static and dynamic assessment of myocardial perfusion by computed tomography. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2016;17:836–44.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
81.
Keir M, Spears D, Caldarone C, Crean AM. Proving the innocence of a “malignant” coronary artery: calling dobutamine stress CT for the defence! J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr. 2017;11:68–9.PubMedCrossRef
82.
Linsen PVM, Kofflard MJM, Lam SW, Kock M. First in humans: dobutamine stress cardiac computed tomography to evaluate dynamic compression of an anomalous left coronary artery. Coron Artery Dis. 2018;29:607–8.PubMedCrossRef
83.
Kilner PJ, Geva T, Kaemmerer H, Trindade PT, Schwitter J, Webb GD. Recommendations for cardiovascular magnetic resonance in adults with congenital heart disease from the respective working groups of the European Society of Cardiology. Eur Heart J. 2010;31:794–805.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
84.
Angelini P, Cheong BY, Lenge De Rosen VV, Lopez JA, Uribe C, Masso AH, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging-based screening study in a general population of adolescents. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2018;71:579–580.
85.
Angelini P, Cheong BY, Lenge De Rosen VV, Lopez A, Uribe C, Masso AH, Ali SW, et al. High-risk cardiovascular conditions in sports-related sudden death: prevalence in 5,169 schoolchildren screened via cardiac magnetic resonance. Texas Heart Inst J. 2018;45:205–213.
86.
Gräni C, Benz DC, Gupta S, Windecker S, Kwong RY. Sudden cardiac death in ischemic heart disease: from imaging arrhythmogenic substrate to guiding therapies. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2020;13:2223–38.PubMedCrossRef
87.
Antiochos P, Ge Y, Heydari B, Steel K, Bingham S, Abdullah SM, et al. Prognostic value of stress cardiac magnetic resonance in patients with known coronary artery disease. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2022;15:60–71.PubMedCrossRef
88.
Paetsch I, Jahnke C, Wahl A, Gebker R, Neuss M, Fleck E, et al. Comparison of dobutamine stress magnetic resonance, adenosine stress magnetic resonance, and adenosine stress magnetic resonance perfusion. Circulation. 2004;110:835–42.PubMedCrossRef
89.
Jahnke C, Nagel E, Gebker R, Kokocinski T, Kelle S, Manka R, et al. Prognostic value of cardiac magnetic resonance stress tests. Circulation. 2007;115:1769–76.PubMedCrossRef
90.
•• Molossi S, Doan T, Sachdeva S. Anomalous coronary arteries: a state-of-the-art approacH. Cardiol Clin. 2023;41:51–69. A state-of-the-art approach to AAOCA is presented, emphasizing the pediatric and teenage populations.PubMedCrossRef
91.
Wahl A, Paetsch I, Gollesch A, Roethemeyer S, Foell D, Gebker R, et al. Safety and feasibility of high-dose dobutamine-atropine stress cardiovascular magnetic resonance for diagnosis of myocardial ischaemia: experience in 1000 consecutive cases. Eur Heart J. 2004;25:1230–6.PubMedCrossRef
92.
Nagel E, Lehmkuhl HB, Bocksch W, Klein C, Vogel U, Frantz E, et al. Noninvasive diagnosis of ischemia-induced wall motion abnormalities with the use of high-dose dobutamine stress MRI: comparison with dobutamine stress echocardiography. Circulation. 1999;99:763–70.PubMedCrossRef
93.
Strigl S, Beroukhim R, Valente AM, Annese D, Harrington JS, Geva T, et al. Feasibility of dobutamine stress cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging in children. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2009;29:313–9.PubMedCrossRef
94.
Molossi S, Agrawal H, Mery CM, Krishnamurthy R, Masand P, Sexson Tejtel SK, et al. Outcomes in anomalous aortic origin of a coronary artery following a prospective standardized approach. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2020;13: e008445.PubMedCrossRef
95.
Hamirani YS, Kramer CM. Cardiac MRI assessment of myocardial perfusion. Future Cardiol. 2014;10:349–58.PubMedCrossRef
96.
Patel AR, Salerno M, Kwong RY, Singh A, Heydari B, Kramer CM. Stress cardiac magnetic resonance myocardial perfusion imaging: JACC review topic of the week. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2021;78:1655–68.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
97.
Engblom H, Xue H, Akil S, Carlsson M, Hindorf C, Oddstig J, et al. Fully quantitative cardiovascular magnetic resonance myocardial perfusion ready for clinical use: a comparison between cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging and positron emission tomography. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2017;19:78.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
98.
Kwong RY and Chandrashekhar Y. The higher you climb, the better the view: quantitative CMR perfusion mapping for CAD. JACC: Cardiovasc Imaging. 2020;13:2700–2702.
99.
• Doan TT, Molossi S, Sachdeva S, Wilkinson JC, Loar RW, Weigand JD, et al. Dobutamine stress cardiac MRI is safe and feasible in pediatric patients with anomalous aortic origin of a coronary artery (AAOCA). Int J Cardiol. 2021;334:42–8 Dobutamine stress cardiac MRI is proven safe and effective for evaluating myocardial ischemia in pediatric AAOCA patients, providing crucial guidance for their care.PubMedCrossRef
100.
Bigler MR, Seiler C, Räber L, Gräni C. Wolf in sheep’s clothing - the false sense of security in patients with anomalous aortic origin of a coronary artery undergoing submaximal stress testing. J Invasive Cardiol. 2021;33:E396-e397.PubMed
101.
Abbott BG, Case JA, Dorbala S, Einstein AJ, Galt JR, Pagnanelli R, et al. Contemporary cardiac SPECT imaging—innovations and best practices: an information statement from the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology. Circ: Cardiovasc Imaging. 2018;11:e000020.
102.
Souza ACdAHd, Harms HJ, Martell L, Bibbo C, Harrington M, Sullivan K, et al. Accuracy and reproducibility of myocardial blood flow quantification by single photon emission computed tomography imaging in patients with known or suspected coronary artery disease. Circ: Cardiovasc Imaging. 2022;15:e013987.
103.
Gräni C, Benz DC, Possner M, Clerc OF, Mikulicic F, Vontobel J, et al. Fused cardiac hybrid imaging with coronary computed tomography angiography and positron emission tomography in patients with complex coronary artery anomalies. Congenit Heart Dis. 2017;12:49–57.PubMedCrossRef
104.
Bigler MR, Ueki Y, Otsuka T, Huber AT, Kadner A, Räber L, et al. Discrepancy between SPECT and dobutamine FFR in right anomalous coronary artery undergoing unroofing. Ann Thoracic Surg. 2020.
105.
Alam L, Omar AMS, Patel KK. Improved performance of PET myocardial perfusion imaging compared to SPECT in the evaluation of suspected CAD. Curr Cardiol Rep. 2023;25:281–93.PubMedCrossRef
106.
Klein R, Celiker-Guler E, Rotstein BH, deKemp RA. PET and SPECT tracers for myocardial perfusion imaging. Semin Nucl Med. 2020;50:208–18.PubMedCrossRef
107.
Aggarwal NR, Drozdova A, Askew JW 3rd, Kemp BJ, Chareonthaitawee P. Feasibility and diagnostic accuracy of exercise treadmill nitrogen-13 ammonia PET myocardial perfusion imaging of obese patients. Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology. 2015;22:1273–80.PubMedCrossRef
108.
Chow BJ, Beanlands RS, Lee A, DaSilva JN, deKemp RA, Alkahtani A, et al. Treadmill exercise produces larger perfusion defects than dipyridamole stress N-13 ammonia positron emission tomography. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2006;47:411–6.PubMedCrossRef
109.
Naya M, Murthy VL, Taqueti VR, Foster CR, Klein J, Garber M, et al. Preserved coronary flow reserve effectively excludes high-risk coronary artery disease on angiography. J Nucl Med. 2014;55:248–55.PubMedCrossRef
110.
Wang TKM, Dong T, Cremer PC, Najm H, Pettersson G, Jaber WA. Utility of positron emission tomography myocardial perfusion imaging for identifying ischemia and guiding treatment in patients with anomalous coronary arteries. Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology. 2023;30:781–9.PubMedCrossRef
111.
•• Bigler MR, Kadner A, Räber L, Ashraf A, Windecker S, Siepe M, et al. Therapeutic management of anomalous coronary arteries originating from the opposite sinus of Valsalva: current evidence, proposed approach, and the unknowing. J Am Heart Assoc. 2022;11: e027098. Proposed diagnostic and therapeutic management of AAOCA with a focus on the middle-aged/older population.
Metadaten
Titel
Noninvasive Multimodality Imaging for the Assessment of Anomalous Coronary Artery
verfasst von
Christoph Gräni
Marius R. Bigler
Raymond Y. Kwong
Publikationsdatum
18.10.2023
Verlag
Springer US
Erschienen in
Current Cardiology Reports / Ausgabe 10/2023
Print ISSN: 1523-3782
Elektronische ISSN: 1534-3170
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11886-023-01948-w

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 10/2023

Current Cardiology Reports 10/2023 Zur Ausgabe

Valvular Heart Disease (TL Kiefer, Section Editor)

Update on Transcatheter Treatment of Mitral and Tricuspid Valve Regurgitation

Pericardial Disease (AL Klein and CL Jellis, Section Editors)

Pericarditis Management in Individuals Contemplating Pregnancy, Currently Pregnant, or Breastfeeding

Global Cardiovascular Health (L Sperling and D Gaita, Section Editors)

Arterial Stiffness and its Impact on Cardiovascular Health

Echocardiography (JM Gardin and AH Waller, Section Editors)

Echocardiographic Evaluation of Cardiac Masses

Global Cardiovascular Health (L Sperling and D Gaita, Section Editors)

COVID Vaccination as a Strategy for Cardiovascular Disease Prevention

Women and Cardiovascular Health (N Goldberg and S Lewis, Section Editors)

Social Risk Factors That Increase Cardiovascular and Breast Cancer Risk

Neu im Fachgebiet Kardiologie

Nach Herzinfarkt mit Typ-1-Diabetes schlechtere Karten als mit Typ 2?

29.05.2024 Herzinfarkt Nachrichten

Bei Menschen mit Typ-2-Diabetes sind die Chancen, einen Myokardinfarkt zu überleben, in den letzten 15 Jahren deutlich gestiegen – nicht jedoch bei Betroffenen mit Typ 1.

Erhöhtes Risiko fürs Herz unter Checkpointhemmer-Therapie

28.05.2024 Nebenwirkungen der Krebstherapie Nachrichten

Kardiotoxische Nebenwirkungen einer Therapie mit Immuncheckpointhemmern mögen selten sein – wenn sie aber auftreten, wird es für Patienten oft lebensgefährlich. Voruntersuchung und Monitoring sind daher obligat.

GLP-1-Agonisten können Fortschreiten diabetischer Retinopathie begünstigen

24.05.2024 Diabetische Retinopathie Nachrichten

Möglicherweise hängt es von der Art der Diabetesmedikamente ab, wie hoch das Risiko der Betroffenen ist, dass sich sehkraftgefährdende Komplikationen verschlimmern.

TAVI versus Klappenchirurgie: Neue Vergleichsstudie sorgt für Erstaunen

21.05.2024 TAVI Nachrichten

Bei schwerer Aortenstenose und obstruktiver KHK empfehlen die Leitlinien derzeit eine chirurgische Kombi-Behandlung aus Klappenersatz plus Bypass-OP. Diese Empfehlung wird allerdings jetzt durch eine aktuelle Studie infrage gestellt – mit überraschender Deutlichkeit.

Update Kardiologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

Newsletter bestellen