Health at older ages is a key public health challenge especially among the developing countries. Older adults are at greater risk of vulnerability due to their physical and functional health risks. With rapidly rising ageing population and increasing burden of non-communicable diseases older adults in India are at a greater risk for multimorbidities. Therefore, to understand this multimorbidity transition and its determinants we used a sample of older Indian adults to examine multimorbidity and its associated risk factors among the Indian older-adults aged 45 and above.
Methods
Using the sample of 72,250 older adults, this study employed the multiple regression analysis to study the risk factors of multimorbidity. Multimorbidity was computed based on the assumption of older-adults having one or more than one disease risks.
Results
Our results confirm the emerging diseases burden among the older adults in India. One of the significant findings of the study was the contrasting prevalence of multimorbidity among the wealthiest groups (AOR = 1.932; 95% CI = 1.824- 2.032). Similarly women were more likely to have a multimorbidity (AOR = 1.34; 95% CI = 1.282—1.401) as compared to men among the older adults in India.
Conclusion
Our results confirm an immediate need for proper policy measures and health system strengthening to ensure the better health of older adults in India.
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Abkürzungen
LASI
Longitudinal Ageing Study in India
MPCE
Monthly Per Capita Expenditure
NCD
Non-Communicable Diseases
OOPE
Out-of-Pocket Expenditure
NA
Not available
Background
India has been witnessing an unprecedented change in the demographic and social structure in recent decades. India is experiencing an epidemiological transition which witnesses a rising burden of noncommunicable diseases (NCDs) [1‐3]. NCDs are rapidly increasing in India mainly because of lifestyle changes [1]. With the ageing population in India, which has now become a challenge for public health experts, policymakers, and other research organizations [3‐5], the increasing prevalence of senility is a concern in India with the rise of NCDs. There is an urgent need to understand the burden of chronic health conditions among older adults Indians in order to improve and develop suitable responses for the future requirements of healthcare services.
An increase in longevity and decrease in mortality leads to an increase the multiple comorbid conditions, which is commonly known as ‘Multimorbidity.’ In other words, Multimorbidity is defined as the coexistence of two or more chronic conditions which have become prevalent widely [6, 7]. Multimorbidity has now emerged as a major public health issue worldwide, and its associated greater adverse outcome of health like- disability, mortality, poor quality of life, hospitalizations, consequent use of medical resources, and health expenditure [8‐11].
Anzeige
Literature suggests that older adults are at larger health risk due to multiple chronic diseases [3, 7, 11‐13]. A systematic review study has revealed that the prevalence of multimorbidity among older adults was found to be more than 55% in different countries [14]. Despite that, high multimorbidity prevalence has been observed in many developed nations, for instance- the United States, Australia [13], Canada [15] & Europe [9, 12, 16]. Interestingly, the older adults from developing nations are inadequately equipped with the multimorbidity challenge; as a result, a study conducted in Vietnam [17] revealed that more than 40% of older adults had multimorbidity conditions, whereas 69% in China [11] and 52% in Bangladesh [18]. Besides that, the least developed country like Tanzania, showed 25.3% multimorbidity prevalence among the older population.
Multimorbidity in Indian settings
Multimorbidity research in India among older adults is still at an early stage. About 23.3% multimorbidity prevalence has been observed in India in the previous study conducted in 2017, where Kerala showed the highest prevalence of multimorbidity with 42%, followed by Punjab (36%), Maharashtra (24%) & West Bengal (23%) [19]. A recent study conducted in the district of Kerala showed 45.4% multimorbidity prevalence [20]. Around 44% multimorbidity prevalence was found in West Bengal [21]. A recent study conducted in the Allahabad district of Uttar Pradesh showed a 31% prevalence of multimorbidity [22].
Literature has suggested that there exists a strong positive association between age and the prevalence of multimorbidity in India [19, 23‐25]. A study conducted in Odisha [26] has revealed that multimorbidity prevalence was higher among women than men, and similar results have also been found in West Bengal [21]. The rich older adults in India were more likely to have poor health due to long-term multimorbidity conditions [27]. Recent studies have revealed that there exist significant associations between obesity [28] and loneliness [29] accompanied by multimorbidity in India. Another recent study has investigated in Odisha that multimorbidity increases the odds of older adults' abuse [30]. There are very few studies on multimorbidity prevalence and its associated risk factors among older adults in India. Therefore, we aim to examine the prevalence of multimorbidity and its associated risk factors among older adults in India and its states.
Methods
Data source
The data for this study has been taken from Longitudinal Ageing Study in India (LASI) Wave 1, which was carried out during 2017–18. LASI is a multidisciplinary, internationally harmonized panel study of 72,250 older adults aged 45 and above, including their spouses less than 45 years, representative to India and all its states and union territories (excluding Sikkim). It is a baseline data of India’s first longitudinal ageing study that provides a comprehensive scientific evidence base on demographics, household economic status, chronic health conditions, symptom-based health conditions, functional health, mental health (cognition and depression), biomarkers, health insurance, and healthcare utilization, family and social networks, social welfare programs, work and employment, retirement, satisfaction, and life expectations.
Anzeige
Analytical sample
Outcome variables
The outcome variable in the study is multimorbidity which was measured based on multiple chronic diseases reported among the older adults surveyed. Respondents were asked about ten various diseases (See supplementary file), from which the outcome variable of this study was computed. These responses were combined into a trichotomous variable with categories (0 = No), (1 = single), and (2 = more than one morbidity) to study the prevalence. But for regression analysis, we converted the variable into two categories where ‘0’ represented no morbidity, and ‘1’ denoted multimorbidity to apply the logistic model in the study.
Independent variables
Demographic and socio-economic risk factors included in the study, such as age, gender, residence, level of education, health insurance status, MPCE (Monthly Per Capita Expenditure) Quintiles, caste-group, religion, currently working, marital status (See supplemental file).
Statistical analysis
We used frequencies, percentages, and cross-tabulations for the prevalence of multimorbidity with respect to the social and demographic characteristics with a 95% confidence interval. We applied the chi-square test (χ2) to see the association between multimorbidity and its covariates. We then performed the logistic regression to study the determinants of multimorbidity among older adults in India. All methods were carried out in accordance with relevant guidelines and regulations. Furthermore, this study is based on secondary source of data and therefore authors did not require any informed consent from the participant. However, the survey agencies that collected data obtained prior consent from the participants.
Results
Socio-demographic characteristics
Table 1 provides the sample distribution of the older-adults in India. Around 42% older-adults are males as compared to 58 percent females. About 68% of older-adults belong to rural areas as compared to 32% of older-adults in urban area. The sample aged more than 75 years and above is around 8% as compared to 13% aged 45 and below. Poorer groups showed the highest percentage with 21.22% followed by Poorest (20.7%) and Middle (20.47%) while Richest showed lowest with 18.03%. Illiterate older adults have showed highest percentage with 49.5% followed by Primary education level (23.21%) while the lowest educational level is observed among above secondary (10.38%). However, Hindu religion is showing highest percentage with 81.92% followed by Muslims (11.67%), while others religion group showed lowest with only 6.41%. OBC constitutes highest percentage of older adults with 46.72% while Schedule Tribe is found be lowest with only 8.76%. On the other hand, currently working older adults are showing 46.28% while those who never worked comprises of 27.57% and those who are not currently working is showing the lowest percentage with 26.14%. The highest percentage is observed among married older adults with 75.6%, while widowed showed 21.66% and others is found to be lowest with only 2.73%.
Table 1
Sample distribution of older adults in India by various socio-demographic and economic background (N = 72,250)
Background
Numbers
Percentage (%)
Place of Residence
Rural
49,274
68.2
Urban
22,976
31.8
MPCE quintile
Poorest
14,956
20.7
Poorer
15,328
21.22
Middle
14,790
20.47
Richer
14,151
19.59
Richest
13,025
18.03
Age at last birthday
≥ 45 Years
9168
12.69
46–60 Years
33,115
45.83
61–75 Years
24,002
33.22
Above 75 Years
5965
8.26
Highest level of Education
Illiterate
35,763
49.5
Primary
16,771
23.21
Secondary/Matriculation
12,216
16.91
Above Secondary
7499
10.38
Religion
Hindu
59,186
81.92
Muslim
8428
11.67
Others
4631
6.41
Caste Category
Scheduled caste
13,688
19.66
Scheduled tribe
6102
8.76
Other backward class
32,527
46.72
None of them
17,310
24.86
Sex of Respondent
Male
30,342
42
Female
41,908
58
Currently working
Yes
33,431
46.28
No
18,884
26.14
Never worked
19,915
27.57
Current Marital Status
Currently married
54,621
75.6
Widowed
15,650
21.66
Others
1975
2.73
Total
72,250
100
Source: Authors’ calculation using LASI-wave-1 data
Multimorbidity prevalence at the national level
Table 2 shows that the prevalence of multimorbidity increased substantially with age, from 48.31% (95% CI = 46.01%—50.61%) in ≥ 45 years to 73.86% (95% CI = 71.44%—76.14%) in those aged above 75 years. Similarly, the crude prevalence of multimorbidity increased modestly with increasing household wealth, from 53.78% (95% CI = 52.32%—55.23%) in the lowest wealth quintile to 71.97% (95% CI = 70.02%—73.84%) in the highest wealth quintile. There is considerably higher prevalence of multimorbidity in urban areas [69.59% (95% CI = 67.66%—71.45%)] as against in rural area [59.48% (95% CI = 58.79%—60.17%)]. There seems not much difference in male and female as far as multimorbidity is concern, however, widowed has higher prevalence of multimorbidity 69.51% (95% CI = 67.98%—71.00%) as compared to currently married 60.92% (95% CI = 60.04%—61.78%).
Table 2
Prevalence of morbidity (%) among the older adults in India with suitable socio-demographic and economic background (N = 72,250)
Background
No-Morbidity
Single-Morbidity
Multimorbidity
[95% C.I.]
[95% C.I.]
[95% C.I.]
Place of Residence
Rural
20.65 (20.07–21.23)
19.88 (19.32–20.44)
59.48 (58.79–60.17)
Urban
14.08 (12.7–15.58)
16.33 (14.94–17.84)
69.59 (67.66–71.45)
MPCE quintile
Poorest
24.86 (23.57–26.2)
21.36 (20.15–22.63)
53.78 (52.32–55.23)
Poorer
19.79 (18.75–20.88)
19.33 (18.29–20.42)
60.87 (59.53–62.19)
Middle
18.13 (17.03–19.29)
19.68 (17.98–21.5)
62.19 (60.42–63.92)
Richer
16.34 (14.57–18.27)
17.68 (16.57–18.84)
65.99 (64.08–67.85)
Richest
12.82 (11.66–14.08)
15.21 (13.98–16.54)
71.97 (70.02–73.84)
Age at last birthday
≥ 45 Years
30.75 (28.86–32.70)
20.95 (19.61–22.36)
48.31 (46.01–50.61)
46–60 Years
21.10 (20.09–22.15)
19.67 (18.65–20.73)
59.23 (57.93–60.51)
61–75 Years
12.71 (11.93–13.54)
17.11 (16.29–17.96)
70.18 (69.06–71.27)
Above 75 Years
9.24 (7.85–10.86)
16.90 (14.95–19.04)
73.86 (71.44–76.14)
Highest level of Education
Illiterate
20.95 (20.21–21.71)
19.71 (18.98–20.46)
59.34 (58.40–60.28)
Primary
16.37 (15.39–17.39)
17.47 (16.58–18.00)
66.17 (64.93–67.38)
Secondary/Matriculation
15.52 (14.44–16.67)
18.19 (16.88–19.58)
66.29 (64.50–68.03)
Above Secondary
17.04 (13.70–20.99)
17.98 (14.76–21.72)
64.99 (60.39–69.32)
Religion
Hindu
19.13 (18.53–19.73)
19.12 (18.46- 19.80)
61.75 (60.92–62.58)
Muslim
15.59 (14.02–17.00)
16.88 (15.15–18.77)
67.53 (65.10–69.87)
Others
16.77 (12.44–22.23)
17.42 (15.39–19.64)
65.81 (61.47–69.91)
Caste Category
Scheduled caste
19.46 (18.39–20.58)
20.24 (19.16–21.37)
60.30 (58.92–61.66)
Scheduled tribe
29.78 (28.14–31.47)
20.65 (19.19–22.18)
49.58 (47.66–51.49)
Other backward class
18.48 (17.37–19.63)
18.84 (17.76–19.98)
62.68 (61.21–64.13)
None of them
14.39 (13.60–15.22)
17.01 (16.16–17.89)
68.6 (67.53–69.66)
Sex of Respondent
Male
18.3 (17.53–19.09)
19.4 (18.58–20.25)
62.30 (61.20–63.38)
Female
18.76 (17.89–19.66)
18.29 (17.46–19.15)
62.95 (61.85–64.03)
Currently working
Yes
23.42 (22.59–24.27)
20.63 (19.83–21.45)
55.96 (54.83–57.07)
No
11.12 (10.28–12.02)
16.74 (15.79–17.73)
72.15 (70.91–73.35)
Never worked
17.45 (15.99–19.02)
17.52 (16.11–19.01)
65.03 (63.20–66.82)
Current Marital Status
Currently married
19.75 (19.14–20.38)
19.33 (18.62–20.06)
60.92 (60.04–61.78)
Widowed
13.53 (12.45–14.69)
16.96 (15.89–18.08)
69.51 (67.98–71.00)
Others
25.83 (17.03–37.15)
17.09 (14.08–20.59)
57.08 (48.73–65.04)
Total
18.57 (17.96–19.19)
18.75 (18.16–19.36)
62.68 (61.90–63.45)
Source: Authors’ calculation using LASI-wave-1 data; Abbreviation: CI Confidence interval
Single & multimorbidity prevalence at the state level
Figure 1 shows the single morbidity prevalence among the older adults in India at the state level using LASI Wave-1 data. The highest single morbidity prevalence was in Odisha (24.4%), followed by Assam (23.2%), Chhattisgarh (23%) & Tamil Nadu (22%), whereas the lowest was seen in Punjab (10.9%), and followed by Kerala (13.4%), Meghalaya (14%) & Chandigarh (14%). Figure 2 indicates the multimorbidity prevalence among older adults in India at the state level. The prevalence of multimorbidity was the highest in Punjab (83%), Chandigarh (78.7%), Kerala (78%), West Bengal (73.4%), & Goa (72.5%), while the lowest was found in Nagaland with 42.6%, followed by Chhattisgarh (44.6%), Meghalaya (48.8%), Odisha (49.4%) & Jharkhand (51.5%).
Fig. 1
Single morbidity prevalence among the older adults in India at state level using LASI Wave-1 data
Fig. 2
Multimorbidity prevalence among the older adults in India at state level using LASI Wave-1 data
×
×
Determinants of multimorbidity
Table 3 depicts the result of regression analysis. The predicted probability of having multiple diseases showed a significant increase, and it is almost three times more likely in 75 years and above (Adjusted OR = 3.325; 95% CI = 3.05 – 3.624; reference category ≥ 45 years of age). Women were more likely than men to have more than one morbidity (Adjusted OR = 1.34; 95% CI = 1.282—1.401). Other characteristics like urban resident (OR = 1.408; 95% CI = 1.355—1.460) with reference to rural, Muslim (AOR = 1.307; 95% CI = 1.237—1.382) against Hindu, and widowed (AOR = 1.08; 95% CI = 1.031—1.131) against currently married have higher likelihood of having multimorbidity. Risk of multimorbidity was highest among the better affluent groups (Richest) (AOR = 1.932; 95% CI = 1.824- 2.032) as compared to the older adults belonging to poorer households who are having the lower odds of having any multimorbidity (AOR = 1.244; 95% CI = 1.183—1.307).
Table 3
Regression analysis result showing the associated risk factors of multimorbidity among the older adults in India (N = 72,250)
Background
Adjusted Odds Ratio
Confidence Interval [95%]
Place of Residence
Ruralc
Urban
1.408a
[1.355,1.46]
MPCE quintile
Poorestc
Poorer
1.244a
[1.183,1.307]
Middle
1.375a
[1.313,1.452]
Richer
1.629a
[1.55,1.719]
Richest
1.932a
[1.824,2.032]
Age at last birthday
≥ 45 Yearsc
46–60 Years
1.971a
[1.875,2.072]
61–75 Years
3a
[2.831,3.178]
Above 75 Years
3.325a
[3.05,3.624]
Highest level of Education
Illiteratec
Primary
1.34a
[1.285,1.398]
Secondary/Matriculation
1.321a
[1.258,1.387]
Above Secondary
1.202a
[1.127,1.283]
Religion
Hinduc
Muslim
1.307a
[1.237,1.382]
Others
1.207a
[1.146,1.272]
Caste Category
Scheduled castec
Scheduled tribe
0.884a
[0.839,0.932]
Other backward class
0.564a
[0.533,0.596]
None of them
0.857a
[0.821,0.894]
Sex of Respondent
Malec
Female
1.34a
[1.282,1.401]
Currently working
Yesc
No
1.489a
[1.423,1.558]
Never worked
1.124a
[1.075,1.175]
Current Marital Status
Currently marriedc
Widowed
1.08a
[1.03,1.131]
Others
0.946
[0.863,1.037]
Alcohol consumption (ever)
Noc
Yes
1.195a
[1.14,1.254]
Source: Authors’ calculation using LASI-wave-1 data
95% confidence interval in the parentheses. Significant level at: asignificant at 1 percent and bsignificant at 5 percent, ® is the reference category of the independent variables
Discussion
Multimorbidity is emerging as a critical public health challenge, especially in developing countries such as India. Owing to the lifestyle changes, shift in disease patterns, and rise in out-of-pocket expenditure (OOPE), multimorbidity is resulting in an economic burden for countries. In parallel to the rise in multimorbidity, the ageing of the population with an increase in life expectancy has become a major public health challenge. The ageing of the population further manifests the multifold vulnerability in old ages caused by these diseases’ risks. In view of the rise in the risk of diseases, we examined the prevalence and risk factors of multimorbidity in 45 and above years using data provided in the LASI wave-1 in India. Our results clearly showed the greater risk for multimorbidity among the older adults being vulnerable in terms of socio-economic hierarchy. Elderly belonging to lower socio-economic groups are at higher risk for multimorbidity, however we found contrasting results where elderly from better socio-economic groups were at a greater risk for multimorbidities in India.
An individual suffers from multimorbidity due to multiple reasons ranging from comorbidities that may arise due to a common risk factor or due to the outcome of a particular disease leading to other diseases [31]. This risk likely enhances with age due to physical and functional vulnerabilities. Research shows ageing contributes to multimorbidity through the loss of physical and functional health, including frailty, which later results in greater complications like falls, disability, immobility, and mortality [32, 33].
Our results showed the significant association between multimorbidity and its associated demographic and socioeconomic risk factors like age, income, education, and place of residence. The results corroborate with the earlier findings where a significant association was found between multimorbidity and socio-economic outcomes [34].
This study showed the significant and positive relation of multimorbidity in urban areas. The risk associated with multimorbidity is higher in 45 and above years in urban areas as compared to rural areas. This higher risk in urban areas is likely attributable to increasing lifestyle changes [35]. This higher risk of disease in urban areas is also appreciated due to the imbalance in medical care that exists in weak health care facilities [36].
Anzeige
One of the significant findings of this paper is the contrasting prevalence of multimorbidity among the wealthiest groups, which diverges from some earlier studies from developing countries examining multimorbidity [37, 38]. One of the most likely reasons may be self-reporting of morbidity, given the fact that older adults belonging to better socio-economic classes have greater access to health care service provisions, which increases the likelihood of their diagnosis and care for a particular disease [39].
Multimorbidity increases likely ageing risk, as shown by various studies [33, 40]. These findings are also well reflected through our results, where an increase in age likely enhances the risk for more than one morbidity. Therefore, increasing longevity has likely consequences of morbidity patterns of older adults, which needs immediate policy attention to avert the challenges of morbidity, disability, and death at older ages. Furthermore, strong measures can ensure active and healthy ageing interventions to avert the burden of the disease with a greater concentration of older adults in upper ages.
Conclusions
This study provides evidence of emerging diseases burden among older adults in India. The study highlights the need for better interventions for older adults to avert the health crisis in later years of life. As the findings of this research specifically indicate the growing burden of multimorbidity, there is an immediate need for proper policy measures and health system strengthening to ensure health ageing in India. Moreover, emphasis should be given to workforce training and quality improvement strategies that can ensure the better physical and functional health of older adults. There is also an immediate need for improving the financial incentives for older adults at older ages, given the challenges they face in terms of health and social security provisions in India.
Limitations of the study
Our study has several limitations. Our study is based on cross-sectional data therefore we could not able to establish causality. We have not included 'Sikkim' state in the study because of data unavailability. The existing data only contains information on prevalence and determinants, which limits our understanding of the severity of diseases and multimorbidity. Furthermore, our study did not include lifestyle factor, dietary and personal habits, as these information were not available in the survey data.
Anzeige
Acknowledgements
Not applicable
Declarations
Ethics approval and consent to participate
The de-identified data is freely available on request and survey agencies that conducted the field survey for the data collection have collected a prior consent from the respondent. The ethical clearance was provided by Indian Council of Medical Research (ICMR), India. Authors were not involved in data collection process and therefore they did not require any informed consent from the participant. All methods were carried out in accordance with relevant guidelines and regulations. Authors used de-identified secondary source of data and therefore they did not require any ethical permission or written informed consent from any individual.
Consent for publication
Not applicable.
Competing interests
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Anzeige
Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
