This is the first study to the best of our knowledge, to report expression of NK cell receptors, their surface ligands, soluble ligands and cytokine profile in Indian women with primary or recurrent ovarian cancer. Immune escape is one of the most challenging questions in cancer biology and how it affects the development of solid tumors remains unanswered. Antitumor immunity was found to be compromised in solid tumors [
26,
27]. We have found immune changes in pEOC patients in terms of increased frequency of circulating CD56
DimNK cells which may indicate proliferation and activation of innate immune cells. A high level of circulatory NK cells in colorectal cancer was associated with better survival and can be used as an independent prognosticator [
28]. However, other circulatory subsets such as CD56
BrightNK, NKT-like, and T cells were comparable with HC in both groups of EOC. The modulation of receptor expression could be an immune escape mechanism in invasive pEOC and rEOC. We have found that alteration of these receptors was more drastic on circulatory immune cells. Two novel mechanisms for down regulation of receptors on circulatory immune cells are the release of soluble ligands as “decoy molecules” which suppresses the expression of target receptors and the release of platelet derived TGF-β which down-regulates the expression of DNAM-1 and CD96 [
29]. Present analysis on these soluble ligands revealed, high soluble MICA level in both groups of cases. Increased soluble MICA may lead to consistent decrease of NKG2D + immune cells. Modulation of surface receptor expression has been reported in several other malignancies [
30,
31]. Down-regulation of activating receptors NKp30, NKp46, and NKG2D is an immune evasion mechanism which led to low cytolytic activity [
27]. In our data, both subsets of NK cells with activating phenotype were reduced which might have lead to immune suppression. Moreover, we also noticed the change in the expression pattern of inhibitory receptors on NK cells in both groups of EOC patients. Circulatory immune cell subsets such as NKp46 + CD56
BrightNK, NKp30 + CD56
DimNK, NKp46 + CD56
DimNK, NKp44 + NKT-like, NKG2A + NKT-like, and NKG2A + T cells were reduced in both groups of EOC patients. This probably indicates immune dysregulation and common receptor expression pattern at primary and recurrent stage of the disease. However, certain subsets such as NKp30 + CD56
BrightNK, NKp44 + T and NKp46 + T cells were reduced specifically in pEOC. In contrast, the frequencies of NKp44 + CD56
DimNK cells were increased, whereas CD161 + CD56
BrightNK, NKG2A + CD56
DimNK, CD161 + NKT-like, and NKp30 + T cells were reduced in rEOC, depicting the immunological differences among these two groups of patients. Clinically relevant anti-metastatic role of NK cells was reported in several solid tumors [
32,
33]. Thus, reduction in circulatory subsets with activating phenotype could have facilitated the breach of local tumor microenvironment by neoplastic cells, reach the circulation and colonize at distant sites. Furthermore, differential reduction in specific subsets, especially in recurrent cancer may be used to rationalize alternative therapeutic strategies and special care of relapsed cases. Again, these differential immune profiles might be a factor of time. As the disease progresses, the immune signature of pEOC undergoes some changes in circulation that might facilitate the disease relapse. Further, immune infiltration has been neglected for a long time but the tumor infiltrated immune cells can also predict the outcome of ovarian cancer [
34]. The tumor infiltrated NK and T cell subsets positive for DNAM-1 are reduced in both groups of patients. Reduction in DNAM-1 receptor especially on NK cells in TME might have led to decrease in NK cell’s ability of synapse formation, a key step to execute the effecter function. Tumor-infiltrating T cells demonstrated a beneficial effect on ovarian cancer patients, especially as a predictive biomarker for the prognosis of ovarian cancer patients suggesting that these cells also play a major role in the outcome of the disease in EOC [
23]. Profile of both groups of tumors was equally immunogenic in terms of ligand expression by tumor cells. The expression of ligands by tumor cells can modulate the phenotype of circulatory immune cells [
35]. Further, we evaluated the serum cytokine level of both groups; exposure to these cytokines can modulate the phenotype and function of immune cells [
36]. IL-6 and oncostatin M have been found to directly stimulate enhanced invasion of cancer cells, stimulate the promotion of cell cycle, enhance resistance to chemotherapy, and cause epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition (EMT) [
37]. IL-10 was also associated with ovarian cancer cell migration and the worst disease-free survival of ovarian cancer patients [
38]. Furthermore, TNF-α and IL-6 induces the generation of reactive oxygen species, nitrogen species and promote DNA damage which accelerates the initiation of tumorigenesis [
39]. Thus, elevated level of IL-6, IL-10 and TNF-α seen in these cases might have led to enhanced invasion, resistance to chemotherapy and disease prognosis. Besides, elevated level of IL-5 and IL-15 in rEOC, it is very interesting to find the elevated level of IL-2 in their sera as IL-2 has promising therapeutic potential, a phase II clinical trial has shown its therapeutic benefits in platinum-resistant ovarian cancer patients [
40]. IL-15 also acts as a super agonist that enhances NK cell function against ovarian cancer [
41]. However, these beneficial effects of IL-2 and IL-15 are not seen in present study. So, to evaluate the influence of increased cytokine levels on the phenotype of different immune cells, spearman’s correlation analysis was carried out between serum cytokine level and receptor expression profile. Among the elevated cytokines, IL-6 was the only cytokine that was positively correlated with NKp46 + CD56
BrightNK cells. Similar cytokine profiles in serum of both patient groups were rarely correlated with phenotype of immune cells, while the correlation was more common in healthy control which indicates the disrupted axis of cytokine and immune cell interactions in both the group of cases in spite of different state of the disease. Although, study has its limitation as in our data, we did not have ligand and receptor expression profile from healthy tissue. Another limitation for the study is the small sample size in this multiparametric study. However, the study has its own strength, possibly highlighting for the first time a broad immune profile comprising expression of the surface receptors, ligands, soluble ligands and cytokine profiles in both pEOC and rEOC patients in an Indian scenario.