nach oben

European Spine Journal

Erschienen in:

17.04.2023 | Original Article

Endoscopic anterior to psoas lumbar interbody fusion: indications, techniques, and clinical outcomes

verfasst von: Yanting Liu, Chan Woong Park, Sagar Sharma, Vit Kotheeranurak, Jin-Sung Kim

Erschienen in: European Spine Journal | Ausgabe 8/2023

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Purpose

The retrospective study aimed to report the surgical technique and clinic-radiological outcomes of endoscopic anterior to psoas interbody lumbar fusion through the retroperitoneal approach with direct and indirect decompression.

Methods

We retrospectively analyzed the results of clinical parameters of patients who underwent endoscopic anterior to psoas interbody lumbar fusion between June 2013 and June 2022. Clinical outcomes were evaluated by the visual analog scale (VAS) and Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) scores. The radiological outcomes were measured and statistically compared in disc height index (DHI), whole lumbar lordosis (WLL), pelvic Incidence (PI), pelvic tilt (PT), Segmental lordosis (SL), the sagittal vertical axis (SVA).

Results

A total of 35 patients were selected for the procedure ranging in age from 51 to 84 years with 17.83 ± 8.85 months follow-up. The mean operation time in lateral position for one level was 162.96 ± 35.76 min (n = 24), and 207.73 ± 66.60 min for two-level fusion. The mean endoscopic time was 32.83 ± 17.71 min per level, with a total estimated blood loss of 230.57 ± 187.22 cc. The mean postoperative VAS back, leg pain score and ODI improved significantly compared to the preoperative values; Radiological data showed significant change in WLL, SL, DHI, PI, PT, and SS; however, there is no significant difference in SVA postoperatively. Subgroup analysis for the radiographic data showed 50 mm length cage has significantly improved for the DHI, SS and SVA compare to 40 mm length cage. The subgroup analysis results showed that hypertensive patients had significantly higher proportion in the incomplete fusion group compare to complete fusion group at one-year follow-up.

Outcomes

The endoscopic anterior to psoas interbody lumbar fusion achieves satisfactory indirect and direct decompression. This convergent technique presents an effective choice for treating lumbar instability associated with disc herniations and foraminal stenosis, thus complementing the indications for oblique lumbar interbody fusion.

Reisener M-J, Pumberger M, Shue J, Girardi FP, Hughes AP (2020) Trends in lumbar spinal fusion—a literature review. J Spine Surg 6:752–761CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Mayer MH (1997) A new microsurgical technique for minimally invasive anterior lumbar interbody fusion. Spine 22(6):691–699. https://doi.org/10.1097/00007632-199703150-00023CrossRefPubMed

Mobbs RJ, Phan K, Malham G, Seex K, Rao PJ (2015) Lumbar interbody fusion: techniques, indications and comparison of interbody fusion options including PLIF, TLIF, MI-TLIF, OLIF/ATP, LLIF and ALIF. J Spine Surg 1:2–18. https://doi.org/10.3978/j.issn.2414-469X.2015.10.05CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Qureshi R, Puvanesarajah V, Jain A, Shimer AL, Shen FH, Hassanzadeh H (2017) A comparison of anterior and posterior lumbar interbody fusions complications, readmissions, discharge dispositions, and costs. Spine 42:1865–1870. https://doi.org/10.1097/brs.0000000000002248CrossRefPubMed

Hsieh PC, Koski TR, O’Shaughnessy BA, Sugrue P, Salehi S, Ondra S, Liu JC (2007) Anterior lumbar interbody fusion in comparison with transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: implications for the restoration of foraminal height, local disc angle, lumbar lordosis, and sagittal balance. J Neurosurg Spine 7:379–386. https://doi.org/10.3171/spi-07/10/379CrossRefPubMed

Fritzell P, Hagg O, Nordwall A (2003) Complications in lumbar fusion surgery for chronic low back pain: comparison of three surgical techniques used in a prospective randomized study. a report from the swedish lumbar spine study group. Eur Spine J 12:178–189. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-002-0493-8CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Yang PL, Zang QJ, Kang J, Li HP, He XJ (2016) Comparison of clinical efficacy and safety among three surgical approaches for the treatment of spinal tuberculosis: a meta-analysis. Eur Spine J 25:3862–3874. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-016-4546-9CrossRefPubMed

Makanji H, Schoenfeld AJ, Bhalla A, Bono CM (2018) Critical analysis of trends in lumbar fusion for degenerative disorders revisited: influence of technique on fusion rate and clinical outcomes. Eur Spine J 27:1868–1876. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-018-5544-xCrossRefPubMed

Kepler CK, Vaccaro AR, Hilibrand AS, Greg Anderson D, Rihn JA, Albert TJ, Radcliff KE (2014) National trends in the use of fusion techniques to treat degenerative spondylolisthesis. Spine 39(19):1584–1589. https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0000000000000486CrossRefPubMed

10.

Martin BI, Mirza SK, Spina N, Spiker WR, Lawrence B, Brodke DS (2019) Trends in lumbar fusion procedure rates and associated hospital costs for degenerative spinal diseases in the united states, 2004 to 2015. Spine 44:369–376. https://doi.org/10.1097/brs.0000000000002822CrossRefPubMed

11.

Malham GM, Parker RM, Goss B, Blecher CM, Ballok ZE (2014) Indirect foraminal decompression is independent of metabolically active facet arthropathy in extreme lateral interbody fusion. Spine 39(22):E1303–E1310. https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0000000000000551CrossRefPubMed

12.

Adogwa O, Elsamadicy AA, Han JL, Cheng J, Karikari I, Bagley CA (2016) Do measures of surgical effectiveness at 1 year after lumbar spine surgery accurately predict 2-year outcomes? J Neurosurg Spine 25:689–696. https://doi.org/10.3171/2015.8.Spine15476CrossRefPubMed

13.

Jung JM, Chung CK, Kim CH, Yang SH, Ko YS, Choi Y (2021) Intraoperative Radiographs in single-level lateral lumbar interbody fusion can predict radiographic and clinical outcomes of follow-up 2 years after surgery. Spine 46:772–780. https://doi.org/10.1097/brs.0000000000003889CrossRefPubMed

14.

Katz AD, Mancini N, Karukonda T, Greenwood M, Cote M, Moss IL (2019) Approach-based Comparative and predictor analysis of 30-day readmission, reoperation, and morbidity in patients undergoing lumbar interbody fusion using the ACS-NSQIP dataset. Spine 44:432–441. https://doi.org/10.1097/brs.0000000000002850CrossRefPubMed

15.

Heo DH, Choi WS, Park CK, Kim JS (2016) Minimally invasive oblique lumbar interbody fusion with spinal endoscope assistance: technical note. World Neurosurg 96:530–536. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2016.09.033CrossRefPubMed

16.

Kim JS, Seong JH (2017) Endoscope-assisted oblique lumbar interbody fusion for the treatment of cauda equina syndrome: a technical note. Eur Spine J 26:397–403. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-016-4902-9CrossRefPubMed

17.

Heo DH, Kim JS (2017) Clinical and radiological outcomes of spinal endoscopic discectomy-assisted oblique lumbar interbody fusion: preliminary results. Neurosurg Focus 43:E13. https://doi.org/10.3171/2017.5.Focus17196CrossRefPubMed

18.

Aguirre AO, Soliman MAR, Azmy S, Khan A, Jowdy PK, Mullin JP, Pollina J (2022) Incidence of major and minor vascular injuries during lateral access lumbar interbody fusion procedures: a retrospective comparative study and systematic literature review. Neurosurg Rev 45:1275–1289. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10143-021-01699-8CrossRefPubMed

19.

Pham MH, Hassan O, Diaz-Aguilar LD, Lehman RA (2021) Complications associated with oblique lumbar interbody fusion at l5-s1: a systematic review of the literature. Neurosurg Open. https://doi.org/10.1093/neuopn/okab018CrossRef

20.

Phan K, Joshua X, Scherman DB, Rao PJ, Mobbs RJ (2017) Anterior lumbar interbody fusion with and without an “access surgeon”: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Spine 42(10):E592–E601. https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0000000000001905CrossRefPubMed

21.

Joseph JR, Smith BW, La Marca F, Park P (2015) Comparison of complication rates of minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion and lateral lumbar interbody fusion: a systematic review of the literature. Neurosurg Focus 39:E4. https://doi.org/10.3171/2015.7.Focus15278CrossRefPubMed

22.

Berry CA, Thawrani DP, Makhoul FR (2021) Inclusion of L5–S1 in oblique lumbar interbody fusion-techniques and early complications-a single center experience. Spine J 21:418–429. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spinee.2020.10.016CrossRefPubMed

23.

Kim KS, Chin DK, Park JY (2009) Herniated nucleus pulposus in isthmic spondylolisthesis: higher incidence of foraminal and extraforaminal types. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 151:1445–1450. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00701-009-0411-5CrossRefPubMed

24.

Jenkins NW, Parrish JM, Nolte MT, Jadczak CN, Geoghegan CE, Mohan S, Hrynewycz NM, Singh K (2021) Charlson comorbidity index: an inaccurate predictor of minimally invasive lumbar spinal fusion outcomes. Int J Spine Surg 15:770–779. https://doi.org/10.14444/8099CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Titel: Endoscopic anterior to psoas lumbar interbody fusion: indications, techniques, and clinical outcomes
verfasst von: Yanting Liu
Chan Woong Park
Sagar Sharma
Vit Kotheeranurak
Jin-Sung Kim
Publikationsdatum: 17.04.2023
Verlag: Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Erschienen in: European Spine Journal / Ausgabe 8/2023
Print ISSN: 0940-6719
Elektronische ISSN: 1432-0932
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-023-07700-w

Arthropedia

Grundlagenwissen der Arthroskopie und Gelenkchirurgie. Erweitert durch Fallbeispiele, Videos und Abbildungen.
» Jetzt entdecken

Neu im Fachgebiet Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie

Knie-TEP: Kein Vorteil durch antibiotikahaltigen Knochenzement

29.05.2024 Periprothetische Infektionen Nachrichten

Zur Zementierung einer Knie-TEP wird in Deutschland zu über 98% Knochenzement verwendet, der mit einem Antibiotikum beladen ist. Ob er wirklich besser ist als Zement ohne Antibiotikum, kann laut Registerdaten bezweifelt werden.

Häusliche Gewalt in der orthopädischen Notaufnahme oft nicht erkannt

28.05.2024 Häusliche Gewalt Nachrichten

In der Notaufnahme wird die Chance, Opfer von häuslicher Gewalt zu identifizieren, von Orthopäden und Orthopädinnen offenbar zu wenig genutzt. Darauf deuten die Ergebnisse einer Fragebogenstudie an der Sahlgrenska-Universität in Schweden hin.

Fehlerkultur in der Medizin – Offenheit zählt!

28.05.2024 Fehlerkultur Podcast

Darüber reden und aus Fehlern lernen, sollte das Motto in der Medizin lauten. Und zwar nicht nur im Sinne der Patientensicherheit. Eine negative Fehlerkultur kann auch die Behandelnden ernsthaft krank machen, warnt Prof. Dr. Reinhard Strametz. Ein Plädoyer und ein Leitfaden für den offenen Umgang mit kritischen Ereignissen in Medizin und Pflege.

Mehr Frauen im OP – weniger postoperative Komplikationen

21.05.2024 Allgemeine Chirurgie Nachrichten

Ein Frauenanteil von mindestens einem Drittel im ärztlichen Op.-Team war in einer großen retrospektiven Studie aus Kanada mit einer signifikanten Reduktion der postoperativen Morbidität assoziiert.

Update Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

Newsletter bestellen

Live-Webinar "Urologie und Sexualmedizin in der Praxis"

Springer Medizin

Endoscopic anterior to psoas lumbar interbody fusion: indications, techniques, and clinical outcomes

Abstract

Purpose

Methods

Results

Outcomes

Arthropedia

Neu im Fachgebiet Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie

Knie-TEP: Kein Vorteil durch antibiotikahaltigen Knochenzement

Häusliche Gewalt in der orthopädischen Notaufnahme oft nicht erkannt

Fehlerkultur in der Medizin – Offenheit zählt!

Mehr Frauen im OP – weniger postoperative Komplikationen

Update Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie

Live-Webinar "Urologie und Sexualmedizin in der Praxis"

Springer Medizin

Abstract

Purpose

Methods

Results

Outcomes

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu diesem Inhalt zu erhalten

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 8/2023

Clinical outcomes of uniportal compared with biportal endoscopic decompression for the treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis

2nd and 3rd generation full endoscopic lumbar spine surgery: clinical safety and learning curve

Learning curve for endoscopic posterior cervical foraminotomy

Letter to the Editor concerning “Predictive factors for respiratory failure and in‑hospital mortality after surgery for spinal metastasis” by Jaipanya P, et al. (Eur Spine J [2023]: doi:10.1007/s00586-023-07638-z)

Enhanced recovery after surgery pathway with modified biportal endoscopic transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion using a large cage. Comparative study with minimally invasive microscopic transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion

Full-endoscopic bilateral over-the-top decompression in lumbar central stenosis: surgical technique and outcomes

Arthropedia

Neu im Fachgebiet Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie

Knie-TEP: Kein Vorteil durch antibiotikahaltigen Knochenzement

Häusliche Gewalt in der orthopädischen Notaufnahme oft nicht erkannt

Fehlerkultur in der Medizin – Offenheit zählt!

Mehr Frauen im OP – weniger postoperative Komplikationen

Update Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie