nach oben

18.04.2024 | Original Article

Effect of cement type on vertical marginal discrepancy and residual excess cement in screwmentable and cementable implant-supported monolithic zirconia crowns

verfasst von: Pınar Yıldız, Göknil Alkan Demetoğlu, Esra Talay Çevlik

Erschienen in: Odontology

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to investigate the vertical marginal discrepancy (VMD) and residual excess cement (REC) of cementable and screwmentable monolithic zirconia crowns cemented with different types of cement. Abutments were attached to 40 implant analogues. Crowns were created using computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing technology from monolithic zirconia blocks, either with or without a screw access hole (SAC). Crowns created both ways were split into two groups and cemented with resin and zinc polycarboxylate cement under a 5-kg weight. VMD and REC values were evaluated using an X20 zoom stereomicroscope. Data were analysed using two-way ANOVA and the Bonferroni test. According to the two-way ANOVA results, REC measurements differed significantly in the crown design and cement groups. However, whilst VMD values were significantly different in both crown design groups, there was no significant difference in the cement groups. According to the Bonferroni test results, the highest REC (157.241 ± 44.29 µm) and VMD (68.052 ± 16.19 µm) values were found in the crowns without SAC and cemented with zinc polycarboxylate. Screwmentable crowns are more effective than cementable crowns in reducing REC and VMD. Whilst polycarboxylate cement reduces VMD in screwmentable crowns, resin cement is more suitable for cementable crowns.

Okuni S, Maekawa K, Mino T, Kurosaki Y, Kuboki T. A retrospective comparison of the survival of vital teeth adjacent to single, bounded edentulous spaces rehabilitated using implant-supported, resin-bonded, and conventional fixed dental prostheses. J Dent. 2022;116: 103911. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2021.103911.CrossRefPubMed

Muddugangadhar BC, Amarnath GS, Sonika R, Chheda PS, Garg A. Meta-analysis of failure and survival rate of implant-supported single crowns, fixed partial denture and implant tooth-supported prostheses. J Int Oral Health. 2015;7:11–7.PubMedPubMedCentral

Lemos CAA, de Souza Batista VE, de Faria Almeida DA, Júnior JFS, Verri FR, Pellizzer EP. Evaluation of cement-retained versus screw-retained implant-supported restorations for marginal bone loss: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Prosthet Dent. 2016;115:419–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2015.08.026.CrossRefPubMed

Gaddale R, Mishra SK, Chowdhary R. Complications of screw-and cement-retained implant-supported full-arch restorations: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Oral Implantol. 2020;13:11–40.

Vindasiute E, Puisys A, Maslova N, Linkeviciene L, Peciuliene V, Linkevicius T. Clinical factors influencing removal of the cement excess in implant-supported restorations. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2015;17:771–8. https://doi.org/10.1111/cid.12170.CrossRefPubMed

Vindasiute E, Puisys A, Maslova N, Linkeviciene L, Peciuliene V, Linkevicius T. The influence of margin location on the amount of undetected cement excess after delivery of cement-retained implant restorations. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2011;22:1379–84. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2010.02119.x.CrossRefPubMed

Linkevicius T, Vindasiute E, Puisys A, Linkeviciene L, Maslova N, Puriene A. The influence of the cementation margin position on the amount of undetected cement. A prospective clinical study. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2013;24:71–6. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2012.02453.x.

Korsch M, Robra BP, Walther W. Predictors of excess cement and tissue response to fixed implant-supported dentures after cementation. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2015;17:45–53. https://doi.org/10.1111/cid.12122.CrossRef

Al Amri MD, Al-Johany SS, Al-Qarni MN, Al-Bakri AS, Al-Maflehi NS, Abualsaud HS. Influence of space size of abutment screw access channel on the amount of extruded excess cement and marginal accuracy of cement-retained single implant restorations. J Prosthet Dent. 2018;119:263–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2017.03.013.CrossRefPubMed

10.

Rajan M, Gunaseelan R. Fabrication of a cement-and screw-retained implant prosthesis. J Prosthet Dent. 2004;92:578–80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2004.09.009.CrossRefPubMed

11.

Sarafidou K, Vasileiadi G, Louvrou MK, Moldovani E, Koidis P, Kokoti M, et al. Screwmentable implant-supported prostheses: a systematic review. J Prosthet Dent. 2021; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2021.08.027.

12.

Grenade C, Mainjot A, Vanheusden A. Fit of single tooth zirconia copings: comparison between various manufacturing processes. J Prosthet Dent. 2011;105:249–55. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(11)60040-1.CrossRefPubMed

13.

Kohorst P, Junghanns J, Dittmer MP, Borchers L, Stiesch M. Different CAD/CAM-processing routes for zirconia restorations: influence on fitting accuracy. Clin Oral Investig. 2011;15:527–36. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-010-0415-9.CrossRefPubMed

14.

Abduo J, Lyons K, Swain M. Fit of zirconia fixed partial denture: a systematic review. J Oral Rehabil. 2010;37:866–76. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2842.2010.02113.x.CrossRefPubMed

15.

Sailer I, Mühlemann S, Zwahlen M, Hämmerle CH, Schneider D. Cemented and screw-retained implant reconstructions: a systematic review of the survival and complication rates. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2012;23:163–201. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2012.02538.x.CrossRefPubMed

16.

Moilanen P, Hjerppe J, Lassila LV, Närhi TO. Fracture strength and precision of fit of implant-retained monolithic zirconia crowns. J Oral Implantol. 2018;44:330–4. https://doi.org/10.1563/aaid-joi-D-17-00249.CrossRefPubMed

17.

Malkondu Ö, Tinastepe N, Akan E, Kazazoğlu E. An overview of monolithic zirconia in dentistry. Biotechnol Biotechnol Equip. 2016;30:644–52. https://doi.org/10.1080/13102818.2016.1177470.CrossRef

18.

Akhlaghian M, Khaledi AA, Farzin M, Pardis S. Vertical marginal fit of zirconia copings fabricated with one direct and three indirect digital scanning techniques. J Prosthet Dent. 2021;126:421–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2020.03.028.CrossRefPubMed

19.

Linkevicius T. Zero bone loss concepts. 1st ed. Berlin: Quintessence Publishing Co; 2019. p. 166–82.

20.

Kachhara S, Ariga P, Jain AR. Recommended cementation for monolithic zirconia crowns. Drug Invention Today. 2018;10:566–8.

21.

Ghodsi S, Arzani S, Shekarian M, Aghamohseni M. Cement selection criteria for full coverage restorations: a comprehensive review of literature. J Clin Exp Dent. 2021;13:1154. https://doi.org/10.4317/jced.58671.CrossRef

22.

Capa N, Tuncel I, Tak O, Usumez A. The effect of luting cement and titanium base on the final color of zirconium oxide core material. J Prosthodont. 2017;26:136–40. https://doi.org/10.1111/jopr.12377.CrossRefPubMed

23.

Nejatidanesh F, Savabi O, Ebrahimi M, Savabi G. Retentive strength of implant-supported base metal copings over short metal abutments using different luting agents and surface treatments. Imp Dent. 2014;23:162–7. https://doi.org/10.1097/ID.0000000000000049.CrossRef

24.

Mansour A, Ercoli C, Graser G, Tallents R, Moss M. Comparative evaluation of casting retention using the ITI solid abutment with six cements. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2002;13:343–8.CrossRefPubMed

25.

Kurt M, Külünk T, Ural Ç, Külünk Ş, Danişman Ş, Savaş S. The effect of different surface treatments on cement-retained implant-supported restorations. J Oral Implantol. 2013;39:44–51. https://doi.org/10.1563/AAID-JOI-D-10-00151.CrossRefPubMed

26.

Mehl C, Harder S, Wolfart M, Kern M, Wolfart S. Retrievability of implant-retained crowns following cementation. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2008;19:1304–11. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2008.01587.x.CrossRefPubMed

27.

Garg P, Pujari M, Prithviraj DR, Khare S. Retentiveness of various luting agents used with implant-supported prosthesis: an in vitro study. J Oral Implantol. 2014;40:649–54. https://doi.org/10.1563/AAID-JOI-D-12-00008.CrossRefPubMed

28.

Nejatidanesh F, Savabi O, Shahtoosi M. Retention of implant-supported zirconium oxide ceramic restorations using different luting agents. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2013;24:20–4. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2011.02358.x.CrossRefPubMed

29.

Piattelli A, Scarano A, Paolantonio M, Assenza B, Leghissa GC, Di Bonaventura G, et al. Fluids and microbial penetration in the internal part of cement-retained versus screw-retained implant-abutment connections. J Periodontal. 2001;72:1146–50. https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.2000.72.9.1146.CrossRef

30.

Oyagüe RC, Sánchez-Turrión A, López-Lozano JF, Suárez-García MJ. Vertical discrepancy and microleakage of laser-sintered and vacuum-cast implant-supported structures luted with different cement types. J Dent. 2012;40:123–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2011.11.007.CrossRefPubMed

31.

Martinez-Rus F, Ferreiroa A, Ozcan M, Pradies G. Marginal discrepancy of monolithic and veneered all-ceramic crowns on titanium and zirconia implant abutments before and after adhesive cementation: a scanning electron microscopy analysis. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2013;28:480–7. https://doi.org/10.11607/jomi.2759.

32.

Moldovan O, Luthardt RG, Corcodel N, Rudolph H. Three-dimensional fit of CAD/CAM-made zirconia copings. Dent Mater. 2011;27:1273–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2011.09.006.CrossRefPubMed

33.

Habib SR, Ali M, Al Hossan A, Majeed-Saidan A, Al QM. Effect of cementation, cement type and vent holes on fit of zirconia copings. Saudi Dent J. 2019;31:45–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sdentj.2018.09.001.CrossRefPubMed

34.

Hidalgo J, Baghernejad D, Falk A, Larsson C. The influence of two different cements on remaining cement excess in cement-retained implant-supported zirconia crowns. An in vitro study. BDJ open. 2021;7:5.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

35.

Linkevicius T, Vindasiute E, Puisys A, Peciuliene V. The influence of margin location on the amount of undetected cement excess after delivery of cement-retained implant restorations. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2011;22:1379–84. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2010.02119.x.CrossRefPubMed

36.

Wang F, Li Q, Chen L, Liu H, Chen L, Dong H. The distribution of marginal excess cement of implant-supported vented and non-vented zirconia crowns with and without cleaning procedures. J Prosthodont. 2023;1:7. https://doi.org/10.1111/jopr.13680.CrossRef

37.

Sancho-Puchades M, Crameri D, Özcan M, Sailer I, Jung RE, Hämmerle CHF, Thoma DS. The influence of the emergence profile on the amount of undetected cement excess after delivery of cement-retained implant reconstructions. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2017;28:1515–22. https://doi.org/10.1111/clr.13020.CrossRefPubMed

38.

Schedle A, Franz A, Rausch-Fan X, Spittler A, Lucas T, Samorapoompichit P, et al. Cytotoxic effects of dental composites, adhesive substances, compomers and cements. Dent Mater. 1998;14:429–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0300-5712(99)00018-4.CrossRefPubMed

39.

Wadhwani C, Rapoport D, La Rosa S, Hess T, Kretschmar S. Radiographic detection and characteristic patterns of residual excess cement associated with cement-retained implant restorations: a clinical report. J Prosthet Dent. 2012;107:151–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(12)60046-8.CrossRefPubMed

40.

Cruz MA, Sorenson JA, Johnson WK. Effect of venting and seating techniques on the cementation of complete coverage restorations. Oper Dent. 2008;33:690–5. https://doi.org/10.2341/08-19.CrossRefPubMed

41.

Hess TA. A technique to eliminate subgingival cement adhesion to implant abutments by using polytetrafluoroethylene tape. J Prosthet Dent. 2014;112:365–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2013.06.026.CrossRefPubMed

42.

Santosa RE, Martin W, Morton D. Effects of a cementing technique in addition to luting agent on the uniaxial retention force of a single-tooth implant-supported restoration: an in vitro study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2010;25:1145–52.PubMed

43.

Zhou H, Ye S, Liu M, Feng H, Wen C. Selection of 1-mm venting or 2.5-mm screw access holes on implant crowns based on cement extrusion and retention capacity. BMC Oral Health. 2022;22:1–9. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-022-02145-x.

Titel: Effect of cement type on vertical marginal discrepancy and residual excess cement in screwmentable and cementable implant-supported monolithic zirconia crowns
verfasst von: Pınar Yıldız
Göknil Alkan Demetoğlu
Esra Talay Çevlik
Publikationsdatum: 18.04.2024
Verlag: Springer Nature Singapore
Erschienen in: Odontology
Print ISSN: 1618-1247
Elektronische ISSN: 1618-1255
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10266-024-00938-w

Bestellen Sie unseren kostenlosen Newsletter Update Zahnmedizin und bleiben Sie gut informiert – ganz bequem per eMail.

Newsletter bestellen

Die Highlights vom Kongress des American College of Cardiology 2024

Springer Medizin

Effect of cement type on vertical marginal discrepancy and residual excess cement in screwmentable and cementable implant-supported monolithic zirconia crowns

Abstract

Neu im Fachgebiet Zahnmedizin

Darf man die Behandlung eines Neonazis ablehnen?

Ein Drittel der jungen Ärztinnen und Ärzte erwägt abzuwandern

Endlich: Zi zeigt, mit welchen PVS Praxen zufrieden sind

Parodontalbehandlung verbessert Prognose bei Katheterablation

Newsletter

Die Highlights vom Kongress des American College of Cardiology 2024

Springer Medizin

Abstract

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu diesem Inhalt zu erhalten

Neu im Fachgebiet Zahnmedizin

Darf man die Behandlung eines Neonazis ablehnen?

Ein Drittel der jungen Ärztinnen und Ärzte erwägt abzuwandern

Endlich: Zi zeigt, mit welchen PVS Praxen zufrieden sind

Parodontalbehandlung verbessert Prognose bei Katheterablation

Newsletter