Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Ophthalmology and Therapy 4/2023

Open Access 26.05.2023 | ORIGINAL RESEARCH

Distribution and Characteristics of Ocular Biometric Parameters among a Chinese Population: A Hospital-Based Study

verfasst von: Xiaohang Chen, Yongzhi Huang, Hao Chen, Longqian Liu

Erschienen in: Ophthalmology and Therapy | Ausgabe 4/2023

Abstract

Introduction

This study aimed to describe the distribution and characteristics of ocular biometric parameters among a large Chinese population.

Methods

This retrospective cross-sectional study included 146,748 subjects whose ocular biometric parameters were measured at the ophthalmology clinic of West China Hospital, Sichuan University, and recorded in the hospital database. Ocular biometric parameters, including axial length, anterior chamber depth, corneal keratometry, and keratometric astigmatism, were recorded. Only monocular data for each subject were analyzed to avoid bias.

Results

Valid data from 85,770 subjects (43,552 females and 42,218 males) aged 3–114 years were included in this study. The mean axial length, mean anterior chamber depth, average corneal keratometry, and mean keratometric astigmatism were 24.61 mm, 3.30 mm, 43.76 D, and 1.19 D, respectively. The stratification of the ocular parameters by age and gender showed significant inter-gender and inter-age differences.

Conclusions

Analysis of a large population of subjects in western China aged 3–114 years showed that the distribution and characteristics of ocular biometric parameters, including axial length, anterior chamber depth, corneal keratometry, and keratometric astigmatism, differed by age and gender. This study is the first to describe ocular biometric parameters in subjects aged > 100 years.
Hinweise

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at https://​doi.​org/​10.​1007/​s40123-023-00716-x.
Key Summary Points
This study analyzed the distribution and characteristics of ocular biometric parameters among a large Chinese population aged 3–114 years.
The aging of the global population emphasizes the importance of assessing ocular biometry parameters in older generations, as these parameters may indicate the development of clinical ocular diseases.
A key strength of the present study is its determination of ocular biometric parameters in subjects aged > 100 years, a group that has not been studied previously.
This study reveals the mean values of biometric parameters, including axial length, anterior chamber depth, corneal keratometry, and keratometric astigmatism, among different age groups and genders of the Chinese population.
Significant inter-gender and inter-age differences were observed in the biometric parameters, including axial length, keratometry, keratometric astigmatism, and anterior chamber depth.
These results contribute to a greater understanding of the inter-gender and inter-age differences in the potential prevalence of ocular diseases.

Introduction

The measurement of ocular biometric parameters is an essential aspect of ophthalmic practice. In addition, determining the means and ranges of the ocular parameters at different ages and gender can help establish reference values and guide the diagnosis of ocular diseases [18]. However, since ocular biometric parameters differ by age, gender, and geographic region [911], there is a need to determine the means and distributions of these parameters among different age groups within a population.
To date, several studies have analyzed the ocular biometric parameters in various populations. For example, the anterior chamber depth (ACD) and axial length (AL) has been reported in German subjects aged 16–87 years [12], and the correlation between ACD and age has been determined among Turkish subjects aged 3–85 years [13]. Moreover, a population-based study including patients from Slovakia aged 19–96 years evaluated the ACD, AL, and corneal keratometry (K) [14]. Another study assessed K among the Canadian population aged 19–84 years [15]. Other studies have reported these ocular biometric parameters in subjects of specific ages and gender. However, few population-based studies have analyzed these ocular parameters among Chinese subjects of all ages.
Therefore, this study aimed to investigate the distribution and characteristics of ocular biometric data across a wide age range (3–114 years) among a large Chinese population.

Methods

Study Design

This retrospective cross-sectional study enrolled patients whose ocular biometric parameters were measured at the ophthalmology clinic of West China Hospital, Sichuan University (Chengdu, China), between November 2011 and December 2019, and whose records were stored in the clinic database. Only biometric measurements recorded from one eye were included in the data analysis to avoid bias.
The study protocol was approved by the Ethics Committee on Biomedical Research of West China Hospital of Sichuan University. Furthermore, the study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki.

Measurements

Ocular biometric parameters, including AL, ACD, K, and keratometric astigmatism (KA), were measured using an IOL Master 500 (Version 7.3, Carl Zeiss Meditec, Jena, Germany) optical biometer featuring distance-independent telecentric keratometry. Patients were termed to have high myopia when the monocular axial length exceeded 26 mm [17]. Mean keratometry was calculated as the average of corneal steep K and flat K, while KA was calculated as the difference between steep K and flat K [18]. The gender of the participants was self-reported [16].

Inclusion and Exclusion Criteria

Raw data retrieved from the clinic database were included in the initial analysis. The data were read and collated by two independent researchers according to the unified quality standard, with results cross-checked. Conflicting views were solved by consensus. Only the initial measurements were included in the analysis for patients with several repeat measurements. Patients with ocular trauma and inconsistent measurement equipment, age, gender, or missing patient data for any of the above indicators were excluded from the analysis. After the data were collated and cleaned, further data analysis was performed (Fig. 1).

Statistical Analysis

All measurement data were recorded in Microsoft Excel (Microsoft Office 2016; Microsoft, Redmond, WA, USA) by two independent researchers. Statistical analyses were performed using SPSS version 26.0 (Chicago, IL, USA) and GraphPad Prism version 8.3 (San Diego, CA, USA) software.
Data were expressed as mean ± standard deviation (SD). The normal distribution of the data was determined using Kolmogorov–Smirnov (K–S) tests. Unpaired two-tailed t-tests were used to evaluate differences between two groups with normally distributed data, while nonparametric Mann–Whitney tests were used to evaluate differences between two groups with non-normally distributed data. Differences between three or more groups were evaluated using Kruskal–Wallis tests, followed by Dunn’s multiple comparison tests. Correlations between ocular biometric parameters and between these parameters and age were evaluated using Pearson or Spearman correlation tests. A p-value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

Distribution and Characteristics of Ocular Biometric Parameters of the Study Population

Data were collected from 146,748 patients who were seen at the ophthalmology clinic of West China Hospital, Sichuan University. However, data from 60,978 patients were excluded due to missing information on age, gender, and ocular biometric parameters. Furthermore, duplicated data were excluded. A total of 85,770 subjects aged 3–114 years (Fig. 2), including 42,218 males (49.22%) and 43,552 females (50.78%), were included in the final analysis.
The study participants had a mean AL of 24.61 mm, mean ACD of 3.30 mm, mean K of 43.7 D, and mean keratometric astigmatism of 1.19 D (Table 1). The mean AL was 0.11 mm longer in males than in females, while K was steeper in males than in females. However, the mean ACD was shallower in females than in males. The difference in KA between females and males was 0.04 D.
Table 1
Ocular biometric parameters of the study population (N = 85,770)
 
Mean ± SD (95% CI)
Median (IQR)
Skewness
Kurtosis
p-value (gender)
AL (mm)
24.61 ± 2.36 (24.60, 24.63)
24.02 (23.06–25.54)
1.462
2.815
 < 0.0001
K (D)
43.76 ± 1.77 (43.75, 43.77)
43.81 (42.72–44.89)
−0.633
2.756
 < 0.0001
ACD (mm)
3.30 ± 0.51 (3.30, 3.31)
3.36 (2.95–3.68)
−0.148
0.097
 < 0.0001
KA
1.19 ± 0.93 (1.18, 1.19)
0.97 (0.58–1.54)
2.984
21.14
 < 0.0001
SD standard deviation, CI confidence interval, IQR interquartile range, AL axial length, K average corneal keratometry, ACD anterior chamber depth, KA keratometric astigmatism
Mann–Whitney tests were used for between-gender comparisons
Skewness was used to denote the degree of the skewed distribution of the ocular biometric parameters and was a measure of data asymmetry. The skewness included normal distribution (skewness = 0), right-skew distribution (positive skew distribution, skewness > 0), and left-skew distribution (negative skew distribution, skewness < 0). Kurtosis showed the peakedness of the distribution of the ocular biometric parameters and was divided into mesokurtic, leptokurtic, and platykurtic [19]. The AL (median, 24.02 mm; K–S test, p < 0.0001) was positively skewed, with a kurtosis of 2.815 (Fig. 3). In addition, KA showed a right skew distribution (median, 0.97; K–S test, p < 0.0001) with a kurtosis of 21.14. In contrast, ACD (median, 3.36; K–S test, p < 0.0001) and K (median, 43.81; K–S test, p < 0.0001) showed negative skew distributions with ACD having a kurtosis of 0.097 and K having a kurtosis of 2.756 (Figs. 4 and 5). All the parameters (AL, KA, ACD, and K) showed that the overall data distribution was flat compared with the normal distribution, which was platykurtic.

Inter-Gender Differences of Ocular Biometric Parameters in Different Age Groups

The World Health Organization defines adolescence as the age group of 10–19 years [2024], and the other participants were divided into age groups of 10-year intervals [25, 26] stratified by gender to determine age- and gender-related differences: subjects aged 3–9 years (Group A, N = 5191), 10–19 years (Group B, N = 11,208), 20–29 years (Group C, N = 6680), 30–39 years (Group D, N = 4100), 40–49 years (Group E, N = 225), 50–59 years (Group F, N = 10,139), 60–69 years (Group G, N = 18,920), 70–79 years (Group H, N = 16,687), 80–89 years (Group I, N = 5384), and 90–114 years (Group J, N = 1236). The ocular biometric parameters in each age group were further stratified based on gender (Table 2 and Table 3).
Table 2
Ocular biometric parameters in females as stratified by age (N = 43,552)
Age group
Number of participants
AL (mm) (mean ± SD, 95% CI)
ACD (mm) (mean ± SD, 95% CI)
K (D) (mean ± SD, 95% CI)
KA (D) (mean ± SD, 95% CI)
Group A
1891
23.49 ± 1.58 (23.42, 23.57)
3.55 ± 0.35 (3.54, 3.57)
43.42 ± 1.62 (43.35, 43.50)
1.77 ± 0.99 (1.73, 1.82)
Group B
4972
24.89 ± 1.34 (24.85 24.92)
3.71 ± 0.28 (3.71, 3.72)
42.93 ± 1.68 (42.88, 42.98)
1.60 ± 0.87 (1.58, 1.63)
Group C
2588
25.44 ± 2.03 (25.36, 25.52)
3.69 ± 0.32 (3.67, 3.70)
43.33 ± 1.70 (43.27, 43.40)
1.60 ± 0.97 (1.56, 1.63)
Group D
1888
25.51 ± 2.32 (25.41, 25.61)
3.65 ± 0.35 (3.64, 3.67)
43.53 ± 1.87 (43.44, 43.61)
1.54 ± 1.07 (1.49, 1.58)
Group E
3663
25.83 ± 3.13 (25.73, 25.93)
3.47 ± 0.45 (3.46, 3.49)
43.45 ± 2.16 (43.38, 43.52)
1.19 ± 0.96 (1.16, 1.22)
Group F
6566
24.99 ± 3.07 (24.92, 25.07)
3.28 ± 0.48 (3.27, 3.30)
43.87 ± 1.89 (43.82, 43.92)
1.00 ± 0.84 (0.98, 1.02)
Group G
8079
24.33 ± 2.55 (24.28, 24.39)
3.14 ± 0.48 (3.13, 3.15)
44.09 ± 1.64 (44.05, 44.12)
0.91 ± 0.85 (0.89, 0.93)
Group H
9249
23.97 ± 1.98 (23.92, 24.01)
3.01 ± 0.48 (3.00, 3.02)
44.21 ± 1.55 (44.17, 44.24)
0.98 ± 0.81 (0.96, 1.00)
Group I
3946
23.74 ± 1.55 (23.69, 23.79)
2.92 ± 0.48 (2.90, 2.93)
44.17 ± 1.53 (44.13, 44.22)
1.11 ± 0.80 (1.09, 1.14)
Group J
710
23.71 ± 1.37 (23.61, 23.81)
2.99 ± 0.51 (2.95, 3.03)
43.92 ± 1.63 (43.80, 44.04)
1.24 ± 0.88 (1.17, 1.30)
p-Values between groups
 < 0.0001
 < 0.0001
 < 0.0001
 < 0.0001
Total
43,552
24.56 ± 2.41 (24.54, 24.58)
3.28 ± 0.52 (3.27, 3.28)
43.80 ± 1.77 (43.78, 43.82)
1.17 ± 0.92 (1.16, 1.18)
AL axial length, K average corneal keratometry, ACD anterior chamber depth, KA keratometric astigmatism
Group A, 3–9 years; Group B, 10–19 years; Group C, 20–29 years; Group D, 30–39 years; Group E, 40–49 years; Group F, 50–59 years; Group G, 60–69 years; Group H, 70–79 years; Group I, 80–89 years; Group J, 90–114 years
The age groups were compared using Kruskal–Wallis tests and Dunn’s multiple comparison tests
Table 3
Ocular biometric parameters in males as stratified by age (N = 42,558)
Age group
Number of participants
AL (mm) (mean ± SD, 95% CI)
ACD (mm) (mean ± SD, 95% CI)
K (D) (mean ± SD, 95% CI)
KA (D) (mean ± SD, 95% CI)
Group A
3300
24.15 ± 1.51 (24.10, 24.21)
3.57 ± 0.31 (3.56, 3.58)
43.25 ± 1.60 (43.19, 43.30)
1.56 ± 0.89 (1.53, 1.59)
Group B
6236
25.16 ± 1.50 (25.12, 25.20)
3.70 ± 0.27 (3.70, 3.71)
42.94 ± 1.70 (42.90, 42.98)
1.60 ± 0.92 (1.58, 1.63)
Group C
4092
25.97 ± 2.01 (25.91, 26.04)
3.70 ± 0.31 (3.69, 3.71)
43.56 ± 1.70 (43.51, 43.61)
1.54 ± 1.04 (1.51, 1.57)
Group D
2212
25.91 ± 2.57 (25.80, 26.01)
3.59 ± 0.39 (3.57, 3.61)
43.54 ± 2.05 (43.45, 43.62)
1.32 ± 0.98 (1.28, 1.36)
Group E
2562
25.31 ± 3.14 (25.19, 25.44)
3.44 ± 0.45 (3.42, 3.45)
43.46 ± 2.15 (43.38, 43.54)
1.18 ± 0.95 (1.14, 1.21)
Group F
3573
24.89 ± 2.92 (24.79, 24.98)
3.31 ± 0.46 (3.30, 3.33)
43.76 ± 1.83 (43.70, 43.82)
1.06 ± 0.84 (1.03, 1.08)
Group G
10,841
24.21 ± 2.39 (24.16, 24.25)
3.12 ± 0.49 (3.12, 3.13)
44.10 ± 1.61 (44.07, 44.13)
0.92 ± 0.82 (0.90, 0.94)
Group H
7438
23.97 ± 2.01 (23.93, 24.02)
3.02 ± 0.49 (3.01, 3.04)
44.16 ± 1.59 (44.13, 44.20)
1.01 ± 0.90 (0.99, 1.03)
Group I
1438
23.80 ± 1.56 (23.72, 23.88)
2.97 ± 0.50 (2.94, 3.00)
44.09 ± 1.59 (44.01, 44.17)
1.16 ± 0.86 (1.12, 1.21)
Group J
526
23.73 ± 1.26 (23.62, 23.84)
2.86 ± 0.44 (2.83, 2.90)
44.17 ± 1.54 (44.04, 44.30)
1.15 ± 0.81 (1.08, 1.22)
p values between groups
 < 0.0001
 < 0.0001
 < 0.0001
 < 0.0001
Total
42,218
24.67 ± 2.32 (24.65, 24.69)
3.33 ± 0.51 (3.33, 3.34)
43.72 ± 1.76 (43.71, 43.74)
1.21 ± 0.94 (1.20, 1.21)
AL axial length, K average corneal keratometry, ACD anterior chamber depth, KA keratometric astigmatism
Group A, 3–9 years; Group B, 10–19 years; Group C, 20–29 years; Group D, 30–39 years; Group E, 40–49 years; Group F, 50–59 years; Group G, 60–69 years; Group H, 70–79 years; Group I, 80–89 years; Group J, 90–114 years
The age groups were compared using Kruskal–Wallis tests and Dunn’s multiple comparison tests

Axial Length (AL)

In males, the AL was shown to increase with age till the age of 30 years, followed by a slight decline. However, in females, the AL was shown to increase with age till age 40 years, followed by a decline. No significant differences in AL were observed between males and females aged 70–114 years. As shown in Fig. 6, most patients with axial lengths over 26 mm were younger than 30 years. The highest percentage of subjects with axial lengths above 26 mm was observed in Group E among females and Group C among males.

Corneal Keratometry (K)

As presented in Tables 2 and 3, the corneal keratometry was relatively stable, with fewer variations among all age groups in both males and females. However, there was a slightly increasing trend with fluctuations in females and males. Figure 6 also displays the data on the average keratometry over 48 diopters in each age and gender group to show the potential prevalence of suspect keratoconus in all age groups. Most study participants with K over 48 D were aged 30–39 years, with a proportion of 0.68% in females and 0.70% in males.
In both males and females, KA showed a gradual decrease with age up to 60–79 years, followed by a slight increase until the age of 114 years (Tables 2 and 3).

Anterior Chamber Depth (ACD)

The ACD showed an increasing trend until the age of 20–29 years, followed by a decline in both males and females. Furthermore, the mean ACD differed significantly among Groups A to G. However, there were no significant differences between Groups H, I, and J. There was a declining trend in ACD values with increasing age in males and females. As shown in Fig. 6, females were more likely than males to have a shallower ACD (ACD < 2.8 mm) before the age of 60 years. Moreover, the older population were more likely to have an anterior chamber depth of less than 2.8 mm than the younger population.

Correlation of Ocular Biometric Parameters with Age in Males and females

Table 4 presents the correlation of ocular biometric parameters with age in females among all age groups. Age was negatively correlated with AL (r = −0.256, p < 0.0001), ACD (r = −0.551, p < 0.0001), and KA (r = −0.270, p < 0.0001). However, age was positively correlated with K (r = 0.215, p < 0.0001). In addition, positive correlations were observed between AL and ACD (r = 0.424, p < 0.0001), AL and KA (r = 0.081, p < 0.0001), ACD and KA (r = 0.025, p < 0.0001), and between K and KA (r = 0.110, p < 0.0001). Whereas K was negatively correlated with AL (r = −0.246, p < 0.0001) and ACD (r = −0.070, p < 0.0001).
Table 4
Correlation of ocular biometric parameters with age in females
 
AL
ACD
K
KA
Age
−0.256**
− 0.551**
0.215**
− 0.270**
AL
0.424**a
− 0.246**a
0.081**a
ACD
− 0.070**a
0.025**a
K
0.110**a
AL axial length, K average corneal keratometry, ACD anterior chamber depth, KA keratometric astigmatism
**p < 0.0001
aPartial correlation with age as the control variable was used to determine the correlation independently of age
Table 5 presents the correlation of ocular biometric parameters with age in males. The results revealed that age was negatively correlated with AL (r = – 0.301, p < 0.0001), ACD (r = – 0.546, p < 0.0001), and KA (r = – 0.312, p < 0.0001). However, age was positively correlated with K (r = 0.234, p < 0.0001). Furthermore, positive correlations were observed between AL and ACD (r = 0.418, p < 0.0001), AL and KA (r = 0.090, p < 0.0001), ACD and KA (r = 0.044, p < 0.0001), and between K and KA (r = 0.116, p < 0.0001). In contrast, K was negatively correlated with AL (r = – 0.243, p < 0.0001) and ACD (r = – 0.076, p < 0.0001). The correlation coefficients for K, AL, and ACD were almost similar between males and females.
Table 5
Correlation of ocular biometric parameters with age in males
 
AL
ACD
K
KA
Age
– 0.301**
– 0.546**
0.234**
– 0.312**
AL
0.418**a
– 0.243**a
0.090**a
ACD
– 0.076**a
0.044**a
K
0.116**a
AL axial length, K average corneal keratometry, ACD anterior chamber depth, KA keratometric astigmatism
**p < 0.0001
aPartial correlation with age as the control variable was used to determine the correlation independently of age

Discussion

To the best of our knowledge, this hospital-based population study is the first to analyze ocular biometric parameters among males and females aged 3–114 years living in western China. Ocular biometric parameters differ between males and females. However, most previous studies did not stratify the ocular biometric parameters based on gender [27]. This study stratified the ocular biometric parameters based on gender and age. Knowing the magnitude of age-related changes in ocular biometric parameters can help in diagnosing ocular diseases. Furthermore, the findings of this study can be used to establish a database to monitor age-associated changes in ocular biometry in the Chinese population.
This study showed a positive skewed distribution of AL, consistent with previous studies [14, 28, 29]. The standard value of AL in humans is considered to be 24 mm, regardless of gender or ethnicity [30, 31]. However, AL tends to be longer in myopic and shorter in hypermetropic eyes. The present study showed a mean AL of 24.61 mm, similar to that recorded among South Korean subjects aged 29–95 years [32]. However, the AL recorded in this study was longer than that recorded among Germans aged 16–87 years [12] and Slovaks aged 19–95 years [14] (Supplementary material Table 1). Furthermore, the present study showed that the mean AL was slightly longer in males (24.67 mm) than in females (24.56 mm), consistent with other studies [14, 29, 33, 34].
The present study also showed that the mean AL tends to increase from infancy to adulthood [35]. Consistent with this evidence, we found an increasing trend of AL with age in Groups A and B in both males and females. According to previous studies, Chinese children and adolescents have a longer AL than other ethnic groups [10, 3638], which could partly explain the higher prevalence of myopia in Asia than in other geographic regions [6, 39]. The AL observed in this study among Groups H, I, and J did not differ significantly with the results observed among Mongolians and Latinos [34, 40].
Globally, myopic maculopathy is one of the leading causes of visual impairment and blindness [41]. Furthermore, older age and longer AL are risk factors for myopic maculopathy [42, 43], a corollary to this is that early screening of people with long AL can potentially prevent or retard the onset or progression of myopic maculopathy. The present study showed a high prevalence of long AL (> 26 mm) among study participants aged 20–40 years, suggesting an increased risk for high myopia. Therefore, this population should be advised to undergo regular ocular follow-ups, and prevent any ocular diseases induced by high myopia, which will probably worsen when they get older, with more risk factors related to these ocular dysfunctions.
Studies evaluating the effects of age on ocular biometric parameters, especially AL, have yielded conflicting results. Some previous studies reported that AL changes significantly with age [14, 29, 44], while another previous study [34] reported that AL did not change significantly with age. These discrepancies could be attributed to differences in sample size, the age distribution of the populations, and the ocular measurements. The present study reported a negative correlation of AL with age in males and females aged 3–114 years, consistent with other previous studies [10, 14, 3638, 45]. Moreover, that the lens thickness tends to increase with age is worth mentioning, which may influence the accuracy of AL measurement.
The present study showed a negative skewness of ACD, with a mean kurtosis of 0.097. The mean ACD was 3.30 mm, which was deeper than that recorded among Slovakian [14], Turkish (3.03 mm) [13], and Iranian (2.79 mm) [26] populations with similar age distribution, but shallower than that recorded among South Korean [32] and German (3.36 mm) [12] populations. The present study also showed significant gender differences in ACD, with the ACD being 0.05 mm shallower in females than males, consistent with previous studies [14, 33, 34]. This study showed that the mean ACD (3.66 mm) among participants under 18 years was shallower than that of their Australian counterparts [46] but deeper than that of Egyptian children [47]. In addition, in the present study, ACD among Chinese subjects aged over 40 years was shallower than that in Latin American [40], Portuguese [48], and Cuban [28] populations, but was almost equal to the ACD in the South Korean population [49]. The differences in optical biometric parameters could have been due to differences in ethnicity [49]. Consistent with previous studies, the present study revealed that ACD decreased with increasing age in males and females [25, 44, 50, 51]. Furthermore, the ACD is estimated to decrease by 0.007 mm per year [52]. Age-related changes in ACD are likely the result of rapid lens thickening with age [53, 54]. However, further studies are required to determine the exact mechanisms.
In Asians, especially in China [55], Singapore [56], and India [57], primary acute angle-closure glaucoma (PAACG) is the most common type of acute ocular hypertensive disease leading to low vision, poor visual field, and even blindness [58, 59]. The high prevalence of PAACG in Asia could be due to the biological characteristics of the Asian eye [58, 60]. According to a previous study, shallow anterior chamber depth is a common feature in patients with glaucoma [61]. Furthermore, patients with shallower ACD are more likely to have glaucomatous optic neuropathy [62]. In addition, patients with an ACD of less than 2.80 mm tend to have angle closure glaucoma, compared with patients with an ACD of at least 3 mm [63]. The present study showed that the older population were more likely than younger population to have an ACD of less than 2.80 mm, suggesting an increased risk of glaucoma with age, consistent with a previous study[64].
Corneal curvature, an indicator of corneal health, is measured by keratometry [18]. The present study showed that the corneal curvature was negatively skewed, with a skewness of −0.633 and a kurtosis of 2.756, consistent with other studies [28, 44, 45, 48]. The mean value of K was 43.76 D, steeper than that recorded among a Turkish population (43.20 D) [13] and an Iranian population aged 6–90 years (43.48 D) [18]. However, the mean K among the western Chinese population was flatter than that of the Slovakian (44.03 D) [14] and Canadian populations (43.95 D) [15]. Gender stratification showed that K was flatter in males than females, with a mean difference of 0.08 D, in agreement with previous results [1316, 18, 38, 48]. The difference in corneal keratometry between males and females may be due, at least in part, to physiological and anatomical differences [13, 18].
The present study showed that K in subjects aged 3–18 years was flatter (43.04 D) than that in similar populations in Germany [10], Iran [18], and Egypt [47]. In addition, K was positively correlated with age in males and females, consistent with previous findings [14, 16, 18]. However, the differences were less significant in subjects over 60 years, suggesting that physiological effects and corneal biomechanisms may be responsible for age-associated alterations in K [65].
Keratoconus is a corneal disease characterized by thinning of the cornea. However, the pathophysiological mechanisms behind keratoconus remain poorly understood [66]. Most subjects are diagnosed with keratoconus in their mid-twenties and early thirties (mean age at diagnosis, 28 years) [67]. Consistent with these findings, the present study showed a high percentage of subjects aged 30–39 years with K values of above 48 D. Since the assessment of keratoconus progression is based on corneal curvature measurements [68], abnormal values in corneal keratometry could be used as an early keratoconus warning.
Consistent with previous studies [14, 29, 6972], the present study showed that K was negatively correlated with AL. The negative correlation may be associated with emmetropization, suggesting that age-associated physiological changes in corneal structure could affect AL [7376]. Generally, ACD is considered to be positively correlated with keratometry [46]. However, this study showed a negative correlation between ACD and keratometry in both males and females. This difference could possibly be attributed to variations in the refractive states of the study participants, and it is likely the result of mechanical influences on the peripheral cornea, which makes the cornea less prolate as the anterior chamber elongates in response to axial length elongation [77]; also, the changes of ACD can be influenced by many other characteristics, including the intraocular pressure [78], glaucoma, cataracts, and other ocular diseases.
The KA in the present study was higher than that recorded among Iranian [18, 79], Slovakian [14], Canadian [15], and Portuguese [48] populations. However, it was lower than that recorded in a population in Turkey [13], and similar to that recorded among the Korean population [80, 81]. Therefore, it is hypothesized that different ethnicities could have different KAs. Similar to previous findings [13, 14, 18, 79], the present study showed between-gender differences in KA. However, the difference was not statistically significant. These results may underestimate the role of variation among ethnic groups and measurements [48, 49].
This study had several limitations. First, this was a cross-sectional and retrospective hospital-based study. Therefore, this study could not show changes in ocular biometric parameters over time in individual subjects. Secondly, the central corneal thickness, the type of keratometric astigmatism, horizontal corneal diameter, lens thickness, and refraction states were not recorded because of the measurement instruments and incomprehensive recording limitations. Thirdly, although data on age and gender were available, other demographic characteristics, such as smoking history and other systemic diseases, were unavailable for all subjects.

Conclusions

This hospital-based study is the first to report the distribution and characteristics of ocular biometric parameters among a large western Chinese population of subjects aged 3–114 years. A vital strength of the present study was the determination of ocular biometric parameters in subjects aged > 100 years, a group that had not been studied previously.
Mean AL, ACD, K, and KA were 24.61 mm, 3.30 mm, 43.76 D, and 1.19 D, respectively. AL was positively correlated with ACD and KA, and negatively correlated with age and K. In addition, ACD was negatively correlated with age. Significant inter-gender and inter-age differences were observed in the ocular parameters, which may contribute to a greater understanding of the inter-gender and inter-age differences in the prevalence of several ocular diseases.

Acknowledgements

Funding

This research was funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China, grant number 82070996, and the Department of Science and Technology of Sichuan Province, grant number 2021YFS0211. The journal’s Rapid Service Fee was funded by the authors.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, Xiaohang Chen and Longqian Liu; methodology, Xiaohang Chen; software, Hao Chen; validation, Xiaohang Chen, Yongzhi Huang, and Hao Chen; formal analysis, Xiaohang Chen; investigation, Xiaohang Chen; resources, Yongzhi Huang; data curation, Xiaohang Chen; writing—original draft preparation, Xiaohang Chen; writing—review and editing, Longqian Liu; visualization, Longqian Liu; supervision, Longqian Liu; project administration, Longqian Liu; funding acquisition, Longqian Liu.

Disclosures

Xiaohang Chen, Yongzhi Huang, Hao Chen, and Longqian Liu have nothing to disclose.

Compliance with Ethics Guidelines

The studies involving human participants were reviewed and approved by the Ethics Committee on Biomedical Research of West China Hospital of Sichuan University. Furthermore, the study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki. Written informed consent from the participant's legal guardian/next of kin was not required to participate in this study following national legislation and institutional requirements.

Data Availability

The datasets analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.
Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://​creativecommons.​org/​licenses/​by-nc/​4.​0/​.
Anhänge

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Zhang C, Zhao J, Zhu Z, Li Y, Li K, Wang Y, et al. Applications of artificial intelligence in myopia: current and future directions. Front Med. 2022;9: 840498.CrossRef Zhang C, Zhao J, Zhu Z, Li Y, Li K, Wang Y, et al. Applications of artificial intelligence in myopia: current and future directions. Front Med. 2022;9: 840498.CrossRef
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Xu Y, Tan Q, Li C, Liu D. The ocular biometry characteristics of young patients with primary angle-closure glaucoma. BMC Ophthalmol. 2022;22(1):150.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Xu Y, Tan Q, Li C, Liu D. The ocular biometry characteristics of young patients with primary angle-closure glaucoma. BMC Ophthalmol. 2022;22(1):150.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Wanichwecharungruang B, Amornpetchsathaporn A, Wongwijitsook W, Kongsomboon K, Chantra S. Evaluation of ocular biometry in primary angle-closure disease with two swept source optical coherence tomography devices. PLoS ONE. 2022;17(3): e0265844.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Wanichwecharungruang B, Amornpetchsathaporn A, Wongwijitsook W, Kongsomboon K, Chantra S. Evaluation of ocular biometry in primary angle-closure disease with two swept source optical coherence tomography devices. PLoS ONE. 2022;17(3): e0265844.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Wanichwecharungruang B, Amornpetchsathaporn A, Kongsomboon K, Wongwijitsook W, Annopawong K, Chantra S. Clinical evaluation of ocular biometry of dual Scheimpflug analyzer, GALILEI G6 and swept source optical coherence tomography, ANTERION. Sci Rep. 2022;12(1):3602.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Wanichwecharungruang B, Amornpetchsathaporn A, Kongsomboon K, Wongwijitsook W, Annopawong K, Chantra S. Clinical evaluation of ocular biometry of dual Scheimpflug analyzer, GALILEI G6 and swept source optical coherence tomography, ANTERION. Sci Rep. 2022;12(1):3602.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Sato T, Yamamoto J, Korehisa H, Hayashi K. Refractive change and optical biometry dynamics after 25-gauge vitrectomy in pseudophakic eyes. Can J Ophthalmol Journal canadien d’ophtalmologie. 2022;57(2):82–9.PubMedCrossRef Sato T, Yamamoto J, Korehisa H, Hayashi K. Refractive change and optical biometry dynamics after 25-gauge vitrectomy in pseudophakic eyes. Can J Ophthalmol Journal canadien d’ophtalmologie. 2022;57(2):82–9.PubMedCrossRef
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Zhong Y, Yu Y, Li J, Lu B, Li S, Zhu Y. Accuracy of intraocular lens power calculation formulas in pediatric cataract patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Front Med. 2021;8: 710492.CrossRef Zhong Y, Yu Y, Li J, Lu B, Li S, Zhu Y. Accuracy of intraocular lens power calculation formulas in pediatric cataract patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Front Med. 2021;8: 710492.CrossRef
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Sun Y, Wei S, Li S, Cao K, Hu J, Yang X, et al. Distribution of ocular biometry in young Chinese eyes: the Anyang University Students Eye Study. Acta Ophthalmol. 2021;99(6):621–7.PubMedCrossRef Sun Y, Wei S, Li S, Cao K, Hu J, Yang X, et al. Distribution of ocular biometry in young Chinese eyes: the Anyang University Students Eye Study. Acta Ophthalmol. 2021;99(6):621–7.PubMedCrossRef
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Saka N, Ohno-Matsui K, Shimada N, Sueyoshi S, Nagaoka N, Hayashi W, et al. Long-term changes in axial length in adult eyes with pathologic myopia. Am J Ophthalmol. 2010;150(4):562-8.e1.PubMedCrossRef Saka N, Ohno-Matsui K, Shimada N, Sueyoshi S, Nagaoka N, Hayashi W, et al. Long-term changes in axial length in adult eyes with pathologic myopia. Am J Ophthalmol. 2010;150(4):562-8.e1.PubMedCrossRef
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Ganesh D, Lin SR. Global metrics on ocular biometry: representative averages and standard deviations across ten countries from four continents. Eye (Lond). 2022;37:511–5.PubMedCrossRef Ganesh D, Lin SR. Global metrics on ocular biometry: representative averages and standard deviations across ten countries from four continents. Eye (Lond). 2022;37:511–5.PubMedCrossRef
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Rauscher FG, Francke M, Hiemisch A, Kiess W, Michael R. Ocular biometry in children and adolescents from 4 to 17 years: a cross-sectional study in central Germany. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2021;41(3):496–511.PubMedCrossRef Rauscher FG, Francke M, Hiemisch A, Kiess W, Michael R. Ocular biometry in children and adolescents from 4 to 17 years: a cross-sectional study in central Germany. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2021;41(3):496–511.PubMedCrossRef
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Hashemi H, Khabazkhoob M, Miraftab M, Emamian MH, Shariati M, Abdolahinia T, et al. The distribution of axial length, anterior chamber depth, lens thickness, and vitreous chamber depth in an adult population of Shahroud. Iran BMC Ophthalmol. 2012;12:50.PubMedCrossRef Hashemi H, Khabazkhoob M, Miraftab M, Emamian MH, Shariati M, Abdolahinia T, et al. The distribution of axial length, anterior chamber depth, lens thickness, and vitreous chamber depth in an adult population of Shahroud. Iran BMC Ophthalmol. 2012;12:50.PubMedCrossRef
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Frisch IB, Rabsilber TM, Becker KA, Reuland AJ, Auffarth GU. Comparison of anterior chamber depth measurements using Orbscan II and IOLMaster. Eur J Ophthalmol. 2007;17(3):327–31.PubMedCrossRef Frisch IB, Rabsilber TM, Becker KA, Reuland AJ, Auffarth GU. Comparison of anterior chamber depth measurements using Orbscan II and IOLMaster. Eur J Ophthalmol. 2007;17(3):327–31.PubMedCrossRef
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Orucoglu F, Akman M, Onal S. Analysis of age, refractive error and gender related changes of the cornea and the anterior segment of the eye with Scheimpflug imaging. Cont Lens Anterior Eye. 2015;38(5):345–50.PubMedCrossRef Orucoglu F, Akman M, Onal S. Analysis of age, refractive error and gender related changes of the cornea and the anterior segment of the eye with Scheimpflug imaging. Cont Lens Anterior Eye. 2015;38(5):345–50.PubMedCrossRef
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Popov I, Waczulikova I, Stefanickova J, Valaskova J, Tomcikova D, Shiwani HA, et al. Analysis of biometric parameters of 2340 eyes measured with optical biometer Lenstar LS900 in a Caucasian population. Eur J Ophthalmol. 2022;32(1):213–20.PubMedCrossRef Popov I, Waczulikova I, Stefanickova J, Valaskova J, Tomcikova D, Shiwani HA, et al. Analysis of biometric parameters of 2340 eyes measured with optical biometer Lenstar LS900 in a Caucasian population. Eur J Ophthalmol. 2022;32(1):213–20.PubMedCrossRef
15.
Zurück zum Zitat AlMahmoud T, Priest D, Munger R, Jackson WB. Correlation between refractive error, corneal power, and thickness in a large population with a wide range of ametropia. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2011;52(3):1235–42.PubMedCrossRef AlMahmoud T, Priest D, Munger R, Jackson WB. Correlation between refractive error, corneal power, and thickness in a large population with a wide range of ametropia. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2011;52(3):1235–42.PubMedCrossRef
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Heidari S, Babor TF, De Castro P, Tort S, Curno M. Sex and Gender Equity in Research: rationale for the SAGER guidelines and recommended use. Res Integr Peer Rev. 2016;1(1):2.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Heidari S, Babor TF, De Castro P, Tort S, Curno M. Sex and Gender Equity in Research: rationale for the SAGER guidelines and recommended use. Res Integr Peer Rev. 2016;1(1):2.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Hosoda Y, Yoshikawa M, Miyake M, Tabara Y, Shimada N, Zhao W, et al. CCDC102B confers risk of low vision and blindness in high myopia. Nat Commun. 2018;9(1):1782.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Hosoda Y, Yoshikawa M, Miyake M, Tabara Y, Shimada N, Zhao W, et al. CCDC102B confers risk of low vision and blindness in high myopia. Nat Commun. 2018;9(1):1782.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Hashemi H, Yekta A, Shokrollahzadeh F, Aghamirsalim M, Ostadimoghaddam H, Hashemi A, et al. The distribution of keratometry in a population based study. J Curr Ophthalmol. 2021;33(1):17–22.PubMedPubMedCentral Hashemi H, Yekta A, Shokrollahzadeh F, Aghamirsalim M, Ostadimoghaddam H, Hashemi A, et al. The distribution of keratometry in a population based study. J Curr Ophthalmol. 2021;33(1):17–22.PubMedPubMedCentral
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Gervilla E, Jiménez R, Anupol J, Duch M, Sesé A. Breath alcohol concentration and perception of drunkenness: a comparison between adolescents and young adults drinking alcohol in public Settings. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020;17(8):2890.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Gervilla E, Jiménez R, Anupol J, Duch M, Sesé A. Breath alcohol concentration and perception of drunkenness: a comparison between adolescents and young adults drinking alcohol in public Settings. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020;17(8):2890.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Ganchimeg T, Ota E, Morisaki N, Laopaiboon M, Lumbiganon P, Zhang J, et al. Pregnancy and childbirth outcomes among adolescent mothers: a World Health Organization multicountry study. BJOG. 2014;121(Suppl 1):40–8.PubMedCrossRef Ganchimeg T, Ota E, Morisaki N, Laopaiboon M, Lumbiganon P, Zhang J, et al. Pregnancy and childbirth outcomes among adolescent mothers: a World Health Organization multicountry study. BJOG. 2014;121(Suppl 1):40–8.PubMedCrossRef
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Erickson JM, Macpherson CF, Ameringer S, Baggott C, Linder L, Stegenga K. Symptoms and symptom clusters in adolescents receiving cancer treatment: a review of the literature. Int J Nurs Stud. 2013;50(6):847–69.PubMedCrossRef Erickson JM, Macpherson CF, Ameringer S, Baggott C, Linder L, Stegenga K. Symptoms and symptom clusters in adolescents receiving cancer treatment: a review of the literature. Int J Nurs Stud. 2013;50(6):847–69.PubMedCrossRef
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Asampong E, Osafo J, Bingenheimer JB, Ahiadeke C. Adolescents and parents’ perceptions of best time for sex and sexual communications from two communities in the Eastern and Volta Regions of Ghana: implications for HIV and AIDS education. BMC Int Health Hum Rights. 2013;13:40.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Asampong E, Osafo J, Bingenheimer JB, Ahiadeke C. Adolescents and parents’ perceptions of best time for sex and sexual communications from two communities in the Eastern and Volta Regions of Ghana: implications for HIV and AIDS education. BMC Int Health Hum Rights. 2013;13:40.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Programming for adolescent health and development. Report of a WHO/UNFPA/UNICEF Study Group on Programming for Adolescent Health. World Health Organization technical report series. 1999;886:i-vi, 1–260. Programming for adolescent health and development. Report of a WHO/UNFPA/UNICEF Study Group on Programming for Adolescent Health. World Health Organization technical report series. 1999;886:i-vi, 1–260.
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Wong TY, Foster PJ, Ng TP, Tielsch JM, Johnson GJ, Seah SK. Variations in ocular biometry in an adult Chinese population in Singapore: the Tanjong Pagar Survey. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2001;42(1):73–80.PubMed Wong TY, Foster PJ, Ng TP, Tielsch JM, Johnson GJ, Seah SK. Variations in ocular biometry in an adult Chinese population in Singapore: the Tanjong Pagar Survey. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2001;42(1):73–80.PubMed
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Hashemi H, KhabazKhoob M, Mehravaran S, Yazdani K, Mohammad K, Fotouhi A. The distribution of anterior chamber depth in a Tehran population: the Tehran eye study. Ophthalm Physiolog Opt. 2009;29(4):436–42.CrossRef Hashemi H, KhabazKhoob M, Mehravaran S, Yazdani K, Mohammad K, Fotouhi A. The distribution of anterior chamber depth in a Tehran population: the Tehran eye study. Ophthalm Physiolog Opt. 2009;29(4):436–42.CrossRef
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Li SM, Iribarren R, Kang MT, Li H, Li SY, Liu LR, et al. Corneal power, anterior segment length and lens power in 14-year-old Chinese children: the anyang childhood eye study. Sci Rep. 2016;6:20243.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Li SM, Iribarren R, Kang MT, Li H, Li SY, Liu LR, et al. Corneal power, anterior segment length and lens power in 14-year-old Chinese children: the anyang childhood eye study. Sci Rep. 2016;6:20243.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
28.
Zurück zum Zitat Hernandez-Lopez I, Estrade-Fernandez S, Cardenas-Diaz T, Batista-Leyva AJ. Biometry, refractive errors, and the results of cataract surgery: a large sample study. J Ophthalmol. 2021;2021:9918763.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Hernandez-Lopez I, Estrade-Fernandez S, Cardenas-Diaz T, Batista-Leyva AJ. Biometry, refractive errors, and the results of cataract surgery: a large sample study. J Ophthalmol. 2021;2021:9918763.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
29.
Zurück zum Zitat Olsen T, Arnarsson A, Sasaki H, Sasaki K, Jonasson F. On the ocular refractive components: the Reykjavik Eye Study. Acta Ophthalmol Scand. 2007;85(4):361–6.PubMedCrossRef Olsen T, Arnarsson A, Sasaki H, Sasaki K, Jonasson F. On the ocular refractive components: the Reykjavik Eye Study. Acta Ophthalmol Scand. 2007;85(4):361–6.PubMedCrossRef
30.
Zurück zum Zitat Huckenpahler AL, Carroll J, Salmon AE, Sajdak BS, Mastey RR, Allen KP, et al. Noninvasive imaging and correlative histology of cone photoreceptor structure in the pig retina. Transl Vis Sci Technol. 2019;8(6):38.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Huckenpahler AL, Carroll J, Salmon AE, Sajdak BS, Mastey RR, Allen KP, et al. Noninvasive imaging and correlative histology of cone photoreceptor structure in the pig retina. Transl Vis Sci Technol. 2019;8(6):38.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
31.
Zurück zum Zitat Roy A, Kar M, Mandal D, Ray RS, Kar C. Variation of axial ocular dimensions with age, sex, height, BMI-and their relation to refractive status. J Clin Diagn Res. 2015;9(1):AC01-AC4.PubMedPubMedCentral Roy A, Kar M, Mandal D, Ray RS, Kar C. Variation of axial ocular dimensions with age, sex, height, BMI-and their relation to refractive status. J Clin Diagn Res. 2015;9(1):AC01-AC4.PubMedPubMedCentral
32.
Zurück zum Zitat Park SH, Park KH, Kim JM, Choi CY. Relation between axial length and ocular parameters. Ophthalmologica. 2010;224(3):188–93.PubMedCrossRef Park SH, Park KH, Kim JM, Choi CY. Relation between axial length and ocular parameters. Ophthalmologica. 2010;224(3):188–93.PubMedCrossRef
33.
Zurück zum Zitat Foster PJ, Broadway DC, Hayat S, Luben R, Dalzell N, Bingham S, et al. Refractive error, axial length and anterior chamber depth of the eye in British adults: the EPIC-Norfolk Eye Study. Br J Ophthalmol. 2010;94(7):827–30.PubMedCrossRef Foster PJ, Broadway DC, Hayat S, Luben R, Dalzell N, Bingham S, et al. Refractive error, axial length and anterior chamber depth of the eye in British adults: the EPIC-Norfolk Eye Study. Br J Ophthalmol. 2010;94(7):827–30.PubMedCrossRef
34.
Zurück zum Zitat Wickremasinghe S, Foster PJ, Uranchimeg D, Lee PS, Devereux JG, Alsbirk PH, et al. Ocular biometry and refraction in Mongolian adults. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2004;45(3):776–83.PubMedCrossRef Wickremasinghe S, Foster PJ, Uranchimeg D, Lee PS, Devereux JG, Alsbirk PH, et al. Ocular biometry and refraction in Mongolian adults. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2004;45(3):776–83.PubMedCrossRef
35.
Zurück zum Zitat Iribarren R. Axial length increasing with age. Ophthalmology. 2011;118(4):785–6 (author reply 6).PubMedCrossRef Iribarren R. Axial length increasing with age. Ophthalmology. 2011;118(4):785–6 (author reply 6).PubMedCrossRef
36.
Zurück zum Zitat Momeni-Moghaddam H, Hashemi H, Zarei-Ghanavati S, Ostadimoghaddam H, Yekta A, Khabazkhoob M. Four-year change in ocular biometric components and refraction in schoolchildren: a cohort study. J Curr Ophthalmol. 2019;31(2):206–13.PubMedCrossRef Momeni-Moghaddam H, Hashemi H, Zarei-Ghanavati S, Ostadimoghaddam H, Yekta A, Khabazkhoob M. Four-year change in ocular biometric components and refraction in schoolchildren: a cohort study. J Curr Ophthalmol. 2019;31(2):206–13.PubMedCrossRef
37.
Zurück zum Zitat Twelker JD, Mitchell GL, Messer DH, Bhakta R, Jones LA, Mutti DO, et al. Children’s ocular components and age, gender, and ethnicity. Optomet Vis Sci. 2009;86(8):918–35.CrossRef Twelker JD, Mitchell GL, Messer DH, Bhakta R, Jones LA, Mutti DO, et al. Children’s ocular components and age, gender, and ethnicity. Optomet Vis Sci. 2009;86(8):918–35.CrossRef
38.
Zurück zum Zitat Zadnik K, Manny RE, Yu JA, Mitchell GL, Cotter SA, Quiralte JC, et al. Ocular component data in schoolchildren as a function of age and gender. Optomet Vis Sci. 2003;80(3):226–36.CrossRef Zadnik K, Manny RE, Yu JA, Mitchell GL, Cotter SA, Quiralte JC, et al. Ocular component data in schoolchildren as a function of age and gender. Optomet Vis Sci. 2003;80(3):226–36.CrossRef
39.
Zurück zum Zitat Li X, Lin H, Jiang L, Chen X, Chen J, Lu F. Low serum vitamin D Is not correlated with myopia in chinese children and adolescents. Front Med. 2022;9:809787.CrossRef Li X, Lin H, Jiang L, Chen X, Chen J, Lu F. Low serum vitamin D Is not correlated with myopia in chinese children and adolescents. Front Med. 2022;9:809787.CrossRef
40.
Zurück zum Zitat Shufelt C, Fraser-Bell S, Ying-Lai M, Torres M, Varma R, Los Angeles Latino Eye Study G. Refractive error, ocular biometry, and lens opalescence in an adult population: the Los Angeles Latino Eye Study. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2005;46(12):4450–60.PubMedCrossRef Shufelt C, Fraser-Bell S, Ying-Lai M, Torres M, Varma R, Los Angeles Latino Eye Study G. Refractive error, ocular biometry, and lens opalescence in an adult population: the Los Angeles Latino Eye Study. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2005;46(12):4450–60.PubMedCrossRef
41.
Zurück zum Zitat Fricke TR, Jong M, Naidoo KS, Sankaridurg P, Naduvilath TJ, Ho SM, et al. Global prevalence of visual impairment associated with myopic macular degeneration and temporal trends from 2000 through 2050: systematic review, meta-analysis and modelling. Br J Ophthalmol. 2018;102(7):855–62.PubMedCrossRef Fricke TR, Jong M, Naidoo KS, Sankaridurg P, Naduvilath TJ, Ho SM, et al. Global prevalence of visual impairment associated with myopic macular degeneration and temporal trends from 2000 through 2050: systematic review, meta-analysis and modelling. Br J Ophthalmol. 2018;102(7):855–62.PubMedCrossRef
42.
Zurück zum Zitat Ueda E, Yasuda M, Fujiwara K, Hashimoto S, Ohno-Matsui K, Hata J, et al. Five-year incidence of myopic maculopathy in a general japanese population: the Hisayama Study. JAMA ophthalmology. 2020;138(8):887–93.PubMedCrossRef Ueda E, Yasuda M, Fujiwara K, Hashimoto S, Ohno-Matsui K, Hata J, et al. Five-year incidence of myopic maculopathy in a general japanese population: the Hisayama Study. JAMA ophthalmology. 2020;138(8):887–93.PubMedCrossRef
43.
Zurück zum Zitat Lin C, Li SM, Ohno-Matsui K, Wang BS, Fang YX, Cao K, et al. Five-year incidence and progression of myopic maculopathy in a rural Chinese adult population: the Handan Eye Study. Ophthalm Physiol Opt. 2018;38(3):337–45.CrossRef Lin C, Li SM, Ohno-Matsui K, Wang BS, Fang YX, Cao K, et al. Five-year incidence and progression of myopic maculopathy in a rural Chinese adult population: the Handan Eye Study. Ophthalm Physiol Opt. 2018;38(3):337–45.CrossRef
44.
Zurück zum Zitat Fotedar R, Wang JJ, Burlutsky G, Morgan IG, Rose K, Wong TY, et al. Distribution of axial length and ocular biometry measured using partial coherence laser interferometry (IOL Master) in an older white population. Ophthalmology. 2010;117(3):417–23.PubMedCrossRef Fotedar R, Wang JJ, Burlutsky G, Morgan IG, Rose K, Wong TY, et al. Distribution of axial length and ocular biometry measured using partial coherence laser interferometry (IOL Master) in an older white population. Ophthalmology. 2010;117(3):417–23.PubMedCrossRef
45.
Zurück zum Zitat Lim LS, Saw SM, Jeganathan VS, Tay WT, Aung T, Tong L, et al. Distribution and determinants of ocular biometric parameters in an Asian population: the Singapore Malay eye study. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2010;51(1):103–9.PubMedCrossRef Lim LS, Saw SM, Jeganathan VS, Tay WT, Aung T, Tong L, et al. Distribution and determinants of ocular biometric parameters in an Asian population: the Singapore Malay eye study. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2010;51(1):103–9.PubMedCrossRef
46.
Zurück zum Zitat Ojaimi E, Rose KA, Morgan IG, Smith W, Martin FJ, Kifley A, et al. Distribution of ocular biometric parameters and refraction in a population-based study of Australian children. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2005;46(8):2748–54.PubMedCrossRef Ojaimi E, Rose KA, Morgan IG, Smith W, Martin FJ, Kifley A, et al. Distribution of ocular biometric parameters and refraction in a population-based study of Australian children. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2005;46(8):2748–54.PubMedCrossRef
47.
Zurück zum Zitat Hashem AO, Roshdy MM, Wahba SS, Saleh MI, Elkitkat RS. Normative values of various pentacam HR parameters for pediatric corneas. Cornea. 2020;39(11):1394–400.PubMedCrossRef Hashem AO, Roshdy MM, Wahba SS, Saleh MI, Elkitkat RS. Normative values of various pentacam HR parameters for pediatric corneas. Cornea. 2020;39(11):1394–400.PubMedCrossRef
48.
Zurück zum Zitat Ferreira TB, Hoffer KJ, Ribeiro F, Ribeiro P, O’Neill JG. Ocular biometric measurements in cataract surgery candidates in Portugal. PLoS ONE. 2017;12(10): e0184837.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Ferreira TB, Hoffer KJ, Ribeiro F, Ribeiro P, O’Neill JG. Ocular biometric measurements in cataract surgery candidates in Portugal. PLoS ONE. 2017;12(10): e0184837.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
49.
Zurück zum Zitat Song JS, Yoon DY, Hyon JY, Jeon HS. Comparison of Ocular biometry and refractive outcomes using IOL Master 500, IOL Master 700, and Lenstar LS900. Korean J Ophthalmol KJO. 2020;34(2):126–32.PubMedCrossRef Song JS, Yoon DY, Hyon JY, Jeon HS. Comparison of Ocular biometry and refractive outcomes using IOL Master 500, IOL Master 700, and Lenstar LS900. Korean J Ophthalmol KJO. 2020;34(2):126–32.PubMedCrossRef
50.
Zurück zum Zitat Schuster AK, Pfeiffer N, Nickels S, Schulz A, Höhn R, Wild PS, et al. Distribution of anterior chamber angle width and correlation with age, refraction, and anterior chamber depth-the Gutenberg health study. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2016;57(8):3740–6.PubMedCrossRef Schuster AK, Pfeiffer N, Nickels S, Schulz A, Höhn R, Wild PS, et al. Distribution of anterior chamber angle width and correlation with age, refraction, and anterior chamber depth-the Gutenberg health study. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2016;57(8):3740–6.PubMedCrossRef
51.
Zurück zum Zitat Jonas JB, Nangia V, Gupta R, Khare A, Sinha A, Agarwal S, et al. Anterior chamber depth and its associations with ocular and general parameters in adults. Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2012;40(6):550–6.PubMedCrossRef Jonas JB, Nangia V, Gupta R, Khare A, Sinha A, Agarwal S, et al. Anterior chamber depth and its associations with ocular and general parameters in adults. Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2012;40(6):550–6.PubMedCrossRef
52.
Zurück zum Zitat Jonas JB, Iribarren R, Nangia V, Sinha A, Pardhi P, Shukla R, et al. Lens Position and age: the central India eye and medical study. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2015;56(9):5309–14.PubMedCrossRef Jonas JB, Iribarren R, Nangia V, Sinha A, Pardhi P, Shukla R, et al. Lens Position and age: the central India eye and medical study. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2015;56(9):5309–14.PubMedCrossRef
53.
Zurück zum Zitat Cui Y, Meng Q, Guo H, Zeng J, Zhang H, Zhang G, et al. Biometry and corneal astigmatism in cataract surgery candidates from Southern China. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2014;40(10):1661–9.PubMedCrossRef Cui Y, Meng Q, Guo H, Zeng J, Zhang H, Zhang G, et al. Biometry and corneal astigmatism in cataract surgery candidates from Southern China. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2014;40(10):1661–9.PubMedCrossRef
54.
Zurück zum Zitat Cook CA, Koretz JF, Pfahnl A, Hyun J, Kaufman PL. Aging of the human crystalline lens and anterior segment. Vision Res. 1994;34(22):2945–54.PubMedCrossRef Cook CA, Koretz JF, Pfahnl A, Hyun J, Kaufman PL. Aging of the human crystalline lens and anterior segment. Vision Res. 1994;34(22):2945–54.PubMedCrossRef
56.
Zurück zum Zitat Foster PJ, Oen FT, Machin D, Ng TP, Devereux JG, Johnson GJ, et al. The prevalence of glaucoma in Chinese residents of Singapore: a cross-sectional population survey of the Tanjong Pagar district. Arch Ophthalmol (Chicago, Ill: 1960). 2000;118(8):1105–11.CrossRef Foster PJ, Oen FT, Machin D, Ng TP, Devereux JG, Johnson GJ, et al. The prevalence of glaucoma in Chinese residents of Singapore: a cross-sectional population survey of the Tanjong Pagar district. Arch Ophthalmol (Chicago, Ill: 1960). 2000;118(8):1105–11.CrossRef
57.
Zurück zum Zitat Dandona L, Dandona R, Mandal P, Srinivas M, John RK, McCarty CA, et al. Angle-closure glaucoma in an urban population in southern India. The Andhra Pradesh eye disease study. Ophthalmology. 2000;107(9):1710–6.PubMedCrossRef Dandona L, Dandona R, Mandal P, Srinivas M, John RK, McCarty CA, et al. Angle-closure glaucoma in an urban population in southern India. The Andhra Pradesh eye disease study. Ophthalmology. 2000;107(9):1710–6.PubMedCrossRef
58.
Zurück zum Zitat Ch’ng TW, Mosavi SA, Noor Azimah AA, Azlan NZ, Azhany Y, Liza-Sharmini AT. Monsoon and primary acute angle closure in malaysia. Med J Malaysia. 2013;68(5):410–4.PubMed Ch’ng TW, Mosavi SA, Noor Azimah AA, Azlan NZ, Azhany Y, Liza-Sharmini AT. Monsoon and primary acute angle closure in malaysia. Med J Malaysia. 2013;68(5):410–4.PubMed
59.
Zurück zum Zitat Tan GS, Hoh ST, Husain R, Gazzard G, Oen FT, Seah SK, et al. Visual acuity after acute primary angle closure and considerations for primary lens extraction. Br J Ophthalmol. 2006;90(1):14–6.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Tan GS, Hoh ST, Husain R, Gazzard G, Oen FT, Seah SK, et al. Visual acuity after acute primary angle closure and considerations for primary lens extraction. Br J Ophthalmol. 2006;90(1):14–6.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
60.
Zurück zum Zitat Lowe RF. Clinical types of primary angle closure glaucoma. Aust N Z J Ophthalmol. 1988;16(3):245–50.PubMedCrossRef Lowe RF. Clinical types of primary angle closure glaucoma. Aust N Z J Ophthalmol. 1988;16(3):245–50.PubMedCrossRef
61.
Zurück zum Zitat Salmon JF. Predisposing factors for chronic angle-closure glaucoma. Prog Retin Eye Res. 1999;18(1):121–32.PubMedCrossRef Salmon JF. Predisposing factors for chronic angle-closure glaucoma. Prog Retin Eye Res. 1999;18(1):121–32.PubMedCrossRef
62.
Zurück zum Zitat Aung T, Nolan WP, Machin D, Seah SK, Baasanhu J, Khaw PT, et al. Anterior chamber depth and the risk of primary angle closure in 2 East Asian populations. Arch Ophthalmol (Chicago, Ill: 1960). 2005;123(4):527–32.CrossRef Aung T, Nolan WP, Machin D, Seah SK, Baasanhu J, Khaw PT, et al. Anterior chamber depth and the risk of primary angle closure in 2 East Asian populations. Arch Ophthalmol (Chicago, Ill: 1960). 2005;123(4):527–32.CrossRef
63.
Zurück zum Zitat Lavanya R, Wong TY, Friedman DS, Aung HT, Alfred T, Gao H, et al. Determinants of angle closure in older Singaporeans. Arch Ophthalmol (Chicago, Ill: 1960). 2008;126(5):686–91.CrossRef Lavanya R, Wong TY, Friedman DS, Aung HT, Alfred T, Gao H, et al. Determinants of angle closure in older Singaporeans. Arch Ophthalmol (Chicago, Ill: 1960). 2008;126(5):686–91.CrossRef
64.
Zurück zum Zitat McManus JR, Netland PA. Screening for glaucoma: rationale and strategies. Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 2013;24(2):144–9.PubMedCrossRef McManus JR, Netland PA. Screening for glaucoma: rationale and strategies. Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 2013;24(2):144–9.PubMedCrossRef
65.
Zurück zum Zitat Namba H, Sugano A, Murakami T, Utsunomiya H, Nishitsuka K, Ishizawa K, et al. Age-related changes in astigmatism and potential causes. Cornea. 2020;39(Suppl 1):S34–8.PubMedCrossRef Namba H, Sugano A, Murakami T, Utsunomiya H, Nishitsuka K, Ishizawa K, et al. Age-related changes in astigmatism and potential causes. Cornea. 2020;39(Suppl 1):S34–8.PubMedCrossRef
66.
Zurück zum Zitat Brautaset RL, Rosén R, Cerviño A, Miller WL, Bergmanson J, Nilsson M. Comparison of macular thickness in patients with keratoconus and control subjects using the cirrus HD-OCT. Biomed Res Int. 2015;2015: 832863.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Brautaset RL, Rosén R, Cerviño A, Miller WL, Bergmanson J, Nilsson M. Comparison of macular thickness in patients with keratoconus and control subjects using the cirrus HD-OCT. Biomed Res Int. 2015;2015: 832863.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
67.
Zurück zum Zitat Godefrooij DA, de Wit GA, Uiterwaal CS, Imhof SM, Wisse RP. Age-specific incidence and prevalence of keratoconus: a nationwide registration study. Am J Ophthalmol. 2017;175:169–72.PubMedCrossRef Godefrooij DA, de Wit GA, Uiterwaal CS, Imhof SM, Wisse RP. Age-specific incidence and prevalence of keratoconus: a nationwide registration study. Am J Ophthalmol. 2017;175:169–72.PubMedCrossRef
68.
Zurück zum Zitat Ng SM, Ren M, Lindsley KB, Hawkins BS, Kuo IC. Transepithelial versus epithelium-off corneal crosslinking for progressive keratoconus. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021;3(3):Cd013512.PubMed Ng SM, Ren M, Lindsley KB, Hawkins BS, Kuo IC. Transepithelial versus epithelium-off corneal crosslinking for progressive keratoconus. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021;3(3):Cd013512.PubMed
69.
Zurück zum Zitat Liu H, Xu Z, Qian Z, Liang J, Wei K, Zu L, et al. Comparison of ocular biometry profiles in urban and rural cataract candidates in Eastern China. J Ophthalmol. 2020;2020:2863698.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Liu H, Xu Z, Qian Z, Liang J, Wei K, Zu L, et al. Comparison of ocular biometry profiles in urban and rural cataract candidates in Eastern China. J Ophthalmol. 2020;2020:2863698.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
70.
Zurück zum Zitat Natung T, Shullai W, Nongrum B, Thangkhiew L, Baruah P, Phiamphu ML. Ocular biometry characteristics and corneal astigmatisms in cataract surgery candidates at a tertiary care center in North-East India. Indian J Ophthalmol. 2019;67(9):1417–23.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Natung T, Shullai W, Nongrum B, Thangkhiew L, Baruah P, Phiamphu ML. Ocular biometry characteristics and corneal astigmatisms in cataract surgery candidates at a tertiary care center in North-East India. Indian J Ophthalmol. 2019;67(9):1417–23.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
71.
Zurück zum Zitat Gaurisankar ZS, van Rijn GA, Lima JEE, Ilgenfritz AP, Cheng Y, Haasnoot GW, et al. Correlations between ocular biometrics and refractive error: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Acta Ophthalmol. 2019;97(8):735–43.PubMedCrossRef Gaurisankar ZS, van Rijn GA, Lima JEE, Ilgenfritz AP, Cheng Y, Haasnoot GW, et al. Correlations between ocular biometrics and refractive error: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Acta Ophthalmol. 2019;97(8):735–43.PubMedCrossRef
72.
Zurück zum Zitat Kim JH, Kim M, Lee SJ, Han SB, Kong YT, Yang HK, et al. Age-related differences in ocular biometry in adult Korean population. BMC Ophthalmol. 2016;16(1):146.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Kim JH, Kim M, Lee SJ, Han SB, Kong YT, Yang HK, et al. Age-related differences in ocular biometry in adult Korean population. BMC Ophthalmol. 2016;16(1):146.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
73.
Zurück zum Zitat Plotnikov D, Cui J, Clark R, Wedenoja J, Pärssinen O, Tideman JWL, et al. Genetic variants associated with human eye size are distinct from those conferring susceptibility to myopia. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2021;62(13):24.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Plotnikov D, Cui J, Clark R, Wedenoja J, Pärssinen O, Tideman JWL, et al. Genetic variants associated with human eye size are distinct from those conferring susceptibility to myopia. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2021;62(13):24.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
74.
Zurück zum Zitat Ishii K, Iwata H, Oshika T. Quantitative evaluation of changes in eyeball shape in emmetropization and myopic changes based on elliptic fourier descriptors. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2011;52(12):8585–91.PubMedCrossRef Ishii K, Iwata H, Oshika T. Quantitative evaluation of changes in eyeball shape in emmetropization and myopic changes based on elliptic fourier descriptors. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2011;52(12):8585–91.PubMedCrossRef
75.
Zurück zum Zitat Brown NP, Koretz JF, Bron AJ. The development and maintenance of emmetropia. Eye (Lond). 1999;13(Pt 1):83–92.PubMedCrossRef Brown NP, Koretz JF, Bron AJ. The development and maintenance of emmetropia. Eye (Lond). 1999;13(Pt 1):83–92.PubMedCrossRef
76.
Zurück zum Zitat Ehrlich DL, Braddick OJ, Atkinson J, Anker S, Weeks F, Hartley T, et al. Infant emmetropization: longitudinal changes in refraction components from nine to twenty months of age. Optomet Vis Sci. 1997;74(10):822–43.CrossRef Ehrlich DL, Braddick OJ, Atkinson J, Anker S, Weeks F, Hartley T, et al. Infant emmetropization: longitudinal changes in refraction components from nine to twenty months of age. Optomet Vis Sci. 1997;74(10):822–43.CrossRef
77.
Zurück zum Zitat Davis WR, Raasch TW, Mitchell GL, Mutti DO, Zadnik K. Corneal asphericity and apical curvature in children: a cross-sectional and longitudinal evaluation. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2005;46(6):1899–906.PubMedCrossRef Davis WR, Raasch TW, Mitchell GL, Mutti DO, Zadnik K. Corneal asphericity and apical curvature in children: a cross-sectional and longitudinal evaluation. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2005;46(6):1899–906.PubMedCrossRef
78.
Zurück zum Zitat Wu Y, Da Qiong CR, Liu J, Yan X. Intraocular pressure and axial length changes during altitude acclimatization from Beijing to Lhasa. PLoS ONE. 2020;15(1): e0228267.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Wu Y, Da Qiong CR, Liu J, Yan X. Intraocular pressure and axial length changes during altitude acclimatization from Beijing to Lhasa. PLoS ONE. 2020;15(1): e0228267.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
79.
Zurück zum Zitat KhabazKhoob M, Hashemi H, Yazdani K, Mehravaran S, Yekta A, Fotouhi A. Keratometry measurements, corneal astigmatism and irregularity in a normal population: the Tehran Eye Study. Ophthal Physiol Opt. 2010;30(6):800–5.CrossRef KhabazKhoob M, Hashemi H, Yazdani K, Mehravaran S, Yekta A, Fotouhi A. Keratometry measurements, corneal astigmatism and irregularity in a normal population: the Tehran Eye Study. Ophthal Physiol Opt. 2010;30(6):800–5.CrossRef
80.
Zurück zum Zitat Choi Y, Eom Y, Song JS, Kim HM. Comparison of anterior, posterior, and total corneal astigmatism measured using a single scheimpflug camera in healthy and keratoconus eyes. Korean J Ophthalmol KJO. 2018;32(3):163–71.PubMedCrossRef Choi Y, Eom Y, Song JS, Kim HM. Comparison of anterior, posterior, and total corneal astigmatism measured using a single scheimpflug camera in healthy and keratoconus eyes. Korean J Ophthalmol KJO. 2018;32(3):163–71.PubMedCrossRef
81.
Zurück zum Zitat Kim H, An Y, Joo CK. Gender-differences in age-related changes of corneal astigmatism in Korean cataract patients. BMC Ophthalmol. 2019;19(1):31.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Kim H, An Y, Joo CK. Gender-differences in age-related changes of corneal astigmatism in Korean cataract patients. BMC Ophthalmol. 2019;19(1):31.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Distribution and Characteristics of Ocular Biometric Parameters among a Chinese Population: A Hospital-Based Study
verfasst von
Xiaohang Chen
Yongzhi Huang
Hao Chen
Longqian Liu
Publikationsdatum
26.05.2023
Verlag
Springer Healthcare
Erschienen in
Ophthalmology and Therapy / Ausgabe 4/2023
Print ISSN: 2193-8245
Elektronische ISSN: 2193-6528
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s40123-023-00716-x

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 4/2023

Ophthalmology and Therapy 4/2023 Zur Ausgabe

Leitlinien kompakt für die Innere Medizin

Mit medbee Pocketcards sicher entscheiden.

Seit 2022 gehört die medbee GmbH zum Springer Medizin Verlag

Erhebliches Risiko für Kehlkopfkrebs bei mäßiger Dysplasie

29.05.2024 Larynxkarzinom Nachrichten

Fast ein Viertel der Personen mit mäßig dysplastischen Stimmlippenläsionen entwickelt einen Kehlkopftumor. Solche Personen benötigen daher eine besonders enge ärztliche Überwachung.

Nach Herzinfarkt mit Typ-1-Diabetes schlechtere Karten als mit Typ 2?

29.05.2024 Herzinfarkt Nachrichten

Bei Menschen mit Typ-2-Diabetes sind die Chancen, einen Myokardinfarkt zu überleben, in den letzten 15 Jahren deutlich gestiegen – nicht jedoch bei Betroffenen mit Typ 1.

15% bedauern gewählte Blasenkrebs-Therapie

29.05.2024 Urothelkarzinom Nachrichten

Ob Patienten und Patientinnen mit neu diagnostiziertem Blasenkrebs ein Jahr später Bedauern über die Therapieentscheidung empfinden, wird einer Studie aus England zufolge von der Radikalität und dem Erfolg des Eingriffs beeinflusst.

Costims – das nächste heiße Ding in der Krebstherapie?

28.05.2024 Onkologische Immuntherapie Nachrichten

„Kalte“ Tumoren werden heiß – CD28-kostimulatorische Antikörper sollen dies ermöglichen. Am besten könnten diese in Kombination mit BiTEs und Checkpointhemmern wirken. Erste klinische Studien laufen bereits.

Update Innere Medizin

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.