nach oben

Current Treatment Options in Gastroenterology

08.05.2024

Current Trends and Developments in Radiologic Assessment of Chronic Pancreatitis

verfasst von: Surenth Nalliah, MD, Esben Bolvig Mark, MSc, PhD, Søren Schou Olesen, MD, PhD, Tine Maria Hansen, MSc, PhD, Jens Brøndum Frøkjær, MD, PhD

Erschienen in: Current Treatment Options in Gastroenterology

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Purpose of Review

Imaging of the pancreas in chronic pancreatitis (CP) has become increasingly valuable. This is driven by increased clinical focus on diagnosis, grading, and monitoring of CP, together with technical advancements. This review provides insights into routine radiological imaging of CP, current research trends and future directions in advanced CP imaging techniques, and finally developments in advanced image analysis.

Recent Findings

Current routine imaging, using computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and ultrasound, plays a major role in diagnosing, staging, and monitoring of CP. Each modality has strengths and limitations, and the use often depends on local practice and expertise. In clinical research, there is a clear trend towards the use of advanced imaging techniques that focus on identifying non-invasive biomarkers representing the underlying pancreatic pathophysiology. Several primarily MRI-based techniques show great promise in especially detecting early stages of CP. Regarding advanced image analysis, there is a trend towards using artificial intelligence with automated pancreas segmentation, extraction of radiomic features, and classification algorithms. These advancements have the potential to identify improved imaging biomarkers for CP.

Summary

Overall, new advances within radiological pancreatic imaging and image analysis may be a significant contributor to improving the management of CP patients.

Singh VK, Yadav D, Garg PK. Diagnosis and Management of Chronic Pancreatitis: A Review. JAMA. 2019;322(24):2422–34. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2019.19411.CrossRefPubMed

Beyer G, Habtezion A, Werner J, et al. Chronic pancreatitis. Lancet. 2020;396:499–512. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(20)31318-0.CrossRefPubMed

Cook ME, Bruun NH, Davidsen L, et al. Multistate model of the natural history of inflammatory pancreatic diseases: a nationwide population-based cohort study. Gastroenterology. 2023;165:1547-1557.e4. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.gastro.2023.08.042.CrossRefPubMed

Lankisch PG. Progression from acute to chronic pancreatitis: a physician’s view. Surg Clin North Am. 1999;79(4):815–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0039-6109(05)70045-1.CrossRefPubMed

Schreyer AG, Jung M, Riemann JF, et al. S3 guideline for chronic pancreatitis - diagnosis, classification and therapy for the radiologist. Rofo. 2014;186:1002–8.CrossRefPubMed

Catalano MF, Sahai A, Levy M, et al. EUS-based criteria for the diagnosis of chronic pancreatitis: the Rosemont classification. Gastrointest Endosc. 2009;69:1251–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gie.2008.07.043.CrossRefPubMed

Schneider A, Löhr JM, Singer MV. The M-ANNHEIM classification of chronic pancreatitis: introduction of a unifying classification system based on a review of previous classifications of the disease. J Gastroenterol. 2007;42:101–19. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00535-006-1945-4.CrossRefPubMed

Layer P, Yamamoto H, Kalthoff L, et al. The different courses of early- and late-onset idiopathic and alcoholic chronic pancreatitis. Gastroenterol. 1994;107:1481–7.CrossRef

Frøkjær JB, Akisik F, Farooq A, et al. Guidelines for the diagnostic cross sectional imaging and severity scoring of chronic pancreatitis. Pancreatology. 2018;18:764–73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pan.2018.08.012.CrossRefPubMed

10.

Dasyam AK, Shah ZK, Tirkes T, Dasyam N, Borhani AA. Cross-sectional imaging-based severity scoring of chronic pancreatitis: why it is necessary and how it can be done. Abdom Radiol (NY). 2020;45(5):1447–57. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-019-02218-6.CrossRefPubMed

11.

Tirkes T, Shah ZK, Takahashi N, et al. Reporting standards for chronic pancreatitis by using CT, MRI, and MR cholangiopancreatography: the consortium for the study of chronic pancreatitis, diabetes, and pancreatic cancer. Radiology. 2019;290:207–15. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2018181353.CrossRefPubMed

12.

Whitcomb DC, Shimosegawa T, Chari ST, et al. International consensus statements on early chronic pancreatitis. recommendations from the working group for the international consensus guidelines for chronic pancreatitis in collaboration with The International Association of Pancreatology, American Pan. Pancreatology. 2018; 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pan.2018.05.008

13.

Whitcomb DC, Frulloni L, Garg P, et al. Chronic pancreatitis: an international draft consensus proposal for a new mechanistic definition. Pancreatol. 2016;16:218–24.CrossRef

14.•

Cruz-Monserrate Z, Gumpper K, Pita V, et al. Biomarkers of chronic pancreatitis: a systematic literature review. Pancreatology. 2021. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pan.2021.01.006. This review analyzes the literature to identify the most likely candidates for biomarkers of CP.

15.

Dominguez-Munoz JE, Drewes AM, Lindkvist B, et al. Recommendations from the United European Gastroenterology evidence-based guidelines for the diagnosis and therapy of chronic pancreatitis. Pancreatology. 2018; 18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pan.2018.09.016

16.

Lohr JM, Dominguez-Munoz E, Rosendahl J, et al. United European Gastroenterology evidence-based guidelines for the diagnosis and therapy of chronic pancreatitis (HaPanEU) United Eur. Gastroenterol J. 2017;5:153–99.

17.

Issa Y, Kempeneers MA, van Santvoort HC, et al. Diagnostic performance of imaging modalities in chronic pancreatitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur Radiol. 2017;27:3820–44.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

18.

Nordaas IK, Tjora E, Dimcevski G, et al. Structural imaging findings are related to clinical complications in chronic pancreatitis. United Eur Gastroenterol J. 2022. https://doi.org/10.1002/ueg2.12228.CrossRef

19.

Takasaki Y, Ishii S, Fujisawa T, Ushio M, Takahashi S, Yamagata W, Ito K, Suzuki A, Ochiai K, Tomishima K, Saito H, Isayama H. Endoscopic ultrasonography findings of early and suspected early chronic pancreatitis. Diagnostics (Basel). 2020;10(12):1018. https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics10121018.CrossRefPubMed

20.

Sheel ARG, Baron RD, Sarantitis I, et al. The diagnostic value of Rosemont and Japanese diagnostic criteria for ‘indeterminate’ ‘suggestive’ ‘possible’ and ‘early’ chronic pancreatitis. Pancreatology. 2018. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pan.2018.08.002

21.

Tirkes T, Yadav D, Conwell DL, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging as a non-invasive method for the assessment of pancreatic fibrosis (MINIMAP): a comprehensive study design from the consortium for the study of chronic pancreatitis, diabetes, and pancreatic cancer. Abdom Radiol. 2019. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-019-02049-5

22.

Madzak A, Olesen SS, Wathle GK, et al. Secretin-stimulated magnetic resonance imaging assessment of the benign pancreatic disorders: systematic review and proposal for a standardized protocol. Pancreas. 2016;45:1092–103.CrossRefPubMed

23.

Swensson J, Zaheer A, Conwell D, Sandrasegaran K, Manfredi R, Tirkes T. Secretin-enhanced MRCP: how and why-AJR expert panel narrative review. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2021;216(5):1139–49. https://doi.org/10.2214/AJR.20.24857.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

24.

Madzak A, Olesen SS, Haldorsen IS, et al. Secretin-stimulated MRI characterization of pancreatic morphology and function in patients with chronic pancreatitis. Pancreatology. 2017;17:228–36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pan.2017.01.009.CrossRefPubMed

25.

Madzak A, Olesen SS, Lykke Poulsen J, et al. MRI assessed pancreatic morphology and exocrine function are associated with disease burden in chronic pancreatitis. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2017; 29. https://doi.org/10.1097/MEG.0000000000000955

26.

Souza D, Alessandrino F, Ketwaroo GA, et al. Accuracy of a novel noninvasive secretin-enhanced MRCP severity index scoring system for diagnosis of chronic pancreatitis: correlation with EUS-based Rosemont criteria. Radiol Medica. 2020. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11547-020-01181-3

27.

Bieliuniene E, Frøkjær JB, Pockevicius A, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging as a valid noninvasive tool for the assessment of pancreatic fibrosis. Pancreas. 2019. https://doi.org/10.1097/MPA.0000000000001206

28.

Wang L, Gaddam S, Wang N, et al. 2020. Multiparametric mapping magnetic resonance imaging of pancreatic disease. Front Physiol. https://doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2020.00008

29.

Fujita N, Nishie A, Asayama Y, et al. Intravoxel incoherent motion magnetic resonance imaging for assessment of chronic pancreatitis with special focus on its early stage. Acta radiol. 2020;61:579–85. https://doi.org/10.1177/0284185119872687.CrossRefPubMed

30.•

Olesen SS, Steinkohl E, Hansen TM, et al. Single- and multiparameter magnetic resonance imaging for diagnosing and severity grading of chronic pancreatitis. Abdom Radiol. 2022. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-022-03760-6. Use of quantitative T1 mapping, MRE and multiparametric index for CP at different functional stages.

31.

Bhuva AN, Treibel TA, Fontana M, et al. T1 mapping: non-invasive evaluation of myocardial tissue composition by cardiovascular magnetic resonance. Expert Rev Cardiovasc Ther. 2014.

32.

Tirkes T, Lin C, Fogel EL, et al. T1 mapping for diagnosis of mild chronic pancreatitis. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2017;45:1171–6. https://doi.org/10.1002/jmri.25428.CrossRefPubMed

33.

Wang M, Gao F, Wang X, et al. Magnetic resonance elastography and T 1 mapping for early diagnosis and classification of chronic pancreatitis. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2018. https://doi.org/10.1002/jmri.26008

34.•

Liu C, Shi Y, Lan G, et al. Evaluation of pancreatic fibrosis grading by multimodal functional magnetic resonance imaging. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2021. https://doi.org/10.1002/jmri.27626 Use of MRE and T1 mapping in diagnosing various grades of histological pancreatic fibrosis.

35.•

Tirkes T, Yadav D, Conwell DL, et al. Quantitative MRI of chronic pancreatitis: results from a multi-institutional prospective study, magnetic resonance imaging as a non-invasive method for assessment of pancreatic fibrosis (MINIMAP). Abdom Radiol. 2022;47:3792–805. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-022-03654-7. Use of quantitative MRI parameters and a multiparametric score in the diagnosis of CP.CrossRef

36.

Tirkes T, Lin C, Cui E, et al. Quantitative MR evaluation of chronic pancreatitis: Extracellular volume fraction and MR relaxometry. Am J Roentgenol. 2018. https://doi.org/10.2214/AJR.17.18606

37.•

Steinkohl E, Olesen SS, Hansen TM, et al. T1 relaxation times and MR elastography-derived stiffness: new potential imaging biomarkers for the assessment of chronic pancreatitis. Abdom Radiol. 2021;46:5598–608. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-021-03276-5. Use of quantitative T1 mapping and MRE in detecting mild CP.CrossRef

38.•

Cheng M, Gromski MA, Fogel EL, et al. T1 mapping for the diagnosis of early chronic pancreatitis: correlation with Cambridge classification system. Br J Radiol2021. https://doi.org/10.1259/bjr.20200685. Use of T1 mapping in the early stages of CP.

39.

Tirkes T, Dasyam AK, Shah ZK, et al. T1 signal intensity ratio of the pancreas as an imaging biomarker for the staging of chronic pancreatitis. Abdom Radiol. 2022. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-022-03611-4

40.

Steinkohl E, Bertoli D, Hansen TM, et al. Practical and clinical applications of pancreatic magnetic resonance elastography: a systematic review. Abdom Radiol (New York). 2021;46:4744–64. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-021-03143-3.CrossRef

41.

An H, Shi Y, Guo Q, Liu Y. Test–retest reliability of 3D EPI MR elastography of the pancreas. Clin Radiol. 2016;71:1068.e7-1068.e12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crad.2016.03.014.CrossRefPubMed

42.•

Steinkohl E, Olesen SS, Hansen TM, et al. Quantification of parenchymal fibrosis in chronic pancreatitis: relation to atrophy and pancreatic function. Acta radiol. 2022. https://doi.org/10.1177/02841851221114772. Use of MRE and T1 mapping in relation to pancreatic function in CP.

43.

Taso M, Guidon A, Zhao L, et al. Pancreatic perfusion and arterial-transit-time quantification using pseudocontinuous arterial spin labeling at 3T. Magn Reson Med. 2019. https://doi.org/10.1002/mrm.27435

44.

Schawkat K, Ith M, Christe A, et al. Dynamic non-invasive asl perfusion imaging of a normal pancreas with secretin augmented mr imaging. Eur Radiol. 2018. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-017-5227-8

45.

Zhang XM, Shi H, Parker L, et al. Suspected early or mild chronic pancreatitis: Enhancement patterns on gadolinium chelate dynamic MRI. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2003;17:86–94. https://doi.org/10.1002/jmri.10218.CrossRefPubMed

46.

Vietti Violi N, Hilbert T, Bastiaansen JAM, et al. Patient respiratory-triggered quantitative T2 mapping in the pancreas. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2019. https://doi.org/10.1002/jmri.26612.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

47.

Serrao EM, Kessler DA, Carmo B, et al. Magnetic resonance fingerprinting of the pancreas at 1.5T and 3.0T. Sci Rep. 2020. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-74462-6

48.

Schawkat K, Eshmuminov D, Lenggenhager D, et al. Preoperative evaluation of pancreatic fibrosis and lipomatosis: correlation of magnetic resonance findings with histology using magnetization transfer imaging and multigradient echo magnetic resonance imaging. Invest Radiol2018. https://doi.org/10.1097/RLI.0000000000000496

49.

Sugita R, Furuta A, Yamazaki T, et al. Direct visualization of pancreatic juice flow using unenhanced MRI with spin labeling can be aid in diagnosing chronic pancreatitis. Am J Roentgenol. 2014;202:1027–34. https://doi.org/10.2214/AJR.13.10886.CrossRef

50.

Chang CK, Shih TTF, Tien YW, et al. Metabolic alterations in pancreatic cancer detected by in vivo1h-mr spectroscopy: correlation with normal pancreas, pet metabolic activity, clinical stages, and survival outcome. Diagnostics. 2021. https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics11091541

51.

George E, Wortman JR, Fulwadhva UP, et al. Dual energy ct applications in pancreatic pathologies. Br. J. Radiol. 2017

52.•

Wang S, Zhang Y, Xu Y, et al. Progress in the application of dual-energy CT in pancreatic diseases. Eur J Radiol. 2023;168:111090. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrad.2023.111090. This review elaborates on the application of DECT for the diagnosis and characterization, of patients with pancreatic diseases.CrossRefPubMed

53.

Almeida RR, Lo GC, Patino M, et al. Advances in pancreatic ct imaging. Am J Roentgenol. 2018

54.

Kambadakone AR, Sahani D V. Body perfusion CT: technique, clinical applications, and advances. Radiol Clin North Am. 2009

55.

Goetz M, Skornitzke S, Weber C, et al (2016) Machine-learning based comparison of CT-perfusion maps and dual energy CT for pancreatic tumor detection. In: Medical Imaging 2016: Computer-Aided Diagnosis

56.

Arikawa S, Uchida M, Kunou Y, et al. Assessment of chronic pancreatitis: use of whole pancreas perfusion with 256-slice computed tomography. Pancreas. 2012. https://doi.org/10.1097/MPA.0b013e3182374fe0

57.

Lu N, Feng XY, Hao SJ, et al. 64-slice CT perfusion imaging of pancreatic adenocarcinoma and mass-forming chronic pancreatitis. Acad Radiol. 2011. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acra.2010.07.012.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

58.

Esquivel A, Ferrero A, Mileto A, Baffour F, Horst K, Rajiah PS, Inoue A, Leng S, McCollough C, Fletcher JG. Photon-counting detector CT: key points radiologists should know. Korean J Radiol. 2022;23(9):854–65. https://doi.org/10.3348/kjr.2022.0377.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

59.

Willemink MJ, Persson M, Pourmorteza A, Pelc NJ, Fleischmann D. Photon-counting CT: technical principles and clinical prospects. Radiology. 2018;289(2):293–312. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2018172656.CrossRefPubMed

60.•

Yamashita Y, Ashida R, Kitano M. Imaging of fibrosis in chronic pancreatitis. Front Physiol. 2022. The review shows the current status and trends in imaging of fibrosis in CP.

61.•

Yamashita Y, Yamazaki H, Shimokawa T, et al. Shear-wave versus strain elastography in endoscopic ultrasound for the diagnosis of chronic pancreatitis. Pancreatology. 2023. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pan.2022.11.009

62.

Paratore M, Garcovich M, Ainora ME, Del Vecchio LE, Cuccia G, Riccardi L, Pompili M, Gasbarrini A, Zocco MA. The role of transabdominal ultrasound elastography in gastrointestinal non-liver diseases: current application and future prospectives. Diagnostics (Basel). 2023;13(13):2266. https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics13132266.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

63.•

Alvaro Berbís M, Godino FP, del Val JR, et al. Clinical impact of artificial intelligence-based solutions on imaging of the pancreas and liver. World J Gastroenterol. 2023;29:1427–55. https://doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v29.i9.1427. Provides a good overview of some of the current AI-solutions available for analysis of the pancreas.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

64.

Ahmed TM, Kawamoto S, Hruban RH, et al. A primer on artificial intelligence in pancreatic imaging. Diagn Interv Imaging. 2023;104:435–47. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.diii.2023.03.002.CrossRefPubMed

65.

Boeken T, Feydy J, Lecler A, et al. Artificial intelligence in diagnostic and interventional radiology: where are we now? Diagn Interv Imaging. 2023;104:1–5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.diii.2022.11.004.CrossRefPubMed

66.

Olesen SS, Hagn-Meincke R, Drewes AM, et al. Pancreatic atrophy and exocrine insufficiency associate with the presence of diabetes in chronic pancreatitis patients, but additional mediators are operative. Scand J Gastroenterol. 2021. https://doi.org/10.1080/00365521.2020.1867891

67.

Wilcox CM, Yadav D, Ye T, et al. Chronic pancreatitis pain pattern and severity are independent of abdominal imaging findings. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2015. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cgh.2014.10.015

68.

Dai S, Zhu Y, Jiang X, et al. TD-Net: Trans-Deformer network for automatic pancreas segmentation. Neurocomputing. 2023;517:279–93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neucom.2022.10.060.CrossRef

69.•

Panda A, Korfiatis P, Suman G, et al. Two-stage deep learning model for fully automated pancreas segmentation on computed tomography: comparison with intra-reader and inter-reader reliability at full and reduced radiation dose on an external dataset. Med Phys. 2021;48:2468–81. https://doi.org/10.1002/mp.14782. This article provides an example of building an automated pancreas segmentation algoritme with a large dataset.CrossRefPubMed

70.

Wendler T, Kreissl MC, Schemmer B, et al. Artificial Intelligence-powered automatic volume calculation in medical images – available tools, performance and challenges for nuclear medicine. Nukl - Nucl. 2023;62:343–53. https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2200-2145.CrossRef

71.

Kumar H, DeSouza SV, Petrov MS. Automated pancreas segmentation from computed tomography and magnetic resonance images: A systematic review. Comput Methods Programs Biomed. 2019;178:319–28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cmpb.2019.07.002.CrossRefPubMed

72.

Tallam H, Elton DC, Lee S, et al. Fully automated abdominal CT biomarkers for type 2 diabetes using deep learning. Radiology. 2022;304:85–95. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.211914.CrossRefPubMed

73.

Mukherjee S, Patra A, Khasawneh H, et al. Radiomics-based machine-learning models can detect pancreatic cancer on prediagnostic computed tomography scans at a substantial lead time before clinical diagnosis. Gastroenterology. 2022;163:1435-1446.e3. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.gastro.2022.06.066.CrossRefPubMed

74.

Chen H, Liu Y, Shi Z, Lyu Y. Pancreas segmentation by two-view feature learning and multi-scale supervision. Biomed Signal Process Control. 2022;74:103519. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bspc.2022.103519.CrossRef

75.

Gillies RJ, Kinahan PE, Hricak H. Radiomics: images are more than pictures, they are data. Radiology. 2016. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2015151169

76.•

McCague C, Ramlee S, Reinius M, et al. Introduction to radiomics for a clinical audience. Clin. Radiol. 2023. A review of the use of radiomics that is easy to read for clinicians without experience with radiomics.

77.

Wright DE, Mukherjee S, Patra A, et al. Radiomics-based machine learning (ML) classifier for detection of type 2 diabetes on standard-of-care abdomen CTs: a proof-of-concept study. Abdom Radiol. 2022;47:3806–16. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-022-03668-1.CrossRef

78.

Lu CQ, Wang YC, Meng XP, et al. Diabetes risk assessment with imaging: a radiomics study of abdominal CT. Eur Radiol. 2019;29:2233–42. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-018-5865-5.CrossRefPubMed

79.

DeSouza SV, Singh RG, Yoon HD, et al. Pancreas volume in health and disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Expert Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2018;12:757–66. https://doi.org/10.1080/17474124.2018.1496015.CrossRefPubMed

80.

Chu LC, Park S, Kawamoto S, et al. Utility of CT radiomics features in differentiation of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma from normal pancreatic tissue. Am J Roentgenol. 2019;213:349–57. https://doi.org/10.2214/AJR.18.20901.CrossRef

81.

Frøkjær JB, Lisitskaya MV, Jørgensen AS, et al. Pancreatic magnetic resonance imaging texture analysis in chronic pancreatitis: a feasibility and validation study. Abdom Radiol. 2020.https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-020-02512-8

82.

Abbasian Ardakani A, Bureau NJ, Ciaccio EJ, Acharya UR. Interpretation of radiomics features-a pictorial review. Comput Methods Programs Biomed. 2022;215:106609. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cmpb.2021.106609.CrossRefPubMed

83.

Zwanenburg A, Vallières M, Abdalah MA, et al. The image biomarker standardization initiative: standardized quantitative radiomics for high-throughput image-based phenotyping. Radiology. 2020;295:328–38. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2020191145.CrossRefPubMed

Titel: Current Trends and Developments in Radiologic Assessment of Chronic Pancreatitis
verfasst von: Surenth Nalliah, MD
Esben Bolvig Mark, MSc, PhD
Søren Schou Olesen, MD, PhD
Tine Maria Hansen, MSc, PhD
Jens Brøndum Frøkjær, MD, PhD
Publikationsdatum: 08.05.2024
Verlag: Springer US
Erschienen in: Current Treatment Options in Gastroenterology
Print ISSN: 1092-8472
Elektronische ISSN: 1534-309X
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11938-024-00447-3

Leitlinien kompakt für die Innere Medizin

Mit medbee Pocketcards sicher entscheiden.

^{Seit 2022 gehört die medbee GmbH zum Springer Medizin Verlag}

Kostenlos registrieren

Update Innere Medizin

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

Newsletter bestellen

Live-Webinar "Urologie und Sexualmedizin in der Praxis"

Springer Medizin

Current Trends and Developments in Radiologic Assessment of Chronic Pancreatitis

Abstract

Purpose of Review

Recent Findings

Summary

Leitlinien kompakt für die Innere Medizin

Neu im Fachgebiet Innere Medizin

Erhebliches Risiko für Kehlkopfkrebs bei mäßiger Dysplasie

Nach Herzinfarkt mit Typ-1-Diabetes schlechtere Karten als mit Typ 2?

15% bedauern gewählte Blasenkrebs-Therapie

Costims – das nächste heiße Ding in der Krebstherapie?

Update Innere Medizin

Live-Webinar "Urologie und Sexualmedizin in der Praxis"

Springer Medizin

Abstract

Purpose of Review

Recent Findings

Summary

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu diesem Inhalt zu erhalten

Leitlinien kompakt für die Innere Medizin

Neu im Fachgebiet Innere Medizin

Erhebliches Risiko für Kehlkopfkrebs bei mäßiger Dysplasie

Nach Herzinfarkt mit Typ-1-Diabetes schlechtere Karten als mit Typ 2?

15% bedauern gewählte Blasenkrebs-Therapie

Costims – das nächste heiße Ding in der Krebstherapie?

Update Innere Medizin