Correction to: Acta Neurochirurgica a (2023) 165:2843–2853
Anzeige
Unfortunately, we have just noticed a couple of errors in the numbers reported in our recently published manuscript “The clinical course and outcomes of non-aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhages in a single-center retrospective study”.
These errors are as follows:
1.
In the Results section of abstract, the aOR and 95% CI for “loss of consciousness (LOC)” should be 214.23 (17.58–2610.61) instead of 214.67, 95% CI 17.62–2615.89.
2.
In the Results section, subheading “Logistic regression analysis”, lines 9–10, the aOR and 95% CI for “loss of consciousness (LOC)” should be 214.23 (17.58–2610.61) instead of 214.67, 95% CI 17.62–2615.89.
3.
In the Results section of abstract, the aOR and 95% CI for “Fisher grade 4 bleeding pattern” should be 23.24 (1.39–387.56) instead of 23.32, 95% CI 1.40–387.98
4.
In the Results section, subheading “Logistic regression analysis”, lines 10–11, the aOR and 95% CI for “Fisher grade 4 bleeding pattern” should be 23.24 (1.39–387.56) instead of 23.32, 95% CI 1.40–387.98.
5.
In the Discussion section, in page 8, paragraph 2, in the sentence “…In the multivariable logistic regression analysis, LOC was by far the most significant indicator of unfavorable outcome (aOR 137.94, 95% CI 30.92–615.41), regardless of the other factors.”. The aOR should have been 214.23, 95% CI 17.58–2610.61.
6.
In the discussion section, page 8, paragraph 1, lines 9–11, the predictors of poor outcome should have been: “In a multivariate analysis, the predictors for poor outcome were the LOC and Fisher 4 grade bleeding pattern.”
7.
In the Fig. 2, there was a small typo: The number in the “Number of patients with only one hospitalization related to aneurysm treatment: 500” should have been 510 instead of 500. This could be corrected in the Figure legend: “Number of patients with only one hospitalization related to aneurysm treatment should have been 510 instead of 500.”
We sincerely apologize for these mistakes having been missed during the check of page proofs.
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.