Introduction
Methods
Flow Diverter Deployment
Porous FD Approach Based on Flow Resistance Measurements
PED | P64 | ||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | ||
Nominal | lC | 66.8 | 114 | 137 | 135 | – | – | – | – | 186 | 164 | 160 | – | – | – | – | – |
qC | 170 | 464 | 133 | 131 | – | – | – | – | 139 | 187 | 349 | – | – | – | – | – | |
Oversized | lC | – | – | – | – | 5.6 | 4.3 | 4.7 | 42.8 | – | – | – | 5.8 | 19.3 | 6.3 | 9.5 | 36.1 |
qC | – | – | – | – | 239 | 281 | 267 | 157 | – | – | – | 316 | 232 | 308 | 243 | 204 |
Simulation Description
Evaluation Techniques and Study Design
PED | P64 | Treated | Pre | Total | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Nominal | Oversized | Nominal | Oversized | |||
4 | 4 | 3 | 5 | 80 | 5 | 85 |
Results
Flow Resistance
Wire Number
N122 | N168 | N180 | N237 | N270 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
SUM | 35.5 (18.7–59.2) | 25.6 (12.9–45.9) | 42.8 (20.4–72.5) | 45.1 (27.1–62.3) | 47.6 (31.9–66.4) |
PED | 34.8 (18.7–55.9) | 24.7 (12.9–41.4) | 42.2 (20.4–66.8) | 45.1 (27.1–60) | 47.2 (31.9–63.1) |
P64 | 36.1 (19.8–59.2) | 26.6 (14.0–45.9) | 43.4 (22.7–72.5) | 45 (30–62.3) | 47.9 (34.0–66.4) |
Nominal | 52.2 (36.2–59.2) | 38.8 (24.1–45.9) | 64.9 (45.8–72.5) | 59.5 (53.0–62.3) | 62 (50.6–66.4) |
Oversized | 22.4 (18.7–28.2) | 15.4 (12.9–18.5) | 25.7 (20.4–34.6) | 33.8 (27.1–47.3) | 36.3 (31.9–43.4) |
Deployment Scenario
Cumulative Results
PED | P64 | p | |
---|---|---|---|
Nominal | 51.9 (11.8) | 60.3 (9.5) | < 0.0258 |
Oversized | 25.7 (9.4) | 27.5 (8.8) | 0.517 |