Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Obesity Surgery 5/2024

Open Access 21.03.2024 | Original Contributions

Comparison of Dynamic Measures in Intraoperative Goal-Directed Fluid Therapy of Patients with Morbid Obesity Undergoing Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy

verfasst von: Gökhan Urhan, İsmail Demirel, Ahmet Deniz, Ahmet Aksu, Aysun Yıldız Altun, Esef Bolat, Azize Beştaş, Gülsüm Altuntaş

Erschienen in: Obesity Surgery | Ausgabe 5/2024

Abstract

Introduction

Obesity increases the risk of morbidity and mortality during surgical procedures. Goal-directed fluid therapy (GDFT) is a new concept for perioperative fluid management that has been shown to improve patient prognosis. This study aimed to investigate the role of the Pleth Variability Index (PVI), systolic pressure variation (SPV), and pulse pressure variation (PPV) in maintaining tissue perfusion and renal function during GDFT management in patients undergoing laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG).

Materials and Methods

Two hundred ten patients were enrolled in our prospective randomized controlled clinical trial. Demographic data, hemodynamic parameters, biochemical parameters, the amount of crystalloid and colloid fluid administered intraoperatively, and the technique of goal-directed fluid management used were recorded. Patients were randomly divided into three groups: PVI (n = 70), PPV (n = 70), and SPV (n = 70), according to the technique of goal-directed fluid management. Postoperative nausea and vomiting, time of return of bowel movement, and hospital stay duration were recorded.

Results

There was no statistically significant difference between the number of crystalloids administered in all three groups. However, the amount of colloid administered was statistically significantly lower in the SPV group than in the PVI group, and there was no significant difference in the other groups. Statistically, there was no significant difference between the groups in plasma lactate, blood urea, and creatinine levels.

Conclusion

In LSG, dynamic measurement techniques such as PVI, SPV, and PPV can be used in patients with morbid obesity without causing intraoperative and postoperative complications. PVI may be preferred over other invasive methods because it is noninvasive.

Graphical abstract

Hinweise

Key Points

There are limited data for the optimal fluid regimen in morbidly obese patients.
GDFT protocols were recently developed to improve postoperative patient outcomes.
GDFT can be performed by monitoring intravascular volume with hemodynamic measurement.
The use of dynamic indicators may be associated with less fluid administration.

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Introduction

The goal of perioperative fluid management should be to ensure intravascular volume balance and continuity, tissue perfusion, adequate O2 supply, normal electrolyte concentrations, and normoglycemia. For this purpose, crystalloid and/or colloid fluids may be administered intravenously.
In recent years, goal-directed fluid therapy (GDFT) management has come to the forefront to avoid hypervolemia in the intraoperative period and to ensure patient optimization in the postoperative period [1]. GDFT can be performed by monitoring intravascular volume with hemodynamic measurement techniques such as plethysmographic waveform and arterial pressure wave analysis [2]. Although dynamic measurements based on the cardiopulmonary relationship have been reported to be ideal techniques for fluid therapy management in patients receiving mechanical ventilation, it has also been reported that dynamic measurement techniques may not be sufficient to predict fluid requirements in cases where there is a decrease in pulmonary compliance [3].
In the intraoperative period, excessive and uncontrolled fluid infusion can lead to adverse conditions such as hypertension, pulmonary edema, cerebral edema, peripheral edema, periorbital edema, bowel dysfunction, and delayed wound healing. Inadequate fluid intake can lead to decreased cardiac output and impaired tissue perfusion, shock, and multiorgan failure [4, 5]. GDFT protocols in surgical patients have been reported to prevent intraoperative fluid overload and insufficiency and reduce postoperative complications [6].
Obesity is associated with increased total and lean body mass; however, intracellular, extracellular, and absolute total body fluids tend to be relatively reduced in individuals with obesity compared with those with normal weight. Data regarding the most effective fluid management for patients with morbid obesity are insufficient. Some studies indicate the potential harm to patients due to excessive fluid loading in traditional practices; nevertheless, there is a limited number of studies investigating GDFT in the context of bariatric surgery [7].
It is well known that GDFT administers less fluid in the intraoperative period compared with standard fluid therapy strategies. Accordingly, the incidence of surgical site infections is reduced, and the resumption of bowel movements is accelerated [8]. It has been reported that the use of dynamic parameters instead of static parameters, such as mean arterial pressure (MAP), central venous pressure (CVP), and urine monitoring in intraoperative fluid management in patients undergoing surgical procedures, leads to a reduction in perioperative complications and a shortening of hospital stay [9, 10].
In the Pleth Variability Index (PVI) technique, one of the dynamic parameters used to evaluate intravascular volume status, respiratory changes are measured using plethysmography. Another dynamic parameter, systolic pressure variation (SPV), is the difference between the maximum systolic arterial pressure (SAPmax) and the minimum systolic arterial pressure (SAPmin) in a respiratory cycle. Finally, pulse pressure variation (PPV), one of the dynamic parameters, is calculated by measuring the highest (PPmax) and the lowest value (PPmin) of pulse pressure in a respiratory cycle.
Although many studies in the literature compare GDFT management with standard fluid management, studies comparing different dynamic measurement techniques, both invasive and noninvasive, used in the follow-up of GDFT management, especially in bariatric surgery, are very limited. Accordingly, our study aimed to investigate the advantages of PVI, SPV, and PPV techniques, the preferred dynamic measurement techniques for managing GDFT in patients undergoing laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) in the postoperative period.

Material-Method

The study was approved by the Firat University Non-Interventional Research Ethics Committee (dated 19/12/2018, number 300693). Between February 1, 2019, and August 1, 2019, a total of 210 patients with morbid obesity, who provided written consent, were prospectively enrolled in our randomized controlled clinical study at the Department of General Surgery, Firat University Hospital.
Those who had undergone bariatric surgery other than sleeve gastrectomy, were aged younger than 18 years, had cardiac arrhythmias, had a cardiac ejection fraction < 30%, had pulmonary pathology that did not allow tidal volume formation greater than 6 mL/kg, and had hepatic and renal dysfunction and patients with American Society of Anesthesiologist (ASA) physical status ASA-3 were excluded from the study.
The 210 patients who were enrolled in the study were randomly divided into three groups using the sealed envelope method: PVI (n = 70), PPV (n = 70), and SPV (n = 70), depending on which measurement technique was used during the follow-up of the GDFT.
In our study, PVI measurements were performed using Masimo Set version V7.1.1.5 pulse oximetry (MasimoCo, Irvine, California) to continuously, automatically, and noninvasively measure plethysmographic changes during the respiratory cycle. PPV and SPV were measured continuously and automatically using a CARESCAPE B650 model monitor (General Electric Healthcare, USA) using arterial pressure wave analysis via a 20-G radial artery cannula.
Regardless of the groups, 2–3 mg/kg propofol (propofol 1%, Fresenius, Germany) corresponding to total body weight (TBW), 1 µg/kg remifentanil (Ultiva®, GSK, USA) corresponding to ideal body weight (IBW), and 0.6–0.8 mg/kg rocuronium bromide (Esmeron®, MSD, Germany) were used during the induction of general anesthesia. Endotracheal intubation was performed after an adequate depth of anesthesia was achieved. During maintenance anesthesia, 0.05–0.2 µg/kg remifentanil infusion and 2–2.5% sevoflurane (Sevorane®, liquid 100%, Abbvie, England) were administered with a 50:50% medical air: O2 mixture according to the IBW. Rocuronium bromide was used as a muscle relaxant for maintenance if needed. In this standard general anesthesia protocol, the patient was ventilated with an end-tidal CO2, between 35 and 45 mmHg, a tidal volume of 8 mL/kg according to the IBW, and an I:E (inspiration-to-expiration) ratio of 1:2 to maintain normocapnia. At the end of the surgery, the residual effect of the intraoperatively administered muscle relaxant was eliminated using 2 mg/kg sugammadex (Bridion®, MSD, Netherlands), according to the intravenous IBW.
The same surgical team performed the surgery on all patients in the study, and the intra-abdominal pressure was maintained below 15 mmHg.
Patients in the PVI group (n = 70) received 500 mL of crystalloid during induction and a 2 mL/kg/h crystalloid infusion corresponding to the TBW. If the PVI exceeded 13% for more than 5 min, 250 mL bolus colloid infusions were administered until the PVI was 13%, and the colloid doses were recorded. Patients whose mean arterial pressure could not be brought to 65 mmHg despite a PVI value of 13% or less were administered norepinephrine.
Patients in the SPV group (n = 70) received 500 mL of crystalloid during induction and a crystalloid infusion of 2 mL/kg/h, according to TBW. If the SPV was above 10 mmHg for more than 5 min, 250 mL bolus colloid infusions were administered until the SPV was 10 mmHg, and the colloid doses were recorded. Patients whose SPV value decreased to 10 mmHg or less but whose mean arterial pressure value of 65 mmHg could not be achieved were administered norepinephrine.
Patients in the PPV group (n = 70) received 500 mL crystalloid during induction and a crystalloid infusion of 2 mL/kg/h corresponding to TBW. When PPV exceeded 13% for more than 5 min, 250 mL bolus colloid infusions were administered until PPV was 13%, and the colloid doses were recorded. Patients whose mean arterial pressure could not be reduced to 65 mmHg despite a PPV value of 13% or less were administered norepinephrine.
In our study, lactate concentrations were recorded and compared in blood samples taken from patients during skin incision, at the beginning of each hour during surgery, and at 6, 12, and 24 h postoperatively to assess tissue perfusion. We used 0.9% NaCl as a crystalloid and succinylated gelatin (Gelofusine®, B. Braun) as a colloid. Blood urea and creatinine levels were recorded preoperatively and postoperatively at week 24 to assess renal function. Postoperative nausea and vomiting score, time of return of bowel movements, tracking of bowel sounds, time of first gas leakage, and number of days of hospital stay were recorded.
In line with the primary objective of our study, a sample size analysis was conducted using the G*power software (Version 3.1) to determine the number of patients required for inclusion in the research. The sample size determination analysis drew upon literature information and expert opinions. As a result of the conducted sample size analysis, a decision was made to include a total of 210 patients in the sample, considering an 80% power (1-β = 0.80) and α = 0.05 error value (95% confidence interval).

Statistical Analysis

All analyses were performed using the IBM SPSS Statistics Version 22.0 statistical software package. Categorical variables are expressed as numbers and percentages, whereas continuous variables are summarized as mean and standard deviation and median and minimum–maximum where appropriate. The chi-squared test was used to compare categorical variables between the groups. The normality of distribution for continuous variables was confirmed using the Kolmogorov–Smirnov test. For comparison of more than two groups, one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) or the Kruskal–Wallis test was used depending on whether the statistical hypotheses were fulfilled. For normally distributed data, regarding the homogeneity of variances, the Bonferroni, Scheffe, and Tamhane tests were used for multiple comparisons of groups. For non-normally distributed data, the Bonferroni-adjusted Mann–Whitney U test was used for multiple comparisons of groups. To evaluate the change in the measurements obtained in the time interval, repeated measurement analysis was applied. The statistical level of significance for all tests was considered as 0.05.

Results

The flow of patients’ participation in the study is shown in Fig. 1.
When comparing the patients’ demographic data (age, height, weight, body mass index (BMI), sex), no significant difference was found between the groups (Table 1).
Table 1
Demographic data
 
Group
p value
PVI (n = 70)
SPV (n = 70)
PPV (n = 70)
Age
35.04 ± 10.065
35.06 ± 11.544
36.99 ± 10.927
0.470
Weight
120.69 ± 22.321
121.61 ± 26.790
117.40 ± 17.437
0.501
Height
165.83 ± 9.731
167.36 ± 9.523
165.73 ± 8.672
0.512
BMI
43.731 ± 6.313
43.7479 ± 6.166
42.7286 ± 5.533
0.514
Sex (female/male)
54/16
48/22
54/16
0.408
When comparing the amount of crystalloid administered to the patients during the intraoperative period, there was no statistically significant difference between the groups (p = 0.598). However, when comparing the amount of colloid administered intraoperatively, it was found that the mean amount was statistically significantly higher in the PVI group than in the SPV group (p = 0.010*). No other pairwise comparisons showed a significant difference (Table 2).
Table 2
Amount of fluid given to patients intraoperatively
 
Group
p value
PVI (n = 70)
SPV (n = 70)
PPV (n = 70)
Crystalloid (mL)
790.91 ± 80.94
804.57 ± 97.34
793.30 ± 75.15
0.598
Colloid (mL)
364.28 ± 239.58
239.28 ± 234.81
303.57 ± 247.79
0.010*
*Between PVI and SPV
The intraoperative PVI, SPV, and PPV values are shown in Fig. 2.
No statistically significant difference was found when intraoperative and postoperative lactate values were compared between the groups (p = 0.250) (Table 3). The decrease in lactate levels over time in the postoperative period was statistically significant in all groups (p < 0.001) (Table 3).
Table 3
Lactate values (mmol/L)
 
Group
In-group time change (p value)
PVI (n = 70)
SPV (n = 70)
PPV (n = 70)
Intraoperative
Introduction
1.393 ± 0.511
1.197 ± 0.436
1341 ± 0.641
 < 0.001*
1st hour
1.490 ± 0.525
1.297 ± 0.402
1.293 ± 0.490
Postoperative
6th hour
2.559 ± 1.032
2.547 ± 0.859
2.573 ± 1.052
12th hour
2.264 ± 0.887
2.053 ± 0.632
2.250 ± 0.887
24th hour
1.549 ± 0.705
1.484 ± 0.493
1.564 ± 0.489
Between the groups (p value)
0.250
 
* Means statistically significant
No statistically significant difference was found when comparing urea and creatinine levels between groups (p = 0.369 and p = 0.771, respectively) (Table 4). In addition, it was found that preoperative urea and creatinine levels were statistically significantly higher than urea and creatinine levels at the 24th postoperative hour in all groups (p = 0.001).
Table 4
Urea-creatinine values of the patient groups
 
Group
p value for time change
PVI (n = 70)
SPV (n = 70)
PPV (n = 70)
Urea (mg/dL)
Preoperative
32.56 ± 20.83
29.09 ± 10.43
28.44 ± 9.49
 < 0.001*
Postoperative
17.04 ± 5.63
18.56 ± 855
16.61 ± 11.03
p value for the group
0.369
 
Creatinine (mg/dL)
Preoperative
0.672 ± 0.136
0.698 ± 0.150
0.698 ± 0.179
 < 0.001*
Postoperative
0.644 ± 0.137
0.650 ± 0.151
0.650 ± 0.211
p value for the group
0.771
 
* Means statistically significant
It was found that there was no statistically significant difference in postoperative nausea and vomiting scores, return of bowel movements, and hospital stay of patients (Tables 5 and 6).
Table 5
Nausea-vomiting in patient groups
 
Group
Total
p value
PVI (n = 70)
SPV (n = 70)
PPV (n = 70)
Nausea
None
10 (14.3%)
14 (20.0%)
10 (14.3%)
34 (16.2%)
0.888
0–2 h
11 (15.7%)
7 (10.0%)
8 (11.4%)
26 (12.4%)
2–6 h
24 (34.3%)
23 (32.9%)
27 (38.6%)
74 (35.2%)
6–24 h
25 (35.7%)
26 (37.1%)
25 (35.7%)
76 (36.2%)
Vomiting
None
41 (58.6%)
43 (61.4%)
38 (54.3%)
122 (58.51%)
0.956
0–2 h
2 (2.9%)
2 (2.9%)
3 (4.3%)
7 (3.3%)
2–6 h
6 (8.6%)
6 (8.6%)
9 (12.9%)
21 (10.0%)
6–24 h
21 (30.0%)
19 (27.1%)
20 (28.6%)
60 (28.6%)
Table 6
Return of bowel movements and length of hospitalization in patient groups
 
Group
p value
PVI (n = 70)
SPV (n = 70)
PPV (n = 70)
Median (min–max)
Median (min–max)
Median (min–max)
Gas (days)
2 (1–4)
2 (1–3)
2 (1–3)
0.119
Stool (days)
4 (2–5)
4 (2–5)
4 (1–5)
0.587
Length of hospitalization (days)
6 (4–10)
7 (5–9)
7 (4–16)
0.186

Discussion

Studies have attracted attention in recent years showing that perioperative fluid therapy management directly affects patient prognosis. GDFT has been shown to reduce postoperative complications and shorten hospital stays [11]. Therefore, various fluid therapy management protocols are used [12]. The protocols used in GDFT have been reported to reduce patient morbidity and mortality [13]; however, there are few protocols in the guidelines for fluid management in bariatric surgery.
If fluid therapy is inadequate, complications such as hypotension, acute renal injury, arrhythmia, ischemia, and anastomotic leakage may occur due to hypovolemia. In contrast, complications such as prolonged mechanical ventilation, delayed wound healing, infection, and prolonged discharge time due to hypervolemia may occur after excessive fluid intake [14, 15].
Nowadays, bariatric surgical procedures are mostly performed with laparoscopic techniques, and it is well known that hemodynamic disturbances may occur during such procedures due to insufflation and the patient’s position. However, it has been reported that these deteriorations are not evident in the clinic when the pressure is 15 mmHg or less [16]. As long as the intra-abdominal pressure does not exceed 15 mmHg during laparoscopic procedures, the decrease in cardiac output is minimal and does not affect the clinical outcome in healthy subjects [17]. As in these studies, surgical procedures in our study were performed with insufflation pressures of 15 mmHg and below.
Recent studies found no difference between the choice of crystalloids or colloids in GDFT strategies regarding complications, morbidity, and mortality [18, 19]. Moreover, although it has been shown that the choice of crystalloid and colloid solutions does not cause a significant difference in mortality rates, it has also been found that the choice of hydroxyethyl starch (HES) as a colloid may increase mortality [20]. Accordingly, we used 0.9% NaCl as a crystalloid and succinylated gelatin (Gelofusine®, B. Braun) as a colloid in our study. Although the amount of colloid used was statistically lower in the SPV group in the present study, we do think it was not clinically significant.
It has been reported that PVI is safe in assessing fluid responsiveness in perioperative patient groups. However, the noninvasive technique of PVI used in GDFT is distinct from invasive techniques. Nevertheless, it is suggested that noninvasive techniques such as PVI may be inadequate in patient groups with vascular tone and volume changes [21, 22].
Studies have reported that SPV and PPV-controlled fluid management, invasive GDFT techniques, successfully predict response to fluid therapy [2326]. In another study, PPV, goal-directed therapy, and standard fluid therapy were compared regarding postoperative complications and hospital stay. It was found that there was no difference in complication rates, and the length of hospital stay decreased in the GDFT group [23].
Despite these studies in the literature, there are few studies on GDFT management in patients with morbid obesity. Although the dynamic parameters differed in our study, a similar protocol was used in the patients. Our study used a threshold of 13% for PVI-directed fluid therapy, 10 mmHg for SPV-directed fluid therapy, and 13% for PPV-directed fluid therapy under the thresholds used in the literature [11, 27].
There is a significant relationship between intravascular volume insufficiency, tissue hypoxia, and lactate levels. Measurement of plasma lactate levels, one of the methods used to assess tissue perfusion, is a sensitive technique, even though it is indirect [28]. The reason why the measurement of lactate levels is preferred in evaluating the efficiency of fluid resuscitation is the normalization of plasma lactate levels as a result of meeting fluid requirements and providing adequate cardiac preload [29]. We used plasma lactate values to evaluate tissue perfusion and blood urea and creatinine values to evaluate renal functions.

Conclusion

As a result, it was found that there was no superiority among the three groups in terms of tissue perfusion and renal function. In light of these findings, it was determined that adequate intravascular volume was provided, and renal perfusion was preserved in all three groups. For LSG, it was found that there was no difference between the goal-directed fluid therapies using PVI, SPV, and PPV measurement techniques in terms of lactate levels, urea-creatinine levels, return time of bowel movements, and hospital stay. In this case, the noninvasive PVI measurement technique may be preferred as a first step because it is easier to use than the invasive PPV and SPV measurement techniques. Although GDFT protocols are known to prevent intraoperative fluid overload in bariatric surgery, further research is needed to optimize dynamic measurement techniques that automatically and continuously display variable results.

Declarations

Ethical Approval.

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
Informed consent was obtained from all individuals included in the study.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no competing interests.
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://​creativecommons.​org/​licenses/​by/​4.​0/​.

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Unsere Produktempfehlungen

Die Chirurgie

Print-Titel

Das Abo mit mehr Tiefe

Mit der Zeitschrift Die Chirurgie erhalten Sie zusätzlich Online-Zugriff auf weitere 43 chirurgische Fachzeitschriften, CME-Fortbildungen, Webinare, Vorbereitungskursen zur Facharztprüfung und die digitale Enzyklopädie e.Medpedia.

Bis 30. April 2024 bestellen und im ersten Jahr nur 199 € zahlen!

e.Med Interdisziplinär

Kombi-Abonnement

Für Ihren Erfolg in Klinik und Praxis - Die beste Hilfe in Ihrem Arbeitsalltag

Mit e.Med Interdisziplinär erhalten Sie Zugang zu allen CME-Fortbildungen und Fachzeitschriften auf SpringerMedizin.de.

Literatur
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Turkut N, Altun D, Canbolat N, et al. Comparison of stroke volume variation-based goal-directed therapy versus standard fluid therapy in patients undergoing head and neck surgery: a randomized controlled study. Balkan Med J. 2022;39:351–7.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Turkut N, Altun D, Canbolat N, et al. Comparison of stroke volume variation-based goal-directed therapy versus standard fluid therapy in patients undergoing head and neck surgery: a randomized controlled study. Balkan Med J. 2022;39:351–7.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Navarro e Lima LH, Papa FV, Amorim CG, et al. Perioperative fluid therapy: more questions than definitive answers. Braz J Anesthesiol. 2022;72(6):683–4.PubMedPubMedCentral Navarro e Lima LH, Papa FV, Amorim CG, et al. Perioperative fluid therapy: more questions than definitive answers. Braz J Anesthesiol. 2022;72(6):683–4.PubMedPubMedCentral
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Messina A, Robba C, Calabro L, et al. Association between perioperative fluid administration and postoperative outcomes: a 20-year systematic review and a meta-analysis of randomized goal-directed trials in majör visceral/noncardiac surgery. Crit Care. 2021;25:43.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Messina A, Robba C, Calabro L, et al. Association between perioperative fluid administration and postoperative outcomes: a 20-year systematic review and a meta-analysis of randomized goal-directed trials in majör visceral/noncardiac surgery. Crit Care. 2021;25:43.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Piccioni F, Bernasconi F, Tramontano GTA, et al. A systematic review of pulse pressure variation and stroke volume variation to predict fluid responsiveness during cardiac and thoracic surgery. J Clin Monit Comput. 2017;31:677–84.CrossRefPubMed Piccioni F, Bernasconi F, Tramontano GTA, et al. A systematic review of pulse pressure variation and stroke volume variation to predict fluid responsiveness during cardiac and thoracic surgery. J Clin Monit Comput. 2017;31:677–84.CrossRefPubMed
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Messina A, Lionetti G, Foti L, et al. Mini fluid challenge and end-expiratory occlusion test to assess fluid responsiveness in the operating room (MANEUVER study). Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2021;38:422–31.CrossRefPubMed Messina A, Lionetti G, Foti L, et al. Mini fluid challenge and end-expiratory occlusion test to assess fluid responsiveness in the operating room (MANEUVER study). Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2021;38:422–31.CrossRefPubMed
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Jessen MK, Vallentin MF, Holmberg MJ, et al. Goal-directed haemodynamic therapy during general anaesthesia for noncardiac surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Br J Anaesth. 2022;128(3):416–33.CrossRefPubMed Jessen MK, Vallentin MF, Holmberg MJ, et al. Goal-directed haemodynamic therapy during general anaesthesia for noncardiac surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Br J Anaesth. 2022;128(3):416–33.CrossRefPubMed
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Brienza N, Biancofiore G, Cavaliere F, et al. Clinical guidelines for perioperative hemodynamic management of non cardiac surgical adult patients. Minerva Anestesiol. 2019;85(12):1315–33.CrossRefPubMed Brienza N, Biancofiore G, Cavaliere F, et al. Clinical guidelines for perioperative hemodynamic management of non cardiac surgical adult patients. Minerva Anestesiol. 2019;85(12):1315–33.CrossRefPubMed
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Mukai A, Suehiro K, Watanabe R, et al. Impact of intraoperative goal-directed fluid therapy on majör morbidity and mortality after transthoracic oesophagectomy: a multicentre, randomised controlled trial. Br J Anaesth. 2020;125(6):953–61.CrossRefPubMed Mukai A, Suehiro K, Watanabe R, et al. Impact of intraoperative goal-directed fluid therapy on majör morbidity and mortality after transthoracic oesophagectomy: a multicentre, randomised controlled trial. Br J Anaesth. 2020;125(6):953–61.CrossRefPubMed
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Alimian M, Mohseni M, Moghadam OM, et al. Effects of liberal versus restrictive fluid therapy on renal function indices in laparoscopic bariatric surgery. Anesth Pain Med. 2020;10(5):e95378.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Alimian M, Mohseni M, Moghadam OM, et al. Effects of liberal versus restrictive fluid therapy on renal function indices in laparoscopic bariatric surgery. Anesth Pain Med. 2020;10(5):e95378.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Chong MA, Wang Y, Berbenetz NM, et al. Does goal-directed haemodynamic and fluid therapy improve peri-operative outcomes? Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2018;35:469–83.CrossRefPubMed Chong MA, Wang Y, Berbenetz NM, et al. Does goal-directed haemodynamic and fluid therapy improve peri-operative outcomes? Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2018;35:469–83.CrossRefPubMed
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Saway JP, McCaul M, Mulekar MS, et al. Review of outcomes of low verses standard pressure pneumoperitoneum in laparoscopic surgery. Am Surg. 2022;88(8):1832–7.CrossRefPubMed Saway JP, McCaul M, Mulekar MS, et al. Review of outcomes of low verses standard pressure pneumoperitoneum in laparoscopic surgery. Am Surg. 2022;88(8):1832–7.CrossRefPubMed
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Kopitkó C, Rosivall L, Medve L, et al. Pneumoperitoneum and acute kidney injury—an integrative clinical concept review. ASAIO J. 2023;69:54–65.CrossRef Kopitkó C, Rosivall L, Medve L, et al. Pneumoperitoneum and acute kidney injury—an integrative clinical concept review. ASAIO J. 2023;69:54–65.CrossRef
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Ripollésa J, Espinosab A, Casansc R, et al. Colloids versus crystalloids in objective-guided fluid therapy, systematic review and meta-analysis. Too early or too late to draw conclusions Rev Bras J Anestesiol. 2015;65(4):281–91. Ripollésa J, Espinosab A, Casansc R, et al. Colloids versus crystalloids in objective-guided fluid therapy, systematic review and meta-analysis. Too early or too late to draw conclusions Rev Bras J Anestesiol. 2015;65(4):281–91.
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Yates DR, Davies SJ, Milner HE, et al. Crystalloid or colloid for goal-directed fluid therapy in colorectal surgery. Br J Anaesth. 2014;112:281–9.CrossRefPubMed Yates DR, Davies SJ, Milner HE, et al. Crystalloid or colloid for goal-directed fluid therapy in colorectal surgery. Br J Anaesth. 2014;112:281–9.CrossRefPubMed
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Zarbock A, Buhre W. Hydroxyethyl starch in the perioperative period: friend, foe, or still an unsolved issue? Anesth Analg. 2022;134(4):683–5.CrossRefPubMed Zarbock A, Buhre W. Hydroxyethyl starch in the perioperative period: friend, foe, or still an unsolved issue? Anesth Analg. 2022;134(4):683–5.CrossRefPubMed
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Desgranges FP, Bouvet L, de Souza Neto EP, et al. Non-invasive measurement of digital plethysmographic variability index to predict fluid responsiveness in mechanically ventilated children: a systematic review and meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy studies. Anaesth Crit Care Pain Med. 2023;42(3):101194.CrossRefPubMed Desgranges FP, Bouvet L, de Souza Neto EP, et al. Non-invasive measurement of digital plethysmographic variability index to predict fluid responsiveness in mechanically ventilated children: a systematic review and meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy studies. Anaesth Crit Care Pain Med. 2023;42(3):101194.CrossRefPubMed
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Erkoç SK, Kırımker EO, Büyük S, et al. Reducing risk for acute kidney injury after living donor hepatectomy by protocolized fluid restriction: single-center experience. Transplant Proc. 2022;54(8):2243–7.CrossRefPubMed Erkoç SK, Kırımker EO, Büyük S, et al. Reducing risk for acute kidney injury after living donor hepatectomy by protocolized fluid restriction: single-center experience. Transplant Proc. 2022;54(8):2243–7.CrossRefPubMed
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Theerawit P, Morasert T, Sutherasan Y. Inferior vena cava diameter variation compared with pulse pressure variation pressure variation as predictors of fluid responsiveness in patients with sepsis. J Crit Care. 2016;36:246–51.CrossRefPubMed Theerawit P, Morasert T, Sutherasan Y. Inferior vena cava diameter variation compared with pulse pressure variation pressure variation as predictors of fluid responsiveness in patients with sepsis. J Crit Care. 2016;36:246–51.CrossRefPubMed
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Prado L, Lobo F, de Oliveira N, et al. Intraoperative haemodynamic optimisation therapy with venoarterial carbon dioxide difference and pulse pressure variation – does it work? Anaesthesiol Intensive Ther. 2020;52(4):297–303.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Prado L, Lobo F, de Oliveira N, et al. Intraoperative haemodynamic optimisation therapy with venoarterial carbon dioxide difference and pulse pressure variation – does it work? Anaesthesiol Intensive Ther. 2020;52(4):297–303.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Meneghini C, Rabozzi R, Franci P. Correlation of the ratio of caudal vena cava diameter and aorta diameter with systolic pressure variation in anesthetized dogs. Am J Vet Res. 2016;77(2):137–43.CrossRefPubMed Meneghini C, Rabozzi R, Franci P. Correlation of the ratio of caudal vena cava diameter and aorta diameter with systolic pressure variation in anesthetized dogs. Am J Vet Res. 2016;77(2):137–43.CrossRefPubMed
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Mathis MR, Schechtman SA, Engoren MC, et al. Arterial pressure variation in elective non-cardiac surgery: identifying reference distributions and modifying factors. Anesthesiol. 2018;126(2):249–59.CrossRef Mathis MR, Schechtman SA, Engoren MC, et al. Arterial pressure variation in elective non-cardiac surgery: identifying reference distributions and modifying factors. Anesthesiol. 2018;126(2):249–59.CrossRef
28.
Zurück zum Zitat Virág M, Rottler M, Gede N, et al. Goal-directed fluid therapy enhances gastrointestinal recovery after laparoscopic surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Pers Med. 2022;12:734.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Virág M, Rottler M, Gede N, et al. Goal-directed fluid therapy enhances gastrointestinal recovery after laparoscopic surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Pers Med. 2022;12:734.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
29.
Zurück zum Zitat Pino RM, Singh J. Appropriate clinical use of lactate measurements. Anaesthesiology. 2021;134(4):637–44.CrossRef Pino RM, Singh J. Appropriate clinical use of lactate measurements. Anaesthesiology. 2021;134(4):637–44.CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Comparison of Dynamic Measures in Intraoperative Goal-Directed Fluid Therapy of Patients with Morbid Obesity Undergoing Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy
verfasst von
Gökhan Urhan
İsmail Demirel
Ahmet Deniz
Ahmet Aksu
Aysun Yıldız Altun
Esef Bolat
Azize Beştaş
Gülsüm Altuntaş
Publikationsdatum
21.03.2024
Verlag
Springer US
Erschienen in
Obesity Surgery / Ausgabe 5/2024
Print ISSN: 0960-8923
Elektronische ISSN: 1708-0428
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-024-07154-z

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 5/2024

Obesity Surgery 5/2024 Zur Ausgabe

Vorsicht, erhöhte Blutungsgefahr nach PCI!

10.05.2024 Koronare Herzerkrankung Nachrichten

Nach PCI besteht ein erhöhtes Blutungsrisiko, wenn die Behandelten eine verminderte linksventrikuläre Ejektionsfraktion aufweisen. Das Risiko ist umso höher, je stärker die Pumpfunktion eingeschränkt ist.

Darf man die Behandlung eines Neonazis ablehnen?

08.05.2024 Gesellschaft Nachrichten

In einer Leseranfrage in der Zeitschrift Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology möchte ein anonymer Dermatologe bzw. eine anonyme Dermatologin wissen, ob er oder sie einen Patienten behandeln muss, der eine rassistische Tätowierung trägt.

Deutlich weniger Infektionen: Wundprotektoren schützen!

08.05.2024 Postoperative Wundinfektion Nachrichten

Der Einsatz von Wundprotektoren bei offenen Eingriffen am unteren Gastrointestinaltrakt schützt vor Infektionen im Op.-Gebiet – und dient darüber hinaus der besseren Sicht. Das bestätigt mit großer Robustheit eine randomisierte Studie im Fachblatt JAMA Surgery.

Chirurginnen und Chirurgen sind stark suizidgefährdet

07.05.2024 Suizid Nachrichten

Der belastende Arbeitsalltag wirkt sich negativ auf die psychische Gesundheit der Angehörigen ärztlicher Berufsgruppen aus. Chirurginnen und Chirurgen bilden da keine Ausnahme, im Gegenteil.

Update Chirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

S3-Leitlinie „Diagnostik und Therapie des Karpaltunnelsyndroms“

Karpaltunnelsyndrom BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Karpaltunnelsyndrom ist die häufigste Kompressionsneuropathie peripherer Nerven. Obwohl die Anamnese mit dem nächtlichen Einschlafen der Hand (Brachialgia parästhetica nocturna) sehr typisch ist, ist eine klinisch-neurologische Untersuchung und Elektroneurografie in manchen Fällen auch eine Neurosonografie erforderlich. Im Anfangsstadium sind konservative Maßnahmen (Handgelenksschiene, Ergotherapie) empfehlenswert. Bei nicht Ansprechen der konservativen Therapie oder Auftreten von neurologischen Ausfällen ist eine Dekompression des N. medianus am Karpaltunnel indiziert.

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“

Radiusfraktur BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Webinar beschäftigt sich mit Fragen und Antworten zu Diagnostik und Klassifikation sowie Möglichkeiten des Ausschlusses von Zusatzverletzungen. Die Referenten erläutern, welche Frakturen konservativ behandelt werden können und wie. Das Webinar beantwortet die Frage nach aktuellen operativen Therapiekonzepten: Welcher Zugang, welches Osteosynthesematerial? Auf was muss bei der Nachbehandlung der distalen Radiusfraktur geachtet werden?

PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske
Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“

Appendizitis BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Inhalte des Webinars zur S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“ sind die Darstellung des Projektes und des Erstellungswegs zur S1-Leitlinie, die Erläuterung der klinischen Relevanz der Klassifikation EAES 2015, die wissenschaftliche Begründung der wichtigsten Empfehlungen und die Darstellung stadiengerechter Therapieoptionen.

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.