Synopsis
Highlights - Whats this paper adds
-
Prenatal based fetal weight reference z-scores were more accurate in identifying small neonates than post-natal fetal weight reference z-scores and abdominal circumference z-scores;
-
The INTEGROWTH-21st approach, consisting of one formula to calculate fetal weight and of a prenatal reference standard performed better or similarly than other methods across all subgroups defined by gestational age and neonatal size.
Introduction
Materials and methods
Results
Mother age (years) | 34 (30–38) |
Pre-pregnancy BMI (Kg/m2) | 26 (23–29) |
Race | |
White | 80.3% (326/406) |
Black | 15.76% (64/406) |
Asian | 3.94% (16/406) |
Nulliparity | 60.59% (246/406) |
Gestational age at birth (weeks) | 38 (37–39) |
Mode of delivery | |
Spontaneous vaginal delivery | 41.87% (170/406) |
Operative vaginal delivery | 4.68% (19/406) |
Cesarean section | 53.45% (217/406) |
Neonatal weight (grams) | 2800 (2450–3178) |
Neonatal male sex | 47.54% (193/406) |
Birth-weight centile | Variable | Area under ROC curve % (95% CI) | Sensitivity at 10% FPR % (95% CI) | p value | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AC | EFW postnatal standard | EFW prenatal standard IG-21 | ||||
< 10th | AC | 84.91 (82.33–87.49) | 53.18 (43.18–62.05) | – | ||
EFW postnatal standard | 83.07 (80.37–85.77) | 46.82 (35.91–56.82) | < 0.05 | – | ||
EFW prenatal standard IG-21 | 86.52 (84.15–88.90) | 54.55 (46.82–63.18) | < 0.05 | < 0.05 | – | |
EFW prenatal standard Hadlock | 87.27 (84.96–89.58) | 55.91 (47.27–63.64) | < 0.05 | < 0.05 | 0.190 | |
< 3rd | AC | 88.81 (85.67–91.96) | 56.10 (43.90–68.97) | – | ||
EFW postnatal standard | 86.78 (83.25–90.31) | 56.10 (45.12–68.29) | < 0.05 | – | ||
EFW prenatal standard IG-21 | 89.85 (86.77–92.93) | 64.63 (50.00–78.05) | < 0.05 | < 0.05 | – | |
EFW prenatal standard Hadlock | 89.51 (86.35–92.66) | 59.76 (46.34–71.95) | 0.344 | < 0.05 | 0.562 |
Birthweight centile (gestational age) | Variable | Area under ROC curve % (95% CI) | p value | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
AC | EFW postnatal standard | EFW prenatal standard IG-21 | |||
< 10th (24–27 wks) | AC | 86.91 (79.91–93.91) | – | ||
EFW postnatal standard | 89.4 (82.94–95.8) | 0.970 | – | ||
EFW prenatal standard IG-21 | 88.15(81.56–94.7) | 0.191 | 0.312 | – | |
EFW prenatal standard Hadlock | 89.7 (C 83.46–95.9) | 0.127 | < 0.05 | 0.262 | |
< 3rd (24–27 wks) | AC | 90.7 (81.09–100) | – | ||
EFW postnatal standard | 90.98 (C 80.17–100) | 0.829 | – | ||
EFW prenatal standard IG-21 | 92.09 (82.41–100) | 0.256 | 0.319 | – | |
EFW prenatal standard Hadlock | 91.86% (81.5–100) | 0.489 | 0.426 | 0.829 | |
< 10th (28–33 wks) | AC | 85.14 (81.52–88.75) | – | ||
EFW postnatal standard | 87.13 (83.87–90.38) | 0.257 | – | ||
EFW prenatal standard IG-21 | 87.13 (83.87–90.38) | < 0.05 | < 0.05 | – | |
EFW prenatal standard Hadlock | 88.68 (85.66–91.69) | < 0.05 | < 0.05 | < 0.05 | |
< 3rd (28–33 wks) | AC | 89.87 (85.99–93.75) | – | ||
EFW postnatal standard | 89.08 (84.77–93.39) | 0.350 | – | ||
EFW prenatal standard IG-21 | 90.92 (87.13–94.72) | 0.077 | < 0.05 | – | |
EFW prenatal standard Hadlock | 90.67 (86.81–94.53) | 0.447 | 0.173 | 0.769 | |
< 10th (34–36 wks) | AC | 84.49 (80.33–88.64) | – | ||
EFW postnatal standard | 85.11 (81.18–89.04) | 0.362 | – | ||
EFW prenatal standard IG-21 | 85.5 (81.6–89.46) | 0.082 | 0.363 | – | |
EFW prenatal standard Hadlock | 84.75 (80.62–88.88) | 0.841 | 0.763 | 0.449 | |
< 3rd (34–36 wks) | AC | 84.49(80.33–88.64) | – | ||
EFW postnatal standard | 85.11 (81.18–89.04) | 0.751 | – | ||
EFW prenatal standard IG-21 | 85.53 (81.6–89.46) | 0.372 | 0.322 | – | |
EFW prenatal standard Hadlock | 84.75 (80.62–88.88) | 0.828 | 0.711 | 0.795 |