nach oben

International Orthopaedics

Erschienen in:

01.02.2020 | Review Article

Range-of-motion improvement and complication rate in open and arthroscopic osteocapsular arthroplasty for primary osteoarthritis of the elbow: a systematic review

verfasst von: Dong Min Kim, Minkyu Han, In-Ho Jeon, Myung Jin Shin, Kyoung-Hwan Koh

Erschienen in: International Orthopaedics | Ausgabe 2/2020

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Purpose

To analyze ROM changes by using a Bayesian method, to compare complication and re-operation rates between open osteocapsular arthroplasty (OPEN) and arthroscopic osteocapsular arthroplasty (ARTHRO) for primary osteoarthritis of the elbow, and find evidence-based tendencies.

Methods

The PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Embase databases were searched. We performed descriptive analysis to compare ARTHRO and OPEN, a Bayesian analysis of ROM changes, and methodological assessment to determine the tendencies of OPEN and ARTHRO.

Results

Eighteen articles (625 patients, 634 elbows) were analyzed. There were 11 articles on OPEN and 8 articles on ARTHRO (1 article was a comparative study between OPEN and ARTHRO). According to the Bayesian method, flexion and total arc of flexion-extension increased more with OPEN than with ARTHRO. Further, ARTHRO showed a narrower width in the ROM graph than OPEN. The number of complications was 17 (5.1%) and five (2.0%), and the number of re-operations was 32 (9.5%) and 14 (5.6%) for OPEN and ARTHRO, respectively. By analyzing six high-quality articles, we found three tendencies: OPEN and ARTHRO were both effective for improving pain score, flexion-extension arc, and functional outcome; OPEN did not improve the pronation-supination arc; and there was a weak tendency that OPEN was more effective than ARTHRO for improving the flexion arc.

Conclusion

Both OPEN and ARTHRO improved ROM and clinical scores. The Bayesian method indicated that although OPEN increased the flexion and flexion-extension arc more than ARTHRO, ARTHRO resulted in a relatively consistent surgical outcome. Additionally, OPEN caused relatively higher complication and re-operation rates than ARTHRO.

Stanley D (1994) Prevalence and etiology of symptomatic elbow osteoarthritis. J Shoulder Elb Surg 3:386–389. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1058-2746(09)80024-4 CrossRef

Gramstad GD, Galatz LM (2006) Management of elbow osteoarthritis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 88:421–430. https://doi.org/10.2106/jbjs.E.00568 CrossRefPubMed

Cheung EV, Adams R, Morrey BF (2008) Primary osteoarthritis of the elbow: current treatment options. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 16:77–87. https://doi.org/10.5435/00124635-200802000-00005 CrossRefPubMed

Gay DM, Lyman S, Do H, Hotchkiss RN, Marx RG, Daluiski A (2012) Indications and reoperation rates for total elbow arthroplasty: an analysis of trends in New York state. J Bone Joint Surg Am 94:110–117. https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.J.01128 CrossRefPubMed

Kodama A, Mizuseki T, Adachi N (2018) Macroscopic investigation of failed Kudo type 5 total elbow arthroplasty. J Shoulder Elb Surg 27:1380–1385. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2018.05.002 CrossRef

Katolik LI (2011) Osteocapsular debridement for elbow arthritis. Hand Clin 27:165–170. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hcl.2011.03.001 CrossRefPubMed

Wada T, Isogai S, Ishii S, Yamashita T (2004) Debridement arthroplasty for primary osteoarthritis of the elbow. J Bone Joint Surg Am 86:233–241. https://doi.org/10.2106/00004623-200402000-00004 CrossRefPubMed

Kashiwagi D (1978) Intra-articular changes of the osteoarthritic elbow, especially about the fossa olecrani. Journal of the Japanese Orthopaedic Association 52:1367–1382

Morrey BF (1992) Primary degenerative arthritis of the elbow. Treatment by ulnohumeral arthroplasty J Bone Joint Surg Br 74:409–413. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.74B3.1587890 CrossRefPubMed

10.

Tsuge K, Murakami T, Yasunaga Y, Kanaujia RR (1987) Arthroplasty of the elbow. Twenty years' experience of a new approach J Bone Joint Surg Br 69:116–120. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.69B1.3818716 CrossRefPubMed

11.

Oka Y (2000) Debridement arthroplasty for osteoarthrosis of the elbow: 50 patients followed mean 5 years. Acta Orthop Scand 71:185–190. https://doi.org/10.1080/000164700317413175 CrossRefPubMed

12.

Tsuge K, Mizuseki T (1994) Debridement arthroplasty for advanced primary osteoarthritis of the elbow. Results of a new technique used for 29 elbows. J Bone Joint Surg Br 76:641–646. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620x.76b4.8027156 CrossRefPubMed

13.

Minami M, Kato S, Kashiwagi D (1996) Outerbridge-Kashiwagi's method for arthroplasty of osteoarthritis of the elbow — 44 elbows followed for 8–16 years. J Orthop Sci 1:11–15. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01234111 CrossRef

14.

Antuna SA, Morrey BF, Adams RA, O'Driscoll SW (2002) Ulnohumeral arthroplasty for primary degenerative arthritis of the elbow: long-term outcome and complications. J Bone Joint Surg Am 84:2168–2173. https://doi.org/10.2106/00004623-200212000-00007 CrossRefPubMed

15.

Phillips NJ, Ali A, Stanley D (2003) Treatment of primary degenerative arthritis of the elbow by ulnohumeral arthroplasty. A long-term follow-up J Bone Joint Surg Br 85:347–350. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620x.85b3.13201 CrossRefPubMed

16.

Tashjian RZ, Wolf JM, Ritter M, Weiss AP, Green A (2006) Functional outcomes and general health status after ulnohumeral arthroplasty for primary degenerative arthritis of the elbow. J Shoulder Elb Surg 15:357–366. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2005.08.004 CrossRef

17.

Rettig LA, Hastings H 2nd, Feinberg JR (2008) Primary osteoarthritis of the elbow: lack of radiographic evidence for morphologic predisposition, results of operative debridement at intermediate follow-up, and basis for a new radiographic classification system. J Shoulder Elb Surg 17:97–105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2007.03.014 CrossRef

18.

Hattori Y, Doi K, Sakamoto S, Hoshino S, Dodakundi C (2011) Capsulectomy and debridement for primary osteoarthritis of the elbow through a medial trans-flexor approach. J Hand Surg Am 36:1652–1658. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhsa.2011.07.018 CrossRefPubMed

19.

Cha SM, Shin HD, Kim KC, Park IY (2014) Outcomes of the mini-open Outerbridge-Kashiwagi procedure according to preoperative radiocapitellar joint status. J Hand Surg Am 39:209–218. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhsa.2013.10.016 CrossRefPubMed

20.

Forster MC, Clark DI, Lunn PG (2001) Elbow osteoarthritis: prognostic indicators in ulnohumeral debridement--the Outerbridge-Kashiwagi procedure. J Shoulder Elb Surg 10:557–560. https://doi.org/10.1067/mse.2001.118416 CrossRef

21.

Sarris I, Riano FA, Goebel F, Goitz RJ, Sotereanos DG (2004) Ulnohumeral arthroplasty: results in primary degenerative arthritis of the elbow. Clin Orthop Relat Res 420:190–193. https://doi.org/10.1097/00003086-200403000-00026 CrossRef

22.

Ugurlu M, Senkoylu A, Ozsoy H, Demirkale I, Kilicarslan K, Dogan M (2009) Outcome of ulnohumeral arthroplasty in osteoarthritis of the elbow. Acta Orthop Belg 75:606–610PubMed

23.

Redden JF, Stanley D (1993) Arthroscopic fenestration of the olecranon fossa in the treatment of osteoarthritis of the elbow. Arthroscopy 9:14–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0749-8063(05)80337-8 CrossRefPubMed

24.

Ogilvie-Harris DJ, Gordon R, MacKay M (1995) Arthroscopic treatment for posterior impingement in degenerative arthritis of the elbow. Arthroscopy 11:437–443. https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-8063(95)90198-1 CrossRefPubMed

25.

Krishnan SG, Harkins DC, Pennington SD, Harrison DK, Burkhead WZ (2007) Arthroscopic ulnohumeral arthroplasty for degenerative arthritis of the elbow in patients under fifty years of age. J Shoulder Elb Surg 16:443–448. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2006.09.001 CrossRef

26.

Adams JE, Wolff LH 3rd, Merten SM, Steinmann SP (2008) Osteoarthritis of the elbow: results of arthroscopic osteophyte resection and capsulectomy. J Shoulder Elb Surg 17:126–131. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2007.04.005 CrossRef

27.

Kovachevich R, Steinmann SP (2012) Arthroscopic ulnar nerve decompression in the setting of elbow osteoarthritis. J Hand Surg Am 37:663–668. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhsa.2012.01.003 CrossRefPubMed

28.

MacLean SB, Oni T, Crawford LA, Deshmukh SC (2013) Medium-term results of arthroscopic debridement and capsulectomy for the treatment of elbow osteoarthritis. J Shoulder Elb Surg 22:653–657. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2013.01.030 CrossRef

29.

Lim TK, Koh KH, Lee HI, Shim JW, Park MJ (2014) Arthroscopic debridement for primary osteoarthritis of the elbow: analysis of preoperative factors affecting outcome. J Shoulder Elb Surg 23:1381–1387. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2014.01.009 CrossRef

30.

Kim SJ, Kim JW, Lee SH, Choi JW (2017) Retrospective comparative analysis of elbow arthroscopy used to treat primary osteoarthritis with and without release of the posterior band of the medial collateral ligament. Arthroscopy 33:1506–1511. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arthro.2017.02.013 CrossRefPubMed

31.

Ozbaydar MU, Tonbul M, Altan E, Yalaman O (2006) Arthroscopic treatment of symptomatic loose bodies in osteoarthritic elbows. Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc 40:371–376PubMed

32.

Yan H, Cui GQ, Wang JQ, Yin Y, Ao YF (2011) Arthroscopic debridement of osteoarthritic elbow in professional athletes. Chin Med J 124:4223–4228. https://doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.issn.0366-6999.2011.24.019 CrossRefPubMed

33.

Merolla G, Buononato C, Chillemi C, Paladini P, Porcellini G (2015) Arthroscopic joint debridement and capsular release in primary and post-traumatic elbow osteoarthritis: a retrospective blinded cohort study with minimum 24-month follow-up. Musculoskelet Surg 99(Suppl 1):S83–S90. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12306-015-0365-0 CrossRefPubMed

34.

McLaughlin RE 2nd, Savoie FH 3rd, Field LD, Ramsey JR (2006) Arthroscopic treatment of the arthritic elbow due to primary radiocapitellar arthritis. Arthroscopy 22:63–69. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arthro.2005.10.013 CrossRefPubMed

35.

Kelly EW, Bryce R, Coghlan J, Bell S (2007) Arthroscopic debridement without radial head excision of the osteoarthritic elbow. Arthroscopy 23:151–156. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arthro.2006.10.008 CrossRefPubMed

36.

Bornu BC, Clement X, Kempf JF, Clavert P (2015) Arthroscopic elbow joint release with radial head resection arthroplasty: 12 cases. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 101:735–739. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.otsr.2015.07.009 CrossRefPubMed

37.

Kwak JM, Kholinne E, Sun Y, Lim S, Koh KH, Jeon IH (2019) Clinical outcome of osteocapsular arthroplasty for primary osteoarthritis of the elbow: comparison of arthroscopic and open procedure. Arthroscopy 35:1083–1089. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arthro.2018.11.057 CrossRefPubMed

38.

Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG, Group P (2009) Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. PLoS Med 6:e1000097. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1000097 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

39.

Slim K, Nini E, Forestier D, Kwiatkowski F, Panis Y, Chipponi J (2003) Methodological index for non-randomized studies (minors): development and validation of a new instrument. ANZ J Surg 73:712–716. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1445-2197.2003.02748.x CrossRefPubMed

40.

Huisstede BM, Miedema HS, van Opstal T et al (2006) Interventions for treating the posterior interosseus nerve syndrome: a systematic review of observational studies. J Peripher Nerv Syst 11:101–110. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1085-9489.2006.00074.x CrossRefPubMed

41.

Escobar MD, West M (1995) Bayesian density estimation and inference using mixtures. J Am Stat Assoc 90:577–588. https://doi.org/10.1080/01621459.1995.10476550 CrossRef

42.

Neal RM (2000) Markov chain sampling methods for Dirichlet process mixture models. J Comput Graph Stat 9:249–265. https://doi.org/10.1080/10618600.2000.10474879 CrossRef

43.

Jara A, Hanson TE, Quintana FA, Müller P, Rosner GL (2011) DPpackage: Bayesian non- and semi-parametric Modelling in R. J Stat Softw 40:1–30CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

44.

Kodde IF, van Rijn J, van den Bekerom MP, Eygendaal D (2013) Surgical treatment of post-traumatic elbow stiffness: a systematic review. J Shoulder Elb Surg 22:574–580. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2012.11.010 CrossRef

Titel: Range-of-motion improvement and complication rate in open and arthroscopic osteocapsular arthroplasty for primary osteoarthritis of the elbow: a systematic review
verfasst von: Dong Min Kim
Minkyu Han
In-Ho Jeon
Myung Jin Shin
Kyoung-Hwan Koh
Publikationsdatum: 01.02.2020
Verlag: Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Erschienen in: International Orthopaedics / Ausgabe 2/2020
Print ISSN: 0341-2695
Elektronische ISSN: 1432-5195
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-019-04458-z

Update Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

Newsletter bestellen

Die Highlights vom Kongress des American College of Cardiology 2024

Springer Medizin

Range-of-motion improvement and complication rate in open and arthroscopic osteocapsular arthroplasty for primary osteoarthritis of the elbow: a systematic review

Abstract

Purpose

Methods

Results

Conclusion

Arthropedia

Neu im Fachgebiet Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie

TEP mit Roboterhilfe führt nicht zu größerer Zufriedenheit

Lever-Sign-Test hilft beim Verdacht auf Kreuzbandriss

Ein Drittel der jungen Ärztinnen und Ärzte erwägt abzuwandern

Aquatherapie bei Fibromyalgie wirksamer als Trockenübungen

Update Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie

Die Highlights vom Kongress des American College of Cardiology 2024

Springer Medizin

Abstract

Purpose

Methods

Results

Conclusion

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu diesem Inhalt zu erhalten

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 2/2020

Dual mobility constructs in revision total hip arthroplasty: survivorship analysis in recurrent dislocation versus other indications at three to twelve-year follow-up

Outcome of primary deltoid ligament repair in acute ankle fractures: a meta-analysis of comparative studies

Does the induced membrane have antibacterial properties? An experimental rat model of a chronic infected nonunion

Learning curve and clinical outcomes of percutaneous endoscopic transforaminal decompression for lumbar spinal stenosis

Posterolateral clamp placement on the pelvic brim provides optimal reduction of transtectal acetabular fractures fixed through the anterior intrapelvic approach

Letter to the editor: Translation, cross-cultural adaptation, and validation of the Italian version of the Oxford Shoulder Instability Score

Arthropedia

Neu im Fachgebiet Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie

TEP mit Roboterhilfe führt nicht zu größerer Zufriedenheit

Lever-Sign-Test hilft beim Verdacht auf Kreuzbandriss

Ein Drittel der jungen Ärztinnen und Ärzte erwägt abzuwandern

Aquatherapie bei Fibromyalgie wirksamer als Trockenübungen

Update Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie