Skip to main content
Erschienen in: BMC Oral Health 1/2022

Open Access 01.12.2022 | Research

Prevalence and correlates of periodontitis among Kenyan women planning to conceive

verfasst von: Brenda Oyaro, Erica Lokken, Hudson Alumera, Shahid Hussein, Barbra Richardson, Kishorchandra Mandaliya, Walter Jaoko, John Kinuthia, Elizabeth Dimba, Arthur Kemoli, R. Scott McClelland

Erschienen in: BMC Oral Health | Ausgabe 1/2022

Abstract

Background

Periodontitis has been associated with adverse pregnancy outcomes. Little is known about the burden and risk factors for periodontitis among reproductive age women in sub-Saharan Africa. This analysis aimed to determine the prevalence and correlates of periodontitis among Kenyan women planning to conceive.

Methods

HIV-seronegative, reproductive-age women who were planning to conceive were enrolled and underwent a periodontal examination. Following the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention clinical case definitions, the presence and severity of periodontitis was determined by establishing the level of clinical periodontal attachment loss and graded in three categories: no/mild, moderate, and severe. Secondary outcomes included the scores on the Gingival Index and Decayed, Missing, and Filled Teeth (DMFT) Index. Correlates of periodontitis were examined using univariable and multivariable logistic regression.

Results

Of the 647 women in the study, 84% (n = 541) had no/mild periodontitis, 15% (n = 97) had moderate periodontitis, and 1% (n = 9) had severe periodontitis. Mild gingivitis was present in 61% (n = 396) of women, while 27% (n = 176) had moderate gingivitis, and 1% (n = 9) had severe gingivitis. The majority (75%, n = 487) of women had a DMFT index in the very low range (score < 5). Periodontitis was observed in 12% (12/101) of nulliparous women compared to 13% (36/286) of women with one prior delivery (prevalence ratio [PR] 1.03, 95% confidence interval [95% CI] 0.57–1.96), 21% (36/170) of women with two prior deliveries (PR 1.78, 95% CI 0.97–3.26), and 24% (22/90) of women with 3 or more prior deliveries (PR 2.06, 95% CI 1.08–3.92).

Conclusion

This study demonstrated a substantial prevalence of moderate-severe periodontitis among women planning to conceive in Kenya. These results highlight the need to address the oral care needs of reproductive age women, particularly those with multiple prior pregnancies.
Hinweise

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Abkürzungen
AUDIT
Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test
BMI
Body Mass Index
CAL
Clinical Attachment Loss
CEJ
Cement Enamel Junction
CI
Confidence Interval
DCC
Discordant Couples Clinic
DMFT
Decayed, Missing, and Filled Teeth
IQR
Inter-quartile range
KNH
Kenyatta National Hospital
NICHD
National Institute Child Health and Human Development
NIH
National Institutes of Health
PR
Prevalence Ratio
STI
Sexually Transmitted Infection

Introduction

Periodontitis is among the commonest diseases of the oral cavity, with an estimated global prevalence of 27% [1]. It is a chronic inflammatory condition caused by microbial infection of the supporting tissues around the teeth that include the gingiva, alveolar bone, and periodontal ligament. Clinical diagnosis of periodontitis is based on measures of periodontal pocket depth, interdental clinical attachment loss, pattern and extent of alveolar bone loss, or a combination of these measures [2].
Risk factors associated with periodontitis include poor oral hygiene, cigarette smoking, parity, and hormonal changes in women especially during pregnancy [36]. Inflammatory mediators including the NOD-like receptor pyrin domain-containing 3 (NLRP3) and enzymes like transglutaminase may play a role in the pathogenesis and progression of periodontitis [7, 8]. Additionally, periodontitis has been associated with systemic illnesses like cardiovascular disease and rheumatoid arthritis as well as adverse pregnancy outcomes, including preeclampsia and preterm birth [9]. Periodontitis is often studied in pregnant women because of its association with adverse pregnancy outcomes [10]. One recognized limitation of assessing this disease during pregnancy is the fact that hormonal changes during pregnancy lead to changes in periodontal tissues, increasing the likelihood of diagnosing periodontitis during this period [6].
Few studies have examined periodontal disease status among women planning for a pregnancy. The rationale for conducting this analysis was to understand the prevalence and risk factors associated with periodontitis in reproductive-age women planning pregnancy. This is an important population for further study, as intervention to address periodontitis prior to conception holds potential for reducing the risk of periodontitis-associated adverse pregnancy outcomes.

Methods

Study population

This cross-sectional analysis used data collected during the enrollment and periodontal examination visits in the Microbiota and Preterm Birth study [11]. The primary aim of the parent study was to test the hypothesis that the vaginal microbiota present near to the time of conception is associated with women’s risk of spontaneous preterm birth. The study included reproductive age HIV-seronegative women with immediate fertility intent. Additional eligibility criteria included being ≤ 45 years old, planning to become pregnant and remain in the study area through pregnancy, having a menstrual period in the prior 3 months or recently discontinued contraceptive methods that induce amenorrhea (e.g., implant, hormonal intrauterine device), willing to comply with study procedures, and able to provide informed consent. Women were excluded if they were currently pregnant, using contraception other than condoms for STI prevention, had a history of uterine or cervical surgery other than caesarean section, or reported a history of seeking treatment for infertility. Recruitment was conducted through several sources including family planning clinics, the Discordant Couples Clinic (DCC) at Kenyatta National Hospital (KNH), and referrals from study participants. All eligible women referred from any of these sources were invited to participate in the study after completing the informed consent process.

Sample size determination

The sample size for this analysis was driven by the total number of participants enrolled in the parent study (N = 701) [11].

Study procedures

At enrollment, a standardized face-to-face interview was conducted by study clinicians/nurses to collect information on sociodemographic characteristics; sexual behavior; reproductive, contraceptive, and medical history; cigarette smoking; and alcohol use using the Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test (AUDIT) [12]. A physical examination was performed by an experienced study clinician, including height and weight measurements that were used to calculate body mass index (BMI).
Periodontal examination visits were scheduled within a month of the enrollment visit. Initially, a brief interview to collect information on oral hygiene and health seeking behavior was done followed by periodontal examination conducted by experienced co-investigators in their respective clinics at the University of Nairobi Dental School (HA) and the Coast General Teaching and Referral Hospital Dental Unit (SH). Urgent periodontal care needs including scaling, radiographs, and filling/extraction were addressed at no cost to the participant.
The presence and severity of periodontitis was determined by establishing the level of clinical attachment loss (CAL). This was calculated as the sum of the clinical attachment measurement and the probing pocket depth. Clinical attachment measurement, which is the distance between the cement-enamel junction (CEJ) and the gingival margin, was recorded to the nearest whole millimeter using a periodontal probe (University of Michigan “O” probe with William’s markings, Hu-Friedy Co. USA). This variable was given a positive value when there was gingival recession and a negative value when the gingival margin was coronal to the CEJ. Pocket measurement was done on the following teeth—16, 12, 24, 36, 32 and 44 according to Ramfjord’s index [13]. The level of periodontitis was categorized as no/mild, moderate, or severe based on the clinical attachment loss values. Severe periodontitis was defined based on the presence of ≥ 2 interproximal sites with CAL ≥ 6 mm (not on same tooth). Moderate periodontitis was defined based on the presence of ≥ 2 interproximal sites with CAL ≥ 4 mm but < 6 mm (not on same tooth). Individuals not meeting criteria for moderate or severe periodontitis were classified as having no or mild periodontitis.
The Gingival Index, a measure for assessing severity of gingivitis, was determined by assessing the degree of gingival inflammation and categorized as normal gingiva, mild inflammation (slight change in color, slight edema, no bleeding on probing), moderate inflammation (redness, edema, glazing, bleeding on probing), or severe inflammation (marked redness, edema, ulceration, prone to spontaneous bleeding) [14]. The Decayed, Missing, and Filled Teeth (DMFT) Index was calculated as the sum of the number of decayed, missing, and filled teeth due to dental caries. This was subsequently categorized as very low < 5, low 5–8.9, moderate 9–13.9 and high ≥ 14 [15].
Calibrations were conducted at least three times per year. At the Nairobi site, an experienced periodontist served as the gold standard examiner for (HA), who then served as the gold standard examiner for (SH), the dentist in Mombasa. Both the primary examiner and the gold standard examiner conducted parallel examinations on five individuals. Kappa scores were calculated to characterize the level of agreement between the two scores. A score of 0.8 was the pre-determined inter-examiner level of agreement and lower levels were addressed through discussion and agreement between the gold standard examiner and the examiner at the site. The results for the inter-examiner calibration were 0.86 and 0.84 for Nairobi and Mombasa respectively. Intra-examiner variability was evaluated after every 50 participants at each study site, with results being kappa 1.00 for both Nairobi and Mombasa. During the intra-examiner variability calibration, one participant underwent the periodontal exam twice and results of the two periodontal exams were compared across both attempts.

Data analysis

Baseline characteristics were summarized as median and interquartile range (IQR) for continuous variables and count and percentage for categorical variables. Some categories of baseline characteristics were merged based on scientific or statistical considerations. Body mass index data were analyzed as a binary outcome with obese and non-obese categories using the standard obese cut-off of ≥ 30 to define obesity. These categories were chosen because obesity has been identified as a risk factor for periodontitis [16, 17], while no differences in risk have been observed across the lower categories of BMI. Household income categories were collapsed into three categories for analysis, as there were very few observations in the < Ksh 2500 and > Ksh 75,000 income categories. The primary outcome was periodontitis, classified as no/mild, moderate, and severe following the clinical case definitions proposed by the CDC working group for use in population-based surveillance [2]. The severe periodontitis outcome category contained very few positive observations, so it was combined with the moderate periodontitis category for analysis. Similar combined categories were created for categories of the Gingival and DMFT indices. Univariate logistic regression was used to estimate the association between each correlate and the presence of moderate or severe periodontitis. Variables associated with moderate or severe periodontitis in univariate analysis (p < 0.1) were included in the multivariable model. The level of significance used to select variables for inclusion in the multivariable model was not based on statistical significance at the alpha = 0.05 level. A higher p-value threshold was used because variables do not need to be statistically significant to be confounders of other variables in a multivariable model. All associations were reported as prevalence ratios (PR) with 95% confidence intervals (95% CI). Similar analyses were conducted for the secondary outcomes (Gingival Index and DMFT Index).

Results

Between April 2017 and March 2020, 701 women were enrolled, of whom 92% (n = 647) had a periodontal examination. Baseline characteristics of the 647 women are presented in Table 1. Of the 647 women enrolled, 65%, (n = 423) were from Nairobi and 35%, (n = 224) from Mombasa. Their median age was 29 (IQR 25–34) years, and most (96%, n = 622) were either married or living with a partner. Only 0.5% (n = 3) women were current smokers, and 2% (n = 14) were classified as having hazardous or harmful alcohol use (AUDIT score ≥ 7). A quarter of the women (25%, n = 156) were obese based on BMI ≥ 30. Nearly all participants (99%, n = 643) reported cleaning their teeth with toothbrushes, with 94% (n = 608) of women reporting using fluoride-containing toothpaste. Almost half (47%, n = 303) had received no previous dental care. On examination, 84% (n = 541) of the women had no/mild periodontitis, 15% (n = 97) had moderate periodontitis, and only 1% (n = 9) had severe periodontitis. Ten percent (n = 65) of the women had no gingivitis, 61% (n = 396) had mild gingivitis, 27% (n = 176) had moderate gingivitis, and only 1% (n = 9) had severe gingivitis. The majority (75%, n = 487) of women had a very low (< 5) DMFT Index, while 16% (n = 101) had a low (5–8.9) DMFT Index, 7% (n = 44) had a moderate (9–13.9) DMFT Index, and 2% (n = 14) had a high (≥ 14) DMFT Index.
Table 1
Baseline characteristics of 647 Kenyan women planning for pregnancy
Characteristic
Median (IQR) or N (%)
Age (years)
29 (24–34)
Level of education (years)
 
0–8
164 (25.3)
9–12
250 (38.6)
 > 12
253 (36.0)
Study site
 
Nairobi
423 (65.4)
Mombasa
224 (34.6)
Marital status
 
Married/living with partner
622 (96.1)
Monthly household income (Ksh)
 
≤ 2,500–10,000
225 (35.0)
10,001–30,000
277 (43.0)
≥ 30,001
141 (21.9)
Availability of household water and electricity
416 (64.3)
Current smoker
3 (0.5)
Alcohol use (AUDIT score)
 
0 (non-drinker)
560 (86.6)
1–6 (Non-hazardous)
73 (11.3)
 ≥ 7 (Hazardous)
14 (2.2)
Chronic illness*
22 (3.2)
Frequency of teeth cleaning/week
6 (5.6)
Toothbrush use
643 (99.4)
Fluoride-containing toothpaste use
132 (38.2)
Time since last dental visit
 
< 6 months
33 (5.1)
6–12 months
61 (9.4)
> 1 year but < 2 years
39 (6.0)
≥ 2 years but < 5 years
89 (13.8)
≥ 5 years
122 (18.9)
Never received dental care
303 (46.8)
Obese (BMI ≥ 30)
156 (24.5)
Parity
 
Nulliparous
101 (15.6)
1
286 (44.2)
2
170 (26.3)
 ≥ 3
90 (13.9)
Gravidity
 
0
62 (9.6)
 ≥ 1
585 (90.4)
*Women reporting history of any chronic illness including hypertension and diabetes mellitus
Correlates of moderate-severe periodontitis are presented in Table 2; only parity, age, and education were associated at p < 0.1. Periodontitis was observed in 12% (12/101) of nulliparous women compared to 13% (36/286) of women with one prior delivery (PR 1.03, 95% CI 0.57–1.96), 21% (36/170) of women with two prior deliveries (PR 1.78, 95% CI 0.97–3.26), and 24% (22/90) of women with 3 or more prior deliveries (PR 2.06, 95% CI 1.08–3.92). There was a statistical trend for increased prevalence of moderate-severe periodontitis with increasing age (Wald p-value = 0.1). The prevalence of moderate-severe periodontitis in women < 25 years old was 12% (16/135), while moderate-severe periodontitis was observed in 15% (30/207) of women aged 25–29 years (PR 1.22, 95% CI 0.69–2.16), 17% (27/161) women aged 30–34 years (PR 1.42, 95% CI 0.80–2.51), 23% (26/115) of women aged 35–39 years (PR 1.91, 95% CI 1.08–3.38), and 24% (7/29) of women > 40 years old (PR 2.04, 95% CI 0.92–4.50). There was also a trend for lower prevalence of periodontitis with increasing educational level (Wald p-value = 0.1). The prevalence of moderate-severe periodontitis in women with 0–8 years of education was 20% (33/164), while moderate-severe periodontitis was observed in 18% (44/250) of women with 9–12 years of education (PR 0.88, 95% CI 0.58–1.31) and 12% (29/233) of women with > 12 years of education (PR 0.62, 95% CI 0.39–0.98). Age and educational level were collinear, so only educational level was included in the multivariable model, as this variable was more strongly associated with moderate-severe periodontitis in univariable analysis. In the multivariable analysis including educational level, the association between parity and moderate-severe periodontitis was similar to univariable results.
Table 2
Correlates of moderate-severe periodontitis in Kenyan women planning for pregnancy
Characteristic
No/Mild Periodontitis
n = 541
N (%)
Moderate-severe periodontitis
n = 106
N (%)
Unadjusted PR (95% CI)
p value
Adjusted PR (95% CI)
p value
Study site
      
Nairobi
353 (83.5)
70 (16.5)
1.0
0.9
  
Mombasa
187 (83.9)
36 (16.1)
0.98 (0.68–1.41)
   
Age, years
      
< 25
119 (88.1)
16 (11.9)
1.0
0.1
  
25–29
177 (85.5)
30 (14.5)
1.22 (0.69–2.16)
   
30–34
134 (83.2)
27 (16.8)
1.42 (0.80–2.51)
   
35–39
89 (77.4)
26 (22.6)
1.91 (1.08–3.38)
   
 > 40
22 (75.9)
7 (24.1)
2.04 (0.92–4.50)
   
Highest education levela
      
0–8 years
131 (79.9)
33 (20.1)
1.0
0.1
1.0
0.2
9–12 years
206 (82.4)
44 (17.6)
0.88 (0.58–1.31)
 
1.01 (0.67–1.52)
 
 > 12 years
204 (87.6)
29 (12.4)
0.62 (0.39–0.98)
 
0.69 (0.44–1.10)
 
Socioeconomic status (monthly earnings in Ksh)
      
 ≤ 10,000
181 (80.4)
44 (19.6)
1.0
0.2
  
10,001–30,000
234 (84.5)
43 (15.5)
0.79 (0.54–1.16)
   
 ≥ 30,001
123 (87.2)
18 (12.8)
0.65 (0.39–1.08)
   
Availability of household water and electricity
      
No
189 (81.8)
42 (18.2)
1.0
0.4
  
Yes
352 (84.6)
64 (15.4)
0.85 (0.59–1.21)
   
Alcohol use (AUDIT score)
      
0 (non-drinker)
465 (83.0)
95 (17.0)
1.0
0.4
  
1–6 (Non-hazardous)
65 (89.0)
8 (11.0)
0.65 (0.33–1.27)
   
 ≥ 7 (Hazardous)
11 (78.6)
3 (21.4)
1.26 (0.46–3.50)
   
Chronic illness
      
No
524 (83.8)
101 (16.2)
1.0
0.4
  
Yes
17 (77.3)
5 (22.7)
1.41 (0.64–3.10)
   
Frequency of teeth cleaning per day
      
 < 2
183 (82.1)
40 (17.9)
1.0
0.4
  
 ≥ 2
358 (84.4)
66 (15.6)
0.87 (0.61–1.24)
   
Time period since last dental visit
      
0–12 months
86 (91.5)
8 (8.5)
1.0
0.3
  
 > 1 year but < 2 years
32 (82.1)
7 (17.9)
2.11 (0.82–5.42)
   
 ≥ 2 years but < 5 years
72 (80.9)
17 (19.1)
2.24 (1.02–4.94)
   
 ≥ 5 years
99 (81.1)
23 (18.9)
2.22 (1.04–4.73)
   
Never received dental care
252 (83.2)
51 (16.8)
1.98 (0.97–4.02)
   
BMI
      
Non-obese < 30
409 (84.9)
73 (15.1)
1.0
0.2
  
Obese ≥ 30
125 (80.1)
31 (19.9)
1.31 (0.90–1.92)
   
Parityb
      
Nulliparous
89 (88.1)
12 (11.9)
1.0
0.01
1.0
0.02
1
250 (87.4)
36 (12.6)
1.03 (0.57–1.96)
 
1.06 (0.57–1.95)
 
2
134 (78.8)
36 (21.2)
1.78 (0.97–3.26)
 
1.77 (0.97–3.25)
 
 ≥ 3
68 (75.6)
22 (24.4)
2.06 (1.08–3.92)
 
1.99 (1.04–3.82)
 
Gravidityc
      
0
55 (88.7)
7 (11.3)
1.0
0.3
  
 ≥ 1
486 (83.1)
99 (16.9)
1.50 (0.73–3.08)
   
aIncluded in multivariable model
bNumber of pregnancies that reached viability (> 20 weeks’ gestation)
cTotal number of pregnancies including those ending in abortion, miscarriage, and ectopic pregnancy
Correlates of gingivitis are presented in Table 3. In univariable analyses, moderate-severe gingivitis was more common in women from Mombasa compared to Nairobi. Lower prevalences were observed in association with increasing levels of education and monthly household income. In a multivariable analysis including all three variables, the association with site was similar, while the associations with education and income were attenuated, and no longer statistically significant.
Table 3
Correlates of moderate-severe gingivitis in Kenyan women planning for pregnancy
Characteristic
No/Mild gingivitis
n = 461
N (%)
Moderate-severe gingivitis
n = 185
N (%)
Unadjusted PR (95% CI)
p value
Adjusted PR (95% CI)
p value
Study sitea
      
Nairobi
315 (74.6)
107 (25.4)
1.0
0.01
1.0
0.04
Mombasa
146 (65.2)
78 (34.8)
1.37 (1.08–1.75)
 
1.30 (1.01–1.66)
 
Age, years
      
 < 25
97 (71.9)
38 (28.1)
1.0
0.9
  
25–29
152 (73.4)
55 (26.6)
0.94 (0.66–1.34)
   
30–34
113 (70.2)
48 (29.8)
1.06 (0.74–1.52)
   
35–39
79 (69.3)
35 (30.7)
1.09 (0.74–1.60)
   
 > 40
20 (69.0)
9 (31.0)
1.10 (0.60–2.02)
   
Highest education levela
      
0–8 years
102 (62.2)
62 (37.8)
1.0
0.002
1.0
0.07
9–12 years
176 (70.7)
73 (29.3)
0.78 (0.59–1.02)
 
0.82 (0.62–1.08)
 
 > 12 years
183 (78.5)
50 (21.5)
0.57 (0.41–0.78)
 
0.65 (0.45–0.94)
 
Socioeconomic statusa (monthly earnings in Ksh)
      
 ≤ 10,000
144 (64.3)
80 (35.7)
1.0
0.01
1.0
0.2
10,001–30,000
206 (74.4)
71 (25.6)
0.72 (0.55–0.94)
 
0.78 (0.59–1.02)
 
 ≥ 30,001
108 (76.6)
33 (23.4)
0.66 (0.46–0.93)
 
0.85 (0.60–1.26)
 
Availability of household water and electricity
      
No
157 (68.3)
73 (31.7)
1.0
0.2
  
Yes
304 (73.1)
112 (26.9)
0.85 (0.66–1.09)
   
Alcohol use (AUDIT score)
      
0 (non-drinker)
394 (70.5)
165 (29.5)
1.0
0.4
  
1–6 (Non-hazardous)
56 (76.7)
17 (23.3)
0.79 (0.51–1.22)
   
 ≥ 7 (Hazardous)
11 (78.6)
3 (21.4)
0.73 (0.26–2.00)
   
Chronic illness
      
No
445 (71.3)
179 (28.7)
1.0
0.9
  
Yes
16 (72.7)
6 (27.3)
0.95 (0.48–1.90)
   
Frequency of teeth cleaning per day
      
 < 2
158 (712)
64 (28.8)
1.0
0.9
  
 ≥ 2
303 (71.5)
121 (28.5)
0.99 (0.77–1.28)
   
Time period since last dental visit
      
0–12 months
72 (77.4)
21 (22.6)
1.0
0.4
  
 > 1 year but < 2 years
30 (76.9)
9 (23.1)
1.02 (0.52–2.03)
   
 ≥ 2 years but < 5 years
58 (65.2)
31 (34.8)
1.54 (0.96–2.47)
   
 ≥ 5 years
88 (72.1)
34 (27.9)
1.23 (0.77–1.98)
   
Never received dental care
213 (70.3)
90 (29.7)
1.32 (0.87–1.99)
   
BMI
      
Non-obese < 30
344 (71.5)
137 (28.5)
1.0
0.9
  
Obese ≥ 30
112 (71.8)
44 (28.2)
0.99 (0.74–1.32)
   
Parity
      
Nulliparous
73 (72.3)
28 (27.7)
1.0
0.9
  
1
206 (72.3)
79 (27.7)
1.00 (0.69–1.44)
   
2
120 (70.6)
50 (29.4)
1.06 (0.72–1.57)
   
 ≥ 3
62 (68.9)
28 (31.1)
1.12 (0.72–1.74)
   
Gravidity
      
0
47 (75.8)
15 (24.2)
1.0
0.4
  
 ≥ 1
414 (70.9)
170 (29.1)
1.20 (0.76–1.90)
   
aIncluded in multivariable model
Correlates of DMFT index are presented in Table 4. In univariable analyses, higher prevalences of DMFT index in the upper range (≥ 5) were observed in association with increasing age and gravidity. The prevalence of DMFT index in the upper range (≥ 5) was significantly lower in women who had never received dental care. Age and time period since last dental visit were collinear, hence only age was included in the multivariable model since it was more strongly associated with the outcome. Results were similar in a multivariable model that included age and gravidity.
Table 4
Correlates of DMFT index in Kenyan women planning for pregnancy
Characteristic
Very low DMFT index
n = 487
N (%)
Low/Mod/High DMFT index
n = 159
N (%)
Unadjusted PR (95% CI)
p value
Adjusted PR (95% CI)
p value
Study site
      
Nairobi
314 (74.2)
109 (25.8)
1.0
0.4
  
Mombasa
173 (77.6)
50 (22.4)
0.87 (0.65–1.17)
   
Age, yearsa
      
 < 25
109 (80.7)
26 (19.3)
1.0
0.02
1.0
0.04
25–29
166 (80.2)
41 (19.8)
1.03 (0.66–1.60)
 
0.97 (0.62–1.50)
 
30–34
116 (72.5)
44 (27.5)
1.43 (0.93–2.19)
 
1.31 (0.85–2.02)
 
35–39
75 (65.2)
40 (34.8)
1.81 (1.18–2.77)
 
1.66 (1.08–2.55)
 
 > 40
21 (72.4)
8 (27.6)
1.43 (0.72–2.84)
 
1.29 (0.65–2.56)
 
Highest education level
      
0–8 years
126 (76.8)
38 (23.2)
1.0
0.8
  
9–12 years
185 (74.3)
64 (25.7)
1.11 (0.78–1.57)
   
 > 12 years
176 (75.5)
57 (24.5)
1.06 (0.74–1.51)
   
Socioeconomic status (monthly earnings in Ksh)
      
 ≤ 10,000
174 (77.3)
51 (22.7)
1.0
0.7
  
10,001–30,000
205 (74.0)
72 (26.0)
1.15 (0.84–1.57)
   
 ≥ 30,001
105 (75.0)
35 (25.0)
1.10 (0.76–1.61)
   
Availability of household water and electricity
      
No
175 (75.8)
56 (24.2)
1.0
0.9
  
Yes
312 (75.2)
103 (24.8)
1.02 (0.77–1.36)
   
Alcohol use (AUDIT score)
      
0 (non-drinker)
418 (74.8)
141 (25.2)
1.0
0.7
  
1–6 (Non-hazardous)
58 (79.5)
15 (20.5)
0.82 (0.51–1.31)
   
 ≥ 7 (Hazardous)
11 (78.6)
3 (21.4)
0.85 (0.31–2.34)
   
Chronic illness
      
No
469 (75.2)
155 (24.8)
1.0
0.5
  
Yes
18 (81.8)
4 (18.2)
0.73 (0.30–1.80)
   
Frequency of teeth cleaning per day
      
 < 2
169 (75.8)
54 (24.2)
1.0
0.9
  
 ≥ 2
318 (75.2)
105 (24.8)
1.03 (0.77–1.36)
   
Time period since last dental visita
      
0–12 months
61 (64.9)
33 (35.1)
1.0
 < 0.001
  
 > 1 year but < 2 years
25 (64.1)
14 (35.9)
1.02 (0.62–1.69)
   
 ≥ 2 years but < 5 years
56 (62.9)
33 (37.1)
1.06 (0.72–1.55)
   
 ≥ 5 years
81 (66.9)
40 (33.1)
0.94 (0.65–1.37)
   
Never received dental care
264 (87.1)
39 (12.9)
0.37 (0.25–0.55)
   
BMI
      
Non-obese < 30
366 (76.1)
115 (23.9)
1.0
0.5
  
Obese ≥ 30
115 (73.7)
41 (26.3)
1.10 (0.81–1.50)
   
Parity
      
Nulliparous
83 (82.2)
18 (17.8)
1.0
0.4
  
1
214 (75.1)
71 (24.9)
1.40 (0.88–2.23)
   
2
125 (73.5)
45 (26.5)
1.49 (0.91–2.42)
   
 ≥ 3
65 (72.2)
25 (27.8)
1.56 (0.91–2.66)
   
Gravidityb
      
0
54 (87.1)
8 (12.9)
1.0
0.02
1.0
0.09
 ≥ 1
433 (74.1)
151 (25.9)
2.00 (1.04–3.88)
 
1.79 (0.91–3.50)
 
aAge and time-period since last dental visit were collinear, so only age was included in the multivariable model
bIncluded in multivariable model

Discussion

In this population of Kenyan women planning to conceive, nearly one out of six had moderate-severe periodontitis, and the prevalence of moderate-severe periodontitis was almost twice as high in multiparous women compared to those with parity of one or less. The prevalence of moderate-severe gingivitis, a precursor to periodontitis was 29%.
Studies in different settings have shown wide variation in the prevalence of periodontitis. In a US-based study using combined data from the 2009–2010 and 2011–2012 cycles of the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, the prevalence of periodontitis was estimated at 46%, with 8.9% of the population having severe periodontitis [18]. In a similar survey conducted among pre-conception women at the Maternal and Child Health Hospital, Changzhou, China between January 2012 and December 2014, the overall prevalence of periodontitis was 74%. In this Chinese cohort, 22% had mild periodontitis, 51% had moderate periodontitis and 1% had severe periodontitis [19]. A cross-sectional study in a Tanzanian cohort of pregnant women found a 5% prevalence of severe periodontitis [20]. Differences in the prevalence of periodontitis across these different studies may be attributed to differences in study design, definitions of periodontitis, and differences in the age, race, access to dental care, and socioeconomic status of study populations [1, 21, 22].
The association between higher parity and increased likelihood of periodontitis observed in this population of Kenyan women is consistent with findings from other studies [2325]. An important biological mechanism explaining the higher risk of periodontitis with increasing parity is that pregnancy causes a rise in circulating levels of estrogen and progesterone. Human gingiva contains receptors for estrogen and progesterone, and increased plasma levels result in accumulation of these hormones in gingival tissues causing changes in sub-gingival microbiota, increased vascular permeability, and greater susceptibility to inflammation [6, 26]. While the inflammation of periodontal tissues during pregnancy is temporary [27], destruction of periodontal tissue may persist even after childbirth. Repeated occurrences of untreated periodontitis during multiple pregnancies may explain the association between higher parity and the presence of moderate-severe periodontitis [28]. The observed association between periodontitis and higher parity could also be a result of confounding by other factors such as age. Multiparous women tend to be older than nulliparous or uniparous women, and periodontal disease prevalence increases with age [5]. However, this and other studies have observed that the association is not eliminated in analyses adjusting for age, suggesting that the effect of parity on periodontal health is not due to age alone. Inequities in access to healthcare among women of lower socioeconomic status and lower educational levels, who also tend to have more children, could also contribute to the observed association [29]. Nonetheless, sociodemographic variables and educational level were only modestly associated with moderate-severe periodontitis in this Kenyan cohort, and adjustment for educational attainment did not attenuate the association between parity and periodontal disease.
Several studies and systematic reviews have concluded that there is an association between periodontitis and spontaneous preterm birth [3033]. Despite this consistent association, clinical trials have generally not found that treatment of periodontal disease reduces the risk for adverse pregnancy outcomes. Several possible explanations have been proposed including lack of a causal association, shared risk factors like socioeconomic status and smoking, insufficiently powered clinical trials, variable definitions of periodontitis, and treatment that may have been too late or insufficiently aggressive to improve pregnancy outcomes [34]. Populations like this cohort of Kenyan women would be ideal for future longitudinal studies to determine whether earlier, more aggressive, and more prolonged interventions addressing periodontitis could improve birth outcomes.
A unique finding of this analysis was that never receiving dental care was protective against a high DMFT index. The explanation could be that women who had not experienced problems with tooth decay never sought dental care. Further these women were younger, and might have had access to preventive oral health care information, making them less likely to have had oral problems that would require dental care.
This study had several strengths. First, women were examined prior to becoming pregnant, enabling preconception exposure measurement. Additionally, standardized periodontal examinations were conducted by experienced clinicians with rigorous quality control. The population size (N = 647) also provided sufficient power for this analysis.
The findings from this analysis should be interpreted in the context of several limitations. First, the cross-sectional design does not provide evidence of a temporal relationship between some exposures and outcomes. Second, this analysis included multiple comparisons, increasing the risk that observed associations might be due to chance. Nonetheless, the association between multi-parity and periodontitis identified in this population was consistent with findings from prior studies [2325, 35].

Conclusion

This study demonstrated a substantial prevalence of moderate-severe periodontitis among Kenyan women planning to conceive. These findings highlight the need to address the oral health care needs of reproductive age women, especially those who are multiparous, since the prevalence of moderate-severe periodontitis was particularly high in this group. Advances in the field of salivary and periodontal tissue biomarkers as potential therapeutic targets for treatment and prevention of oral inflammatory and immunological diseases could lead to early diagnosis and treatment of oral inflammatory conditions like periodontitis. Questions remain about whether earlier and more aggressive treatment of periodontal disease could improve pregnancy outcomes in populations like this one.

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to acknowledge the contributions of our clinical, laboratory, and administrative staff in Nairobi, Mombasa, and Seattle. We also recognize the time and effort contributed by the research participants, without whom this work would not have been possible. Finally, it is with sadness that we acknowledge the passing of our friend and colleague Dr. Hudson Alumera, a dedicated periodontal clinician, educator, and researcher, who we lost too soon during the COVID-19 pandemic. This publication is dedicated to his memory.

Declarations

The study received ethical approval from the Kenyatta National Hospital—University of Nairobi Ethics and Research Committee and the University of Washington Human Subjects Research Committee. All sample collection and testing procedures were carried out in accordance with the rules and regulations of these ethical bodies overseeing this research. All participants provided written informed consent.
Not applicable.

Competing interests

RSM receives research funding, paid to the University of Washington, from Hologic Corporation. At the time of the study, EL was a postdoctoral fellow at the University of Washington; she is now employed by AbbVie, Inc. All other authors do not have any competing interests.
Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://​creativecommons.​org/​licenses/​by/​4.​0/​. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://​creativecommons.​org/​publicdomain/​zero/​1.​0/​) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Disease GBD, Injury I, Prevalence C. Global, regional, and national incidence, prevalence, and years lived with disability for 310 diseases and injuries, 1990–2015: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2015. Lancet. 2016;388(10053):1545–602.CrossRef Disease GBD, Injury I, Prevalence C. Global, regional, and national incidence, prevalence, and years lived with disability for 310 diseases and injuries, 1990–2015: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2015. Lancet. 2016;388(10053):1545–602.CrossRef
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Page RC, Eke PI. Case definitions for use in population-based surveillance of periodontitis. J Periodontol. 2007;78(7 Suppl):1387–99.CrossRef Page RC, Eke PI. Case definitions for use in population-based surveillance of periodontitis. J Periodontol. 2007;78(7 Suppl):1387–99.CrossRef
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Vouros ID, Kalpidis CD, Chadjipantelis T, Konstantinidis AB. Cigarette smoking associated with advanced periodontal destruction in a Greek sample population of patients with periodontal disease. J Int Acad Periodontol. 2009;11(4):250–7.PubMed Vouros ID, Kalpidis CD, Chadjipantelis T, Konstantinidis AB. Cigarette smoking associated with advanced periodontal destruction in a Greek sample population of patients with periodontal disease. J Int Acad Periodontol. 2009;11(4):250–7.PubMed
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Kubota M, Tanno-Nakanishi M, Yamada S, Okuda K, Ishihara K. Effect of smoking on subgingival microflora of patients with periodontitis in Japan. BMC Oral Health. 2011;11:1.CrossRef Kubota M, Tanno-Nakanishi M, Yamada S, Okuda K, Ishihara K. Effect of smoking on subgingival microflora of patients with periodontitis in Japan. BMC Oral Health. 2011;11:1.CrossRef
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Morelli EL, Broadbent JM, Leichter JW, Thomson WM. Pregnancy, parity and periodontal disease. Aust Dent J. 2018. Morelli EL, Broadbent JM, Leichter JW, Thomson WM. Pregnancy, parity and periodontal disease. Aust Dent J. 2018.
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Carrillo-de-Albornoz A, Figuero E, Herrera D, Bascones-Martinez A. Gingival changes during pregnancy: II. Influence of hormonal variations on the subgingival biofilm. J Clin Periodontol. 2010;37(3):230–40.CrossRef Carrillo-de-Albornoz A, Figuero E, Herrera D, Bascones-Martinez A. Gingival changes during pregnancy: II. Influence of hormonal variations on the subgingival biofilm. J Clin Periodontol. 2010;37(3):230–40.CrossRef
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Isola G, Polizzi A, Santonocito S, Alibrandi A, Williams RC. Periodontitis activates the NLRP3 inflammasome in serum and saliva. J Periodontol. 2022;93(1):135–45.CrossRef Isola G, Polizzi A, Santonocito S, Alibrandi A, Williams RC. Periodontitis activates the NLRP3 inflammasome in serum and saliva. J Periodontol. 2022;93(1):135–45.CrossRef
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Matarese G, Curro M, Isola G, Caccamo D, Vecchio M, Giunta ML, et al. Transglutaminase 2 up-regulation is associated with RANKL/OPG pathway in cultured HPDL cells and THP-1-differentiated macrophages. Amino Acids. 2015;47(11):2447–55.CrossRef Matarese G, Curro M, Isola G, Caccamo D, Vecchio M, Giunta ML, et al. Transglutaminase 2 up-regulation is associated with RANKL/OPG pathway in cultured HPDL cells and THP-1-differentiated macrophages. Amino Acids. 2015;47(11):2447–55.CrossRef
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Nazir MA. Prevalence of periodontal disease, its association with systemic diseases and prevention. Int J Health Sci (Qassim). 2017;11(2):72–80. Nazir MA. Prevalence of periodontal disease, its association with systemic diseases and prevention. Int J Health Sci (Qassim). 2017;11(2):72–80.
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Sanz M, Kornman K. Periodontitis and adverse pregnancy outcomes: consensus report of the Joint EFP/AAP Workshop on Periodontitis and Systemic Diseases. J Periodontol. 2013;84(4):S164–9.PubMed Sanz M, Kornman K. Periodontitis and adverse pregnancy outcomes: consensus report of the Joint EFP/AAP Workshop on Periodontitis and Systemic Diseases. J Periodontol. 2013;84(4):S164–9.PubMed
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Lokken EM, Mandaliya K, Srinivasan S, Richardson BA, Kinuthia J, Lannon S, et al. Impact of preconception vaginal microbiota on women’s risk of spontaneous preterm birth: protocol for a prospective case-cohort study. BMJ Open. 2020;10(2):e035186.CrossRef Lokken EM, Mandaliya K, Srinivasan S, Richardson BA, Kinuthia J, Lannon S, et al. Impact of preconception vaginal microbiota on women’s risk of spontaneous preterm birth: protocol for a prospective case-cohort study. BMJ Open. 2020;10(2):e035186.CrossRef
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Ramfjord SP. The Periodontal Disease Index (PDI). J Periodontol. 1967;38(6 Suppl):602–10.CrossRef Ramfjord SP. The Periodontal Disease Index (PDI). J Periodontol. 1967;38(6 Suppl):602–10.CrossRef
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Loe H. The Gingival Index, the Plaque Index and the Retention Index Systems. J Periodontol. 1967;38(6 Suppl):610–6.CrossRef Loe H. The Gingival Index, the Plaque Index and the Retention Index Systems. J Periodontol. 1967;38(6 Suppl):610–6.CrossRef
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Khan S, Bettiol S, Kent K, Barnett T, Peres M, Crocombe LA. Obesity and periodontitis in Australian adults: a population-based cross-sectional study. Int Dent J. 2020;70(1):53–61.CrossRef Khan S, Bettiol S, Kent K, Barnett T, Peres M, Crocombe LA. Obesity and periodontitis in Australian adults: a population-based cross-sectional study. Int Dent J. 2020;70(1):53–61.CrossRef
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Martinez-Herrera M, Silvestre-Rangil J, Silvestre FJ. Association between obesity and periodontal disease. A systematic review of epidemiological studies and controlled clinical trials. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2017;22(6):e708–15.PubMedPubMedCentral Martinez-Herrera M, Silvestre-Rangil J, Silvestre FJ. Association between obesity and periodontal disease. A systematic review of epidemiological studies and controlled clinical trials. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2017;22(6):e708–15.PubMedPubMedCentral
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Eke PI, Dye BA, Wei L, Slade GD, Thornton-Evans GO, Borgnakke WS, et al. Update on prevalence of periodontitis in adults in the United States: NHANES 2009 to 2012. J Periodontol. 2015;86(5):611–22.CrossRef Eke PI, Dye BA, Wei L, Slade GD, Thornton-Evans GO, Borgnakke WS, et al. Update on prevalence of periodontitis in adults in the United States: NHANES 2009 to 2012. J Periodontol. 2015;86(5):611–22.CrossRef
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Jiang H, Su Y, Xiong X, Harville E, Wu H, Jiang Z, et al. Prevalence and risk factors of periodontal disease among pre-conception Chinese women. Reprod Health. 2016;13(1):141.CrossRef Jiang H, Su Y, Xiong X, Harville E, Wu H, Jiang Z, et al. Prevalence and risk factors of periodontal disease among pre-conception Chinese women. Reprod Health. 2016;13(1):141.CrossRef
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Gesase N, Miranda-Rius J, Brunet-Llobet L, Lahor-Soler E, Mahande MJ, Masenga G. The association between periodontal disease and adverse pregnancy outcomes in Northern Tanzania: a cross-sectional study. Afr Health Sci. 2018;18(3):601–11.CrossRef Gesase N, Miranda-Rius J, Brunet-Llobet L, Lahor-Soler E, Mahande MJ, Masenga G. The association between periodontal disease and adverse pregnancy outcomes in Northern Tanzania: a cross-sectional study. Afr Health Sci. 2018;18(3):601–11.CrossRef
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Nazir M, Al-Ansari A, Al-Khalifa K, Alhareky M, Gaffar B, Almas K. Global prevalence of periodontal disease and lack of its surveillance. Sci World J. 2020;2020:2146160. Nazir M, Al-Ansari A, Al-Khalifa K, Alhareky M, Gaffar B, Almas K. Global prevalence of periodontal disease and lack of its surveillance. Sci World J. 2020;2020:2146160.
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Tefera A, Bekele B. Periodontal disease status and associated risk factors in patients attending a tertiary hospital in Northwest Ethiopia. Clin Cosmet Investig Dent. 2020;12:485–92.CrossRef Tefera A, Bekele B. Periodontal disease status and associated risk factors in patients attending a tertiary hospital in Northwest Ethiopia. Clin Cosmet Investig Dent. 2020;12:485–92.CrossRef
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Taani DQ, Habashneh R, Hammad MM, Batieha A. The periodontal status of pregnant women and its relationship with socio-demographic and clinical variables. J Oral Rehabil. 2003;30(4):440–5.CrossRef Taani DQ, Habashneh R, Hammad MM, Batieha A. The periodontal status of pregnant women and its relationship with socio-demographic and clinical variables. J Oral Rehabil. 2003;30(4):440–5.CrossRef
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Machuca G, Khoshfeiz O, Lacalle JR, Machuca C, Bullon P. The influence of general health and socio-cultural variables on the periodontal condition of pregnant women. J Periodontol. 1999;70(7):779–85.CrossRef Machuca G, Khoshfeiz O, Lacalle JR, Machuca C, Bullon P. The influence of general health and socio-cultural variables on the periodontal condition of pregnant women. J Periodontol. 1999;70(7):779–85.CrossRef
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Scheutz F, Baelum V, Matee MI, Mwangosi I. Motherhood and dental disease. Community Dent Health. 2002;19(2):67–72.PubMed Scheutz F, Baelum V, Matee MI, Mwangosi I. Motherhood and dental disease. Community Dent Health. 2002;19(2):67–72.PubMed
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Wu M, Chen SW, Jiang SY. Relationship between gingival inflammation and pregnancy. Mediators Inflamm. 2015;2015: 623427.PubMedPubMedCentral Wu M, Chen SW, Jiang SY. Relationship between gingival inflammation and pregnancy. Mediators Inflamm. 2015;2015: 623427.PubMedPubMedCentral
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Gonzalez-Jaranay M, Tellez L, Roa-Lopez A, Gomez-Moreno G, Moreu G. Periodontal status during pregnancy and postpartum. PLoS ONE. 2017;12(5): e0178234.CrossRef Gonzalez-Jaranay M, Tellez L, Roa-Lopez A, Gomez-Moreno G, Moreu G. Periodontal status during pregnancy and postpartum. PLoS ONE. 2017;12(5): e0178234.CrossRef
28.
Zurück zum Zitat Cohen DW, Shapiro J, Friedman L, Kyle GC, Franklin S. A longitudinal investigation of the periodontal changes during pregnancy and fifteen months post-partum. II J Periodontol. 1971;42(10):653–7.CrossRef Cohen DW, Shapiro J, Friedman L, Kyle GC, Franklin S. A longitudinal investigation of the periodontal changes during pregnancy and fifteen months post-partum. II J Periodontol. 1971;42(10):653–7.CrossRef
29.
Zurück zum Zitat Ueno M, Ohara S, Inoue M, Tsugane S, Kawaguchi Y. Association between parity and dentition status among Japanese women: Japan public health center-based oral health study. BMC Public Health. 2013;13:993.CrossRef Ueno M, Ohara S, Inoue M, Tsugane S, Kawaguchi Y. Association between parity and dentition status among Japanese women: Japan public health center-based oral health study. BMC Public Health. 2013;13:993.CrossRef
31.
Zurück zum Zitat Teshome A, Yitayeh A. Relationship between periodontal disease and preterm low birth weight: systematic review. Pan Afr Med J. 2016;24:215.CrossRef Teshome A, Yitayeh A. Relationship between periodontal disease and preterm low birth weight: systematic review. Pan Afr Med J. 2016;24:215.CrossRef
32.
Zurück zum Zitat Manrique-Corredor EJ, Orozco-Beltran D, Lopez-Pineda A, Quesada JA, Gil-Guillen VF, Carratala-Munuera C. Maternal periodontitis and preterm birth: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 2019;47(3):243–51.CrossRef Manrique-Corredor EJ, Orozco-Beltran D, Lopez-Pineda A, Quesada JA, Gil-Guillen VF, Carratala-Munuera C. Maternal periodontitis and preterm birth: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 2019;47(3):243–51.CrossRef
33.
Zurück zum Zitat Daalderop LA, Wieland BV, Tomsin K, Reyes L, Kramer BW, Vanterpool SF, et al. Periodontal disease and pregnancy outcomes: overview of systematic reviews. JDR Clin Trans Res. 2018;3(1):10–27.PubMed Daalderop LA, Wieland BV, Tomsin K, Reyes L, Kramer BW, Vanterpool SF, et al. Periodontal disease and pregnancy outcomes: overview of systematic reviews. JDR Clin Trans Res. 2018;3(1):10–27.PubMed
34.
Zurück zum Zitat Michalowicz BS, Gustafsson A, Thumbigere-Math V, Buhlin K. The effects of periodontal treatment on pregnancy outcomes. J Periodontol. 2013;84(4 Suppl):S195-208.PubMed Michalowicz BS, Gustafsson A, Thumbigere-Math V, Buhlin K. The effects of periodontal treatment on pregnancy outcomes. J Periodontol. 2013;84(4 Suppl):S195-208.PubMed
35.
Zurück zum Zitat Cappelli DPMCC. Prevention in clinical oral health care. St. Louis, Mo.: Mosby Elsevier; 2008. Cappelli DPMCC. Prevention in clinical oral health care. St. Louis, Mo.: Mosby Elsevier; 2008.
Metadaten
Titel
Prevalence and correlates of periodontitis among Kenyan women planning to conceive
verfasst von
Brenda Oyaro
Erica Lokken
Hudson Alumera
Shahid Hussein
Barbra Richardson
Kishorchandra Mandaliya
Walter Jaoko
John Kinuthia
Elizabeth Dimba
Arthur Kemoli
R. Scott McClelland
Publikationsdatum
01.12.2022
Verlag
BioMed Central
Erschienen in
BMC Oral Health / Ausgabe 1/2022
Elektronische ISSN: 1472-6831
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-022-02243-w

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 1/2022

BMC Oral Health 1/2022 Zur Ausgabe

„Übersichtlicher Wegweiser“: Lauterbachs umstrittener Klinik-Atlas ist online

17.05.2024 Klinik aktuell Nachrichten

Sie sei „ethisch geboten“, meint Gesundheitsminister Karl Lauterbach: mehr Transparenz über die Qualität von Klinikbehandlungen. Um sie abzubilden, lässt er gegen den Widerstand vieler Länder einen virtuellen Klinik-Atlas freischalten.

Klinikreform soll zehntausende Menschenleben retten

15.05.2024 Klinik aktuell Nachrichten

Gesundheitsminister Lauterbach hat die vom Bundeskabinett beschlossene Klinikreform verteidigt. Kritik an den Plänen kommt vom Marburger Bund. Und in den Ländern wird über den Gang zum Vermittlungsausschuss spekuliert.

Darf man die Behandlung eines Neonazis ablehnen?

08.05.2024 Gesellschaft Nachrichten

In einer Leseranfrage in der Zeitschrift Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology möchte ein anonymer Dermatologe bzw. eine anonyme Dermatologin wissen, ob er oder sie einen Patienten behandeln muss, der eine rassistische Tätowierung trägt.

Ein Drittel der jungen Ärztinnen und Ärzte erwägt abzuwandern

07.05.2024 Klinik aktuell Nachrichten

Extreme Arbeitsverdichtung und kaum Supervision: Dr. Andrea Martini, Sprecherin des Bündnisses Junge Ärztinnen und Ärzte (BJÄ) über den Frust des ärztlichen Nachwuchses und die Vorteile des Rucksack-Modells.

Update Zahnmedizin

Bestellen Sie unseren kostenlosen Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert – ganz bequem per eMail.