Künstliche Intelligenz: Herausforderungen und Nutzen in der Intensivmedizin

 

 Buy Article Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

The high workload in intensive care medicine arises from the exponential growth of medical knowledge, the flood of data generated by the permanent and intensive monitoring of intensive care patients, and the documentation burden. Artificial intelligence (AI) is predicted to have a great impact on ICU work in the near future as it will be applicable in many areas of critical care medicine. These applications include documentation through speech recognition, predictions for decision support, algorithms for parameter optimisation and the development of personalised intensive care medicine. AI-based decision support systems can augment human therapy decisions. Primarily through machine learning, a sub-discipline of AI, self-adaptive algorithms can learn to recognise patterns and make predictions. For actual use in clinical settings, the explainability of such systems is a prerequisite. Intensive care staff spends a large amount of their working hours on documentation, which has increased up to 50% of work time with the introduction of PDMS. Speech recognition has the potential to reduce this documentation burden. It is not yet precise enough to be usable in the clinic. The application of AI in medicine, with the help of large data sets, promises to identify diagnoses more quickly, develop individualised, precise treatments, support therapeutic decisions, use resources with maximum effectiveness and thus optimise the patient experience in the near future.

Publication History

Article published online:
23 March 2022

© 2022. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Rüdigerstraße 14, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany

• Literatur

• 1 Flohr L, Beaudry S, Johnson KT. et al. Clinician-Driven Design of VitalPAD-An Intelligent Monitoring and Communication Device to Improve Patient Safety in the Intensive Care Unit. IEEE J Transl Eng Health Med 2018; 6: 3000114 DOI: 10.1109/JTEHM.2018.2812162. (PMID: 29552425)
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 2 Beecken W-D. Changes – Analyse der Entwicklung der Digitalen Medizin im deutschen Gesundheitssystem aus ärztlicher Sicht. In: Matusiewicz D. Think Tanks im Gesundheitswesen. FOM-Edition. Wiesbaden: Springer Fachmedien; 2020: 29-44
  Google Scholar
• 3 Martin L, Peine A. Was ist neu … Einsatz von künstlicher Intelligenz in der Intensivmedizin: Hype oder schon Realität?. Anaesthesist 2021; 70: 40-41 DOI: 10.1007/s00101-020-00891-7. (PMID: 33242115)
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 4 Ahmed A, Chandra S, Herasevich V. et al. The effect of two different electronic health record user interfaces on intensive care provider task load, errors of cognition, and performance. Crit Care Med 2011; 39: 1626-1634 DOI: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e31821858a0. (PMID: 21478739)
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 5 Ballermann MA, Shaw NT, Arbeau KJ. et al. Impact of a Critical Care Clinical Information System on Interruption Rates During Intensive Care Nurse and Physician Documentation Tasks. Stud Health Technol Inform 2010; 160: 274-278 (PMID: 20841692)
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 6 Cheung A, van Velden FHP, Lagerburg V. et al. The organizational and clinical impact of integrating bedside equipment to an information system: a systematic literature review of patient data management systems (PDMS). Int J Med Inform 2015; 84: 155-165
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 7 Toll E. The Cost of Technology. JAMA 2020; 323: 1661-1662 DOI: 10.1001/jama.2020.2752. (PMID: 32369125)
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 8 Butler R, Monsalve M, Thomas GW. et al. Estimating Time Physicians and Other Health Care Workers Spend with Patients in an Intensive Care Unit Using a Sensor Network. Am J Med 2018; 131: 972.e9-972.e15
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 9 Momenipur A, Pennathur PR. Balancing Documentation and direct patient care activities: a study of a mature electronic health record system. Int J Ind Ergon 2019; 72: 338-346 DOI: 10.1016/j.ergon.2019.06.012. (PMID: 32201437)
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 10 Shanafelt TD, Dyrbye LN, Sinsky C. et al. Relationship Between Clerical Burden and Characteristics of the Electronic Environment With Physician Burnout and Professional Satisfaction. Mayo Clin Proc 2016; 91: 836-848 DOI: 10.1016/j.mayocp.2016.05.007. (PMID: 27313121)
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 11 Beil M, Proft I, van Heerden D. et al. Ethical considerations about artificial intelligence for prognostication in intensive care. Intensive Care Med Exp 2019; 7: 70 DOI: 10.1186/s40635-019-0286-6. (PMID: 31823128)
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 12 Cosgriff CV, Celi LA, Stone DJ. Critical Care, Critical Data. Biomed Eng Comput Biol 2019; 10: 1179597219856564 DOI: 10.1177/1179597219856564. (PMID: 31217702)
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 13 McCarthy J, Minsky ML, Rochester N. et al. A Proposal for the Dartmouth Summer Research Project on Artificial Intelligence. AI Magazine 2006; 27: 12-14
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 14 Peine A, Lütge C, Poszler F. et al. Künstliche Intelligenz und maschinelles Lernen in der intensivmedizinischen Forschung und klinischen Anwendung. Anästh Intensivmed 2020; 61: 372-384
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 15 Bini SA. Artificial Intelligence, Machine Learning, Deep Learning, and Cognitive Computing: What Do These Terms Mean and How Will They Impact Health Care?. J Arthroplasty 2018; 33: 2358-2361 DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2018.02.067. (PMID: 29656964)
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 16 Cleophas TJ, Zwinderman AH. Machine Learning in Medicine – a complete Overview. Cham; Heidelberg: Springer International Publishing;: 2015
  CrossrefGoogle Scholar
• 17 Schmidhuber J. Deep learning in neural networks: an overview. Neural Networks 2015; 61: 85-117 DOI: 10.1016/j.neunet.2014.09.003. (PMID: 25462637)
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 18 Arntfield R, Wu D, Tschirhart J. et al. Automation of Lung Ultrasound Interpretation via Deep Learning for the Classification of Normal versus Abnormal Lung Parenchyma: A Multicenter Study. Diagnostics (Basel) 2021; 11: 2049 DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics11112049. (PMID: 34829396)
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 19 Esteva A, Kuprel B, Novoa RA. et al. Dermatologist-level classification of skin cancer with deep neural networks. Nature 2017; 542: 115-118 DOI: 10.1038/nature21056. (PMID: 28117445)
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 20 Tai Y, Wei L, Zhou H. et al. Machine learning-based haptic-enabled surgical navigation with security awareness. Concurrency Computat Pract Exper 2019; 31: 1-12
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 21 Davoudi A, Malhotra KR, Shickel B. et al. Intelligent ICU for Autonomous Patient Monitoring Using Pervasive Sensing and Deep Learning. Sci Rep 2019; 9: 8020 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-019-44004-w. (PMID: 31142754)
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 22 Greco M, Caruso PF, Cecconi M. Artificial Intelligence in the Intensive Care Unit. Semin Respir Crit Care Med 2021; 42: 2-9 DOI: 10.1055/s-0040-1719037. (PMID: 33152770)
  Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 23 Koczulla AR, Wöhrle H. Digitale Medizin auf der Intensivstation. Pneumologe 2020; 17: 264-266
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 24 Collins S, Couture B, Kang MJ. et al. Quantifying and Visualizing Nursing Flowsheet Documentation Burden in Acute and Critical Care. AMIA Annu Symp Proc 2018; 2018: 348-357 (PMID: 30815074)
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 25 Johnson AEW, Pollard TJ, Shen L. et al. MIMIC-III, a freely accessible critical care database. Sci Data 2016; 3: 160035 DOI: 10.1038/sdata.2016.35. (PMID: 27219127)
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 26 Pollard TJ, Johnson AEW, Raffa JD. et al. The eICU Collaborative Research Database, a freely available multi-center database for critical care research. Sci Data 2018; 5: 180178 DOI: 10.1038/sdata.2018.178. (PMID: 30204154)
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 27 Medicine in the digital age. Nat Med [Anonym]. 2019; 25: 1 DOI: 10.1038/s41591-018-0322-1. (PMID: 30617338)
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 28 Dymek C, Kim B, Melton GB. et al. Building the evidence-base to reduce electronic health record-related clinician burden. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2021; 28: 1057-1061 DOI: 10.1093/jamia/ocaa238. (PMID: 33340326)
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 29 Goss FR, Blackley SV, Ortega CA. et al. A clinician survey of using speech recognition for clinical documentation in the electronic health record. Int J Med Inform 2019; 130: 103938 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2019.07.017. (PMID: 31442847)
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 30 Slutsky AS, Ranieri VM. Ventilator-induced lung injury. N Engl J Med 2013; 369: 2126-2136 DOI: 10.1056/NEJMc1400293. (PMID: 24597883)
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 31 Komorowski M, Celi LA, Badawi O. et al. The Artificial Intelligence Clinician learns optimal treatment strategies for sepsis in intensive care. Nature Med 2018; 24: 1716-1720 DOI: 10.1038/s41591-018-0213-5. (PMID: 30349085)
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 32 Jansson M, Rubio J, Gavaldà R. et al. Artificial Intelligence for clinical decision support in Critical Care, required and accelerated by COVID-19. Anaesth Crit Care Pain Med 2020; 39: 691-693 DOI: 10.1016/j.accpm.2020.09.010. (PMID: 33099016)
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 33 Pirracchio R, Cohen MJ, Malenica I. et al. Big data and targeted machine learning in action to assist medical decision in the ICU. Anaesth Crit Care Pain Med 2019; 38: 377-384 DOI: 10.1016/j.accpm.2018.09.008. (PMID: 30339893)
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 34 Peine A, Hallawa A, Bickenbach J. et al. Development and validation of a reinforcement learning algorithm to dynamically optimize mechanical ventilation in critical care. NPJ Digit Med 2021; 4: 32 DOI: 10.1038/s41746-021-00388-6. (PMID: 33608661)
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 35 Marx G, Dusch M, Czaplik M. et al. Telemedizin für die vier Säulen der Anästhesiologie: Positionspapier der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Anästhesiologie und Intensivmedizin (DGAI) und der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Telemedizin (DG Telemed). Anästh Intensivmed 2019; 60: 191-207
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 36 Lin Y-W, Zhou Y, Faghri F. et al. Analysis and prediction of unplanned intensive care unit readmission using recurrent neural networks with long short-term memory. PLoS One 2019; 14: e0218942 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0218942. (PMID: 31283759)
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 37 Sim I, Gorman P, Greenes RA. et al. Clinical decision support systems for the practice of evidence-based medicine. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2001; 8: 527-534 DOI: 10.1136/jamia.2001.0080527. (PMID: 11687560)
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 38 Rawson TM, Moore LSP, Hernandez B. et al. A systematic review of clinical decision support systems for antimicrobial management: are we failing to investigate these interventions appropriately?. Clin Microbiol Infect 2017; 23: 524-532 DOI: 10.1016/j.cmi.2017.02.028. (PMID: 28268133)
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 39 Rawson TM, Ahmad R, Toumazou C. et al. Artificial intelligence can improve decision-making in infection management. Nat Hum Behav 2019; 3: 543-545 DOI: 10.1038/s41562-019-0583-9. (PMID: 31190023)
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 40 Loo TS, Davis RB, Lipsitz LA. et al. Electronic medical record reminders and panel management to improve primary care of elderly patients. Arch Intern Med 2011; 171: 1552-1558 DOI: 10.1001/archinternmed.2011.394. (PMID: 21949163)
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 41 McGinn TG, McCullagh L, Kannry J. et al. Efficacy of an evidence-based clinical decision support in primary care practices: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA Intern Med 2013; 173: 1584-1591 DOI: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2013.8980. (PMID: 23896675)
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 42 Chertow GM, Lee J, Kuperman GJ. et al. Guided medication dosing for inpatients with renal insufficiency. JAMA 2001; 286: 2839-2844 DOI: 10.1001/jama.286.22.2839. (PMID: 11735759)
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 43 Wright A, Pang J, Feblowitz JC. et al. Improving completeness of electronic problem lists through clinical decision support: a randomized, controlled trial. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2012; 19: 555-561 DOI: 10.1136/amiajnl-2011-000521. (PMID: 22215056)
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 44 Abràmoff MD, Lavin PT, Birch M. et al. Pivotal trial of an autonomous AI-based diagnostic system for detection of diabetic retinopathy in primary care offices. NPJ Digit Med 2018; 1: 39 DOI: 10.1038/s41746-018-0040-6. (PMID: 31304320)
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 45 Corny J, Rajkumar A, Martin O. et al. A machine learning-based clinical decision support system to identify prescriptions with a high risk of medication error. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2020; 27: 1688-1694 DOI: 10.1093/jamia/ocaa154. (PMID: 32984901)
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 46 Cabitza F, Rasoini R, Gensini GF. Unintended Consequences of Machine Learning in Medicine. JAMA 2017; 318: 517-518 DOI: 10.1001/jama.2017.7797. (PMID: 28727867)
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 47 Peiffer-Smadja N, Rawson TM, Ahmad R. et al. Machine learning for clinical decision support in infectious diseases: a narrative review of current applications. Clin Microbiol Infect 2020; 26: 584-595 DOI: 10.1016/j.cmi.2020.05.020. (PMID: 32450256)
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 48 McCoy AB, Thomas EJ, Krousel-Wood M. et al. Clinical decision support alert appropriateness: a review and proposal for improvement. Ochsner J 2014; 14: 195-202 (PMID: 24940129)
  Google Scholar
• 49 Asan O, Smith PD, Montague E. More screen time, less face time – implications for EHR design. J Eval Clin Pract 2014; 20: 896-901 DOI: 10.1111/jep.12182. (PMID: 24835678)
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 50 Margalit RS, Roter D, Dunevant MA. et al. Electronic medical record use and physician-patient communication: an observational study of Israeli primary care encounters. Patient Educ Couns 2006; 61: 134-141 DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2005.03.004. (PMID: 16533682)
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 51 Kwan JL, Lo L, Ferguson J. et al. Computerised clinical decision support systems and absolute improvements in care: meta-analysis of controlled clinical trials. BMJ 2020; 370: m3216 DOI: 10.1136/bmj.m3216. (PMID: 32943437)
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 52 He J, Baxter SL, Xu J. et al. The practical implementation of artificial intelligence technologies in medicine. Nat Med 2019; 25: 30-36 DOI: 10.1038/s41591-018-0307-0. (PMID: 30617336)
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 53 Muinga N, Abejirinde IO, Paton C. et al. Designing paper-based records to improve the quality of nursing documentation in hospitals: A scoping review. J Clin Nurs 2021; 30: 56-71
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 54 Chao C-A. The impact of electronic health records on collaborative work routines: A narrative network analysis. Int J Med Inform 2016; 94: 100-111 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2016.06.019. (PMID: 27573317)
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 55 Hodgson T, Magrabi F, Coiera E. Efficiency and safety of speech recognition for documentation in the electronic health record. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2017; 24: 1127-1133 DOI: 10.1093/jamia/ocx073. (PMID: 29016971)
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 56 Zuchowski M. Weniger Dokumentationsaufwand, mehr Zeit. Klinik Management aktuell 2020; 25: 72-73
  Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 57 Blackley SV, Schubert VD, Goss FR. et al. Physician use of speech recognition versus typing in clinical documentation: A controlled observational study. Int J Med Inform 2020; 141: 104178 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2020.104178. (PMID: 32521449)
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 58 Panch T, Mattie H, Celi LA. The “inconvenient truth” about AI in healthcare. NPJ Digit Med 2019; 77: 1-3 DOI: 10.1038/s41746-019-0155-4. (PMID: 31453372)
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 59 Gijsberts CM, Groenewegen KA, Hoefer IE. et al. Race/Ethnic Differences in the Associations of the Framingham Risk Factors with Carotid IMT and Cardiovascular Events. PLoS One 2015; 10: e0132321 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0132321. (PMID: 26134404)
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 60 Tran BD, Chen Y, Liu S. et al. How does medical scribes’ work inform development of speech-based clinical documentation technologies? A systematic review. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2020; 27: 808-817 DOI: 10.1093/jamia/ocaa020. (PMID: 32181812)
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 61 Poncette A-S, Spies C, Mosch L. et al. Clinical Requirements of Future Patient Monitoring in the Intensive Care Unit: Qualitative Study. JMIR Med Inform 2019; 7: e13064 DOI: 10.2196/13064. (PMID: 31038467)
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 62 U.S. Food and Drug Administration. Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning in Software as a Medical Device. www.fda.gov/medical-devices/software-medical-device-samd/artificial-intelligence-and-machine-learning-software-medical-device
  PubMedGoogle Scholar