Skip to main content
Log in

Ash pollen allergy: reliable detection of sensitization on the basis of IgE to Ole e 1

  • Original
  • Published:
Allergo Journal International Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

Background: Alongside hazel, alder and birch pollen allergies, ash pollen allergy is a relevant cause of hay fever during spring in the European region. For some considerable time, ash pollen allergy was not routinely investigated and its clinical relevance may well have been underestimated, particularly since ash and birch tree pollination times are largely the same. Ash pollen extracts are not yet well standardized and diagnosis is therefore sometimes unreliable. Olive pollen, on the other hand, is strongly cross-reactive with ash pollen and is apparently better standardized. Therefore, the main allergen of olive pollen, Ole e 1, has been postulated as a reliable alternative for the detection of ash pollen sensitization.

Methods: To determine to what extent specific IgE against Ole e 1 in patients with ash pollen allergy is relevant, we included 183 subjects with ash pollen allergy displaying typical symptoms in March/April and positive skin prick test specific IgE against Ole e 1 (t224) and ash pollen (t25) and various birch allergens (Bet v 1, Bet v 2/v 4) in a retrospective study.

Results: A significant correlation was seen between specific IgE against Ole e 1 and ash pollen, but also to a slightly lesser extent between IgE against Ole e 1 and skin prick test with ash pollen, the latter being even higher than IgE and skin prick test both with ash pollen. No relevant correlation was found with birch pollen allergens, demonstrating the very limited cross-reactivity between ash and birch pollen.

Conclusion: It appears appropriate to determine specific IgE against Ole e 1 instead of IgE against ash pollen to detect persons with ash pollen allergy. Our findings may also support the idea of using possibly better standardized or more widely available olive pollen extracts instead of ash pollen extract for allergen-specific immunotherapy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

Bet v:

Betula verrucosa

CAP:

Capacity, ImmunoCAP®

Fra e:

Fraxinus excelsior

HMW:

High molcular weight

IgE:

Immunglobulin E

IHRP:

In-house reference preparation

Ole e:

Olea europaea

NaCl:

Sodiumchloride

NPT:

Nasal provocation test

SIT:

Specific immunotherapy

References

  1. Poncet P, Senechal H, Clement G, Purohit A, Sutra JP, Desvaux FX et al. Evaluation of ash pollen sensitization pattern using proteomic approach with individual sera from allergic patients. Allergy 2010; 65: 571–580

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Hemmer W, Focke M, Wantke F, Götz M, Jarisch R, Jäger S. Ash (Fraxinus excelsior)-pollen allergy in central Europe: specific role of pollen panallergens and the major allergen of ash pollen, Fra e 1. Allergy 2000; 55: 923–930

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Barderas R, Purohit A, Papanikolaou I, Rodriguez R, Pauli G, Villalba M. Cloning, expression, and clinical significance of the major allergen from ash pollen, Fra e 1. J Allergy Clin Immunol 2005; 115: 351–357

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Hrabina M, Purohit A, Oster JP, Papanikolaou I, Jain K, Pascal P et al. Standardization of an ash (Fraxinus excelsior) pollen allergen extract. Int Arch Allergy Immunol 2007; 142: 11–18

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Niederberger V, Purohit A, Oster JP, Spitzauer S, Valenta R, Pauli G. The allergen profile of ash (Fraxinus excelsior) pollen: cross-reactivity with allergens from various plant species. Clin Exp Allergy 2002; 32: 933–941

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Schmid-Grendelmeier P, Peeters AG, Wahl R, Wüthrich P. Zur Bedeutung der Eschenpollenallergie. Allergologie 1994; 17: 535–542

    Google Scholar 

  7. Palomares O, Swoboda I, Villalba M, Balic N, Spitzauer S, Rodriguez R et al. The major allergen of olive pollen Ole e 1 is a diagnostic marker for sensitization to Oleaceae. Int Arch Allergy Immunol 2006; 141: 110–118

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Bousquet J, Guerin B, Hewitt B, Lim S, Michel FB. Allergy in the Mediterranean area. III: Cross reactivity among Oleaceae pollens. Clin Allergy 1985; 15: 439–448

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Wahl R, Schmid-Grendelmeier P, Cromwell O, Wüthrich B. In vitro investigation of cross-reactivity between birch and ash pollen allergen extracts. J Allergy Clin Immunol 1996; 98: 99–106

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Asero R. Analysis of hypersensitivity to oleaceae pollen in an olive-free and ash-free area by commercial pollen extracts and recombinant allergens. Eur Ann Allergy Clin Immunol 2011; 43: 77–80

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Twaroch TE, Focke M, Civaj V, Weber M, Balic N, Mari A et al. Carrier-bound, nonallergenic Ole e 1 peptides for vaccination against olive pollen allergy. J Allergy Clin Immunol 2011; 128: 178–184 e7

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Rodriguez R, Villalba M, Batanero E, Palomares O, Quiralte J, Salamanca G et al. Olive pollen recombinant allergens: value in diagnosis and immunotherapy. J Invest Allergol Clin Immunol 2007; 17 Suppl 1: 4–10

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. D’Amato G, Cecchi L, Bonini S, Nunes C, Annesi-Maesano I, Behrendt H et al. Allergenic pollen and pollen allergy in Europe. Allergy 2007; 62: 976–990

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Alche JD, Castro AJ, Jimenez-Lopez JC, Morales S, Zafra A, Hammam-Khalifa AM et al. Differential characteristics of olive pollen from different cultivars: biological and clinical implications. J Invest Allergol Clin Immunol 2007; 17 Suppl 1: 17–23

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Focke M, Marth K, Flicker S, Valenta R. Heterogeneity of commercial timothy grass pollen extracts. Clin Exp Allergy 2008; 38: 1400–1408

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Focke M, Marth K, Valenta R. Molecular composition and biological activity of commercial birch pollen allergen extracts. Eur J Clin Invest 2009; 39: 429–436

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Barderas R, Purohit A, Rodriguez R, Pauli G, Villalba M. Isolation of the main allergen Fra e 1 from ash (Fraxinus excelsior) pollen: comparison of the natural and recombinant forms. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol 2006; 96: 557–563

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Peter Schmid-Grendelmeier.

Additional information

German version www.springermedizin.de/allergo-journal

Conflict of interest

The authors state that there are no conflict of interest.

Cite this as Imhof K, Probst E, Seifert B, Regenass S, Schmid-Grendelmeier P. Ash pollen allergy — reliable detection of sensitization on the basis of IgE to Ole e 1. Allergo J Int 2014; 23: 78–83 DOI 10.1007/s40629-014-0010-8

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Imhof, K., Probst, E., Seifert, B. et al. Ash pollen allergy: reliable detection of sensitization on the basis of IgE to Ole e 1. Allergo J Int 23, 78–83 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40629-014-0010-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40629-014-0010-8

Key words

Navigation