Abstract
Bias, jaconfounding, and random variation/chance are the reasons for a non-causal association between an exposure and outcome. This chapter will define and discuss these concepts so that they may be appropriately considered whenever one is interpreting the data from a study.
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Cited in “Quote Me” How to add wit and wisdom to your conversation. Compiled by J Edward Breslin. Hounslow Press, Ontario, Canada, 1990, p 44.
Davey Smith G, Ebrahim S. Data dredging, bias, or confounding. BMJ 2002; 325: 1437–1438.
Sackett DL. Bias in analytic research. J Chronic Dis 1979; 32:51–63
http://publichealth.jbpub.com/aschengrau/ppts/confounding.ppt10.
Pearl, Judea (2000). Causality: Models, Reasoning, and Inference. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. ISBN 0–521-77362–8.
Bradford Hill, Austin. “The environment or disease: association Or causation?”. Proc Roy Soc Med May 1965; 58:295–300. PMID 14283879
Mayrent, Sherry L. Epidemiology in Medicine. Williams & Wilkins, Baltimore, MD; 1987. ISBN 0–316-35636–0.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2008 Springer Science + Business Media B.V
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Glasser, S.P. (2008). Bias, Confounding, and Effect Modification. In: Glasser, S.P. (eds) Essentials of Clinical Research. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-8486-7_17
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-8486-7_17
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-1-4020-8485-0
Online ISBN: 978-1-4020-8486-7
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)