BMC Infectious Diseases (2023) 23:820
Anzeige
The original publication of this article contained 2 incorrect table citations. The incorrect and correct information is listed in this correction article. The original article has been updated.
Incorrect.
However, they were sensitive to Doxycycline (100%) followed by Amikacin (95%) (Table 2). Of the 20 isolates recovered, 85% (n = 17) of them were biofilm producers, and recovery of biofilm-forming and MDR A. baumannii was shown to vary with admission wards (Table 3).
Correct.
Anzeige
However, they were sensitive to Doxycycline (100%) followed by Amikacin (95%) (Table 3). Of the 20 isolates recovered, 85% (n = 17) of them were biofilm producers, and recovery of biofilm-forming and MDR A. baumannii was shown to vary with admission wards (Table 2).
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.