Introduction
Human monkeypox is a rare zoonosis caused by Monkeypox Virus (MPXV), an Orthopoxvirus, similar in his clinical presentation to the smallpox infection, endemic in Central and Western Africa [1]. Two different clades of MPXV have been identified: a more virulent Congo Basin (Central African) and a less virulent West African clade [2].
At the beginning of May 2022, clusters of human monkeypox were identified in several non-endemic countries [3]. The first reported case of this new outbreak was reported in the United Kingdom on May 6th 2022, in an individual with a recent travel history to West Africa [4]. Since then, MPXV infection has been reported in an increasing number of countries worldwide in individuals without epidemiological links to endemic countries. Infected individuals during this outbreak appear to be mainly young men with unprotected sexual intercourses as the sole reported risk factor [5].
Anzeige
On July 23rd, WHO declared that the monkeypox outbreak represents a public health emergency of international concern. [3]
The first confirmed Monkeypox case in Italy was reported on May 20th, identified in a patient who recently travelled to Spain [6]. After that, the number of MPOX cases progressively increased, reaching a total of 957 confirmed cases throughout Italy, with a higher concentration in Lombardy (410 cases) and Lazio (161 cases) regions [7].
On May 10, 2023, the World Health Organization (WHO) declared that MPOX is no longer a public health emergency of international concern [8].
The decision was based on the consistent decline in global diagnoses. However, it was also emphasized that all countries worldwide should maintain their surveillance and response capabilities, integrating MPOX prevention and care into national health programs.
Anzeige
This study aims to describe the clinical presentation of monkeypox virus infection in individuals followed in the Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS Hospital in Rome, Lazio, Italy.
Methods
We collected clinical history and laboratory parameters of all patients with a consistent clinical presentation and a polymerase chain reaction (PCR) confirmed MPOX infection who came to our hospital between May 20th and August 30th 2022.
Clinical presentations drove microbiological sampling and laboratory testing; all patients had swabs collected from skin vesicles and pharynx, as well as urine and blood samples. These samples were also collected during follow-up visits. All collected samples underwent PCR testing for the research of the MPXV genome; the diagnosis of MPOX infection was confirmed in the case of positivity of at least 1 sample.
Patients with a confirmed diagnosis of human monkeypox took part in a video/telephone consultation to do counselling regarding the diagnosis and to assess follow-up.
For subjects co-infected with HIV, data regarding CD4 + cell count, HIV-RNA and CD4/CD8 ratio were also collected. All patients provided written informed consent for the storage and publication of anonymized clinical details and publication of clinical images.
Results
During the study period, 26 patients presenting with consistent symptoms were tested for MPXV between May 20th and August 30th: 16 (61.5%) had positive PCR on at least one sample.
All confirmed monkeypox patients were men who identified themselves as MSM, with a median age of 41.5 years (IQR 33.75– 47.00). Four patients (25%) reported previous smallpox vaccination during childhood. All patients reported unprotected sexual intercourses prior to the appearance of the lesions or the onset of the symptoms. One of them came to our attention reporting previous sexual intercourse with a confirmed case of human monkeypox, showing disseminated vesicles and referring fever 48 h before the scheduled visit.
All patients showed up to be infected by the Western African clade (Clade II).
Anzeige
All patients who tested positive presented a cutaneous vesicular rash, more frequently on the genital area (N = 5, 31.25%) or the anus and the perianal area (N = 7, 43.75%). Nevertheless, vesicles have been found on the upper and lower limbs (N = 10, 62.50%) as well as on the back (N = 3, 18.75%), the face (N = 2, 12.50%), and the chest (N = 4, 25.00%) [Figs. 1, 2, 3 and 4]. Four patients did not present lesions on the genital or perianal area. Two patients (12.50%) only developed one vesicle (one on the penile shaft, one on the left hand); both had been vaccinated for smallpox during childhood. Eight patients reported systemic symptoms (50%), more frequent fever (N = 8, 50%) and lymphadenopathy (N = 6, 37.50%) in the inguinal area. None of these eight cases reported previous vaccination for smallpox. Systemic symptoms always appeared before skin lesions, with a median time between the two events of 1 day (IQR 0.00–2.0).
Fig. 1
Clinical progression of skin lesions in the perianal area from day 1 (day of diagnosis) to day 9
×
![]()
Fig. 2
Cutaneous manifestation of MPOX infection in the perianal area of a PLWH
×
![]()
Fig. 3
Bilateral cutaneous manifestations of MPOX infection
×
![]()
Anzeige
Fig. 4
Skin lesion on the wrist of a person with MPOX infection
×
![]()
One patient reported a sore throat (6.2%) that spontaneously resolved in 3 days.
The most frequently reported symptom was pruritus, reported by 100% of patients, and pain localized on the site of the vesicles (N = 13; 81.25%), poorly responsive to pain relief therapy. In particular, patients relied on oral nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) and paracetamol for pain management, ineffectively addressing the symptom. No patient in this cohort used analgesic drugs of a different class.
We observed anxiety and mood deflection in all patients described in this series, probably as a reaction to prolonged isolation but also as a consequence of the stigma regarding this disease.
Anzeige
Nine patients also had HIV-1 infection (56.25%); all of them were on highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) at the time of the diagnosis of MPXV infection and had a suppressed HIV-RNA (i.e. below 50 copies/mL). The median CD4 + cell count was 402 cells/mmc (IQR 325– 574) with a median CD4/CD8 ratio of 0.79 (IQR 0.61–1.17). No significant clinical presentation or outcome differences have been observed during our follow-up time for people living with HIV (PLWHIV). Three patients (18.75%) were on daily PrEP with Tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF)/Emtricitabine (FTC). One patient had a resolved hepatitis B.
Regarding screening for concomitant STIs, one patient tested positive for Treponema pallidum (positive VDRL and TPHA) and required therapy after the resolution of the MPXV infection. Another patient tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 but did not develop symptoms nor require medical assistance or specific medication.
None of the patients had a severe form of the disease, and none of them required antiviral or antibiotic therapy nor hospitalization. No deaths were reported. The median duration of infection was 19.5 days (IQR 14.0-20.3).
All patients underwent follow-up visits 10 and 21 days from the beginning of the symptoms. Patients were considered healed when all of the following conditions were fulfilled: (a) clinical recovery, meaning the absence of systemic symptoms, (b) no new skin lesions appeared in the previous 48 h from the clinical evaluation, (c) negative polymerase chain reactions for the research of Monkeypox virus performed on blood and urine samples as well as skin and pharyngeal swabs.
All patients were isolated at home until the negativization of the microbiological tests for infection control purposes.
Discussion
This case series analyzes the clinical characteristics of sixteen patients with human monkeypox infection diagnosed in a single Italian clinical center, aiming at describing clinical presentations and management of monkeypox virus infection in a non-endemic, high-income setting.
Overall, we observed a mild clinical presentation of monkeypox virus infection. Our patients only reported minor symptoms, with a complete clinical resolution after 7–10 days from diagnosis and no need for antiviral therapy.
Monkeypox cases in non-endemic areas are not new; several outbreaks have been reported in the past [9]. The most significant difference is the size and spread of the current outbreak compared to previous outbreaks, as well as the reported route of transmission.
The clinical features we observed in this cohort of patients are consistent with the characteristics described for the western African clade of monkeypox virus infection in the previous outbreaks, generally associated with a lower mortality rate [10]. The vesicles of the patients of this case series presented a similar natural history to those described in other similar case series [11] [12].
The clinical features described for our cases were comparable to the ones seen in Nigerian outbreaks of the western African clade of monkeypox virus in 2017-18 [13] and, in general, with the clinical manifestations described in the literature for the MPOX infection. Benites-Zapata et al., in a systematic review and meta-analysis comprising 19 articles published before June 2022, described the main clinical manifestations of MPOX infection [14]. Their work found that 25% of patients (95% CI 3–58%) experienced respiratory difficulties during the acute event, and 19% (95% CI 9–32%) had ocular involvement with conjunctivitis. Moreover, an overall hospitalization rate of 35% (95% CI 4–59%) was reported, with 4% of patients experiencing fatal outcomes due to complications.
Regarding the 2022 outbreak, the rate of hospitalization in non-endemic countries has been reported to be 11.1% in Portugal [15], 9.2% in the UK [16], 8.3% in Germany [17]. The reasons for hospitalization were related to pain management in cases that had become too severe or to managing complications.
In our experience, no patients exhibited respiratory symptoms or ocular involvement, and none required hospitalization, even for an HIV co-infection.
Furthermore, the patients described in this series present some differences from the ones described during previous outbreaks of the Monkeypox Virus Infection, in line with other findings in the literature describing cohorts of patients from the 2022 outbreak. First, all the patients are young men who referred to have had unprotected sexual intercourses prior to the beginning of the symptoms. All the patients had no epidemiological links to Western Africa. Most of the lesions are focused on the genital and perianal area, suggesting an association with sexual transmission.
The patients that reported a previous vaccination for the smallpox virus had a milder presentation of the infection, generally with one single papule and no systemic symptoms.
A potential limitation of our study is the relatively small size of our cohort when compared to other cohorts reported in the literature. Our outpatient clinic was not the designated referral center in Rome during the MPOX 2022 outbreak; nevertheless, we managed to observe a considerable number of MPOX infection cases, closely monitored with clinical and laboratory follow-up until the resolution of the acute condition.
Our study describes the clinical presentation of monkeypox virus infection in a real-life setting. What we consider most important is facilitating healthcare workers to provide an MPOX infection diagnosis in the shortest time possible, even in cases with few symptoms that could be more difficult to attribute to MPOX, especially in non-endemic countries. This would allow the patient to receive appropriate care during the acute phase, thereby preventing the onset of complications (e.g., superinfections, ocular or respiratory involvement) and hospitalization.
Acknowledgements
Not applicable.
Declarations
Ethics approval and consent to participate
The study was performed in accordance with the 1964 Declaration of Helsinki and later amendments.
Consent for publication
All patients signed an informed consent regarding using their clinical and laboratory data in aggregated and anonymous form.
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.