Skip to main content
Erschienen in: European Radiology 4/2013

01.04.2013 | Gastrointestinal

Unit costs in population-based colorectal cancer screening using CT colonography performed in university hospitals in The Netherlands

verfasst von: M. C. de Haan, M. Thomeer, J. Stoker, E. Dekker, E. J. Kuipers, M. van Ballegooijen

Erschienen in: European Radiology | Ausgabe 4/2013

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Objectives

Computed tomography (CT) colonography cost assumptions so far ranged from €346 to €594 per procedure, based on clinical CT reimbursement rates. The aim of our study was to estimate the costs in a screening situation.

Methods

Data were collected within an invitational population-based CRC screening trial (n = 2,920, age 50–75 years) with a dedicated CT-screening setting. Unit costs were calculated per action, per invitee and per participant (depending on adherence) and per individual with detected advanced neoplasia. Sensitivity analyses were performed, and alternative scenarios were considered.

Results

Of the invitees, 47.2 % were reminded, 38.8 % scheduled for an intake, 37.2 % scheduled for CT colonography, 33.6 % underwent CT colonography and 1.1 % needed a re-examination. Lesions ≥10 mm were detected in 2.9 % of the invitees. Invitation costs were €5.57. Costs per CT colonography (intake to results) were €144.00. Extra costs of communication of positive results were €9.00. Average costs of invitational-based CT colonography screening were €56.97 per invitee, €169.40 per participant and €2,772.51 per individual with detected advanced neoplasia.

Conclusions

Dutch costs of CT-screening were substantially lower than the cost assumptions that were used in published cost-effectiveness analyses on CT colonography screening. This finding indicates that previous cost-effectiveness analyses should be updated, at least for the Dutch situation.

Key Points

CT colonography screening costs have historically been based on (local) clinical reimbursement rates
Estimates ranged from €346–€594, based on abdominal and/or pelvic computed tomography
Average costs per participant within an invitational population-based screening program: €169.40
Average CT colonography costs per individual with detected advanced neoplasia: €2,772.51
Previous cost-effectiveness analyses should probably be updated
Anhänge
Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat de Haan MC, van Gelder RE, Graser A, Bipat S, Stoker J (2011) Diagnostic value of CT-colonography as compared to colonoscopy in an asymptomatic screening population: a meta-analysis. Eur Radiol 21:1747–1763PubMedCrossRef de Haan MC, van Gelder RE, Graser A, Bipat S, Stoker J (2011) Diagnostic value of CT-colonography as compared to colonoscopy in an asymptomatic screening population: a meta-analysis. Eur Radiol 21:1747–1763PubMedCrossRef
2.
Zurück zum Zitat McFarland EG, Levin B, Lieberman DA et al (2008) American Cancer Society; U.S. Multisociety Task Force on Colorectal Cancer; American College of Radiology. Revised colorectal screening guidelines: joint effort of the American Cancer Society, U.S. Multisociety Task Force on Colorectal Cancer, and American College of Radiology. Radiology 248:717–720PubMedCrossRef McFarland EG, Levin B, Lieberman DA et al (2008) American Cancer Society; U.S. Multisociety Task Force on Colorectal Cancer; American College of Radiology. Revised colorectal screening guidelines: joint effort of the American Cancer Society, U.S. Multisociety Task Force on Colorectal Cancer, and American College of Radiology. Radiology 248:717–720PubMedCrossRef
3.
Zurück zum Zitat U.S. Preventive Services Task Force (2008) Screening for colorectal cancer: U.S. Preventive Services Task Force recommendation statement. Ann Intern Med 149:627–637 U.S. Preventive Services Task Force (2008) Screening for colorectal cancer: U.S. Preventive Services Task Force recommendation statement. Ann Intern Med 149:627–637
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Rex DK, Johnson DA, Anderson JC, Schoenfeld PS, Burke CA, Inadomi JM (2009) American College of Gastroenterology. American College of Gastroenterology guidelines for colorectal cancer screening 2009. Am J Gastroenterol 104:739–750PubMedCrossRef Rex DK, Johnson DA, Anderson JC, Schoenfeld PS, Burke CA, Inadomi JM (2009) American College of Gastroenterology. American College of Gastroenterology guidelines for colorectal cancer screening 2009. Am J Gastroenterol 104:739–750PubMedCrossRef
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Mavranezouli I, East JE, Taylor SA (2008) CT colonography and cost-effectiveness. Eur Radiol 18:2485–2497PubMedCrossRef Mavranezouli I, East JE, Taylor SA (2008) CT colonography and cost-effectiveness. Eur Radiol 18:2485–2497PubMedCrossRef
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Knudsen AB, Lansdorp-Vogelaar I, Rutter CM et al (2010) Cost-effectiveness of computed tomographic colonography screening for colorectal cancer in the medicare population. J Natl Cancer Inst 102:1238–1252PubMedCrossRef Knudsen AB, Lansdorp-Vogelaar I, Rutter CM et al (2010) Cost-effectiveness of computed tomographic colonography screening for colorectal cancer in the medicare population. J Natl Cancer Inst 102:1238–1252PubMedCrossRef
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Vijan S, Hwang I, Inadomi J et al (2007) The cost-effectiveness of CT colonography in screening for colorectal neoplasia. Am J Gastroenterol 102:380–390PubMedCrossRef Vijan S, Hwang I, Inadomi J et al (2007) The cost-effectiveness of CT colonography in screening for colorectal neoplasia. Am J Gastroenterol 102:380–390PubMedCrossRef
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Vanness DJ, Knudsen AB, Lansdorp-Vogelaar I et al (2011) Comparative economic evaluation of data from the ACRIN National CT Colonography Trial with three cancer intervention and surveillance modeling network microsimulations. Radiology 261:487–498PubMedCrossRef Vanness DJ, Knudsen AB, Lansdorp-Vogelaar I et al (2011) Comparative economic evaluation of data from the ACRIN National CT Colonography Trial with three cancer intervention and surveillance modeling network microsimulations. Radiology 261:487–498PubMedCrossRef
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Sonnenberg A, Delcò F, Bauerfeind P (1999) Is virtual colonoscopy a cost-effective option to screen for colorectal cancer? Am J Gastroenterol 94:2268–2274PubMedCrossRef Sonnenberg A, Delcò F, Bauerfeind P (1999) Is virtual colonoscopy a cost-effective option to screen for colorectal cancer? Am J Gastroenterol 94:2268–2274PubMedCrossRef
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Ladabaum U, Song K, Fendrick AM (2004) Colorectal neoplasia screening with virtual colonoscopy: when, at what cost, and with what national impact? Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2:554–563PubMedCrossRef Ladabaum U, Song K, Fendrick AM (2004) Colorectal neoplasia screening with virtual colonoscopy: when, at what cost, and with what national impact? Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2:554–563PubMedCrossRef
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Lansdorp-Vogelaar I, van Ballegooijen M, Zauber AG, Boer R, Wilschut J, Habbema JD (2009) At what costs will screening with CT colonography be competitive? A cost-effectiveness approach. Int J Cancer 124:1161–1168PubMedCrossRef Lansdorp-Vogelaar I, van Ballegooijen M, Zauber AG, Boer R, Wilschut J, Habbema JD (2009) At what costs will screening with CT colonography be competitive? A cost-effectiveness approach. Int J Cancer 124:1161–1168PubMedCrossRef
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Pickhardt PJ, Hassan C, Laghi A, Zullo A, Kim DH, Morini S (2007) Cost-effectiveness of colorectal cancer screening with computed tomography colonography: the impact of not reporting diminutive lesions. Cancer 109:2213–2221PubMedCrossRef Pickhardt PJ, Hassan C, Laghi A, Zullo A, Kim DH, Morini S (2007) Cost-effectiveness of colorectal cancer screening with computed tomography colonography: the impact of not reporting diminutive lesions. Cancer 109:2213–2221PubMedCrossRef
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Pickhardt PJ, Hassan C, Laghi A, Kim DH (2009) CT colonography to screen for colorectal cancer and aortic aneurysm in the medicare population: cost-effectiveness analysis. AJR Am J Roentgenol 192:1332–1340PubMedCrossRef Pickhardt PJ, Hassan C, Laghi A, Kim DH (2009) CT colonography to screen for colorectal cancer and aortic aneurysm in the medicare population: cost-effectiveness analysis. AJR Am J Roentgenol 192:1332–1340PubMedCrossRef
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Hassan C, Pickhardt PJ, Laghi A et al (2008) Computed tomographic colonography to screen for colorectal cancer, extracolonic cancer, and aortic aneurysm: model simulation with cost-effectiveness analysis. Arch Intern Med 168:696–705PubMedCrossRef Hassan C, Pickhardt PJ, Laghi A et al (2008) Computed tomographic colonography to screen for colorectal cancer, extracolonic cancer, and aortic aneurysm: model simulation with cost-effectiveness analysis. Arch Intern Med 168:696–705PubMedCrossRef
15.
Zurück zum Zitat de Wijkerslooth TR, de Haan MC, Stoop EM et al (2010) Study protocol: population screening for colorectal cancer by colonoscopy or CTC: a randomized controlled trial. BMC Gastroenterol 10:47PubMedCrossRef de Wijkerslooth TR, de Haan MC, Stoop EM et al (2010) Study protocol: population screening for colorectal cancer by colonoscopy or CTC: a randomized controlled trial. BMC Gastroenterol 10:47PubMedCrossRef
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Stoop EM, de Haan MC, de Wijkerslooth TR et al (2011) Participation and yield of colonoscopy versus non-cathartic CT colonography in population-based screening for colorectal cancer: a randomised controlled trial. Lancet Oncol 13:55–64PubMedCrossRef Stoop EM, de Haan MC, de Wijkerslooth TR et al (2011) Participation and yield of colonoscopy versus non-cathartic CT colonography in population-based screening for colorectal cancer: a randomised controlled trial. Lancet Oncol 13:55–64PubMedCrossRef
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Liedenbaum MH, Bipat S, Bossuyt PM et al (2011) Evaluation of a standardized CT colonography training program for novice readers. Radiology 258:477–487PubMedCrossRef Liedenbaum MH, Bipat S, Bossuyt PM et al (2011) Evaluation of a standardized CT colonography training program for novice readers. Radiology 258:477–487PubMedCrossRef
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Hara AK, Johnson CD, MacCarty RL, Welch TJ (2000) Incidental extracolonic findings at CT colonography. Radiology 215:353–357PubMed Hara AK, Johnson CD, MacCarty RL, Welch TJ (2000) Incidental extracolonic findings at CT colonography. Radiology 215:353–357PubMed
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Gluecker TM, Johnson CD, Wilson LA et al (2003) Extracolonic findings at CT colonography: evaluation of prevalence and cost in a screening population. Gastroenterology 124:911–916PubMedCrossRef Gluecker TM, Johnson CD, Wilson LA et al (2003) Extracolonic findings at CT colonography: evaluation of prevalence and cost in a screening population. Gastroenterology 124:911–916PubMedCrossRef
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Yee J, Kumar NN, Godara S et al (2005) Extracolonic abnormalities discovered incidentally at CT colonography in a male population. Radiology 236:519–526PubMedCrossRef Yee J, Kumar NN, Godara S et al (2005) Extracolonic abnormalities discovered incidentally at CT colonography in a male population. Radiology 236:519–526PubMedCrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Unit costs in population-based colorectal cancer screening using CT colonography performed in university hospitals in The Netherlands
verfasst von
M. C. de Haan
M. Thomeer
J. Stoker
E. Dekker
E. J. Kuipers
M. van Ballegooijen
Publikationsdatum
01.04.2013
Verlag
Springer-Verlag
Erschienen in
European Radiology / Ausgabe 4/2013
Print ISSN: 0938-7994
Elektronische ISSN: 1432-1084
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-012-2689-6

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 4/2013

European Radiology 4/2013 Zur Ausgabe

Mammakarzinom: Brustdichte beeinflusst rezidivfreies Überleben

26.05.2024 Mammakarzinom Nachrichten

Frauen, die zum Zeitpunkt der Brustkrebsdiagnose eine hohe mammografische Brustdichte aufweisen, haben ein erhöhtes Risiko für ein baldiges Rezidiv, legen neue Daten nahe.

„Übersichtlicher Wegweiser“: Lauterbachs umstrittener Klinik-Atlas ist online

17.05.2024 Klinik aktuell Nachrichten

Sie sei „ethisch geboten“, meint Gesundheitsminister Karl Lauterbach: mehr Transparenz über die Qualität von Klinikbehandlungen. Um sie abzubilden, lässt er gegen den Widerstand vieler Länder einen virtuellen Klinik-Atlas freischalten.

Klinikreform soll zehntausende Menschenleben retten

15.05.2024 Klinik aktuell Nachrichten

Gesundheitsminister Lauterbach hat die vom Bundeskabinett beschlossene Klinikreform verteidigt. Kritik an den Plänen kommt vom Marburger Bund. Und in den Ländern wird über den Gang zum Vermittlungsausschuss spekuliert.

Darf man die Behandlung eines Neonazis ablehnen?

08.05.2024 Gesellschaft Nachrichten

In einer Leseranfrage in der Zeitschrift Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology möchte ein anonymer Dermatologe bzw. eine anonyme Dermatologin wissen, ob er oder sie einen Patienten behandeln muss, der eine rassistische Tätowierung trägt.

Update Radiologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.