Skip to main content
Erschienen in: BMC Anesthesiology 1/2024

Open Access 01.12.2024 | Research

Operator gender differences in major mechanical complications after central line insertions: a subgroup analysis of a prospective multicentre cohort study

verfasst von: Leila Naddi, Janna Hübinette, Thomas Kander, Ola Borgquist, Maria Adrian

Erschienen in: BMC Anesthesiology | Ausgabe 1/2024

Abstract

Background

A previous study on mechanical complications after central venous catheterisation demonstrated differences in complication rates between male and female operators. The objective of this subgroup analysis was to further investigate these differences. The hypothesis was that differences in distribution of predefined variables between operator genders could be identified.

Methods

This was a subgroup analysis of a prospective, multicentre, observational cohort study conducted between March 2019 and December 2020 including 8 586 patients ≥ 16 years receiving central venous catheters at four emergency care hospitals. The main outcome measure was major mechanical complications defined as major bleeding, severe cardiac arrhythmia, pneumothorax, arterial catheterisation, and persistent nerve injury. Independent t-test and χ2 test were used to investigate differences in distribution of major mechanical complications and predefined variables between male and female operators. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was used to determine association between operator gender and major mechanical complications.

Results

Female operators had a lower rate of major mechanical complications than male operators (0.4% vs 0.8%, P = .02), were less experienced (P < .001), had more patients with invasive positive pressure ventilation (P < .001), more often chose the internal jugular vein (P < .001) and more frequently used ultrasound guidance (P < .001). Male operators more often chose the subclavian vein (P < .001) and inserted more catheters with bore size ≥ 9 Fr (P < .001). Multivariable logistic regression analysis showed that male operator gender was associated with major mechanical complication (OR 2.67 [95% CI: 1.26–5.64]) after correction for other relevant independent variables.

Conclusions

The hypothesis was confirmed as differences in distribution of predefined variables between operator genders were found. Despite being less experienced, female operators had a lower rate of major mechanical complications. Furthermore, male operator gender was independently associated with a higher risk of major mechanical complications. Future studies are needed to further investigate differences in risk behaviour between male and female operators.

Trial registration

Clinicaltrials.gov identifier: NCT03782324. Date of registration: 20/12/2018.
Hinweise

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Abkürzungen
CVC
Central Venous Catheter
BMI
Body Mass Index
SD
Standard Deviation
EHR
Electronic Health Record
Dx
Dexter (right)
Sin
Sinister (left)

Background

Central venous catheterisation comes with a risk of immediate mechanical complications such as bleeding, cardiac arrhythmia, arterial puncture, pneumothorax and nerve injury [14]. Previous studies have reported an incidence of mechanical complications between 1.1% and 18%, where 0.2–2.3% were classified as severe and may have a negative impact on mortality [3, 510]. Central venous catheters (CVCs) are both indispensable and common in modern healthcare. Approximately 27 million CVC insertions are performed annually worldwide [11], meaning that mechanical complications contribute significantly to increased morbidity, mortality, and costs.
Real-time ultrasound guidance is strongly recommended for CVC insertions because it both increases success rates and reduces the number of mechanical complications compared with the landmark method [1223]. However, there are several other factors that also influence the risk of mechanical complications, such as patient characteristics, operator experience, and vascular insertion site [1, 2, 4, 8, 24, 25].
In a recently performed prospective multicentre observational cohort study on incidence and risk factors for mechanical complications after central venous catheterisation (the CVC-MECH trial), the incidence of major mechanical complications was 0.4% in hospitals where real-time ultrasound guidance is the standard of care for central venous access [8]. Interestingly, female operator gender was independently associated with a lower risk of major mechanical complications, which, to the best of the authors’ knowledge, never previously has been reported.
The aim of this study was to further analyse how the predefined major mechanical complications and variables [26] were distributed between male and female operators and to assess if operator gender is associated with major mechanical complications. The hypothesis was that differences in the distribution of the predefined variables between operator genders could be identified.

Methods

Setting and participants

All patients ≥ 16 years who received a CVC at any of four emergency care hospitals in Region Skåne, Sweden, from 2 March 2019 to 31 December 2020 were eligible for inclusion. Patients with fictitious social security numbers, arterial catheters accidentally documented as CVC insertions, and CVC insertions with missing insertion dates were excluded. For patients with multiple CVCs during the study period, only one CVC insertion was included, and the inclusion was based on worst case selection. Thus, the CVC insertion with a complication was selected, and if no complication occurred, one of the CVC insertions was randomly chosen. All four hospitals used the same clinical guidelines for CVC insertion [14]. and they all had the same electronic health record system (Melior, Cerner Corporation, North Kansas City, Missouri, USA). One hospital was a university hospital with approximately 1300 beds, and the other three were county hospitals with 200–300 beds each.

Primary outcome measures

Major mechanical complications defined as 1) bleeding grade 3–4 (bleeding/haemothorax requiring invasive intervention or blood transfusion, and bleeding with life-threatening consequences), 2) persistent nerve injury (clinical signs existing > 72 h), 3) cardiac arrhythmia grade 3–4 (symptomatic arrhythmia requiring urgent medical intervention, and arrhythmia with life-threatening consequences), 4) pneumothorax, and 5) arterial catheterisation [26].

Predefined variables

The following predefined variables [26] with possible association with mechanical complications were analysed: patient age, gender, body mass index (BMI) and coagulopathy (prothrombin time international normalised ratio > 1.8, activated partial thromboplastin time > 1.3 × normal value (> 43 s), or platelet count < 50 × 109/L), use of invasive positive pressure ventilation, insertion at night (21:00 to 07:00), vascular insertion site (internal jugular vein dexter (dx)/sinister (sin), external jugular vein dx/sin, subclavian vein dx/sin or femoral vein dx/sin), operator gender and experience (number of individual CVC insertions per vascular insertion site prior to study start), ultrasound guidance, catheter bore size (< 9 or ≥ 9 Fr), and number of skin punctures (1 or > 1). All variables were selected based on clinical experience/importance in combination with results from previous studies [35, 27].

Data sources

Previously unpublished data from the CVC-MECH database (Microsoft Excel v. 2013; Microsoft, Redmond, Washington, USA) were used in the present study and all available patients in the database were included. All data were prospectively collected as described in detail in the Methods section of the main study [8, 26]. The manual review of the patient’s electronic health record included text records after the CVC insertion date along with evaluations of postprocedural chest X-rays to identify every mechanical complication that occurred within 24 h after CVC insertion. Furthermore, data regarding previous CVC insertion experience and gender were collected for each operator.

Statistical methods

Normally distributed data were defined after comparing histograms with the normal distribution curve and median compared with mean and are reported with mean ± standard deviation (SD). Binary and categorical variables are reported as numbers and proportions in percentages. Independent t-test was used when comparing the means of the continuous normally distributed variables ‘patient BMI’ and ‘patient age’. For all other comparisons the χ2 test was used. The comparison of the following dichotomised variables between operator genders was based on results from previous studies [1, 3, 4, 8, 2731]: patient BMI < 20 kg / m2, limited operator experience, catheter bore size ≥ 9 Fr., and number of skin punctures (dichotomised to 1 vs > 1). Multivariable logistic regression was used to determine if the association between male operator gender and major mechanical complications remained after adjusting for other relevant independent variables. The number of variables to be included in the multivariable analysis was adapted to the number of major mechanical complications, with a requirement of at least eight events per variable. The inclusion of variables was based on the results from the univariate analyses. As all the defined major mechanical complications only can occur for jugular and subclavian vein catheterisations, femoral vein catheterisations were excluded in the multivariable logistic regression analysis. Results are reported as the odds ratio (OR) with 95% confidence interval (CI). All analyses were performed with SPSS Statistics 28.0.0.0 or 29.0.1.1 (IBM SPSS, Version 28.0 or 29.0. Armonk, NY: IBM Corp). A P-value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

The flow chart in Fig. 1 describes the details of the patient inclusion/exclusion process. A total of 8 586 patients were included. The CVC insertions were performed by 281 individual operators. Patient baseline data, central venous catheter insertion characteristics and operator characteristics are reported in Table 1.
Table 1
Patient baseline data, central venous catheter insertion characteristics and operator characteristics
Characteristics
Values, n (%) for all variables except Age and BMI, reported with mean (SD)
Patients
8 586 (100)
 Female sex
3 535 (41)
 Age (yr)
66 (16)
 BMI
27 (6.0)
 BMI <20
659 (7.7)
     Missing
260 (3.0)
 Coagulopathya
1 190 (14)
 Positive pressure ventilation
4 844 (56)
 CVC insertions
8 586 (100)
Insertion technique
 Ultrasound-guided
8 072 (94)
 Landmark
230 (2.7)
 Change over guidewire
22 (0.3)
     Missing
262 (3.1)
 Insertion at nightb
1 232 (14)
 Catheter bore size ≥9 Fr
1 387 (16)
     Missing
648 (7.5)
 Internal jugular vein
7 079 (82)
 Subclavian veinc
1 134 (13)
 Femoral vein
112 (1.3)
 External jugular vein
64 (0.7)
     Missing
197 (2.3)
 >1 skin puncture
1 268 (15)
     Missing
301 (3.5)
Individual operators
281 (100)
 Female
108 (38)
Operator gender per CVC insertion
 Female
3 053 (36)
 Male
5149 (60)
 Missing
384 (4.5)
Operator experience per CVC insertion
 Internal jugular vein
7 079 (100)
     <100
1150 (16)
     ≥100
5698 (80)
     Missing
231 (3.3)
 Subclavian vein
1 134 (100)
     <100
503 (44)
     ≥100
616 (54)
     Missing
15 (1.3)
 Femoral vein
112 (100)
     <100
86 (77)
     ≥100
19 (17)
     Missing
7 (6)
aProthrombin time international normalised ratio > 1.8, activated partial thromboplastin time > 1.3 × normal value (> 43 s), or platelet count < 50 × 109/L
bCatheter insertion between 21:00 and 07:00
cSubclavian/axillary vein
The distribution of major mechanical complications with regards to operator gender is reported in Table 2. In summary, the incidence (95% CI) of major mechanical complications was 0.8% (0.6 – 1.1) for male operators and 0.4% (0.2 – 0.6) for female operators (P = .02). The distribution of predefined variables between operator genders is reported in Table 3. In summary, female operators were less experienced (P < .001), more often used ultrasound guidance (P < .001) and had more patients with invasive positive pressure ventilation (P < .001) compared to male operators. The choice of insertion site also differed, with more female operators choosing the internal jugular vein (P < .001) and more male operators choosing the subclavian vein (P < .001). Insertion of large-bore catheters was more common among male operators (P < .001).
Table 2
Distribution of major mechanical complications between male and female operators
Major mechanical complications
Male operator, n = 5 149a
Female operator, n = 3 053a
P-value
Bleeding grade 3–4b, n (%)
7 (0.14)
2 (0.07)
.56
Cardiac arrhythmia grade 3–4c, n (%)
8 (0.16)
1 (0.03)
.20
Arterial catheterisation, n (%)
10 (0.19)
5 (0.16)
.96
Pneumothorax, n (%)
15 (0.29)
2 (0.07)
.06
Persistent nerve injuryd, n (%)
0 (0)
1 (0.03)
.79
Total, n (%)
40 (0.78)
11 (0.36)
.02
aMissing data for operator gender, n = 384 (4.5%). No insertion with a major mechanical complication had missing data on operator gender
bBleeding/haemothorax requiring invasive intervention or blood transfusion and bleeding with life-threatening consequences
cSymptomatic arrhythmia requiring urgent medical intervention and arrhythmia with life-threatening consequences
dNerve injury with clinical signs persisting > 72 h
Table 3
Distribution of predefined variables between male and female operators
Predefined variables
Male operator, n = 5 149a
Female operator, n = 3 053a
P-value
Patient BMI, mean (SD)
27 (6.0)
27 (5.8)
.46
BMI < 20, n (%)
399 (7.8)
227 (7.5)
.61
Patient age, mean (SD)
66 (15)
66 (16)
.06
Coagulopathyb, n (%)
727 (14)
418 (14)
.59
Positive pressure ventilation, n (%)
2931 (57)
1861 (61)
 < .001
Limited operator experiencec, n (%)
866 (17)
873 (29)
 < .001
 > 1 skin puncture, n (%)
753 (15)
479 (16)
.19
Ultrasound-guided, n (%)
4909 (95)
2999 (98)
 < .001
Insertion at nightd, n (%)
637 (12)
398 (13)
.38
Catheter bore size ≥ 9 Fr, n (%)
914 (18)
439 (14)
 < .001
Internal jugular vein, n (%)
4158 (81)
2743 (90)
 < .001
Subclavian vein, n (%)
864 (17)
258 (8.5)
 < .001
Femoral vein, n (%)
68 (1.3)
37 (1.2)
.67
aMissing data for operator gender, n = 384 (4.5%)
bProthrombin time international normalised ratio > 1.8, activated partial thromboplastin time > 1.3 × normal value (> 43 s), or platelet count < 50 × 109/L
c< 100 or ≥ 100 individual central line insertions in the chosen vein
dCatheter insertion between 21:00 and 07:00
The result from the multivariable logistic regression analysis for major mechanical complication is reported in Table 4. As only a small number of CVC insertions were associated with a major mechanical complication, all predefined variables could not be corrected for. Only the variables that were distributed differently between male and female operators were included, except catheter bore size, which was excluded due to the highest occurrence of missing data. The results showed that male operator gender (OR 2.67 [95% CI: 1.26–5.64]; P = .01) and limited operator experience (OR 2.72 [95% CI: 1.44–5.14]; P = .002) were independently associated with a higher risk of major mechanical complication.
Table 4
Multivariable logistic regression analysis for major mechanical complication
Major mechanical complication (n = 45)
Odds ratio
95% CI
P-value
Male operator gender
2.67
1.26–5.64
.01
Subclavian vein catheterisation
1.37
0.67–2.81
.39
Limited operator experience (< 100)
2.72
1.44–5.14
.002
Ultrasound guidance
0.88
0.20–3.79
.86
Positive pressure ventilation
0.64
0.35–1.17
.15
Observations 8 097

Discussion

This subgroup analysis of a prospective multicentre observational cohort study, including 8 586 patients, investigated operator gender aspects of major mechanical complications after central line insertions and showed that female operators, despite being less experienced, had a lower rate of major mechanical complications compared to male operators. In addition, multivariable logistic regression analysis for major mechanical complication showed that male operator gender was independently associated with a higher risk of major mechanical complication.
Previous data indicate that operator training and experience are critical for successful cannulation and low complication rates [2, 25, 29, 3234]. This was confirmed in the previous study on the same cohort where limited operator experience was independently associated with a higher risk of both minor and major mechanical complications [8]. Interestingly, the present subgroup analysis shows that female operators not only had a lower incidence of major mechanical complications than male operators but also were less experienced, a finding that calls for further investigation of explanatory factors.
Differences in patient outcome in relation to caring physician gender have been described in other areas of the medical field. In a recent study by Blohm et al. female surgeons were found to have more favourable outcomes than male surgeons in cholecystectomies [35] which is in line with the results from a study by Wallis et al. showing that patients treated by female surgeons had a lower 30-day mortality than patients treated by male surgeons [36]. Similar findings have also been described in the field of internal medicine, were a study by Tsugawa et al. showed lower mortality and readmission rates for patients treated by female internists compared with those treated by male internists [37].
Gender differences in risk behaviour and in willingness to call for help may partly explain these findings [38, 39]. Another possible factor to consider is adherence to clinical guidelines, which Baumhäkel et al. have shown to differ depending on physicians’ and patients’ gender [40]. The reason behind these differences needs further investigation.
Ultrasound guidance for central venous access reduces the number of mechanical complications [1219, 22, 23, 41, 42]. This study showed that female operators used ultrasound guidance to a higher degree than male operators, which could be seen as an explanation for their lower rate of major mechanical complications. However, adjusting for ultrasound guidance in the multivariable logistic regression analysis did not affect the association between male operator gender and higher risk of major mechanical complication.
Female operators had more patients with invasive positive pressure ventilation compared to male operators, but this did not seem to affect the complication rates in this study. In contrast, a retrospective study by Heidemann et al. on mechanical complications following CVC insertion, revealed that complications were more common in patients with positive pressure ventilation [27]. However, in a recent randomised clinical trial by Czarnic et al. comparing ultrasound-guided catheterisation of the axillary vein with the internal jugular vein in mechanically ventilated patients, no correlation was found between positive end-expiratory pressure or peak inspiratory pressure and success rate. Additionally, the incidence of mechanical complications was low [43].
Differences were also found in the operators’ choice of vascular insertion site. Female operators chose the internal jugular vein to a larger extent, whereas male operators chose the subclavian vein to a larger extent. Several previous studies have shown that catheterisation of the subclavian vein is associated with a higher risk of pneumothorax [2, 3, 7, 8, 26, 32], which could explain the higher rate of major mechanical complications for male operators. However, adjusting for subclavian vein catheterisation in the multivariable logistic regression analysis did not affect the association between male operator gender and higher risk of major mechanical complication.
Previous studies have shown an association between larger bore size catheters and mechanical complications, although mostly in the form of minor bleedings [1, 8, 30]. In this study, male operators were observed to more frequently insert catheters with a bore size ≥ 9 Fr. However, this difference is unlikely to account for their higher rate of major mechanical complications as there was no association between insertion of large bore size catheters and major mechanical complications in the main study on the same cohort [8].

Limitations

This study has several limitations. First, the study is observational, and the difference in the incidence of major mechanical complications between male and female operators should be confirmed in future studies. Second, the study relies on a strong tradition at the participating hospitals to document every CVC insertion in the medical records, yet some CVC insertions with associated major mechanical complications may not have been recorded. Third, although the predefined variables in the study protocol [26] as well as in the multivariate analysis were selected very carefully, unmeasured confounders may remain. Fourth, considering that the results are hypothesis generating, no correction for multiple testing was undertaken and the results should therefore be interpreted with caution. This concern is partly addressed by the multivariable logistic regression analysis. However, it should be observed that the logistic regression model is susceptible to overfitting due to the limited number of outcomes, further underscoring the need for continued cautious interpretation of the results. Finally, the overall use of ultrasound guidance in this study was very high (95% and 98% for male and female operators, respectively), which makes the results difficult to apply in hospitals where ultrasound guidance is scarce.

Conclusions

This observational study showed that female operators, despite being less experienced, had a lower incidence of major mechanical complications after CVC insertion than male operators. As proposed in the hypothesis, differences in the distribution of predefined variables between operator genders were identified. However, these differences did not seem to explain the differences in complications rates between male and female operators. When adjusting for the majority of the variables that were distributed differently between the genders in a multivariable analysis, the significant association between male operator gender and a higher risk of major mechanical complication remained. Future studies are needed to confirm or reject this, as well as to gain better understanding of any underlying causes.

Acknowledgements

Not applicable.

Declarations

This study was approved by the Regional Ethical Review Authority, Lund, Sweden (protocol number 2018/295). As the study was observational and did not imply an increased risk for the included patients, the Regional Ethical Review Authority, Lund, Sweden waived the requirement for written informed consent. An opt-out was offered to all participants by information sheets and advertisements at the study sites. The manuscript was prepared according to the STROBE guidelines for observational studies [44].
Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://​creativecommons.​org/​licenses/​by/​4.​0/​. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://​creativecommons.​org/​publicdomain/​zero/​1.​0/​) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Polderman KH, Girbes AJ. Central venous catheter use. Part 1: mechanical complications. Intensive Care Med. 2002;28:1–17.PubMedCrossRef Polderman KH, Girbes AJ. Central venous catheter use. Part 1: mechanical complications. Intensive Care Med. 2002;28:1–17.PubMedCrossRef
2.
Zurück zum Zitat McGee DC, Gould MK. Preventing complications of central venous catheterization. N Engl J Med. 2003;348:1123–33.PubMedCrossRef McGee DC, Gould MK. Preventing complications of central venous catheterization. N Engl J Med. 2003;348:1123–33.PubMedCrossRef
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Bjorkander M, Bentzer P, Schott U, Broman ME, Kander T. Mechanical complications of central venous catheter insertions: A retrospective multicenter study of incidence and risks. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2019;63:61–8.PubMedCrossRef Bjorkander M, Bentzer P, Schott U, Broman ME, Kander T. Mechanical complications of central venous catheter insertions: A retrospective multicenter study of incidence and risks. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2019;63:61–8.PubMedCrossRef
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Schummer W, Schummer C, Rose N, Niesen WD, Sakka SG. Mechanical complications and malpositions of central venous cannulations by experienced operators. A prospective study of 1794 catheterizations in critically ill patients. Intensive Care Med. 2007;33:1055–9.PubMedCrossRef Schummer W, Schummer C, Rose N, Niesen WD, Sakka SG. Mechanical complications and malpositions of central venous cannulations by experienced operators. A prospective study of 1794 catheterizations in critically ill patients. Intensive Care Med. 2007;33:1055–9.PubMedCrossRef
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Calvache J-A, Rodríguez M-V, Trochez A, Klimek M, Stolker R-J, Lesaffre E. Incidence of mechanical complications of central venous catheterization using landmark technique: do not try more than 3 times. J Intensive Care Med. 2016;31:397–402.PubMedCrossRef Calvache J-A, Rodríguez M-V, Trochez A, Klimek M, Stolker R-J, Lesaffre E. Incidence of mechanical complications of central venous catheterization using landmark technique: do not try more than 3 times. J Intensive Care Med. 2016;31:397–402.PubMedCrossRef
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Lathey RK, Jackson RE, Bodenham A, Harper D, Patle V, Anaesthetic A. Research Matrix of Y A multicentre snapshot study of the incidence of serious procedural complications secondary to central venous catheterisation. Anaesthesia. 2017;72:328–34.PubMedCrossRef Lathey RK, Jackson RE, Bodenham A, Harper D, Patle V, Anaesthetic A. Research Matrix of Y A multicentre snapshot study of the incidence of serious procedural complications secondary to central venous catheterisation. Anaesthesia. 2017;72:328–34.PubMedCrossRef
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Parienti JJ, Mongardon N, Megarbane B, Mira JP, Kalfon P, Gros A, et al. Intravascular Complications of Central Venous Catheterization by Insertion Site. N Engl J Med. 2015;373:1220–9.PubMedCrossRef Parienti JJ, Mongardon N, Megarbane B, Mira JP, Kalfon P, Gros A, et al. Intravascular Complications of Central Venous Catheterization by Insertion Site. N Engl J Med. 2015;373:1220–9.PubMedCrossRef
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Adrian M, Borgquist O, Kroger T, Linne E, Bentzer P, Spangfors M, et al. Mechanical complications after central venous catheterisation in the ultrasound-guided era: a prospective multicentre cohort study. Br J Anaesth. 2022;129:843–50.PubMedCrossRef Adrian M, Borgquist O, Kroger T, Linne E, Bentzer P, Spangfors M, et al. Mechanical complications after central venous catheterisation in the ultrasound-guided era: a prospective multicentre cohort study. Br J Anaesth. 2022;129:843–50.PubMedCrossRef
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Bell J, Goyal M, Long S, Kumar A, Friedrich J, Garfinkel J, et al. Anatomic Site-Specific Complication Rates for Central Venous Catheter Insertions. J Intensive Care Med. 2020;35:869–74.PubMedCrossRef Bell J, Goyal M, Long S, Kumar A, Friedrich J, Garfinkel J, et al. Anatomic Site-Specific Complication Rates for Central Venous Catheter Insertions. J Intensive Care Med. 2020;35:869–74.PubMedCrossRef
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Ingefors S, Adrian M, Heckley G, Borgquist O, Kander T. Major immediate insertion-related complications after central venous catheterisation and associations with mortality, length of hospital stay, and costs: A prospective observational study. J Vasc Access. 2024;11297298231222929. Ingefors S, Adrian M, Heckley G, Borgquist O, Kander T. Major immediate insertion-related complications after central venous catheterisation and associations with mortality, length of hospital stay, and costs: A prospective observational study. J Vasc Access. 2024;11297298231222929.
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Lamperti M, Bodenham AR, Pittiruti M, Blaivas M, Augoustides JG, Elbarbary M, et al. International evidence-based recommendations on ultrasound-guided vascular access. Intensive Care Med. 2012;38:1105–17.PubMedCrossRef Lamperti M, Bodenham AR, Pittiruti M, Blaivas M, Augoustides JG, Elbarbary M, et al. International evidence-based recommendations on ultrasound-guided vascular access. Intensive Care Med. 2012;38:1105–17.PubMedCrossRef
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Lamperti M, Biasucci DG, Disma N, Pittiruti M, Breschan C, Vailati D, et al. European Society of Anaesthesiology guidelines on peri-operative use of ultrasound-guided for vascular access (PERSEUS vascular access). Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2020;37:344–76.PubMedCrossRef Lamperti M, Biasucci DG, Disma N, Pittiruti M, Breschan C, Vailati D, et al. European Society of Anaesthesiology guidelines on peri-operative use of ultrasound-guided for vascular access (PERSEUS vascular access). Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2020;37:344–76.PubMedCrossRef
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Frykholm P, Pikwer A, Hammarskjold F, Larsson AT, Lindgren S, Lindwall R, et al. Clinical guidelines on central venous catheterisation Swedish Society of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2014;58:508–24.PubMedCrossRef Frykholm P, Pikwer A, Hammarskjold F, Larsson AT, Lindgren S, Lindwall R, et al. Clinical guidelines on central venous catheterisation Swedish Society of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2014;58:508–24.PubMedCrossRef
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Brass P, Hellmich M, Kolodziej L, Schick G, Smith AF. Ultrasound guidance versus anatomical landmarks for internal jugular vein catheterization. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015;1:CD006962. Brass P, Hellmich M, Kolodziej L, Schick G, Smith AF. Ultrasound guidance versus anatomical landmarks for internal jugular vein catheterization. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015;1:CD006962.
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Sobolev M, Shiloh AL, Di Biase L, Slovut DP. Ultrasound-guided cannulation of the femoral vein in electrophysiological procedures: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Europace. 2017;19:850–5.PubMed Sobolev M, Shiloh AL, Di Biase L, Slovut DP. Ultrasound-guided cannulation of the femoral vein in electrophysiological procedures: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Europace. 2017;19:850–5.PubMed
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Rupp SM, Apfelbaum JL, Blitt C, Caplan RA, Connis RT, Domino KB, et al. Practice guidelines for central venous access: a report by the American Society of Anesthesiologists Task Force on Central Venous Access. Anesthesiology. 2012;116:539–73.PubMedCrossRef Rupp SM, Apfelbaum JL, Blitt C, Caplan RA, Connis RT, Domino KB, et al. Practice guidelines for central venous access: a report by the American Society of Anesthesiologists Task Force on Central Venous Access. Anesthesiology. 2012;116:539–73.PubMedCrossRef
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Practice Guidelines for Central Venous Access. An Updated Report by the American Society of Anesthesiologists Task Force on Central Venous Access. Anesthesiology. 2020;2020(132):8–43. Practice Guidelines for Central Venous Access. An Updated Report by the American Society of Anesthesiologists Task Force on Central Venous Access. Anesthesiology. 2020;2020(132):8–43.
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Bodenham Chair A, Babu S, Bennett J, Binks R, Fee P, Fox B, et al. Association of Anaesthetists of Great Britain and Ireland: Safe vascular access 2016. Anaesthesia. 2016;71:573–85.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Bodenham Chair A, Babu S, Bennett J, Binks R, Fee P, Fox B, et al. Association of Anaesthetists of Great Britain and Ireland: Safe vascular access 2016. Anaesthesia. 2016;71:573–85.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Zawadka M, La Via L, Wong A, Olusanya O, Muscarà L, Continella C, et al. Real-Time Ultrasound Guidance as Compared With Landmark Technique for Subclavian Central Venous Cannulation: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis With Trial Sequential Analysis. Crit Care Med. 2023;51:642–52.PubMedCrossRef Zawadka M, La Via L, Wong A, Olusanya O, Muscarà L, Continella C, et al. Real-Time Ultrasound Guidance as Compared With Landmark Technique for Subclavian Central Venous Cannulation: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis With Trial Sequential Analysis. Crit Care Med. 2023;51:642–52.PubMedCrossRef
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Subramony R, Spann R, Medak A, Campbell C. Ultrasound-Guided vs Landmark Method for Subclavian Vein Catheterization in an Academic Emergency Department. J Emerg Med. 2022;62:760–8.PubMedCrossRef Subramony R, Spann R, Medak A, Campbell C. Ultrasound-Guided vs Landmark Method for Subclavian Vein Catheterization in an Academic Emergency Department. J Emerg Med. 2022;62:760–8.PubMedCrossRef
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Timsit JF, Baleine J, Bernard L, Calvino-Gunther S, Darmon M, Dellamonica J, et al. Expert consensus-based clinical practice guidelines management of intravascular catheters in the intensive care unit. Ann Intensive Care. 2020;10:118.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Timsit JF, Baleine J, Bernard L, Calvino-Gunther S, Darmon M, Dellamonica J, et al. Expert consensus-based clinical practice guidelines management of intravascular catheters in the intensive care unit. Ann Intensive Care. 2020;10:118.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Leibowitz A, Oren-Grinberg A, Matyal R. Ultrasound Guidance for Central Venous Access: Current Evidence and Clinical Recommendations. J Intensive Care Med. 2020;35:303–21.PubMedCrossRef Leibowitz A, Oren-Grinberg A, Matyal R. Ultrasound Guidance for Central Venous Access: Current Evidence and Clinical Recommendations. J Intensive Care Med. 2020;35:303–21.PubMedCrossRef
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Theodoro D, Krauss M, Kollef M, Evanoff B. Risk factors for acute adverse events during ultrasound-guided central venous cannulation in the emergency department. Acad Emerg Med. 2010;17:1055–61.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Theodoro D, Krauss M, Kollef M, Evanoff B. Risk factors for acute adverse events during ultrasound-guided central venous cannulation in the emergency department. Acad Emerg Med. 2010;17:1055–61.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Walsh EC, Fitzsimons MG. Preventing mechanical complications associated with central venous catheter placement. BJA Educ. 2023;23:229–37.PubMedCrossRef Walsh EC, Fitzsimons MG. Preventing mechanical complications associated with central venous catheter placement. BJA Educ. 2023;23:229–37.PubMedCrossRef
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Adrian M, Borgquist O, Bentzer P, Akeson J, Spangfors M, Wrigstad J, et al. Research protocol for mechanical complications after central venous catheterisation: a prospective controlled multicentre observational study to determine incidence and risk factors of mechanical complications within 24 hours after cannulation. BMJ Open. 2019;9: e029301.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Adrian M, Borgquist O, Bentzer P, Akeson J, Spangfors M, Wrigstad J, et al. Research protocol for mechanical complications after central venous catheterisation: a prospective controlled multicentre observational study to determine incidence and risk factors of mechanical complications within 24 hours after cannulation. BMJ Open. 2019;9: e029301.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Heidemann L, Nathani N, Sagana R, Chopra V, Heung M. A Contemporary Assessment of Mechanical Complication Rates and Trainee Perceptions of Central Venous Catheter Insertion. J Hosp Med. 2017;12:646–51.PubMedCrossRef Heidemann L, Nathani N, Sagana R, Chopra V, Heung M. A Contemporary Assessment of Mechanical Complication Rates and Trainee Perceptions of Central Venous Catheter Insertion. J Hosp Med. 2017;12:646–51.PubMedCrossRef
28.
Zurück zum Zitat Ives C, Moe D, Inaba K, Castelo Branco B, Lam L, Talving P, et al. Ten years of mechanical complications of central venous catheterization in trauma patients. Am Surg. 2012;78:545–9.PubMedCrossRef Ives C, Moe D, Inaba K, Castelo Branco B, Lam L, Talving P, et al. Ten years of mechanical complications of central venous catheterization in trauma patients. Am Surg. 2012;78:545–9.PubMedCrossRef
29.
30.
Zurück zum Zitat Kander T, Frigyesi A, Kjeldsen-Kragh J, Karlsson H, Rolander F, Schött U. Bleeding complications after central line insertions: relevance of pre-procedure coagulation tests and institutional transfusion policy. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2013;57:573–9.PubMedCrossRef Kander T, Frigyesi A, Kjeldsen-Kragh J, Karlsson H, Rolander F, Schött U. Bleeding complications after central line insertions: relevance of pre-procedure coagulation tests and institutional transfusion policy. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2013;57:573–9.PubMedCrossRef
31.
Zurück zum Zitat Lennon M, Zaw NN, Pöpping DM, Wenk M. Procedural complications of central venous catheter insertion. Minerva Anestesiol. 2012;78:1234–40.PubMed Lennon M, Zaw NN, Pöpping DM, Wenk M. Procedural complications of central venous catheter insertion. Minerva Anestesiol. 2012;78:1234–40.PubMed
32.
Zurück zum Zitat Kusminsky RE. Complications of central venous catheterization. J Am Coll Surg. 2007;204:681–96.PubMedCrossRef Kusminsky RE. Complications of central venous catheterization. J Am Coll Surg. 2007;204:681–96.PubMedCrossRef
33.
Zurück zum Zitat Jagneaux T, Caffery TS, Musso MW, Long AC, Zatarain L, Stopa E, et al. Simulation-Based Education Enhances Patient Safety Behaviors During Central Venous Catheter Placement. J Patient Saf. 2021;17:425–9.PubMedCrossRef Jagneaux T, Caffery TS, Musso MW, Long AC, Zatarain L, Stopa E, et al. Simulation-Based Education Enhances Patient Safety Behaviors During Central Venous Catheter Placement. J Patient Saf. 2021;17:425–9.PubMedCrossRef
34.
Zurück zum Zitat Schulz J, Scholler A, Frank P, Scheinichen D, Flentje M, Eismann H. Palmaers T [Complications and success rates of subclavian vein catheterization depending on experience]. Anaesthesist. 2021;70:291–7.PubMedCrossRef Schulz J, Scholler A, Frank P, Scheinichen D, Flentje M, Eismann H. Palmaers T [Complications and success rates of subclavian vein catheterization depending on experience]. Anaesthesist. 2021;70:291–7.PubMedCrossRef
35.
Zurück zum Zitat Blohm M, Sandblom G, Enochsson L, Österberg J. Differences in Cholecystectomy Outcomes and Operating Time Between Male and Female Surgeons in Sweden. JAMA Surg. 2023;158:1168–75.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Blohm M, Sandblom G, Enochsson L, Österberg J. Differences in Cholecystectomy Outcomes and Operating Time Between Male and Female Surgeons in Sweden. JAMA Surg. 2023;158:1168–75.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
36.
Zurück zum Zitat Wallis CJ, Ravi B, Coburn N, Nam RK, Detsky AS, Satkunasivam R. Comparison of postoperative outcomes among patients treated by male and female surgeons: a population based matched cohort study. BMJ. 2017;359: j4366.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Wallis CJ, Ravi B, Coburn N, Nam RK, Detsky AS, Satkunasivam R. Comparison of postoperative outcomes among patients treated by male and female surgeons: a population based matched cohort study. BMJ. 2017;359: j4366.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
37.
Zurück zum Zitat Tsugawa Y, Jena AB, Figueroa JF, Orav EJ, Blumenthal DM, Jha AK. Comparison of Hospital Mortality and Readmission Rates for Medicare Patients Treated by Male vs Female Physicians. JAMA Intern Med. 2017;177:206–13.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Tsugawa Y, Jena AB, Figueroa JF, Orav EJ, Blumenthal DM, Jha AK. Comparison of Hospital Mortality and Readmission Rates for Medicare Patients Treated by Male vs Female Physicians. JAMA Intern Med. 2017;177:206–13.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
38.
Zurück zum Zitat Byrnes JP, Miller DC, Schafer WD. Gender differences in risk taking: A meta-analysis. Psychol Bull. 1999;125:367.CrossRef Byrnes JP, Miller DC, Schafer WD. Gender differences in risk taking: A meta-analysis. Psychol Bull. 1999;125:367.CrossRef
39.
Zurück zum Zitat Harris CR, Jenkins M. Gender differences in risk assessment: why do women take fewer risks than men? Judgm Decis Mak. 2006;1:48–63.CrossRef Harris CR, Jenkins M. Gender differences in risk assessment: why do women take fewer risks than men? Judgm Decis Mak. 2006;1:48–63.CrossRef
40.
Zurück zum Zitat Baumhakel M, Muller U, Bohm M. Influence of gender of physicians and patients on guideline-recommended treatment of chronic heart failure in a cross-sectional study. Eur J Heart Fail. 2009;11:299–303.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Baumhakel M, Muller U, Bohm M. Influence of gender of physicians and patients on guideline-recommended treatment of chronic heart failure in a cross-sectional study. Eur J Heart Fail. 2009;11:299–303.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
41.
Zurück zum Zitat Sidoti A, Brogi E, Biancofiore G, Casagli S, Guarracino F, Malacarne P, et al. Ultrasound- versus landmark-guided subclavian vein catheterization: a prospective observational study from a tertiary referral hospital. Sci Rep. 2019;9:12248.ADSPubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Sidoti A, Brogi E, Biancofiore G, Casagli S, Guarracino F, Malacarne P, et al. Ultrasound- versus landmark-guided subclavian vein catheterization: a prospective observational study from a tertiary referral hospital. Sci Rep. 2019;9:12248.ADSPubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
42.
Zurück zum Zitat Schmidt GA, Blaivas M, Conrad SA, Corradi F, Koenig S, Lamperti M, et al. Ultrasound-guided vascular access in critical illness. Intensive Care Med. 2019;45:434–46.PubMedCrossRef Schmidt GA, Blaivas M, Conrad SA, Corradi F, Koenig S, Lamperti M, et al. Ultrasound-guided vascular access in critical illness. Intensive Care Med. 2019;45:434–46.PubMedCrossRef
43.
Zurück zum Zitat Czarnik T, Czuczwar M, Borys M, Chrzan O, Filipiak K, Maj M, et al. Ultrasound-Guided Infraclavicular Axillary Vein Versus Internal Jugular Vein Cannulation in Critically Ill Mechanically Ventilated Patients: A Randomized Trial. Crit Care Med. 2023;51:e37–44.PubMedCrossRef Czarnik T, Czuczwar M, Borys M, Chrzan O, Filipiak K, Maj M, et al. Ultrasound-Guided Infraclavicular Axillary Vein Versus Internal Jugular Vein Cannulation in Critically Ill Mechanically Ventilated Patients: A Randomized Trial. Crit Care Med. 2023;51:e37–44.PubMedCrossRef
44.
Zurück zum Zitat von Elm E, Altman DG, Egger M, Pocock SJ, Gøtzsche PC, Vandenbroucke JP. The Strengthening the Reporting of aObservational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies. Lancet. 2007;370:1453–7.CrossRef von Elm E, Altman DG, Egger M, Pocock SJ, Gøtzsche PC, Vandenbroucke JP. The Strengthening the Reporting of aObservational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies. Lancet. 2007;370:1453–7.CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Operator gender differences in major mechanical complications after central line insertions: a subgroup analysis of a prospective multicentre cohort study
verfasst von
Leila Naddi
Janna Hübinette
Thomas Kander
Ola Borgquist
Maria Adrian
Publikationsdatum
01.12.2024
Verlag
BioMed Central
Erschienen in
BMC Anesthesiology / Ausgabe 1/2024
Elektronische ISSN: 1471-2253
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12871-024-02455-3

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 1/2024

BMC Anesthesiology 1/2024 Zur Ausgabe

Blutdrucksenkung schon im Rettungswagen bei akutem Schlaganfall?

31.05.2024 Apoplex Nachrichten

Der optimale Ansatz für die Blutdruckkontrolle bei Patientinnen und Patienten mit akutem Schlaganfall ist noch nicht gefunden. Ob sich eine frühzeitige Therapie der Hypertonie noch während des Transports in die Klinik lohnt, hat jetzt eine Studie aus China untersucht.

Ähnliche Überlebensraten nach Reanimation während des Transports bzw. vor Ort

29.05.2024 Reanimation im Kindesalter Nachrichten

Laut einer Studie aus den USA und Kanada scheint es bei der Reanimation von Kindern außerhalb einer Klinik keinen Unterschied für das Überleben zu machen, ob die Wiederbelebungsmaßnahmen während des Transports in die Klinik stattfinden oder vor Ort ausgeführt werden. Jedoch gibt es dabei einige Einschränkungen und eine wichtige Ausnahme.

Nicht Creutzfeldt Jakob, sondern Abführtee-Vergiftung

29.05.2024 Hyponatriämie Nachrichten

Eine ältere Frau trinkt regelmäßig Sennesblättertee gegen ihre Verstopfung. Der scheint plötzlich gut zu wirken. Auf Durchfall und Erbrechen folgt allerdings eine Hyponatriämie. Nach deren Korrektur kommt es plötzlich zu progredienten Kognitions- und Verhaltensstörungen.

Häusliche Gewalt in der orthopädischen Notaufnahme oft nicht erkannt

28.05.2024 Häusliche Gewalt Nachrichten

In der Notaufnahme wird die Chance, Opfer von häuslicher Gewalt zu identifizieren, von Orthopäden und Orthopädinnen offenbar zu wenig genutzt. Darauf deuten die Ergebnisse einer Fragebogenstudie an der Sahlgrenska-Universität in Schweden hin.

Update AINS

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.