Congenital intrathoracic accessory spleen is a very rare trick of nature: a case report

The presence of splenic tissue in the thoracic cavity can be acquired or congenital. Acquired intrathoracic spleen (splenosis) commonly occurs following splenic and/or diaphragmatic injury that results in the seeding of splenic tissue in the chest [1]. In contrast, congenital intrathoracic accessory spleen (CIAS) is the presence of splenic tissue within the thoracic cavity from birth. CIAS is extremely rare, and only four reports exist in the literature. To our knowledge, no cases have been reported from the United States to date [2, 3].

In clinical practice, CIAS may pose a diagnostic dilemma [3]. Furthermore, in cases of hematologic disorders such as idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura (ITP), a missed splenic tissue such as CIAS may result in relapse [3]. As such, we sought to highlight an interesting case of CIAS, and raise awareness about crucial aspects of its presentation based on a review of the literature.

The patient was a 14-year-old healthy female referred to us after an intrathoracic mass was incidentally discovered in the left hemithorax on a CT scan (Fig. 1) obtained in the setting of a roll-over all-terrain vehicle (ATV) accident. She had no history of previous injuries or hospitalizations. She denied any previous history of symptoms that could be related to the mass, including no shortness of breath or chest pain. Her family history was noncontributory, and physical exam was unremarkable. Contrast enhancement on CT demonstrated an approximately 9.7 × 6.3 cm mass. Blood supply appeared to originate from the left internal mammary artery and the inferior phrenic artery. The left inferior phrenic vein appeared enlarged. Lungs, pleura, esophagus, and chest wall were without abnormalities. No lymphadenopathy was noted. Due to the large size of the mass, and diagnostic uncertainty we recommended resection. Differential included sequestration, malignancy and accessory spleen.

She underwent a left sided video assisted thoracoscopy surgery (VATS). A total of four ports were required -5 mm port in the left 5th intercostal space along the anterior axillary line, 12 mm port in the eighth intercostal space in the mid axillary line on the left (subsequently extended into a 5 cm mini-thoracotomy by dividing the intercostal muscles and latissimus dorsi for retrieval of the specimen), 5 mm port in the third intercostal space in the anterior axillary line, and 5 mm port in the fourth intercostal space in the posterior axillary line. The mass was extra-pleural and in the medial inferior portion of the left thoracic cavity. A LigaSure™ device was used to release the pleural attachments and adhesions along the borders of the mass. Small arterial and venous tributaries were encountered on the anteromedial surface heading towards the internal mammary vessels along the anterior border of the pericardium, as well as, inferomedial arterial vessels headed towards the diaphragm. All vessels were ligated using 5 mm hemoclips and the LigaSure™. Following this, the specimen was dissected fully from the extra-pleural space, the specimen was placed in a specimen bag, partially morcellated and removed through the 12 mm port incision that was extended into a 5 cm mini-thoracotomy by dividing the intercostal muscles and latissimus dorsi. A portion of the sample was sent for frozen section analyses and pathology returned as “Lymphoid and spindle cell lesion, no overt features of malignancy”.

A 20-French chest tube was placed intraoperatively, all port sites were closed, and she was extubated to room air in stable condition. Her hospital course was uneventful. Briefly, chest tube was discontinued on postoperative day (POD) 1, and she was discharged later that day. She was seen again in clinic 2 weeks following discharge and was doing well. Chest X-ray was unremarkable and we arranged for follow up as needed. She continued to do well without concerns 5 months following discharge.

The specimen was sent to pathology for examination and was grossly described as a 169-g, 13 × 9.5 × 5.6 cm aggregate of solid, tan-pink, firm, and fleshy tissue with smooth cut surfaces (Fig. 2). It had a thin, semi-translucent capsule. Histologic examination revealed a lymphoid proliferation with condensation around arteries consistent with splenic white pulp, as well as, intervening stroma and sinusoids consistent with red pulp (Fig. 3). Immunostains performed on the slides showed an admixture of CD3+ T-lymphocytes (including a proportion of CD8+ T-lymphocytes) within the red pulp and CD20 + B-lymphocytes coalescing around the vessels in the white pulp. CD163 highlighted sinusoidal lining cells (Fig. 4). Flow cytometry was also performed on the specimen and revealed an admixture of T-lymphocytes and B-lymphocytes; no aberrant population was identified.

There are only four reports of CIAS to date. Patient characteristics in these cases included: age range of 7 months to 62 years, sex ratio of 3 females to 1 male, and laterality ratio of 3 left sided to 1 right sided chest mass (Table 1). Symptoms at the time of diagnosis included chest pain, shortness of breath, and cough [2].

Similar to extralobar sequestration, blood supply to CIAS is often extrapulmonary with reports of intercostal vessels, and abdominal mesenchymal vessels being the most common [4]. Sequestration and malignancy were the leading differential diagnoses [2, 4]. As such, CT scan alone may not reliably diagnose CIAS and distinguish it from sequestration [3, 5]. More specific methods of identifying CIAS on imaging include ferumoxide enhanced MRIs, and noninvasive nuclear scintigraphy [3, 5]. Interestingly, in two studies where preoperative biopsies were performed, the pathology was inconclusive [1, 2]. In our case, we performed frozen sections intraoperatively that were also non-diagnostic. In terms of surgical management, all lesions in the left chest were approached with a left incision (VATs or thoracotomy). On the other hand, Balacumaraswami et al. (2002) used a right thoracotomy incision for the right paraspinal splenic mass. All patients were followed up without issue with the longest LOS being 7 days. Our patient was discharged on POD1.

The pathogenesis/embryology of CIAS is unclear [3]. Nonetheless, it is thought to occur between the fifth and seventh weeks of embryologic development secondary to migration of primordial splenic cells into the pleural cavity prior to fusion of pleuroperitoneal fold and esophageal mesentery and septum transversum [1]. This may explain why reports of accessory splenic tissue is almost exclusively on the left [3]. Of note, the only study to date of presumed CIAS to have reported a right sided intrathoracic mass was in a patient whose history was notable for splenectomy at the age of 3 [1]. The presence of the mass in the right paraspinal region may suggest seeding through the hiatus during the splenectomy procedure [3]. CIAS can be differentiated from intrathoracic splenosis as it is almost exclusively a solitary mass that enhances on CT due to its established blood supply. In addition, CIAS are not usually associated with pleural nodules [3, 5].

Taken together, CIAS is a rare and benign presentation which cannot be distinguished from bronchopulmonary sequestration on CT alone. Pediatric thoracic surgeons should consider intrathoracic spleen as a possibility in lesions that have characteristics of sequestration on imaging. Furthermore, biopsies are often equivocal. Resection should be considered if malignancy is suspected, and to decrease the risk of relapse in patients undergoing splenectomy for hematologic disorders [3].