Next Article in Journal
Utilization of Multiple-Criteria Decision Analysis (MCDA) to Support Healthcare Decision-Making FIFARMA, 2016
Previous Article in Journal
Towards a More Transparent HTA Process in Poland: New Polish HTA Methodological Guidelines
 
 
Journal of Market Access & Health Policy (JMAHP) is published by MDPI from Volume 12 Issue 1 (2024). Previous articles were published by another publisher in Open Access under a CC-BY (or CC-BY-NC-ND) licence, and they are hosted by MDPI on mdpi.com as a courtesy and upon agreement with Taylor & Francis.
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Annuity Payments Can Increase Patient Access to Innovative Cell and Gene Therapies under England’s Net Budget Impact Test

by
Jesper Jørgensen
and
Panos Kefalas
*
Cell Therapy Catapult Limited, Guy’s Hospital, 12th Floor Tower Wing, Great Maze Pond, London SE1 9RT, UK
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
J. Mark. Access Health Policy 2017, 5(1), 1355203; https://doi.org/10.1080/20016689.2017.1355203
Submission received: 11 May 2017 / Revised: 1 January 2017 / Accepted: 10 July 2017 / Published: 31 July 2017

Abstract

Background: Cell and gene therapies have the potential to provide therapeutic breakthroughs, but the high costs of researching, developing, manufacturing and delivering them translate into prices that may challenge healthcare budgets. Various measures exist that aim to address the affordability challenge, including reducing price, limiting patient numbers and/or linking remuneration to product performance. Objective: To explore how the net budget impact test recently introduced in England can affect patient access to high-value, one-off cell and gene therapies, and how managed entry agreements can improve access. Methods: We use a hypothetical example where a new high-value, one-off therapy launches in an indication where it displaces a relatively low cost chronic treatment. We calculate the number of patients that can be treated without exceeding the £20 million net budget impact threshold, and compare results for scenarios where a full upfront payment is used, and where annuity-based payments are used. Results: Charging a full upfront payment at the time of treatment can lead to suboptimal patient access. Conclusion: Annuity-based payments in combination with an outcomes-based remuneration scheme reduce consequences of decision uncertainty and can increase patient access, without exceeding the net budget impact test.
Keywords: budget impact; pricing and reimbursement; patient access; managed entry agreement; risk-sharing; high-cost; advanced therapy medicinal product (ATMP); cell therapy; gene therapy budget impact; pricing and reimbursement; patient access; managed entry agreement; risk-sharing; high-cost; advanced therapy medicinal product (ATMP); cell therapy; gene therapy

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Jørgensen, J.; Kefalas, P. Annuity Payments Can Increase Patient Access to Innovative Cell and Gene Therapies under England’s Net Budget Impact Test. J. Mark. Access Health Policy 2017, 5, 1355203. https://doi.org/10.1080/20016689.2017.1355203

AMA Style

Jørgensen J, Kefalas P. Annuity Payments Can Increase Patient Access to Innovative Cell and Gene Therapies under England’s Net Budget Impact Test. Journal of Market Access & Health Policy. 2017; 5(1):1355203. https://doi.org/10.1080/20016689.2017.1355203

Chicago/Turabian Style

Jørgensen, Jesper, and Panos Kefalas. 2017. "Annuity Payments Can Increase Patient Access to Innovative Cell and Gene Therapies under England’s Net Budget Impact Test" Journal of Market Access & Health Policy 5, no. 1: 1355203. https://doi.org/10.1080/20016689.2017.1355203

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop