nach oben

Erschienen in:

22.04.2021 | Research and Reporting Methods

A Consensus-Based Checklist for Reporting of Survey Studies (CROSS)

verfasst von: Akash Sharma, MBBS, Nguyen Tran Minh Duc, MD, Tai Luu Lam Thang, MD, Nguyen Hai Nam, MD, Sze Jia Ng, MD, Kirellos Said Abbas, MBCH, Nguyen Tien Huy, MD, PhD, Ana Marušić, MD, PhD, Christine L. Paul, PhD, Janette Kwok, MBBS, Juntra Karbwang, MD, PhD, Chiara de Waure, MD, MSc, PhD, Frances J. Drummond, PhD, Yoshiyuki Kizawa, MD, PhD, Erik Taal, PhD, Joeri Vermeulen, MSN, CM, Gillian H. M. Lee, PhD, Adam Gyedu, MD, MPH, Kien Gia To, PhD, Martin L. Verra, PhD, Évelyne M. Jacqz-Aigrain, MD, PhD, Wouter K. G. Leclercq, MD, Simo T. Salminen, PhD, Cathy Donald Sherbourne, PhD, Barbara Mintzes, PhD, Sergi Lozano, PhD, Ulrich S. Tran, DSc, Mitsuaki Matsui, MD, MSc, PhD, Mohammad Karamouzian, DVM, MSc, PhD candidate

Erschienen in: Journal of General Internal Medicine | Ausgabe 10/2021

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Excerpt

A survey is a list of questions aiming to extract a set of desired data or opinions from a particular group of people.¹ Surveys can be administered quicker than some other methods of data gathering and facilitate data collection from a large number of participants. Numerous questions can be included in a survey that allow for increased flexibility in evaluation of several research areas, such as analysis of risk factors, treatment outcomes, disease trends, cost-effectiveness of care, and quality of life. Surveys can be conducted by phone, mail, face-to-face, or online using web-based software and applications. Online surveys can help reduce or prevent geographical dependence and increase the validity, reliability, and statistical power of the studies. Moreover, online surveys facilitate rapid survey administration as well as data collection and analysis.² …

Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich

Wikipedia contributors. (2020). Survey (human research). In Wikipedia, The Free Encyclopedia. Retrieved 19:59, December 26, 2020, from https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Survey_(human_research)&oldid=994953597.

Maymone MBC, Venkatesh S, Secemsky E, Reddy K, Vashi NA. Research Techniques Made Simple: Web-Based Survey Research in Dermatology: Conduct and Applications. J Invest Dermatol 2018;138(7):1456-1462. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jid.2018.02.032.CrossRefPubMed

Alcock I, White MP, Pahl S, Duarte-Davidson R, Fleming LE. Associations Between Pro-environmental Behaviour and Neighbourhood Nature, Nature Visit Frequency and Nature Appreciation: Evidence from a Nationally Representative Survey in England, Environ Int 2020;136:105441. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2019.105441.CrossRefPubMed

Siddiqui J, Brown K, Zahid A, Young CJ. Current Practices and Barriers to Referral for Cytoreductive Surgery and HIPEC Among Colorectal Surgeons: a Binational Survey. Eur J Surg Oncol 2020;46(1):166-172. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejso.2019.09.007CrossRefPubMed

Lee JG, Park CH, Chung H, Park JC, Kim DH, Lee BI, Byeon JS, Jung HY. Current Status and Trend in Training for Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection: a Nationwide Survey in Korea. PLoS One 2020;15(5):e0232691. doi: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0232691CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

McChesney SL, Zelhart MD, Green RL, Nichols RL. Current U.S. Pre-Operative Bowel Preparation Trends: a 2018 Survey of the American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons Members. Surg Infect 2020;21(1):1-8. doi: https://doi.org/10.1089/sur.2019.125CrossRef

Núñez A, Manzano CA, Chi C. Health Outcomes, Utilization, and Equity in Chile: an Evolution from 1990 to 2015 and the Effects of the Last Health Reform. Public Health 2020;178:38-48. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.puhe.2019.08.017CrossRefPubMed

Blackwell AKM, Kosīte D, Marteau TM, Munafò MR. Policies for Tobacco and E-Cigarette Use: a Survey of All Higher Education Institutions and NHS Trusts in England. Nicotine Tob Res 2020;22(7):1235-1238. doi: https://doi.org/10.1093/ntr/ntz192CrossRefPubMed

Liu S, Zhu Y, Chen W, Wang L, Zhang X, Zhang Y. Demographic and Socioeconomic Factors Influencing the Incidence of Ankle Fractures, a National Population-Based Survey of 512187 Individuals. Sci Rep 2018;8(1):10443. doi: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-28722-1CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

10.

Tamanini JTN, Pallone LV, Sartori MGF, Girão MJBC, Dos Santos JLF, de Oliveira Duarte YA, van Kerrebroeck PEVA. A Populational-Based Survey on the Prevalence, Incidence, and Risk Factors of Urinary Incontinence in Older Adults-Results from the “SABE STUDY”. Neurourol Urodyn 2018;37(1):466-477. doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/nau.23331CrossRefPubMed

11.

Tink W, Tink JC, Turin TC, Kelly M. Adverse childhood experiences: survey of resident practice, knowledge, and attitude. Fam Med 2017;49(1):7-13PubMed

12.

Shi S, Lio J, Dong H, Jiang I, Cooper B, Sherer R. Evaluation of Geriatrics Education at a Chinese University: a Survey of Attitudes and Knowledge Among Undergraduate Medical Students. Gerontol Geriatr Educ 2020;41(2):242-249. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/02701960.2018.1468324CrossRefPubMed

13.

Bennett, C., Khangura, S., Brehaut, J. C., Graham, I. D., Moher, D., Potter, B. K., & Grimshaw, J. M. (2010). Reporting Guidelines for Survey Research: an Analysis of Published Guidance and Reporting Practices. PLoS Med, 8(8), e1001069. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1001069CrossRefPubMed

14.

Turk T, Elhady MT, Rashed S, Abdelkhalek M, Nasef SA, Khallaf AM, Mohammed AT, Attia AW, Adhikari P, Amin MA, Hirayama K, Huy NT. Quality of Reporting Web-Based and Non-web-based Survey Studies: What Authors, Reviewers and Consumers Should Consider. PLoS One 2018;13(6):e0194239. doi: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0194239CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

15.

Jones, T. L., Baxter, M. A., & Khanduja, V. (2013). A Quick Guide to Survey Research. Ann R Coll Surg Engl, 95(1), 5–7. https://doi.org/10.1308/003588413X13511609956372CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

16.

Jones D, Story D, Clavisi O, Jones R, Peyton P. An Introductory Guide to Survey Research in Anaesthesia. Anaesth Intensive Care 2006;34(2):245-53. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/0310057X0603400219CrossRefPubMed

17.

Alderman AK, Salem B. Survey Research. Plast Reconstr Surg 2010;126(4):1381-9. doi: https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0b013e3181ea44f9CrossRefPubMed

18.

Moher D, Weeks L, Ocampo M, Seely D, Sampson M, Altman DG, Schulz KF, Miller D, Simera I, Grimshaw J, Hoey J. Describing Reporting Guidelines for Health Research: a Systematic Review. J Clin Epidemiol 2011;64(7):718-42. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2010.09.013CrossRefPubMed

19.

Simera, I., Moher, D., Hirst, A. et al. Transparent and Accurate Reporting Increases Reliability, Utility, and Impact of Your Research: Reporting Guidelines and the EQUATOR Network. BMC Med 8, 24 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1186/1741-7015-8-24CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

20.

Moher D, Schulz KF, Simera I, Altman DG. Guidance for Developers of Health Research Reporting Guidelines. PLoS Med 2010;7(2):e1000217. doi: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1000217CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

21.

Tan WK, Wigley J, Shantikumar S. The Reporting Quality of Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses in Vascular Surgery Needs Improvement: a Systematic Review. Int J Surg 2014;12(12):1262-5. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsu.2014.10.015CrossRefPubMed

22.

Grimshaw, J. (2014). SURGE (The SUrvey Reporting GuidelinE). In Guidelines for Reporting Health Research: a User’s Manual (eds D. Moher, D.G. Altman, K.F. Schulz, I. Simera and E. Wager). https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118715598.ch20

23.

Eysenbach G. Improving the Quality of Web Surveys: The Checklist for Reporting Results of Internet E-Surveys (CHERRIES). J Med Internet Res 2004;6(3):e34. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.6.3.e34.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

24.

EquatorNetwork.org. Developing your reporting guideline. 3 July 2018 [cited 12/28/2020]; Available from: https://www.equator-network.org/toolkits/developing-a-reporting-guideline/developing-your-reporting-guideline/.

25.

Li AH, Thomas SM, Farag A, Duffett M, Garg AX, Naylor KL. Quality of Survey Reporting in Nephrology Journals: a Methodologic Review. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 2014;9(12):2089-94. doi: https://doi.org/10.2215/CJN.02130214CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

26.

Shankar PR, Maturen KE. Survey Research Reporting in Radiology Publications: a Review of 2017 to 2018. J Am Coll Radiol 2019;16(10):1378-1384. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacr.2019.07.012CrossRefPubMed

27.

Duffett M, Burns KE, Adhikari NK, Arnold DM, Lauzier F, Kho ME, Meade MO, Hayani O, Koo K, Choong K, Lamontagne F, Zhou Q, Cook DJ. Quality of Reporting of Surveys in Critical Care Journals: a Methodologic Review. Crit Care Med 2012 Feb;40(2):441-9. doi: https://doi.org/10.1097/CCM.0b013e318232d6c6CrossRefPubMed

28.

Story DA, Gin V, na Ranong V, Poustie S, Jones D; ANZCA Trials Group. Inconsistent Survey Reporting in Anesthesia Journals. Anesth Analg 2011;113(3):591-5. doi: https://doi.org/10.1213/ANE.0b013e3182264aafCrossRefPubMed

29.

Marcopulos BA, Guterbock TM, Matusz EF. [Formula: see text] Survey Research in Neuropsychology: a Systematic Review. Clin Neuropsychol 2020;34(1):32-55. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/13854046.2019.1590643CrossRefPubMed

30.

Rybakov KN, Beckett R, Dilley I, Sheehan AH. Reporting Quality of Survey Research Articles Published in the Pharmacy Literature. Res Soc Adm Pharm 2020;16(10):1354-1358. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sapharm.2020.01.005CrossRef

31.

Pagano MB, Dunbar NM, Tinmouth A, Apelseth TO, Lozano M, Cohn CS, Stanworth SJ; Biomedical Excellence for Safer Transfusion (BEST) Collaborative. A Methodological Review of the Quality of Reporting of Surveys in Transfusion Medicine. Transfusion. 2018;58(11):2720-2727. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/trf.14937CrossRefPubMed

32.

Mulvany JL, Hetherington VJ, VanGeest JB. Survey Research in Podiatric Medicine: an Analysis of the Reporting of Response Rates and Non-response Bias. Foot (Edinb) 2019;40:92-97. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foot.2019.05.005CrossRef

33.

Tabernero P, Parker M, Ravinetto R, Phanouvong S, Yeung S, Kitutu FE, Cheah PY, Mayxay M, Guerin PJ, Newton PN. Ethical Challenges in Designing and Conducting Medicine Quality Surveys. Tropical Med Int Health 2016 Jun;21(6):799-806. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/tmi.12707CrossRef

34.

Keeney S, Hasson F, McKenna H. Consulting the Oracle: Ten Lessons from Using the Delphi Technique in Nursing Research. J Adv Nurs 2006; 53(2): 205-12 8p. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2648.2006.03716.x.CrossRefPubMed

35.

Zamanzadeh V, Rassouli M, Abbaszadeh A, Alavi-Majd H, Nikanfar A, Ghahramanian A. Details of content validity index and objectifying it in instrument development. Nursing Pract Today 2014; 1(3): 163-71.

Titel: A Consensus-Based Checklist for Reporting of Survey Studies (CROSS)
verfasst von: Akash Sharma, MBBS
Nguyen Tran Minh Duc, MD
Tai Luu Lam Thang, MD
Nguyen Hai Nam, MD
Sze Jia Ng, MD
Kirellos Said Abbas, MBCH
Nguyen Tien Huy, MD, PhD
Ana Marušić, MD, PhD
Christine L. Paul, PhD
Janette Kwok, MBBS
Juntra Karbwang, MD, PhD
Chiara de Waure, MD, MSc, PhD
Frances J. Drummond, PhD
Yoshiyuki Kizawa, MD, PhD
Erik Taal, PhD
Joeri Vermeulen, MSN, CM
Gillian H. M. Lee, PhD
Adam Gyedu, MD, MPH
Kien Gia To, PhD
Martin L. Verra, PhD
Évelyne M. Jacqz-Aigrain, MD, PhD
Wouter K. G. Leclercq, MD
Simo T. Salminen, PhD
Cathy Donald Sherbourne, PhD
Barbara Mintzes, PhD
Sergi Lozano, PhD
Ulrich S. Tran, DSc
Mitsuaki Matsui, MD, MSc, PhD
Mohammad Karamouzian, DVM, MSc, PhD candidate
Publikationsdatum: 22.04.2021
Verlag: Springer International Publishing
Erschienen in: Journal of General Internal Medicine / Ausgabe 10/2021
Print ISSN: 0884-8734
Elektronische ISSN: 1525-1497
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-021-06737-1

Leitlinien kompakt für die Innere Medizin

Mit medbee Pocketcards sicher entscheiden.

^{Seit 2022 gehört die medbee GmbH zum Springer Medizin Verlag}

Kostenlos registrieren

Neu im Fachgebiet Innere Medizin

„Jeder Fall von plötzlichem Tod muss obduziert werden!“

17.05.2024 Plötzlicher Herztod Nachrichten

Ein signifikanter Anteil der Fälle von plötzlichem Herztod ist genetisch bedingt. Um ihre Verwandten vor diesem Schicksal zu bewahren, sollten jüngere Personen, die plötzlich unerwartet versterben, ausnahmslos einer Autopsie unterzogen werden.

Hirnblutung unter DOAK und VKA ähnlich bedrohlich

17.05.2024 Direkte orale Antikoagulanzien Nachrichten

Kommt es zu einer nichttraumatischen Hirnblutung, spielt es keine große Rolle, ob die Betroffenen zuvor direkt wirksame orale Antikoagulanzien oder Marcumar bekommen haben: Die Prognose ist ähnlich schlecht.

Schlechtere Vorhofflimmern-Prognose bei kleinem linken Ventrikel

17.05.2024 Vorhofflimmern Nachrichten

Nicht nur ein vergrößerter, sondern auch ein kleiner linker Ventrikel ist bei Vorhofflimmern mit einer erhöhten Komplikationsrate assoziiert. Der Zusammenhang besteht nach Daten aus China unabhängig von anderen Risikofaktoren.

Semaglutid bei Herzinsuffizienz: Wie erklärt sich die Wirksamkeit?

17.05.2024 Herzinsuffizienz Nachrichten

Bei adipösen Patienten mit Herzinsuffizienz des HFpEF-Phänotyps ist Semaglutid von symptomatischem Nutzen. Resultiert dieser Benefit allein aus der Gewichtsreduktion oder auch aus spezifischen Effekten auf die Herzinsuffizienz-Pathogenese? Eine neue Analyse gibt Aufschluss.

Update Innere Medizin

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

Newsletter bestellen

Die Highlights vom Kongress des American College of Cardiology 2024

Springer Medizin

Excerpt

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu diesem Inhalt zu erhalten

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 10/2021

COVID-19 in the California State Prison System: an Observational Study of Decarceration, Ongoing Risks, and Risk Factors

My Son, My Interpreter

Rates of Metformin Use in Stage 3b Chronic Kidney Disease Rose After FDA Label Change

Atrial Fibrillation Is Associated with Cognitive Impairment, All-Cause Dementia, Vascular Dementia, and Alzheimer’s Disease: a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Low-Dose Computed Tomographic Screening for Lung Cancer: Time to Implement or Unresolved Questions?