Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Clinical Research in Cardiology 11/2009

01.11.2009 | Original Paper

Adenosine-induced maximal coronary hyperemia for myocardial fractional flow reserve measurements: comparison of administration by femoral venous versus antecubital venous access

verfasst von: Michael Lindstaedt, Waldemar Bojara, Tim Holland-Letz, Aydan Yazar, Thomas Fadgyas, Lucie Müller, Andreas Mügge, Alfried Germing

Erschienen in: Clinical Research in Cardiology | Ausgabe 11/2009

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Background

Maximal hyperemia is a critical prerequisite for correct fractional flow reserve (FFR) measurements. Continuous administration of adenosine by femoral venous access is considered the gold-standard. However, antecubital venous access is used as an alternative route of administration due to the increasing popularity of radial versus femoral access for coronary catheterization. Because of a potentially larger cross sectional venous area in the arm—theoretically associated with slower flow velocities—and the extremely short half-life of adenosine, there are concerns whether this route of administration is truly equivalent to the femoral route.

Methods

Fifty randomly selected patients with coronary artery disease were included. FFR was measured with a pressure monitoring wire and the recording was digitally stored. Hyperemia was successively induced by adenosine via the antecubital vein at a dose of 140 μg kg−1 min−1 (A140), via the antecubital vein at a dose of 170 μg kg−1 min−1 (A170), and via the femoral vein at a dose of 140 μg kg−1 min−1 (F140).

Results

Induction of hyperemia by A140 yielded significantly lower hyperemic responses than compared with A170 (P = 0.038) and F140 (P = 0.005). No significant difference was seen between adenosine administration by A170 versus F140. Hyperemic stimulation by A140 underestimated lesion severity near the ischemic threshold of FFR more frequently than the other modalities. There were no differences in side-effects between any of the dosages and routes of administration.

Conclusions

The intravenous application of adenosine via antecubital venous access is feasible but slightly less effective than the femoral approach. In this setting, an antecubital dosage of 170 μg kg−1 min−1 is comparable to the standard dosage of 140 μg kg−1 min−1 in the femoral vein. In some patients, this regimen might prevent an underestimation of lesion severity.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Wilson RF, Wyche K, Christensen BV et al (1990) Effects of adenosine on human coronary arterial circulation. Circulation 82:1595–1606PubMed Wilson RF, Wyche K, Christensen BV et al (1990) Effects of adenosine on human coronary arterial circulation. Circulation 82:1595–1606PubMed
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Van Der Voort PH, van Hagen E, Hendrix G et al (1996) Comparison of intravenous adenosine to intracoronary papaverine for calculation of pressure-derived fractional flow reserve. Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn 39:120–125CrossRefPubMed Van Der Voort PH, van Hagen E, Hendrix G et al (1996) Comparison of intravenous adenosine to intracoronary papaverine for calculation of pressure-derived fractional flow reserve. Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn 39:120–125CrossRefPubMed
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Kern MJ, Deligonul U, Tatineni S et al (1991) Intravenous adenosine: continuous infusion and low dose bolus administration for determination of coronary vasodilator reserve in patients with and without coronary artery disease. J Am Coll Cardiol 18:718–729PubMedCrossRef Kern MJ, Deligonul U, Tatineni S et al (1991) Intravenous adenosine: continuous infusion and low dose bolus administration for determination of coronary vasodilator reserve in patients with and without coronary artery disease. J Am Coll Cardiol 18:718–729PubMedCrossRef
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Pijls NH, De Bruyne B, Peels K et al (1996) Measurement of fractional flow reserve to assess the functional severity of coronary-artery stenoses. N Engl J Med 334:1703–1708CrossRefPubMed Pijls NH, De Bruyne B, Peels K et al (1996) Measurement of fractional flow reserve to assess the functional severity of coronary-artery stenoses. N Engl J Med 334:1703–1708CrossRefPubMed
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Casella G, Leibig M, Schiele TM et al (2004) Are high doses of intracoronary adenosine an alternative to standard intravenous adenosine for the assessment of fractional flow reserve? Am Heart J 148:590–595CrossRefPubMed Casella G, Leibig M, Schiele TM et al (2004) Are high doses of intracoronary adenosine an alternative to standard intravenous adenosine for the assessment of fractional flow reserve? Am Heart J 148:590–595CrossRefPubMed
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Kern MJ, Lerman A, Bech JW et al (2006) Physiological assessment of coronary artery disease in the cardiac catheterization laboratory: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association Committee on Diagnostic and Interventional Cardiac Catheterization, Council on Clinical Cardiology. Circulation 114:1321–1341CrossRefPubMed Kern MJ, Lerman A, Bech JW et al (2006) Physiological assessment of coronary artery disease in the cardiac catheterization laboratory: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association Committee on Diagnostic and Interventional Cardiac Catheterization, Council on Clinical Cardiology. Circulation 114:1321–1341CrossRefPubMed
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Jeremias A, Filardo SD, Whitbourn RJ et al (2000) Effects of intravenous and intracoronary adenosine 5′-triphosphate as compared with adenosine on coronary flow and pressure dynamics. Circulation 101:318–323PubMed Jeremias A, Filardo SD, Whitbourn RJ et al (2000) Effects of intravenous and intracoronary adenosine 5′-triphosphate as compared with adenosine on coronary flow and pressure dynamics. Circulation 101:318–323PubMed
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Zijlstra F, Juilliere Y, Serruys PW et al (1988) Value and limitations of intracoronary adenosine for the assessment of coronary flow reserve. Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn 15:76–80CrossRefPubMed Zijlstra F, Juilliere Y, Serruys PW et al (1988) Value and limitations of intracoronary adenosine for the assessment of coronary flow reserve. Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn 15:76–80CrossRefPubMed
9.
Zurück zum Zitat De Bruyne B, Pijls NH, Barbato E et al (2003) Intracoronary and intravenous adenosine 5′-triphosphate, adenosine, papaverine, and contrast medium to assess fractional flow reserve in humans. Circulation 107:1877–1883CrossRefPubMed De Bruyne B, Pijls NH, Barbato E et al (2003) Intracoronary and intravenous adenosine 5′-triphosphate, adenosine, papaverine, and contrast medium to assess fractional flow reserve in humans. Circulation 107:1877–1883CrossRefPubMed
10.
Zurück zum Zitat World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki: ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects (2000) JAMA 284:3043–3045 World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki: ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects (2000) JAMA 284:3043–3045
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Pijls NH, van Schaardenburgh P, Manoharan G et al (2007) Percutaneous coronary intervention of functionally nonsignificant stenosis: 5-year follow-up of the DEFER Study. J Am Coll Cardiol 49:2105–2111CrossRefPubMed Pijls NH, van Schaardenburgh P, Manoharan G et al (2007) Percutaneous coronary intervention of functionally nonsignificant stenosis: 5-year follow-up of the DEFER Study. J Am Coll Cardiol 49:2105–2111CrossRefPubMed
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Legalery P, Schiele F, Seronde MF et al (2005) One-year outcome of patients submitted to routine fractional flow reserve assessment to determine the need for angioplasty. Eur Heart J 26:2623–2629CrossRefPubMed Legalery P, Schiele F, Seronde MF et al (2005) One-year outcome of patients submitted to routine fractional flow reserve assessment to determine the need for angioplasty. Eur Heart J 26:2623–2629CrossRefPubMed
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Fearon WF, Tonino PA, De Bruyne B et al (2007) Rationale and design of the fractional flow reserve versus angiography for multivessel evaluation (FAME) study. Am Heart J 154:632–636CrossRefPubMed Fearon WF, Tonino PA, De Bruyne B et al (2007) Rationale and design of the fractional flow reserve versus angiography for multivessel evaluation (FAME) study. Am Heart J 154:632–636CrossRefPubMed
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Silber S, Albertsson P, Aviles FF et al (2005) Guidelines for percutaneous coronary interventions. The Task Force for Percutaneous Coronary Interventions of the European Society of Cardiology. Eur Heart J 26:804–847CrossRefPubMed Silber S, Albertsson P, Aviles FF et al (2005) Guidelines for percutaneous coronary interventions. The Task Force for Percutaneous Coronary Interventions of the European Society of Cardiology. Eur Heart J 26:804–847CrossRefPubMed
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Doesch C, Seeger A, Hoevelborn T et al (2008) Adenosine stress cardiac magnetic resonance imaging for the assessment of ischemic heart disease. Clin Res Cardiol 97:905–912CrossRefPubMed Doesch C, Seeger A, Hoevelborn T et al (2008) Adenosine stress cardiac magnetic resonance imaging for the assessment of ischemic heart disease. Clin Res Cardiol 97:905–912CrossRefPubMed
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Pijls NH, Kern MJ, Yock PG et al (2000) Practice and potential pitfalls of coronary pressure measurement. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 49:1–16CrossRefPubMed Pijls NH, Kern MJ, Yock PG et al (2000) Practice and potential pitfalls of coronary pressure measurement. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 49:1–16CrossRefPubMed
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Downey HF, Bashour FA, Boatwright RB et al (1975) Uniformity of transmural perfusion in anesthetized dogs with maximally dilated coronary circulations. Circ Res 37:111–117PubMed Downey HF, Bashour FA, Boatwright RB et al (1975) Uniformity of transmural perfusion in anesthetized dogs with maximally dilated coronary circulations. Circ Res 37:111–117PubMed
Metadaten
Titel
Adenosine-induced maximal coronary hyperemia for myocardial fractional flow reserve measurements: comparison of administration by femoral venous versus antecubital venous access
verfasst von
Michael Lindstaedt
Waldemar Bojara
Tim Holland-Letz
Aydan Yazar
Thomas Fadgyas
Lucie Müller
Andreas Mügge
Alfried Germing
Publikationsdatum
01.11.2009
Verlag
D. Steinkopff-Verlag
Erschienen in
Clinical Research in Cardiology / Ausgabe 11/2009
Print ISSN: 1861-0684
Elektronische ISSN: 1861-0692
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00392-009-0056-7

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 11/2009

Clinical Research in Cardiology 11/2009 Zur Ausgabe

„Jeder Fall von plötzlichem Tod muss obduziert werden!“

17.05.2024 Plötzlicher Herztod Nachrichten

Ein signifikanter Anteil der Fälle von plötzlichem Herztod ist genetisch bedingt. Um ihre Verwandten vor diesem Schicksal zu bewahren, sollten jüngere Personen, die plötzlich unerwartet versterben, ausnahmslos einer Autopsie unterzogen werden.

Hirnblutung unter DOAK und VKA ähnlich bedrohlich

17.05.2024 Direkte orale Antikoagulanzien Nachrichten

Kommt es zu einer nichttraumatischen Hirnblutung, spielt es keine große Rolle, ob die Betroffenen zuvor direkt wirksame orale Antikoagulanzien oder Marcumar bekommen haben: Die Prognose ist ähnlich schlecht.

Schlechtere Vorhofflimmern-Prognose bei kleinem linken Ventrikel

17.05.2024 Vorhofflimmern Nachrichten

Nicht nur ein vergrößerter, sondern auch ein kleiner linker Ventrikel ist bei Vorhofflimmern mit einer erhöhten Komplikationsrate assoziiert. Der Zusammenhang besteht nach Daten aus China unabhängig von anderen Risikofaktoren.

Semaglutid bei Herzinsuffizienz: Wie erklärt sich die Wirksamkeit?

17.05.2024 Herzinsuffizienz Nachrichten

Bei adipösen Patienten mit Herzinsuffizienz des HFpEF-Phänotyps ist Semaglutid von symptomatischem Nutzen. Resultiert dieser Benefit allein aus der Gewichtsreduktion oder auch aus spezifischen Effekten auf die Herzinsuffizienz-Pathogenese? Eine neue Analyse gibt Aufschluss.

Update Kardiologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.