Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Begleitende Messungen zur Qualitätssicherung bei Ellenbogenprothetik

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
AE-Manual der Endoprothetik

  • 2494 Accesses

Zusammenfassung

Da das Ellenbogengelenk eine zentrale Rolle bei wichtigen Aktivitäten des täglichen Lebens und der daraus resultierenden Lebensqualität spielt, sollten diese Aspekte auch bei der initialen Befunderhebung sowie im weiteren Verlauf erhoben werden. Publizierte Richtlinien geben einen guten Anhalt über die in Frage kommenden Messinstrumente. In unserer Klinik hat sich eine Kombination von objektiven Parametern wie z. B. Greifkraft, aktiver Beweglichkeit und radiologischen Parametern sowie subjektiven Scores wie dem QuickDASH als Einschätzung der gesamten oberen Extremität, dem PREE als Einschätzung der Gelenkfunktion sowie dem Teil der psychischen Gesundheit aus dem SF-36 bewährt.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 159.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Literatur

  • Angst F, Goldhahn J, John M, Herren DB, Simmen BR (2005a) Vergleich des rheumatischen und posttraumatischen Ellenbogengelenks nach Totalprothese. Eine umfassende sowie spezifische Beurteilung von Klinik, Funktion und Lebensqualität. Orthopäde 34:794–800

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Angst F, John M, Pap G et al (2005b) Comprehensive assessment of clinical outcome and quality of life after total elbow arthroplasty. Arthritis Rheum 53:73–82

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Angst F, Goldhahn J, Drerup S, Kolling C, Aeschlimann A, Simmen BR, Schwyzer HK (2012) Responsiveness of five outcome measurement instruments in total elbow arthroplasty. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken) 64:1749–1755

    Google Scholar 

  • Ashmore AM, Gozzard C, Blewitt N (2007) Use of the Liverpool Elbow Score as a postal questionnaire for the assessment of outcome after total elbow arthroplasty. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 16(Suppl):S 55–58

    Google Scholar 

  • Balyk R, Luciak-Corea C, Otto D, Baysal D, Beaupre L (2008) Do outcomes differ after rotator cuff repair for patients receiving workers’ compensation? Clin Orthop Relat Res 466:3025–3033

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Beaton DE, Wright JG, Katz JN (2005) Development of the QuickDASH: comparison of three item-reduction approaches. J Bone Joint Surg Am 87:1038–1046

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Beckstead JW (2009) Content validity is naught. Int J Nurs Stud 46:1274–1283

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bortz J, Döring N (2006) Forschungsmethoden und Evaluation: für Human- und Sozialwissenschaftler, 4. Aufl. Springer, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • Broberg MA, Morrey BF (1986) Results of delayed excision of the radial head after fracture. J Bone Joint Surg Am 68:669–674

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Dawson J, Doll H, Boller I et al (2008a) Comparative responsiveness and minimal change for the Oxford Elbow Score following surgery. Qual Life Res 17:1257–1267

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dawson J, Doll H, Boller I et al (2008b) The development and validation of a patient-reported questionnaire to assess outcomes of elbow surgery. J Bone Joint Surg Br 90:466–473

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • de Boer YA, Hazes JM, Winia PC, Brand R, Rozing PM (2001) Comparative responsiveness of four elbow scoring instruments in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. J Rheumatol 28:2616–2623

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • de Boer YA, van den Ende CH, Eygendaal D, Jolie IM, Hazes JM, Rozing PM (1999) Clinical reliability and validity of elbow functional assessment in rheumatoid arthritis. J Rheumatol 26:1909–1917

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • de Vet HC , Terwee CB, Ostelo RW, Beckerman H, Knol DL, Bouter LM (2006) Minimal changes in health status questionnaires: distinction between minimally detectable change and minimally important change. Health Qual Life Outcomes 4:54

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ewald FC (1975) Total elbow replacement. Orthop Clin North Am 6:685–696

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Fan ZJ, Smith CK, Silverstein BA (2008) Assessing validity of the QuickDASH and SF-12 as surveillance tools among workers with neck or upper extremity musculoskeletal disorders. J Hand Ther 21:354–365

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fevang BT, Lie SA, Havelin LI, Skredderstuen A, Furnes O (2009) Results after 562 total elbow replacements: a report from the Norwegian Arthroplasty Register. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 18:449–456

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Figgie MP, Inglis AE, Mow CS, Wolfe SW, Sculco TP, Figgie HE 3rd (1990) Results of reconstruction for failed total elbow arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 253:123–132

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fitzpatrick R, Davey C, Buxton MJ, Jones DR (1998) Evaluating patient-based outcome measures for use in clinical trials. Health Technol Assess 2: i–iv, 1–74

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gerhardt JJ (1983) Clinical measurements of joint motion and position in the neutral-zero method and SFTR recording: basic principles. Int Rehabil Med 5:161–164

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Germann G, Harth A, Wind G, Demir E (2003) Standardisation and validation of the German version 2.0 of the Disability of Arm, Shoulder, Hand (DASH) questionnaire. Unfallchirurg 106:13–19

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Goldhahn J, Kolling C, Gay S, Simmen BR (2007) Functional staging and surgical intervention of the elbow and shoulder joints in a patient with rheumatoid arthritis. Nat Clin Pract Rheumatol 3:112–117

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gosling T, Blauth M, Lange T, Richter M, Bastian L, Krettek C (2004) Outcome assessment after arthrolysis of the elbow. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 124:232–236

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gummesson C, Atroshi I, Ekdahl C (2003) The disabilities of the arm, shoulder and hand (DASH) outcome questionnaire: longitudinal construct validity and measuring self-rated health change after surgery. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 4:11

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gummesson C, Ward MM, Atroshi I (2006) The shortened disabilities of the arm, shoulder and hand questionnaire (QuickDASH): validity and reliability based on responses within the full-length DASH. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 7:44

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hassenpflug J, Hahne HJ, Hedderich J (1992) Comments on the use of the „life-table method“ in orthopedics. Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb 130:223–229

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hudak PL, Amadio PC, Bombardier C (1996) Development of an upper extremity outcome measure: the DASH (disabilities of the arm, shoulder and hand) [corrected]. The Upper Extremity Collaborative Group (UECG). Am J Ind Med 29:602–608

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hudak PL, Hogg-Johnson S, Bombardier C, McKeever PD, Wright JG (2004) Testing a new theory of patient satisfaction with treatment outcome. Med Care 42:726–739

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Inglis AE, Pellicci PM (1980) Total elbow replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Am 62:1252–1258

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jackson JL, Chamberlin J, Kroenke K (2001) Predictors of patient satisfaction. Soc Sci Med 52:609–620

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • John M, Angst F, Pap G, Junge A, Mannion AF (2007) Cross-cultural adaptation, reliability and validity of the Patient Rated Elbow Evaluation (PREE) for German-speaking patients. Clin Exp Rheumatol 25:195–205

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • John M, Angst F, Awiszus F, King GJ, MacDermid JC, Simmen BR (2010) The American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Elbow Questionnaire: cross-cultural adaptation into German and evaluation of its psychometric properties. J Hand Ther 23:301–313; quiz 314

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kaplan RM, Saccuzzo DP (2008) Psychological testing: principles, applications, and issues, 7. Aufl. Wadsworth, Cengage Learning, Belmont

    Google Scholar 

  • King GJ, Richards RR, Zuckerman JD et al (1999) A standardized method for assessment of elbow function. Research Committee, American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 8:351–354

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kong MC, Camacho FT, Feldman SR, Anderson RT, Balkrishnan R (2007) Correlates of patient satisfaction with physician visit: differences between elderly and non-elderly survey respondents. Health Qual Life Outcomes 5:62

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lee JT, Azari K, Jones N (2008) Long term results of radial tunnel release–the effect of co-existing tennis elbow, multiple compression syndromes and workers’ compensation. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 61:1095–1099

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lin CT, Albertson GA, Schilling LM et al (2001) Is patients’ perception of time spent with the physician a determinant of ambulatory patient satisfaction? Arch Intern Med 161:1437–1442

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • MacDermid JC (2001) Outcome evaluation in patients with elbow pathology: issues in instrument development and evaluation. J Hand Ther 14:105–114

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mahomed NN, Liang MH, Cook EF et al (2002) The importance of patient expectations in predicting functional outcomes after total joint arthroplasty. J Rheumatol 29:1273–1279

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Matheson LN, Melhorn JM, Mayer TG, Theodore BR, Gatchel RJ (2006) Reliability of a visual analog version of the QuickDASH. J Bone Joint Surg Am 88:1782–1787

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mathiowetz V, Weber K, Volland G, Kashman N (1984) Reliability and validity of grip and pinch strength evaluations. J Hand Surg Am 9:222–226

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mathiowetz V, Wiemer DM, Federman SM (1986) Grip and pinch strength: norms for 6- to 19-year-olds. Am J Occup Ther 40:705–711

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • McKinley RK, Stevenson K, Adams S, Manku-Scott TK (2002) Meeting patient expectations of care: the major determinant of satisfaction with out-of-hours primary medical care? Fam Pract 19:333–338

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mira JJ, Tomas O, Virtudes-Perez M, Nebot C, Rodriguez-Marin J (2009) Predictors of patient satisfaction in surgery. Surgery 145:536–541

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Morrey BF, Askew LJ, Chao EY (1981) A biomechanical study of normal functional elbow motion. J Bone Joint Surg Am 63:872–877

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Morrey BF, Adams RA (1992) Semiconstrained arthroplasty for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis of the elbow. J Bone Joint Surg Am 74:479–490

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • O’Neill OR, Morrey BF, Tanaka S, An KN (1992) Compensatory motion in the upper extremity after elbow arthrodesis. Clin Orthop 281:89–96

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Offenbacher M, Ewert T, Sangha O, Stucki G (2003) Validation of a German version of the ‚Disabilities of Arm, Shoulder and Hand‘ questionnaire (DASH-G). Z Rheumatol 62:168–177

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Physiolexikon – Physiotherapie von A–Z. (2010) Thieme, Stuttgart

    Google Scholar 

  • Pransky G, Feuerstein M, Himmelstein J, Katz JN, Vickers-Lahti M (1997) Measuring functional outcomes in work-related upper extremity disorders. Development and validation of the Upper Extremity Function Scale. J Occup Environ Med 39:1195–1202

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Pritchard R (1977) Total elbow arthroplasty. Joint replacement in the upper extremity. Mechanical Engineering Publications, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Raven EE, Haverkamp D, Sierevelt IN et al (2008) Construct validity and reliability of the disability of arm, shoulder and hand questionnaire for upper extremity complaints in rheumatoid arthritis. J Rheumatol 35:2334–2338

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ring D, Kadzielski J, Malhotra L, Lee SG, Jupiter JB (2005) Psychological factors associated with idiopathic arm pain. J Bone Joint Surg Am 87:374–380

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ring D, Kadzielski J, Fabian L, Zurakowski D, Malhotra LR, Jupiter JB (2006) Self-reported upper extremity health status correlates with depression. J Bone Joint Surg Am 88:1983–1988

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sathyamoorthy P, Kemp GJ, Rawal A, Rayner V, Frostick SP (2004) Development and validation of an elbow score. Rheumatology (Oxford) 43:1434–1440

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Simmen BR, Bogoch ER, Goldhahn J (2008) Surgery Insight: orthopedic treatment options in rheumatoid arthritis. Nat Clin Pract Rheumatol 4:266–273

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Simmen BR, Angst F, Schwyzer HK et al (2009) A concept for comprehensively measuring health, function and quality of life following orthopaedic interventions of the upper extremity. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 129:113–118

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Spies-Dorgelo MN, van der Windt DA, Prins AP, Dziedzic KS, van der Horst HE (2008) Clinical course and prognosis of hand and wrist problems in primary care. Arthritis Rheum 59:1349–1357

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Stover B, Silverstein B, Wickizer T, Martin DP, Kaufman J (2007) Accuracy of a disability instrument to identify workers likely to develop upper extremity musculoskeletal disorders. J Occup Rehabil 17:227–245

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Svensson I, Sjostrom B, Haljamae H (2001) Influence of expectations and actual pain experiences on satisfaction with postoperative pain management. Eur J Pain 5:125–133

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Tarazi EM, Philip BK (1998) Friendliness of OR staff is top determinant of patient satisfaction with outpatient surgery. Am J Anesthesiol 25:154–157

    Google Scholar 

  • Throckmorton T, Zarkadas P, Sanchez-Sotelo J, Morrey B (2010) Failure patterns after linked semiconstrained total elbow arthroplasty for posttraumatic arthritis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 92:1432–1441

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Turchin DC, Beaton DE, Richards RR (1998) Validity of observer-based aggregate scoring systems as descriptors of elbow pain, function, and disability. J Bone Joint Surg Am 80:154–162

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Werner FW, An KN (1994) Biomechanics of the elbow and forearm. Hand Clin 10:357–373

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Westphal T (2007) Reliability and responsiveness of the German version of the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand questionnaire (DASH). Unfallchirurg 110:548–552

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • WHO (2005) Internationale Klassifikation der Funktionsfähigkeit, Behinderung und Gesundheit: ICF. World Health Organisation, Genf

    Google Scholar 

  • Wu A, Edgar DW, Wood FM (2007) The QuickDASH is an appropriate tool for measuring the quality of recovery after upper limb burn injury. Burns 33:843–849

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Rehaclinic Zurzach, Bad Zurzach, Schweiz

    Dr. med. Felix Angst

  2. Schulthess Klinik, Lengghalde 2, 8008, Zürich, Schweiz

    Priv.-Doz. Dr. Jörg Goldhahn & Miriam Marks

Authors
  1. Dr. med. Felix Angst
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Priv.-Doz. Dr. Jörg Goldhahn
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Miriam Marks
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Felix Angst .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Klinik und Poliklinik für Orthopädie, Universitätsklinikum Hamburg Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany

    Wolfgang Rüther

  2. Schulthess-Klinik, Zürich, Switzerland

    Beat R. Simmen

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Arbeitsgemeinschaft Endoprothetik

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Angst, F., Goldhahn, J., Marks, M. (2013). Begleitende Messungen zur Qualitätssicherung bei Ellenbogenprothetik. In: Rüther, W., Simmen, B. (eds) AE-Manual der Endoprothetik. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-34672-9_10

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-34672-9_10

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-34671-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-34672-9

  • eBook Packages: Medicine (German Language)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation