Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 1/2024

18.09.2023 | Original Research

An Ethical Examination of Donor Anonymity and a Defence of a Legal Ban on Anonymous Donation and the Establishment of a Central Register

verfasst von: Xavier Symons, Henry Kha

Erschienen in: Journal of Bioethical Inquiry | Ausgabe 1/2024

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Many if not most sperm donors in the early years of IVF donated under conditions of anonymity. There is, however, a growing awareness of the ethical cost of withholding identifying parental information from donor children. Today, anonymous donation is illegal in many jurisdictions, and some jurisdictions have gone as far as retrospectively invalidating contracts whereby donors were guaranteed anonymity. This article provides a critical evaluation of the ethics and legality of anonymous donation. We defend Australian and British legislation that has outlawed donor anonymity, and we argue for the establishment of a central registry that provides donor children with the ability to easily and reliably access identifying information about their donor parents.
Literatur
Zurück zum Zitat Allan, S. 2017. Donor conception and the search for ionformation: From secrecy and anonymity to openness. London: Routledge. Allan, S. 2017. Donor conception and the search for ionformation: From secrecy and anonymity to openness. London: Routledge.
Zurück zum Zitat Bruce, N. 1990. On the importance of genetic knowledge. Children and Society 4: 183–196.CrossRef Bruce, N. 1990. On the importance of genetic knowledge. Children and Society 4: 183–196.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Curie-Cohen, M., L. Luttrell, and S. Shapiro. 1979. Current practice of artificial insemination by donor in the United States. New England Journal of Medicine 300: 585–590.CrossRefPubMed Curie-Cohen, M., L. Luttrell, and S. Shapiro. 1979. Current practice of artificial insemination by donor in the United States. New England Journal of Medicine 300: 585–590.CrossRefPubMed
Zurück zum Zitat Cohen, G. 2011. Prohibiting anonymous sperm donation and the child welfare error. Hastings Center Report 41: 13–14.CrossRefPubMed Cohen, G. 2011. Prohibiting anonymous sperm donation and the child welfare error. Hastings Center Report 41: 13–14.CrossRefPubMed
Zurück zum Zitat ———. 2012. Rethinking sperm-donor anonymity: of changed selves, non-identity, and one-night stands. Georgetown Law Journal 100: 431–447. ———. 2012. Rethinking sperm-donor anonymity: of changed selves, non-identity, and one-night stands. Georgetown Law Journal 100: 431–447.
Zurück zum Zitat Cohen, I.G., and T.G. Coan. 2013. Can you buy sperm donor identification? An experiment. Journal of Empirical Legal Studies 10(4): 715–740. Cohen, I.G., and T.G. Coan. 2013. Can you buy sperm donor identification? An experiment. Journal of Empirical Legal Studies 10(4): 715–740.
Zurück zum Zitat Cohen, G., T. Coan, M. Ottey, et al. 2016. Sperm donor anonymity and compensation: An experiment with American sperm donors. Journal of Law and the Biosciences 3: 468–488.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Cohen, G., T. Coan, M. Ottey, et al. 2016. Sperm donor anonymity and compensation: An experiment with American sperm donors. Journal of Law and the Biosciences 3: 468–488.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
Zurück zum Zitat Dennison, M. 2008. Revealing your sources: The case for non-anonymous gamete donation. Journal of Law and Health 21(1): 1–27. Dennison, M. 2008. Revealing your sources: The case for non-anonymous gamete donation. Journal of Law and Health 21(1): 1–27.
Zurück zum Zitat De Melo-Martin, I. 2014. The ethics of anonymous gamete donation: Is there a right to know one’s genetic origins? Hastings Center Report 14(2): 28–35.CrossRef De Melo-Martin, I. 2014. The ethics of anonymous gamete donation: Is there a right to know one’s genetic origins? Hastings Center Report 14(2): 28–35.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Dingle, S. 2021. Brave new humans: The dirty reality of donor conception. Melbourne: Hardie Grant Books. Dingle, S. 2021. Brave new humans: The dirty reality of donor conception. Melbourne: Hardie Grant Books.
Zurück zum Zitat Ethics Committee of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine. 2018. Informing offspring of their conception by gamete or embryo donation: An Ethics Committee opinion. Fertility and Sterility 109: 601–605.CrossRef Ethics Committee of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine. 2018. Informing offspring of their conception by gamete or embryo donation: An Ethics Committee opinion. Fertility and Sterility 109: 601–605.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Golombok, S., L. Blake, P. Casey, et al. 2013. Children born through reproductive donation: A longitudinal study of psychological adjustment. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry 54: 653–660.CrossRefPubMed Golombok, S., L. Blake, P. Casey, et al. 2013. Children born through reproductive donation: A longitudinal study of psychological adjustment. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry 54: 653–660.CrossRefPubMed
Zurück zum Zitat Golombok, S. 2017. Disclosure and donor-conceived children. Human Reproduction 32(7): 1532–1536.CrossRefPubMed Golombok, S. 2017. Disclosure and donor-conceived children. Human Reproduction 32(7): 1532–1536.CrossRefPubMed
Zurück zum Zitat Harper, J., D. Kennett, and D. Reisel. 2016. The end of donor anonymity: How genetic testing is likely to drive anonymous gamete donation out of business. Human Reproduction 31: 1135–1140.CrossRefPubMed Harper, J., D. Kennett, and D. Reisel. 2016. The end of donor anonymity: How genetic testing is likely to drive anonymous gamete donation out of business. Human Reproduction 31: 1135–1140.CrossRefPubMed
Zurück zum Zitat Harrigan, M. M., S. Dieter, J. Leinwohl, and L. Marrin. 2015. “It’s just who I am ... I have brown hair. I have a mysterious father”: An exploration of donor-conceived offspring's identity construction. Journal of Family Communication 15(1): 75–93. Harrigan, M. M., S. Dieter, J. Leinwohl, and L. Marrin. 2015. “It’s just who I am ... I have brown hair. I have a mysterious father”: An exploration of donor-conceived offspring's identity construction. Journal of Family Communication 15(1): 75–93.
Zurück zum Zitat Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority. 2019. Trends in egg and sperm donation. London: HFEA. Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority. 2019. Trends in egg and sperm donation. London: HFEA.
Zurück zum Zitat Kelly, F., D. Dempsey, and C. Frew. 2019. The donor linking practices of Australian fertility clinics. Journal of Law and Medicine 27: 355–368.PubMed Kelly, F., D. Dempsey, and C. Frew. 2019. The donor linking practices of Australian fertility clinics. Journal of Law and Medicine 27: 355–368.PubMed
Zurück zum Zitat Indekeu, A., J. Scheib, J. Maas, et al. 2021. Factors associated with searching for people related through donor conception among donor-conceived people, parents, and donors: A systematic review. Fertility and Sterility 2: 93–119. Indekeu, A., J. Scheib, J. Maas, et al. 2021. Factors associated with searching for people related through donor conception among donor-conceived people, parents, and donors: A systematic review. Fertility and Sterility 2: 93–119.
Zurück zum Zitat Isaksson, S., S. Svanberg, A. Sydsjö, et al. 2011. Two decades after legislation on identifiable donors in Sweden: Are recipient couples ready to be open about using gamete donation? Human Reproduction 26: 853–860.CrossRefPubMed Isaksson, S., S. Svanberg, A. Sydsjö, et al. 2011. Two decades after legislation on identifiable donors in Sweden: Are recipient couples ready to be open about using gamete donation? Human Reproduction 26: 853–860.CrossRefPubMed
Zurück zum Zitat Lampic, C., A. Skoog Svanberg, J. Gudmundsson, et al. 2022. National survey of donor-conceived individuals who requested information about their sperm donor—Experiences from 17 years of identity releases in Sweden. Human Reproduction 37(3): 510–521.CrossRefPubMed Lampic, C., A. Skoog Svanberg, J. Gudmundsson, et al. 2022. National survey of donor-conceived individuals who requested information about their sperm donor—Experiences from 17 years of identity releases in Sweden. Human Reproduction 37(3): 510–521.CrossRefPubMed
Zurück zum Zitat Lea, L. 2016. U.K.’s national sperm bank stops recruiting donors. BBC News, October 27. Lea, L. 2016. U.K.’s national sperm bank stops recruiting donors. BBC News, October 27.
Zurück zum Zitat MacMillan, C., S. Allan, and M. Johnstone. 2021. The motivations of donor-conceived adults for seeking information about, and contact with, sperm donors. Reproductive Biomedicine Online 43(1): 149–158.CrossRefPubMed MacMillan, C., S. Allan, and M. Johnstone. 2021. The motivations of donor-conceived adults for seeking information about, and contact with, sperm donors. Reproductive Biomedicine Online 43(1): 149–158.CrossRefPubMed
Zurück zum Zitat Mahieu, F., W. Decleer, K. Osmanagaoglu, et al. 2019. Anonymous sperm donors’ attitude towards donation and the release of identifying information. Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics 36: 20072016. Mahieu, F., W. Decleer, K. Osmanagaoglu, et al. 2019. Anonymous sperm donors’ attitude towards donation and the release of identifying information. Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics 36: 20072016.
Zurück zum Zitat McCreery, A., and S. Allen. 2021. Donor gamete and surrogacy regulations. O&G Magazine 23(1): 42–44. McCreery, A., and S. Allen. 2021. Donor gamete and surrogacy regulations. O&G Magazine 23(1): 42–44.
Zurück zum Zitat McGovern, P., and W. Schlaff. 2018. Sperm donor anonymity: A concept rendered obsolete by modern technology. Fertility and Sterility 109: 230–231.CrossRefPubMed McGovern, P., and W. Schlaff. 2018. Sperm donor anonymity: A concept rendered obsolete by modern technology. Fertility and Sterility 109: 230–231.CrossRefPubMed
Zurück zum Zitat Mohapatra, S. 2021. The myth of “anonymous” gamete donation in the age of direct-to-consumer genetic testing. In Consumer genetic technologies ethical and legal considerations, edited by I. Glenn Cohen, N.A. Farahany, H.T. Greely and C. Shachar, 93–106. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef Mohapatra, S. 2021. The myth of “anonymous” gamete donation in the age of direct-to-consumer genetic testing. In Consumer genetic technologies ethical and legal considerations, edited by I. Glenn Cohen, N.A. Farahany, H.T. Greely and C. Shachar, 93–106. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Pennings, G. 2009. Problematizing donor conception and drawing the right conclusions from the evidence. Fertility and Sterility 115(5): 1179–1180. Pennings, G. 2009. Problematizing donor conception and drawing the right conclusions from the evidence. Fertility and Sterility 115(5): 1179–1180.
Zurück zum Zitat Pennings, G. 2022. Gamete donation should be anonymous: Against. In 50 big debates in reproductive biomedicine, edited by R. Homburg, A.H. Balen, and R.F. Casper, 165–166. London: Cambridge. Pennings, G. 2022. Gamete donation should be anonymous: Against. In 50 big debates in reproductive biomedicine, edited by R. Homburg, A.H. Balen, and R.F. Casper, 165–166. London: Cambridge.
Zurück zum Zitat Ravitsky, V. 2010. Knowing where you come from: The rights of donor-conceived individuals and the meaning of genetic relatedness. Minnesota Journal of Law, Science & Technology 11(2): 655–684. Ravitsky, V. 2010. Knowing where you come from: The rights of donor-conceived individuals and the meaning of genetic relatedness. Minnesota Journal of Law, Science & Technology 11(2): 655–684.
Zurück zum Zitat Riano-Galen, S., C. Martinez Gonzales, and S. Gallego Riestra. 2021. Ethical and legal questions of anonymity and confidentiality in gamete donation. Anales de Pediatria 94: 337–343. Riano-Galen, S., C. Martinez Gonzales, and S. Gallego Riestra. 2021. Ethical and legal questions of anonymity and confidentiality in gamete donation. Anales de Pediatria 94: 337–343.
Zurück zum Zitat Shukla, U., B. Deval, M. Jansa Perez, et al. 2013. Sperm donor recruitment, attitudes and provider practices—5 years after the removal of donor anonymity. Human Reproduction 28: 676–682.CrossRefPubMed Shukla, U., B. Deval, M. Jansa Perez, et al. 2013. Sperm donor recruitment, attitudes and provider practices—5 years after the removal of donor anonymity. Human Reproduction 28: 676–682.CrossRefPubMed
Zurück zum Zitat Symons, X. 2017. The right to know versus the right to privacy: Donor anonymity and the Assisted Reproductive Treatment Amendment Act 2016 (Vic). Medical Journal of Australia 207: 377–378.CrossRefPubMed Symons, X. 2017. The right to know versus the right to privacy: Donor anonymity and the Assisted Reproductive Treatment Amendment Act 2016 (Vic). Medical Journal of Australia 207: 377–378.CrossRefPubMed
Zurück zum Zitat Taylor Sands, M. 2018. Removing donor anonymity: what does it achieve? Revisiting the welfare of donor-conceived individuals. University of New South Wales Law Journal 41: 526.CrossRef Taylor Sands, M. 2018. Removing donor anonymity: what does it achieve? Revisiting the welfare of donor-conceived individuals. University of New South Wales Law Journal 41: 526.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Turkmendag, I. 2012. The donor-conceived child’s “Right to personal identity”: The public debate on donor anonymity in the United Kingdom. Journal of Law and Society 39: 58–75.CrossRefPubMed Turkmendag, I. 2012. The donor-conceived child’s “Right to personal identity”: The public debate on donor anonymity in the United Kingdom. Journal of Law and Society 39: 58–75.CrossRefPubMed
Zurück zum Zitat Turner, A.J., and A. Coyle. 2000. What does it mean to be a donor offspring? The identity experiences of adults conceived by donor insemination and the implications for counselling and therapy. Human Reproduction 15: 2041–2051.CrossRefPubMed Turner, A.J., and A. Coyle. 2000. What does it mean to be a donor offspring? The identity experiences of adults conceived by donor insemination and the implications for counselling and therapy. Human Reproduction 15: 2041–2051.CrossRefPubMed
Zurück zum Zitat Van den Broeck, U., M. Vandermeeren, D. Vanderschueren, et al. 2013. A systematic review of sperm donors: Demographic characteristics, attitudes, motives and experiences of the process of sperm donation. Human Reproduction Update 19: 37–51.CrossRefPubMed Van den Broeck, U., M. Vandermeeren, D. Vanderschueren, et al. 2013. A systematic review of sperm donors: Demographic characteristics, attitudes, motives and experiences of the process of sperm donation. Human Reproduction Update 19: 37–51.CrossRefPubMed
Zurück zum Zitat Velleman, D. 2008. III.Love and nonexistence. Philosophy and Public Affairs 36(3): 266–288. Velleman, D. 2008. III.Love and nonexistence. Philosophy and Public Affairs 36(3): 266–288.
Zurück zum Zitat Velleman, D. 2015. Beyond price: Essays on birth and death. Cambridge, UK: Open Book Publishers.CrossRef Velleman, D. 2015. Beyond price: Essays on birth and death. Cambridge, UK: Open Book Publishers.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Warnock, M. 2002. Making babies: Is there a right to have children. London: Oxford University Press. Warnock, M. 2002. Making babies: Is there a right to have children. London: Oxford University Press.
Zurück zum Zitat Yee, S. 2009. “Gift without a price tag”: Altruism in anonymous semen donation. Human Reproduction 24: 3–13.CrossRefPubMed Yee, S. 2009. “Gift without a price tag”: Altruism in anonymous semen donation. Human Reproduction 24: 3–13.CrossRefPubMed
Metadaten
Titel
An Ethical Examination of Donor Anonymity and a Defence of a Legal Ban on Anonymous Donation and the Establishment of a Central Register
verfasst von
Xavier Symons
Henry Kha
Publikationsdatum
18.09.2023
Verlag
Springer Nature Singapore
Erschienen in
Journal of Bioethical Inquiry / Ausgabe 1/2024
Print ISSN: 1176-7529
Elektronische ISSN: 1872-4353
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11673-023-10265-4

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 1/2024

Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 1/2024 Zur Ausgabe