Introduction
Old adults are at increased risk of developing severe disease after exposure to SARS-CoV-2 infection. The risk of hospitalization and death increases with age. Therefore, this population was the first to be vaccinated once the vaccine was available. Aging is associated with impaired capability to produce protective antibodies in response to immunization, resulting in reduced efficacy of vaccination [1, 2]. This may be partly due to impaired interactions between T and B cells which negatively influence the humoral response [3]. For example, the immune response after influenza vaccination, as measured by the hemagglutination inhibition assay-HAI, is weaker among older versus younger subjects receiving the same vaccination (4‐5). Furthermore, frailty in older adults is characterized by a paucity of reserves in response to stress and is associated with low levels of IL-6 which correlate with poor response to Influenza vaccination [6].
The question thus arises regarding the immune response of older people after exposure to COVID-19 infection and vaccination. The aim of this study was to test the antibody response to COVID-19 vaccination among individuals aged 65 or older as well as infection rates during the Omicron wave.
Anzeige
Methods
The study was performed between August 2021 and January 2022, after the approval of the third dose of Pfizer-BioNtech mRNA COVID-19 vaccine in Israel. Three population groups were addressed: the first included hospitalized patients in the medical/geriatric departments at the Shaare Zedek Medical Center (SZMC), Jerusalem, Israel. The second group comprised of adult individuals who reside in a nursing home (NH) (Neveh Horim, Nofey Yerushalaim, Jerusalem). The third group comprised of old adults residing in assisted-living care home (ALCH), (Ahuzat Beit Hakerem, and Nofey Yerushalaim, Jerusalem). Demographic and clinical data including age, gender, vaccination status, and comorbidities were collected using a structured questionnaire. Patients who were treated with active chemotherapeutic agents or high-dose corticosteroids (prednisone-equivalent ≥ 20 mg/day) were not included in the study.
COVID-19 serology (anti-spike IgG antibodies), (Abbott ARCHITECT SARS-CoV-2 IgG immunoassay, Abbott Park, IL) was tested at two timeframes: between Aug 2021 and Oct 2021 and during Dec 2021. Tests were performed at the central laboratory at SZMC.
During the study period, NH and ALCH residents were screened weekly for COVID-19 using PCR-based nasopharyngeal swabs (Seegene, Seoul, South Korea) as part of the Israeli Ministry of Health (MOH) policy to identify and isolate early infected patients. The tests were performed in two reference labs in Hadassah School of Medicine (Jerusalem) and Sheba Medical Center (Ramat Gan). The PCR results were obtained and were correlated to infection rates.
Analysis was performed initially for all study participants (immunized and recovered). Subsequent analysis was limited to individuals who were vaccinated three times (with no history of previous infection), thus allowing to examine the vaccine effect by itself.
Anzeige
The study was conducted as part of the Israeli MOH initiative for studies on COVID- 19 (no. 23) and was approved by the SZMC Institutional Review Board (approval no. 0063 − 21 SZMC).
Statistical analysis
Continuous variables were presented as mean ± standard deviation (SD) or as median with interquartile range (IQR), as appropriate. Categorical variables were presented as numbers and percent. Categorical variables were compared between the study groups using Chi-square test. T-test or one-way ANOVA were used for normally distributed variables. Comparisons of continuous variables with non-normal distribution was performed using the Mann-Whitney U test (Wilcoxon Rank Sum Test). The association between residence (nursing home vs. independent assisted living) and the antibody titer was assessed with a linear regression model. Through this model, correction was made for the timing of the antibody test.
Adjusted analysis (using logistic regression) for variables which differed significantly between the study groups in the univariate analysis was used to assess which risk factor was likely associated with infection. A two-tailed p value of < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Statistical analyses were performed using Epi-Info software, version 7.2 and SPSS version 25.
Results
The study was carried out between August 2021 and January 2022. Overall, 285 participants were included. Ninety-two patients were hospitalized in the medical and geriatric departments at SZMC. One hundred ALCH residents and 93 NH residents were recruited.
Baseline demographic and clinical characteristics are presented in Table 1. The mean age of all study participants was 82 ± 7. ALCH residents were older than NH and hospitalized patients (p = 0.01, Table 1). Female patients comprised 63% of the cohort (n = 180). Hospitalized patients had significantly more comorbidities as compared with ALCH and NH residents (mean number of comorbidities 2.5 ± 1.4 versus 1.8 ± 1 versus 1.5 ± 1, respectively, p < 0.001).
Table 1
Demographic and clinical characteristics among the study groups
All patients n = 285 | Hospitalized patients, n = 92 | Nursing home residents, n = 93 | Assisted-living care home residents, n = 100 | P value* | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Age, mean ± SD | 82 ± 7 | 80.4 ± 8 | 82.6 ± 8 | 83.6 ± 5 | 0.01 |
Gender (female), n (%) | 180 (63) | 48 (52) | 60 (65) | 72 (72) | 0.01 |
Comorbidities n (%) | |||||
Diabetes | 98 (34.4) | 53 (57.6) | 29 (31.2) | 16 (16) | < 0.001 |
Hypertension | 194 (68) | 64 (70) | 65 (70) | 65 (65) | 0.7 |
Obesity | 27 (9.5) | 16 (17.4) | 4 (4.3) | 7 (7) | 0.006 |
Cancer | 38 (13) | 14 (15.2) | 11 (11.8) | 13 (13) | 0.8 |
Lung disease | 45 (15.8) | 21 (22.8) | 14 (15) | 10 (10) | 0.05 |
Ischemic heart disease | 141 (49.5) | 59 (64.1) | 42 (45.2) | 40 (40) | 0.002 |
Average(± SD) number of comorbidities | 1.9 ± 1.2 | 2.5 ± 1.4 | 1.8 ± 1 | 1.5 ± 1 | < 0.001 |
Most study participants (254/285) received the first COVID-19 vaccination (mRNA monovalent COVID-19 vaccine, Pfizer-BioNTech) between the end of December and the beginning of February 2020. The second vaccine dose was given 3–4 weeks later. The third vaccine was administered in most subjects (197/212) during August 2021. Two-hundred and three individuals were immunized with three vaccine doses (Table 2). Thirty-nine participants were previously infected (hospitalized patients, n = 10, NH residents, n = 21, and ALCH residents, n = 8).
Table 2
Geometric mean antibody titer (GMAT) of anti-spike IgG antibodies among the study groups
All patients, n = 285 | Hospitalized patients (n = 92) | Nursing home residents (n = 93) | Assisted-living carehome residents (n = 100) | p value |
|---|---|---|---|---|
1st GMAT Au/ml (95% CI) | 1307 (858–1992) | 5292 (3949–7093) | 10,398 (8085–13,373) | < 0.0001 |
2nd GMAT Au/ml (95% CI)a | NA | 3096 (2311–4148) | 3738 (2899–4822) | 0.68 |
Three-dose vaccine recipientsb | 41/92 (45%) | 70/93 (76%) | 91/100 (100%) | |
1st GMAT Au/ml (95% CI) post 3rd vaccine | n = 41 3794 (2279–6319) | n = 70 6096 (4466–8321) | n = 91 11,367 (8845–14,608) | < 0.001 |
2nd GMAT Au/ml (95% CI) post 3rd vaccinec | NA | n = 68/70 3280 (2390–4502) | n = 91/100 3661 (2840–4719) | 0.48 |
Anzeige
The first serology test was sampled at a median of 51 (IQR 36–77) days after the 3rd vaccine dose. The second serology test was performed at a median of 141 (IQR 137–144) days after the 3rd vaccine dose and was available only in the ALCH and NH residents. Table 2 shows the anti-spike IgG antibody levels, presented as geometric mean antibody titer (GMAT, Au/ml) during the two timeframes, in the different study groups. Of note, in the nursing-home, serum samples during the first timeframe, were taken a month later than in ALCHs, with respect to the last vaccine dose. The second serology test samples were taken at both locations at the same time interval with respect to the last vaccine dose.
The anti-spike IgG antibody levels (GMAT, 95% CI) during the first timeframe were significantly higher among ALCH residents versus NH and hospitalized subjects (p < 0.0001) (Table 2). The results of the second serology test of NH and ALCH residents were comparable [3096 (2311–4148) versus 3738 (2899–4822), respectively (p = 0.68)].
Examining the anti-spike IgG antibody levels among three-dose vaccine recipients (excluding recovered patients), showed a similar trend (Table 2).
A sharper decrease was observed overtime in the antibody levels among patients residing in ALCH versus NH residents between the two serology tests that might have been attributed to the delay in obtaining serology tests in the NH residents (versus ALCH residents). To account for this delay (that may affect serology test results), a linear regression model was constructed with the difference between the two serology tests as the dependent variable, and the site of residence as the independent variable. A significant correlation was found between the site of residence and the decrease in the antibody titer (β=-0.3, p = 0.0001). However, after adjusting for the time variables (days between the third vaccination to the first serology test, e.g. first GMAT result, and days between the two measured titers) no difference was found in antibody titers decrease between the two patient groups (p = 0.2).
Anzeige
The change in COVID-19 anti-spike IgG among all study subjects who were vaccinated with three vaccine doses with respect to the time-interval since last vaccination is shown in Fig. 1. A decrease in antibody levels was observed over time.
Fig. 1
Change in SARS-CoV-2 anti-spike IgG (GMAT, 95% confidence interval) over a 5-month period among three-dose vaccine recipients
×
![]()
Overall, 46 study participants were infected with COVID-19 during the study period. All infections occurred during January 2022. Of note, during January, a 4th vaccine dose was administered to most study subjects (183/191, 96%) in both, NH and ALCHs. Infections occurred within a median of 8 days (IQR 7–14) since the 4th vaccine dose. Table 3 summarizes demographic, clinical and serology test results among non-infected and infected subjects residing in the nursing-home and ALCHs. The rate of infection was higher among NH residents as compared to ALCH residents (35/91, 38.4% versus 11/100, 11%, respectively, p < 0.001). Low anti-spike IgG antibody levels were also associated with COVID-19 infection in a univariate analysis.
Table 3
Demographic, clinical and geometric mean antibody titers (GMAT) of anti-spike IgG antibodies among infected and non-infected subjects
Non-infected | Infected | p value | |
|---|---|---|---|
All patients (n = 191)a | 145 | 46 | |
Age, median (IQR) | 84 (80–87) | 85 (81–91) | 0.38 |
Gender (female), n (%) | 102 (70) | 28 (61) | 0.28 |
Residence | |||
Nursing homeb Assisted-living care homes | 55 (61) 89 (89) | 35 (38.9) 11 (11) | < 0.001 |
Diabetes | 31 (21.4) | 13 (28.3) | 0.32 |
Hypertension | 98 (67.6) | 31 (67.4) | 1 |
Obesity | 6 (4.1) | 5 (10.9) | 0.14 |
Cancer | 17 (11.7) | 6 (13.3) | 0.8 |
Lung disease | 16 (11) | 7 (15.2) | 0.4 |
Ischemic heart disease | 59 (40.7) | 20 (43.5) | 0.8 |
Number of comorbidities (mean ± SD) | 2 ± 1.3 | 2.3 ± 1.3 | 0.1 |
Number of vaccines | |||
1 2 3 | 2 (1.3) 14 (10) 129 (89) | 0 7 (15.2) 38 (85) | 1 0.3 0.4 |
Past infection (recovered) | 22 (15) | 7 (15) | 1 |
2nd antibody titer level (Geometric mean, 95% CI, Au/ml) | 4468 (3629–5503) | 2030 (1323–3115) | < 0.001 |
Anzeige
Figure 2 shows the anti-spike IgG antibody titer (GMAT, 95% CI) among non-infected versus infected subjects who received three vaccine doses (2nd titer post 3rd vaccination). The median (IQR) time (days) from last vaccination to infection was 162 days (IQR 161–168). Infected subjects had a significantly lower level of anti-spike IgG antibodies [4113 Au/ml (95% CI 3364–5029) versus 2113 Au/ml (95% CI 1271–3512), p = 0.01].
Fig. 2
Anti-spike IgG antibodies (GMAT, 95% CI) among non-infected and infected three-dose vaccine recipients. GMAT of non-infected subjects (n = 120) was 4113 Au/ml (95% CI 3364–5029) versus 2113 Au/ml (95% CI 1271–3512) (infected individuals, n = 39), p = 0.01. COVID-19-recovered patients were excluded from analysis. Infection was diagnosed based on PCR testing
×
![]()
Administration of the 4th dose had no (short term) effect on the rate of infection; Infection occurred in 45/183 (24.6%) four-dose vaccinees versus 1/8 (12.5%) three-dose vaccinees (p = 0.7).
In an adjusted analysis (not shown), infection was significantly associated with residence in a nursing home [OR 6.4, 95% CI 2.7–15), p < 0.0001] but not anti-spike IgG levels (p = 0.3). Subsequent analysis including only three-dose vaccinees yielded similar results.
Discussion
This study examined the humoral response (antibody levels) to COVID-19 vaccination in three groups of older adults and showed a rapid decrease in antibody level over a few months after vaccination in all study participants. This finding is supported by previous reports [7‐9]. Lai et al. showed a decrease in the median antibody titer between 2 and 6 months after the second COVID-19 vaccination [7]. This has also been reported post infection [10]. Our study adds to the current literature that the decrease in anti-spike IgG levels continues also after a third dose (“first booster”) of the vaccine (Fig. 1).
Low anti-spike IgG levels apparently correlated with higher infection rates (Omicron variant) among vaccinated older individuals (Fig. 2). This has been shown in a study of young healthcare workers where antibody levels among Omicron variant-infected versus non-infected personnel were lower [11].
However, in the present study, subsequent analysis adjusting for residence, showed that the impact of antibody levels on infection rate was insignificant. This finding is supported by previous observation. In a study by Toress et al. no difference was noted in the antibody level between Omicron variant-infected and non-infected elderly individuals (average age 80 years) residing in a NH [12]. All subjects were immunized with three vaccine doses. Similar results were reported by Smoot et al., where no significant association was found between antibody level and infection observed during the Omicron surge [13].
This observation may be attributed, in part, to the unique characteristics of the Omicron variant (immune evasion, increased transmissibility, altered pathogenicity) as opposed to the Delta variant, where high antibody levels were significantly protective against infection [14].
Finally, nursing home residence was significantly associated with higher infection rates (despite no difference in the antibody levels among NH and ALCH residents). This may be attributed to several factors. The living conditions are more crowded in the nursing home compared to ALCHs. In nursing homes there are shared bedrooms, dining rooms and higher dependence on staff who move between patients– all of which may lead to spread of infections. Crowded nursing institutions were more likely to experience larger and deadlier COVID-19 outbreaks [15]. In contrast, ALCH residents have their own apartment and whilst there are communal activities (i.e., eating), during the COVID-19 outbreak, those were stopped.
In addition, although the number of comorbidities among infected NH and ALCH residents did not differ significantly, it is likely that NH residents may have been frailer with decreased functional capacity as compared to ALCH residents. Frailty has been associated with increased infection and mortality [16].
Last, other components of immunity were not tested in this study. For example, neutralizing antibody activity against SARS-CoV-2, IgA levels in the mucous membranes, as well as the specific response of CD4 and CD8 cells after illness or vaccination, to which long-term immune memory is attributed, were not evaluated [17‐19]. All of which may have affected the risk of infection.
Important limitations of this study are its small sample size and the short-term follow-up of study participants regarding infection rate (one month post last serology test). The strengths of the study include the comparison of three different older population groups, with a longer follow up in the NH and ALCH groups, perhaps providing insight to the contribution of the third COVID-19-vaccine dose among older individual regarding both, anti-spike IgG dynamics and risk of infection.
In conclusion, we showed a significant decrease in the level of anti-spike IgG antibodies overtime among three-dose older adult vaccinees. Adjusted analysis showed that residing in a nursing home, rather than elevated antibody levels, was significantly associated with infection during the Omicron surge.
Acknowledgements
Not applicable.
Declarations
Ethical approval
The study was approved by the SZMC Institutional Review Board (approval no. 0063 − 21 SZMC).
Consent for publication
Not applicable.
Informed consent
signed informed consent was obtained from each participant for participation in the study and future publication. All methods were performed in accordance with the relevant guidelines and regulations.
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.